victor809 wrote:....Gene... With all due respect, WTF are you talking about?
I don't even know what you're talking about with that nonsense.
You're now saying that someone advocating buying a shotgun for self defense is likely to trigger a person to shoot up a newspaper? By that logic the entirety of the NRA is culpable, as well as a large portion of the posters here.
And I'm pretty sure no one in Hollywood has advocated attacking journalists, if he got his message from Hollywood, then he didn't get it very clearly.
Your flailing about for someone to blame to try to take the spotlight off our current administration (which has clearly and unambiguously stated that the media is the enemy of the people, which has advocated violence against media on multiple occasions)... Just makes it look like you believe this administration has culpability.
The only thing I'm "flailing" is your weak, way around the mountain blaming of Trump.
victor809 wrote:While his grudge may predate trump by years... That doesn't mean that the impetus to shoot the place up wasn't encouraged by the constant anti media rhetoric.
Applying your reading comprehension, when did the media start advocating the harming of reporters?
That line about Hollywood shows you either have a problem reading or you just refuse to acknowledge what I wrote. I said, "Now as to blatant threats and suggestions for violence look no further than hollyweird and the loony left talking about the President." That is, "...talking about the President.", not a reporter.