#27
that is not close to what was "proven".
interpretations, slants, twists by either and all partisan sides aren't needed to get the points of the report. It is clear reading, straight forward writing. better off to stay away from opinions of those with dogs in the fight, actually, as they cloud the clarity...in my opinion.
So, it was proven there were countless contacts between his crowd and Russia (which has also been proven to have meddled on his behalf) before, during and after the campaign, and that should be alarming enough for any American to want it investigated to the point of deciding for prosecution or not. But without the investigation, that could not be determined.
I looked up bogus, this case does not apply.
Mueller declined to definitively state Trump should be charged (leaving that to Congress) but clearly stated the "facts" do not exonerate him as he was definitely involved (ending the bogus claims)...that should, by definition, end the quotes floating around of made up baseless charges and lies..to be "involved" meant something existed, something happened, and tons of that stuff is delineated in the report.
He also was definitely involved in attempts to thwart the investigation, threats that failed due to the non-compliance of people that, for the most part, he had appointed.
"if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President DID NOT COMMIT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, WE WOULD SO STATE"...from the report. Capitals are mine.
No twists needed. Nothing ambiguous. The investigators did not find that the facts cleared Trump.
and the Hillary mentions belie the fake confidence.
You really should read what's available...without emotion. If you were to read this as if it were about another country, you'd never come to the same conclusions