America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by victor809. 64 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
Disney / Fox merger
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Gene363 Offline
#51 Posted: Fri, Apr 5 2019, 9:55 PM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
At least no State legislature or the parliament of whores, Congress, ever approved a bill and had it signed into law that violated The Constitution. Sarcasm
victor809 Offline
#52 Posted: Sat, Apr 6 2019, 10:30 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS. Read my post. The law as written would have absolutely nothing to do with the bible... Unless you want to suddenly call it a service.

Her reporting is crap, and showed she either didn't understand what was being passed, what parts of the document were relevant, or didn't care because she knew her viewers wouldn't care if it was true or not.

If that's how this "news" station reacts to being wrong then it's really not news. They should have said "sorry, our bad, we retract". They doubled down on incorrect. That's not news. You're now getting your "news" from the equivalent of a cbid forum post.
RMAN4443 Offline
#53 Posted: Sat, Apr 6 2019, 11:44 AM EST
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
A Festivus for the rest of us!!!!!fog
MACS Offline
#54 Posted: Sun, Apr 7 2019, 12:42 AM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
So you're saying OAN does the same thing that CNN and MSNBC and FOX and ABC and NBC and CBS do!!??

Well then I guess they are a legit news channel.
Gene363 Offline
#55 Posted: Sun, Apr 7 2019, 8:24 AM EST
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
MACS wrote:
So you're saying OAN does the same thing that CNN and MSNBC and FOX and ABC and NBC and CBS do!!??

Well then I guess they are a legit news channel.


Rimshot!
victor809 Offline
#56 Posted: Sun, Apr 7 2019, 9:45 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS... This may be what the other news stations do in your head. But it simply is not reality.

Name a single instance where ABC/nbc/cnn (anyone other than Fox) reported a patently false story, and then after it was proven to be false issued another segment using literally incorrect "evidence" to prove it.



On a side note, maybe this is a learning opportunity. Do you Notice how your argument has shifted?

Earlier this thread, when I pointed out that OAN had a number of controversies regarding their false reporting, you first attacked my source (Wikipedia).
Then you fell back to "well how did they handle it when it was proven false"... Because you could justify watching it if they properly correct their errors.

When it's now been shown they double down and are either too stupid to understand their argument or really hope their viewers are... You now rationalize watching them with "they're doing the same thing everyone else is!"

This is not good. I mean... That itself is incorrect. But to even use that as your justification....
MACS Offline
#57 Posted: Mon, Apr 8 2019, 12:03 AM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
I still think OAN is a better source for news than the others, including FOX.

You disagree, and you've stated why. I haven't changed my mind.
victor809 Offline
#58 Posted: Mon, Apr 8 2019, 8:50 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
I still think OAN is a better source for news than the others, including FOX.

You disagree, and you've stated why. I haven't changed my mind.


I suppose it doesn't matter.

You'll watch a "news" network which I've already shown you will literally lie to you about the main focus of their story (whether they are doing it knowingly or unknowingly, I don't know). They will double down on lies to maintain a specific agenda. And you will post their links in defense of your arguments, without filtering it through your own common sense first.

If you're watching that channel without double checking their work, there is a distinct chance they are reducing your actual knowledge.
delta1 Offline
#59 Posted: Mon, Apr 8 2019, 5:56 PM EST
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
Trump is counting on that strategy...

we thought he was kidding when Kellyanne Conway said during his first days in office that Trump will present alternative facts...he's been consistent from day one...

facts are not facts...

the truth is not the truth...
MACS Offline
#60 Posted: Tue, Apr 9 2019, 1:05 AM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Just like all the other networks told us there was solid proof of Trump colluding with Russia... for 2 years... and had people on the air who had people who knew people who were 100% sure he colluded.

But wait... the Mueller report showed no collusion. Now they want his tax returns!!

You can think that OAN is no better (or worse) than the rest, but I disagree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SQ1pgWdnPc
victor809 Offline
#61 Posted: Tue, Apr 9 2019, 8:57 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
MACS wrote:
Just like all the other networks told us there was solid proof of Trump colluding with Russia... for 2 years... and had people on the air who had people who knew people who were 100% sure he colluded.

But wait... the Mueller report showed no collusion. Now they want his tax returns!!

You can think that OAN is no better (or worse) than the rest, but I disagree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SQ1pgWdnPc



Huh.

and if "all the other networks" were like OAN, they would have put out video quoting parts of the Barr Summary saying:

"....Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election..."

And for the record,I don't think any network said there was "solid proof of trump colluding..." They all assumed there would be, they speculated that meuller must have some.... but not one said there was evidence of collusion. (obstruction is another story, as he has literally obstructed in plain view)

and I'm not watching another dumb OAN video
MACS Offline
#62 Posted: Wed, May 1 2019, 5:55 PM EST
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsNDp5s2RRs

Aaaaand Liz Wheeler defends her position.
teedubbya Offline
#63 Posted: Wed, May 1 2019, 7:48 PM EST
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Anyone that has not read the report is merely repeating what someone told them to think.

Ingram’s call in to Fox today was interesting. It turns out their news desk are commie libs and the only truth comes from their entertainment folks.

I admittedly don’t know who this other chick is.
victor809 Offline
#64 Posted: Thu, Jun 20 2019, 9:27 AM EST
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
https://qz.com/1647667/trump-tariffs-on-chinese-goods-could-lead-to-us-bible-shortage/?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!! holy sh$t.... this is hilariously ironic.

Let's see how OAN reports on this.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12
Back to Top