America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 years ago by teedubbya. 71 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Mueller report leaked
opelmanta1900 Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:
Our posts crossed.

I’d love to see someone who truly governs. Someone who will work with the other party and will get down to core business. Break the cycle and take the chance that way even if it cost re-election. I’m worried about the deficit/debt. So no, Beto, Bernie etc don’t fit the bill. Nor does trump.


Would you vote for Mike Rowe or do you know enough about him to say if you would?
teedubbya Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Mike Rowe 2020?


I don’t see my person yet and frankly the are probably not electable because folks pretend to want bipartisanship and compromise but really want the fight and domination of the enemy party. I’ve always liked Kasich but he’s too reasonable to ever win in a world where anyone would be excited about Trump.
teedubbya Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
I doubt it ended... the guy who's now in charge of them just doesn't pretend to love peace... Or brown people...



Then it makes no difference. Trump=Obama Obama=Trump. Hate one hate both in this regard.

I don’t know much about Rowe unless he’s the dirty jobs deadliest catch dude. Even then I don’t know his politics but unless he’s governed a machine like the government before I’d find him hard to support.

I’ll look up who he is later though.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
That's who he is... Every election year a large group of people - myself included - attempt to convince him to run... He doesn't want to, which to me is the first sign of an excellent candidate...

He's a lot more than just a tv personality... He's wise... His responses to nearly everything are measured and well thought out... The policies he favors - even positions I don't necessarily agree with - he favors for sound reason...

He's never run a government or anything like it... Neither have any of our previous presidents... It's a one of a kind job... But he's smart, a listener, and a harder worker than anyone I've ever encountered...
teedubbya Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It is hard to govern. The ineptness of this admin is very apparent to anyone operationalizing things through admins of both parties. Reagan and others had previous governing experience. It does make a difference. Reagan surrounded himself with very skilled people (agree with their politics/integrity or not)

I do prefer an ex governor or mayor over a senator or reality star. Just a practical matter to me probably biased by my daily view.

Kasich has a pretty unique skill set although the trump supporters hate him for showing what I find to be integrity.

The problem with someone like Rowe is you need more than good ideas. You need to staff the machine with folks that can actually accomplish them. That takes skills and experience. I doubt Rowe knows enough of these folks to be effective. I KNOW Trump doesn’t and Trump likely knows more than Rowe.

This is a failed experiment that won’t truly be known for a few years.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Disagree... I think Rowe knows more of those people and - perhaps more importantly - has their respect...
teedubbya Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Disagree... I think Rowe knows more of those people and - perhaps more importantly - has their respect...



Maybe so. Pretty broad statement by me without really knowing. Knee jerk.

I just know it takes a lot of people in every aspect of government to run things. Smart doesn’t do it. It takes a very specific skill set to quote Taken.
teedubbya Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
The people and skills are lacking right now. Not ineptness of the Pres per say just a skill set gap I’ve not seen before. He doesn’t have the horses. It matters. Jimmy Carter had the same issue in some regards. (Proving being a governor in and of itself is not the only solution)
opelmanta1900 Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:

This is a failed experiment that won’t truly be known for a few years.

This view point I still can't come to understand...

In my simplistic and native understanding of government, it seems there's a business side and a social issues side... Social issues and the way the government deals with them changes constantly... Constantly... So nothing trump does on that front will be remembered in 10 years...

On the business side, I have no idea what trump has done that's so bad... The news kept saying Russia Russia Russia, but it sure looks like that's something your enemy would yell at you while trying to push their own hate-driven agenda...
teedubbya Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I’ve never been that focused on Russia as an issue. They did try, and in some ways did effect the election. I never thought Trump was strategic enough to drive any of it. He’s a marketer and carnival barker. He’s never really done much. I’d have been more surprised if he was the kingpin. I don’t doubt some folks in his realm dabbled. Manafort for one. But meh. Just shut that crap down for next time.

I guess I disagree with you on the impact that can be done in a four year term. I truly beleive it typically takes more time to build something than tear it down. I do worry about our position internationally. I see the potential for devistating effects there.

On the opposite side of that, we are still suffering from some of Bush’s decisions. I recognize they are very different, perhaps opposite but both extreme in my view. Remember the turn the desert in to glass or parking lot crowd. Simple thoughts are dangerous.
teedubbya Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Our government is designed to protect us from the whims and passions of the day. In that regard I get what you are saying Opel. As long as the checks and balances hold. I’m afraid they may not.


Unrelated thoughts not specific to this admin - most things aren’t new

Remember the anti Japanese movement in the 80s. When Japan was going to own the USA. I drove fords to that point and when one was in the shop rented a Toyota. I got harassed driving it through a drive through. I guess I wasn’t american enough. Now all cars are mutts. But it’s still a button to push.

Remember how the military was viewed after Vietnam. Not the military but individual servicemen. These guys were drafted primarily. They were scorned and treated like crap. Now folks join as a profession and are put on a pedestal even though it’s more of a job now. I agree with honoring them it’s just weird how the view changed. Which one is so right that it should be codified.

Acting during either time would produce fools gold.

We’ve become so us vs them with them being the enemy that we are starting to act on our emotional outbursts, the very thing our founders meant to keep us from. I do worry they didn’t see that coming and our checks and balances may fail. Both parties are blatantly trying to load courts. Both parties are shamelessly jerrymandering districts. Both are either suppressing or manufacturing votes. And yet my side is good and yours is bad and if you say anything critical about my side you are on theirs. It’s shallow thinking and makes legitimate compromise impossible. It’s simply not reasonable.

When unpredictable compromise is replaced with predictable results based on the R v D scorecard I worry.

And a smart marketer can truly exploit this. (As well as a not so smart one)

Ok I’m done lol. Have fun.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:
Our government is designed to protect us from the whims and passions of the day. In that regard I get what you are saying Opel. As long as the checks and balances hold. I’m afraid they may not.

I'm not sure they will either, but if they don't hold up, it's a good thing to find out...

For what it's worth, I don't think moderate Americans would ever take up arms in a civil war... And despite what the media would have you think, there are more of us than them...
victor809 Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
And despite what the media would have you think, there are more of us than them...


Moderate americans must not smoke cigars....
delta1 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
in Cbidland, moderates get punished because they "don't have the guts to take a stand"...some folks in this place challenge people to find extremism where it may not have existed before...in a similar manner to how Trump governs...
MACS Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,741
opelmanta1900 wrote:
You've been wrongly accused... It resolved rather quickly, but had it not - had it dragged on for months on end - would you have "railed"?


That's not obstruction, either. Being pissed off and complaining is not obstruction.
delta1 Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,776
to those who argue that there was no obstruction because the underlying crime of conspiracy with foreign agents to interfere in a US election could not be proven: how do you explain those perps who are convicted for alleged attempted crimes when entrapped by law enforcement sting operations?

people who solicit an undercover cop posing as a hooker are convicted all the time, even though there was no underlying crime...
victor809 Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
Being pissed off and complaining to your friends and family is "complaining".

That is not the same as what trump did.
DrafterX Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Maybe 23 months and 45 million might have found somethin... Mellow
teedubbya Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It did. It cleared trump on collusion. It’s one of the things that has been strange all along. An investigations conclusion shouldn’t be set at the beginning. The investigation is to find guilt or exonerate. The argument in here seemed to be that you needed proof of guilt before investigating. That’s always been weird. It’s the dirty cop mentality. I know you are guilty and I’m going to prove it whether you are guilty or not. Weird. That is a witch hunt. That is not what happened here. That was just a set up unless it went a way you don’t like. That is the disingenuous path.

Well know more soon but apparently he wasn’t exhonorated on obstruction or vice versa. That’s an argument I’m sure the experts in here will be certain of (whichever side) but the real experts are not. They differ.

There are also a few people in the pokey as a result and some more investigations going on in sdny as a result.

The assumption that an investigation is to find guilt whether it exists or not is absurd. I argued all along with my dad that it could clear him if there is no wrong doing. Funny how honorable, dishonorable, and honorable again are assigned based on how it impacts your guy. I really think Mueller tried to play it straight and has been honorable all along regardless of how the political snakes on both sides acted or are acting.

I suspect there will be a little more ugly in the report that will piss some in here off. But the report did find something. There was no collusion from Trump that he can find. That’s useful and good. It’s what an investigation should do.

It’s odd some think there should be no investigation unless you know the answer.
DrafterX Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Ya..!! Mad
teedubbya Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
No anger. Happiness. Our President didn’t collude with Russia. It’s good to know. I truly hope it sticks and withstands history. I beleive it will. I think it’s a case of a few bad actors around him during a time of chaos.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12