America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by jjanecka. 83 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
8 killed at school in tx...
Speyside Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
Joe, I think it is a slightly different scenario. Another crazy sees the picture, reads the article, and decides that is the way to go. But I have to agree with Frank, and it follows my usual thought process. Never diminish the constitution. Even when it might lessen a significant problem.

We go around and around on this topic here. The problem is there is no obvious solution. I think we do not even understand the basis of the problem. When we were kids, if someone picked on us fists usually solved the problem. If someone was mean so what. And so on. Maybe you understand this phenomenon better than I do. The lack of value for human life is incomprehensible to me. Both their lives and the other kids they kill.
JadeRose Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
tailgater wrote:
Accepting something as inevitable is not the same as "acceptance" in the manner you're projecting.

When we tolerate injustices it doesn't mean we accept it. Other than accepting the fact that it might be inevitable.

Wordplay, to be sure. But the distinction is important.













Gotta disagree with you there. If you tolerate it LONG enough, it means you accept it. If you didn't accept it, you (and I mean we, of course, I'm not actually attacking YOU personally...not this time anyway ) would change it.

I can't imagine we're very far apart on this. I KNOW no one wants to see kids get killed in schools but it happens all the time now and we do nothing except fire up the argument machine about gun control and bullying and crisis actors. That's where we are. We're f*cked.
frankj1 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
I love this thread.
no poopy heads, stuff to digest from all sides.
This is intellectually stimulating.






Either I'm correct, or drunk.
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
You're drunk.
frankj1 Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
correct.


what gave it away?
Thunder.Gerbil Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 11-02-2006
Posts: 121,359
This is cbid.
frankj1 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
The Lovely Caren is right...

I'm like uh idiot

sad
dkeage Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 03-05-2004
Posts: 15,149
frankj1 wrote:
The Lovely Caren is right...

I'm like uh idiot

sad

Waiting up for your phone call?
frankj1 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
dkeage wrote:
Waiting up for your phone call?

it is late, but I got the call 9:30 eastern
Luckily it was a bad time for them to call me, and Victor, the one with the brain, picked up the phone from the unisex bathroom and hung it up.
HuckFinn Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
frankj1 wrote:
they are already sick. media blame is a new and dangerous game...slanted views or not.

and we have established several times recently that a very small percentage of mass murderers have been considered committable.

But "committable" shouldn't be the thing that alarms us nor limits our scope when trying to push for money to be restored and even increased for detection, treatment andd even prevention(?) of mental illness and emotional disturbance.

that said, I'd add:
a sick mind seeking fame? killahs gonna kill anyway.
Kill freedom of the press, government gonna be killing next.



Drunk too.
Few thoughts. Ok, maybe 2.
I don't blame the media. I do think however that the way the media covers and inadvertantly glamourises these shootings needs a rethink. Whatever they're doing is not helping. And not helping solve is not neutral.
Why give a sick mind a fresh raison d'etre? The media is probably well-intentioned and shouldn't be censored, I agree. But the media is a tool that's being wasted if it's just morbidly sympathetic. Which is all I see. Where's the message of lost humanity? Where's the cnn to fox message that we're all in this together? We all seem to be on the same page: shootings are not acceptable. So combine forces, left and right, and stop em.

I find it pretty telling that this thread was posted in 'politics'. How tf is this political?

Last thought ( then regrets for posting): I think we all need to return to basic civility. If our kids saw us, grownups, acting in a more civil manner towards one another maybe they'd behave differently.....
tailgater Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Speyside wrote:
Joe, I think it is a slightly different scenario. Another crazy sees the picture, reads the article, and decides that is the way to go. But I have to agree with Frank, and it follows my usual thought process. Never diminish the constitution. Even when it might lessen a significant problem.

We go around and around on this topic here. The problem is there is no obvious solution. I think we do not even understand the basis of the problem. When we were kids, if someone picked on us fists usually solved the problem. If someone was mean so what. And so on. Maybe you understand this phenomenon better than I do. The lack of value for human life is incomprehensible to me. Both their lives and the other kids they kill.


Our society is blaming guns. Or video games. Or mental health care.

Most of us here grew up with "sticks and stones may break our bones, but names will never hurt me".

Nowadays we preach that names DO hurt and justice is demanded.

That's step one towards normalizing the despicable thoughts in these murderer's heads.



tailgater Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
JadeRose wrote:
Gotta disagree with you there. If you tolerate it LONG enough, it means you accept it. If you didn't accept it, you (and I mean we, of course, I'm not actually attacking YOU personally...not this time anyway ) would change it.

I can't imagine we're very far apart on this. I KNOW no one wants to see kids get killed in schools but it happens all the time now and we do nothing except fire up the argument machine about gun control and bullying and crisis actors. That's where we are. We're f*cked.



I'm just saying that we have to separate things are inevitable and that we tolerate versus things we accept.

If a kid died yesterday would you prefer it was in a school shooting or from a text-while-driving car crash?

A school shooting is something that you have very little control over.
But we send our kids off in our cars with phones we paid for. In other words, we're literally arming our kids with their death vehicle. It's our fault 100%. This is more akin to acceptance than the rogue lunatic spraying bullets in a classroom.
Our disagreement isn't in the tragedy, but in the descriptive emotions.

Because we don't accept either.
We do disagree on the solution, if there even is one.

But the problem isn't the lone shooter taking out a classroom.
See the previously mentioned "sticks and stones" for a good starting point.





teedubbya Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It’s odd to see anyone take the it’s not the guns fault and then turn to blaming the media.

To me it’s also not about schools. Yes make them safer, learn from each event and put things in place. Never give up trying to make things better.

But a shooting at a school is no better or worse than at a mall, a concert, a park or any other venue. You can’t lock down everywhere.

It’s a shooting. The venue is largely irrelevant to me.
frankj1 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
pretty much agree.
Gene363 Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,797
As foretold in a novel titles, "Rage" by one Richard Bachman, AKA Stephen King

"I would not be surprised if we see more school shootings as copycat phenomena.

The evidence is, and there is science on this, that it is the massive news coverage that motivates these shooters. The kids and adults who commit these mass shootings all have one constant: deep-rooted feelings of insignificance.

A properly adjusted person does not confuse and conflate infamy with fame. But it is a country of 350,000,000 with even a tiny fraction of people who do, you have a problem.

Look at social media. There are people who will profoundly embarrass and shame themselves to get notoriety. It’s a staple of certain reality TV shows where some otherwise utterly insignificant people will behave like complete fools, making a mockery of themselves for attention.

We know the progression of this phenomena with mass school shootings:

1) In 1977, and republished again in 1985, Stephen King (under a pseudonym) writes a popular novel about a kid bullied in school who then exacts revenge, in school, with a gun. King lionized this kid as an insignificant bullying victim who strikes back (like he did with “Carrie”).
2) There were at least four school shootings where the shooters had the book or credited it with the idea for their shootings. The media give extensive coverage to the shootings and shooters.
3) The evidence is so clear that King withdraws the book.
4) The Columbine shooters, referring to both the book and the media coverage of the actual school shootings, vow to commit one even bigger.
5) Other future shooters reference and fixate on the prior shootings and the media coverage of them.

The problem isn’t guns. More than half of the households in America have guns. Yet our total lethal violence rate (suicide+homicide by all means) is far lower than many developed democracies with no civilian-owned guns at all.

The problem is clearly not AR-15s or “assault weapons” since the largest US school shooting — by far –was accomplished with a pistol. Pistol/s are far more lethal in a school environment since the shooter can move within a school building or campus undetected by security as the shooter, as Seung-Hui Cho did at Virginia Tech to maximize the number of victims.

The problem, in fact, is the gun control lobby. As with blaming guns on suicide rates (when the evidence shows removing guns may actually increase suicides because it creates more non-gun suicides, initially undetected and classified as accidents), blaming guns for mas shootings diverts attention from he root cause: mental illness.

In fact the gun control lobby has actually blocked funding for mental health funding and armed school guards by poison-pilling legislation that would help, but holding it up if it doesn’t include gun bans on their agenda.

The gun control lobby also works to keep these shootings and shooters in the news. Maintaining 24-hour news coverage is a stated strategy of the gun control lobby following incidents like Parkland and Santa Fe. This rewards school shooters.

The ACLU is also at fault. They have filed and fought over 40 major cases in the US, creating national legal precedents since the 1970’s, making it far more difficult to detain, hold, evaluate and order treatment for people suffering from mental illness. These efforts are exactly coincident with beginning with of these shootings. The EU, Canada, Australia and others have between 50% more to 200% more persons who receive mandatory treatment that does the US."
teedubbya Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I’m pro gun but saying the problem is the gun control lobby or the ACLU is something I can’t take seriously.

As for Steven King I’m sure some would blame his books. Equally absurd as turning to him as an expert of any type.
Ewok126 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
Well said Gene +5.
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
teedubbya wrote:
It’s odd to see anyone take the it’s not the guns fault and then turn to blaming the media.

To me it’s also not about schools. Yes make them safer, learn from each event and put things in place. Never give up trying to make things better.

But a shooting at a school is no better or worse than at a mall, a concert, a park or any other venue. You can’t lock down everywhere.

It’s a shooting. The venue is largely irrelevant to me.


I personally do not feel the media is entirely to blame. I also fault the glorification of voilence and revenge presented by the entertainment industry (movies, TV and video games), the need to be popular, praised and liked on social media and the coddling of our children. Kids today are shielded from failure and receive participation trophys just for showing up. My personal belief is that we are raising a generation of narcissists, with a lack of empathy for others. Kids who apart from social media, have no clue or experience on how to relate to others. My generation was permitted to fail, and for the most part, we learned how to deal with it in heathy ways. Today's kids have been so coddled and shielded from real life, it's no wonder some of them lash out when confronted with the reality of life, with it's problems, disappointments and failures. Just my personal observation, and no one here has to agree with me.

There is one trend I am seeing on some social media sites that usually lean left. The majority are not blaming guns. The ones who are, are calling for an outright ban on all civilian firearms. These are the same posters who last month where promising everyone that "no one wants to take your guns, just AR-15s and mags over 10 rounds". At least now they are being honest.

David (dpnewell)
Ewok126 Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
I will agree with you David. As a child we was permitted to fail and for the most part we did learn or better yet we was taught how to deal with it in healthy ways. In my childhood household a very quick way to get that ass whipped was to be a sore loser. When my son was younger we had behavior issues with him. My wife and I did not even hesitate to seek help. It was either that or I was going to kill him. After about a years worth of visits to the crazy Dr they got him straight and from that end of the spectrum hes been straight ever since. Still a lazy chit though. I also feel you are correct that these kids have been overly coddled and shielded. To the extent to where they do not have to face consequences of their actions until they do something so drastic such as shoot up a class room. Sometimes a persons mind is just broke but I think that a lot of times now a days they are broke because of how they was raised or lack there of. As a kid I was allowed to watch violent shows, listen to Ozzy, Watch the news with things such as Ted Kaczynski, Charles Manson and never have I ever wanted to kill someone, shoot up a school or blow my own brains out. I feel that I was able to differentiate between what to act on and what not to due to upbringing. Just my OP.
Mrs. dpnewell Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 08-23-2014
Posts: 1,373
^We're on the same page, my furry little friend. Growing up I was awkward and nerdy, and all through Jr. High, and High School, I was bullied, picked on and made fun of. We had guns at home, and I had my own rifle. Never during the entire time did I ever consider shooting anyone. You just didn't do that kind of thing.

David (dpnewell)
Ewok126 Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
Mrs. dpnewell wrote:
^We're on the same page, my furry little friend. Growing up I was awkward and nerdy, and all through Jr. High, and High School, I was bullied, picked on and made fun of. We had guns at home, and I had my own rifle. Never during the entire time did I ever consider shooting anyone. You just didn't do that kind of thing.

David (dpnewell)


I can relate all to well. I was in the same boat and had issues with bullies. That all changed when I took the initiative to put a stop to it. All it took was waiting on the biggest one to do his typical BS and while the crowd of kids was standing around watching and going OOOOo... I reached 2 states back, came down home row and biatch slapped that MF so hard his knees turned to rubber bands. I got two days vacation from school over it. My father took me hunting and fishing those two days of suspension. That was the first time I had ever stood up for myself and really never had any other issues from that point forward my entire school life. It didn't require a gun or beating someone down with a ball bat. It just took me showing I wasn't going to stand for it. Another one of those life lessons where my parents taught me you don't have to kill em but to stand up for yourself. Meet force with equal force and that I would have their support any time I had to utilize that. If I abused it then I had to face the consequences including the lack of parental support along with punishment from my father which translates to "Boy, if you ever let someone run over you I will whip your ass." and Boy if you ever bully someone I will whip your ass." It served me very well though out my school years and set the foundation for morals and correct thinking that is still in play today as an old man.

I had passed that on to my son. He got suspended for putting a boy though a wall at school. Same situation he had been bullied for months by this kid. The last straw was the kid took his hat and spit it in. My son didnt just slap the kid. To much WWE in his life. He took a running leap and drop kicked the boy. I paid for the wall with a smile on my face and had to raise hell with the other kids mother. I told her that yes I would pay for any other medical bills if he should need it due to my son gladly but understand, There will be many more medical bills in her child's future until he learns better. And my son will never be punished for standing up for himself meeting force with equal force. Again my son never had any other issues through his school life with bullies and to this day as a young man he will stand for what is right and gladly face any consequences of outcome with a smile knowing he did the right thing at the time after all other outlets have been tired and failed.

Just my OP but it's worked for my life and so far my son's as well.
dstieger Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
Why haven't the killer's parents been arrested?

If anything, they've been 'praised' for issuing a 'thoughtful', sympathetic statement. I don't know if Texas has a specific law requiring gun owners to keep their guns locked away from children....but if not, then perhaps they should. Nothing about them says 'responsible gun owner' to me.

Aside from access to the guns, what about general parental responsibility. I ALWAYS assumed that I was responsible for the conduct of my minor children....I have no idea if there was a legal mandate, but that didn't matter. I get that by the time kids are 16, 17, it may not always be reasonable to 'control' their actions, but even still, the parents MUST, IMO, be responsible for the utter lack of moral sense (barring significant, medically verifiable mental illness.)

Parents as 'friends'...stigmas against 'discipline'... laziness....'nobody's feelings should ever be hurt'....all these things prevalent in today's American parenting are contributing factors that I don't hear anybody talking about.
Buckwheat Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
None of this crazy chit in our country is ever going to change as long as our elected officials can be bought by special interest/PACs. 90-100% of them have dirty money in their pockets. Finance reform is key to cleaning up the cesspool in DC. fog ram27bat
JadeRose Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 05-15-2008
Posts: 19,525
dstieger wrote:
Why haven't the killer's parents been arrested?






This is the best question I've seen so far
bgz Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
Gene363 wrote:

A properly adjusted person does not confuse and conflate infamy with fame. But it is a country of 350,000,000 with even a tiny fraction of people who do, you have a problem.


^This.

Population this big, people are going to snap. Not much you can really do about it.
frankj1 Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
bgz wrote:
^This.

Population this big, people are going to snap. Not much you can really do about it.

I agree with your conclusion, but I don't think that was Gene's point.
bgz Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
frankj1 wrote:
I agree with your conclusion, but I don't think that was Gene's point.


Well, in my defense, after reading that paragraph, I nodded my head and stopped reading.
Abrignac Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,261
IIRC at more than one of our SRO meetings the question was asked as to why the schools weren't more secure. Something to do with fire code and federal regulations. Perhaps we need to take a look in this direction.
frankj1 Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
bgz wrote:
Well, in my defense, after reading that paragraph, I nodded my head and stopped reading.

you don't need a defense
HuckFinn Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 07-10-2017
Posts: 2,044
"Twenty-eight states have what are known as “child access prevention” laws, which impose criminal liability on adults who negligently allow kids to have access to their guns. States with these CAP laws show reductions in both accidental shootings and child suicides. But CAP laws are almost never enforced, in part because they are vague, and in part because prosecutors have no heart to punish parents who have already suffered unimaginable pain when their child killed another child, often their own."

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/10/g
un_accidents_why_are_parents_who_leave_loaded_weapons_lying_around_never.html
delta1 Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
so....those who say "we don't need any more gun control laws ... we just need to enforce those already on the books" are right...

I've become inured to school/mass shootings...adopted America's position of "dammit...oh well." Anything more is wasted energy...and at my age, I have to conserve...
Ewok126 Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2017
Posts: 4,356
dstieger wrote:
Why haven't the killer's parents been arrested?

If anything, they've been 'praised' for issuing a 'thoughtful', sympathetic statement. I don't know if Texas has a specific law requiring gun owners to keep their guns locked away from children....but if not, then perhaps they should. Nothing about them says 'responsible gun owner' to me.

Aside from access to the guns, what about general parental responsibility. I ALWAYS assumed that I was responsible for the conduct of my minor children....I have no idea if there was a legal mandate, but that didn't matter. I get that by the time kids are 16, 17, it may not always be reasonable to 'control' their actions, but even still, the parents MUST, IMO, be responsible for the utter lack of moral sense (barring significant, medically verifiable mental illness.)

Parents as 'friends'...stigmas against 'discipline'... laziness....'nobody's feelings should ever be hurt'....all these things prevalent in today's American parenting are contributing factors that I don't hear anybody talking about.


Texas has Child Access Prevention Laws


and Texas has State Laws Based on Negligent Storage

also Texas has laws Imposing Criminal Liability for Allowing a Child to Gain Access to the
Firearm, Regardless of Whether the Child Uses the Firearm or Causes Injury

So with this being the case if the guns belonged to the parents then they should have been arrested unless the guns was kept in a non Negligent way and the child broke what ever safety devices was being used. If the parents did not have the guns locked up, Trigger safety locks ect then according to Texas state law the parents should be in jail. If this is the case and they are not jail then, this is another fine example of what laws we have not being enforced.

Now the " Parents as Friends" You are correct. It has now become to where in a lot of homes across the US being a friend to the child has become first with the parenting aspect taking a 5th or 6th position. At times my wife would get upset with me saying "You dont talk with him, go places with him, etc in other words being my sons "Friend." She hates it when I tell her I am his Father first, The friend part comes in very last and only if he becomes the type of person I want to be friends with. This means he has to act morally because I do not have friends I do not respect and that rule includes him! I think as most modern parents now a days, they confuse being a "Friend" with a siblings as "Love" which is a whole different thing.

Now as far as the parents being responsible for the utter lack of moral sense (barring significant, medically verifiable mental illness.) You are correct. As a parent this is also a major responsibility. To do any less would be abuse to the child IMHO. But again, this falls back on the "But I cant put him/her in a mental institution because I am their friend. Thus denying proper medical treatment which again is against the law because it is abuse when a minor is involved.

It is really odd, If you are the caretaker of an elderly person, deny them medical treatment one time, you will see laws enforced for elderly abuse in a blink of an eye. But yet you will not see it enforced as quickly for a teenage child. I wonder why this is?

Ok off my soap box. Who is next its all yours.
jjanecka Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2015
Posts: 4,334
Santa Fe let the schools reopen today and guess what. The media was not invited.

I know people who's families are grieving in this one. Santa Fe used to be a small town. I used to stop there on the way to Galveston for gas. Three beautiful women from that area charmed me back in 2010.

All I have to say is that I fully expect Texas to be better prepared. We're Texans, damnitt, there should be an armory in every school.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12