America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 4 years ago by RMAN4443. 194 replies replies.
4 Pages<1234
Going with the wind...
frankj1 Offline
#151 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
ZRX1200 wrote:
No gun law has ever saved a life.

impossible to quantify that statement, actually.
Is it impossible that a lunatic in the throes of homicidal thought was unable to purchase the weapon of choice in certain states...and ran naked into a forest instead?
frankj1 Offline
#152 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
KingoftheCove wrote:
I’m not a liberal, not a conservative either I suppose, but I feel somewhat the same as you here Frankie.
But there’s a problem..............or the potential for a problem..............the slippery slope phenomena.
Once certain rifles get banned, there will be a two pronged effect.
One the one side, there will be those that want to expand the confiscation of certain firearms while at the same time others will oppose it vigorously, opening up black markets, a new market for modified rifles which technically are still “legal” which the owner can then easily modify, etc.

I think the ultimate net effect will be zero...........maybe less than zero...
I just don’t think it’s worth the effort.
What’s happening is fuqin horrible.............we need to look at other solutions that might have a chance.

300, 000, 000.

if that is 300 million, than it represents the approximate number of firearms to confiscate. I'm saying it's a red herring argument by the NRA...slippery slope/don't let them open the door to any restrictions cuz then they'll come for your legal guns. Pure B.S.
Fear not gun owners, confiscation of 300,000,000 guns could never happen. Kills the confiscation argument.

we already have idiotic ways to buy guns in a minute with zero background check! And I've long called for severe penalties including real jail time for individuals and vendors who have guns stolen that end up used in crime...and more severe penalties if unreported as stolen. Without repercussions, it's better than a black market.

Are second amendment absolutists OK with it being illegal for citizens to own Nukes? Grenades? Nerve Gas? Howitzers? Laser Guided Missles?

If yes, than what else is idiotically unacceptable? Tell me where the line is drawn.

Believe me, I accept your feelings and struggle with the answer (as do you) because I believe that over two hundred years ago the perceived future enemy was an evil government and matching its firepower was easily accomplished..but today is a totally different world and unless you own a tank, and your tank will protect you for 5 minutes if they really want you, then your best bet is the ballot box.


victor809 Offline
#153 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
You're literally saying that because each of these crazies has such a different set of screwed up ideologies that it's irrelevant what those ideologies are in terms of preventing future attacks...

And then out the other side of your mouth, you're adamant that he be labeled a white supremacist so that you can link him to the ideologies of past shooters and the current president...

The specifics? Yes, impossible to identify to prevent future attacks.
The generalities? Meh... you probably could prevent future attacks if you targeted specific general groups.

But i've never once suggested we should try to prevent future attacks.

I just enjoy mocking the white nationalist apologists when they go on a shooting spree. I would never once suggest we start preemptively trying to prevent these shootings... that would 100% be anti-american.

After the fact? Yeah, we should label people for who they are so we can mock their ideologies and people who share their ideologies. You know... our precious little past and future shooters and dear orange leader.
ZRX1200 Offline
#154 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,558
Impossible to quantitfy? Hmm I read a book.

20,000 laws.....they’ve worked right? LMAO
DrafterX Offline
#155 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,534
The gunman who fatally shot nine people -- including his sister -- and injured more than two dozen  in Dayton, Ohio, early Sunday was “anti-Second Amendment” and “never spit out a conservative opinion on gun control,” according to a former classmate and friend.

The 24-year-old gunman, who was killed by police less than a minute after he opened fire with an AR-15-style rifle outside a crowded bar, attended Bellbrook High School with Will El-Fakir, the Dayton Daily News reported. Although Fox News has identified him, neither his name nor his photo are being aired or published unless necessary for clarity.

El-Fakir told the paper he stopped talking to him five months ago after the future killer held a gun to his head.

El-Fakir told the paper that his former pal was “definitely not a right-leaning person. His political views definitely leaned to the left. And believe it or not, he was actually pro-gun control. He was actually anti-Second Amendment.”

“I don’t know if this is the motive that made him snap,” El-Fakir told the Dayton Daily News.

In the last months of their friendship, El-Fakir said his troubled friend was getting violent with pals and surveyed bars as good places to do “damage.”

A Twitter feed which appears to have belonged to the suspect also showed left-leaning tweets lamenting the 2016 election of President Trump. The account @iamthespookster didn't bear his name, but did show selfies that resembled known photos of him.

Twitter took the account down late Sunday, fueling speculation that it belonged to the gunman. The killer also appeared to support 2020 Democratic presidential contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, according to The Associated Press.

Film at 11... Think
fishinguitarman Offline
#156 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,148
A full blown liberal??

Figures
deadeyedick Offline
#157 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,052
Just shows how hard it will be to profile these guys to stop their attacks by looking at social media, etc.
fishinguitarman Offline
#158 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,148
There’s a recent post on this thread filled with hypocrisy, stereotyping, racism.....
opelmanta1900 Offline
#159 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
delta1 wrote:
we shouldn't read the written crap that these loons write, nor should we publish it...it taps into their need for attention, and copycats will see that their writings have been published to millions of people in various media, further validating this MO as a way to gain notoriety by blasting a large number of innocent people so their self-important written thoughts could be exposed to the world....

I don't advocate for you or anyone else reading something you don't want to read...

Where I apparently disagree with you and most others here is that reading this shouldn't be taboo and posting it shouldn't be viewed as anything other than discussing...

The idea that these perpetrators are doing this for attention - nevermind the fact that the majority of them don't expect to live through their actions - is as debunked as the video game lie...

When I was a teenager, my dad didn't want me studying evolution... He had no problem with me learning about it in school, but he disliked my extra curricular study of it....

My guess is that my dad had the same issue with evolution that you have with this young mans diatribe... You fear it's a bad idea for which you have no rebuttal...

I have no such fears... I acknowledge the reality that there are a ton of bad ideas in the world I've never encountered and to which I likely have no counter... But I'm willing - anxious even - to encounter them...

Bad ideas - above all - should be discussed to exhaustion... It's how we often stumble upon the good ones...
delta1 Offline
#160 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
I've never entertained any ideas about committing a mass murder, so I wouldn't know what to look for...the "experts" who've studied imprisoned mass murderers have been unsuccessful in developing anything other than a generic profile that would fit millions of similar folks in the general population...

I do believe they are looking for attention or approval...why else would the majority of them spend a lot of time on social media pontificating with other think alike peeps...
frankj1 Offline
#161 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
ZRX1200 wrote:
Impossible to quantitfy? Hmm I read a book.

20,000 laws.....they’ve worked right? LMAO

apples/oranges.
many laws actually do work as intended, mostly on rational people though.


But you said no gun law ever saved a life.
I said impossible to quantify...as in you have no idea if thousands have been saved due to determined mass shooters being unable to purchase firearms where the laws may have worked.

how many lives have been saved by fear of the death penalty? if someone is gonna snap, they're gonna snap.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#162 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
delta1 wrote:

I do believe they are looking for attention or approval...why else would the majority of them spend a lot of time on social media pontificating with other think alike peeps...

Same reason you do?
izonfire Offline
#163 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
DrafterX wrote:
The gunman who fatally shot nine people -- including his sister -- and injured more than two dozen  in Dayton, Ohio, early Sunday was “anti-Second Amendment” and “never spit out a conservative opinion on gun control,” according to a former classmate and friend.

The 24-year-old gunman, who was killed by police less than a minute after he opened fire with an AR-15-style rifle outside a crowded bar, attended Bellbrook High School with Will El-Fakir, the Dayton Daily News reported. Although Fox News has identified him, neither his name nor his photo are being aired or published unless necessary for clarity.

El-Fakir told the paper he stopped talking to him five months ago after the future killer held a gun to his head.

El-Fakir told the paper that his former pal was “definitely not a right-leaning person. His political views definitely leaned to the left. And believe it or not, he was actually pro-gun control. He was actually anti-Second Amendment.”

“I don’t know if this is the motive that made him snap,” El-Fakir told the Dayton Daily News.

In the last months of their friendship, El-Fakir said his troubled friend was getting violent with pals and surveyed bars as good places to do “damage.”

A Twitter feed which appears to have belonged to the suspect also showed left-leaning tweets lamenting the 2016 election of President Trump. The account @iamthespookster didn't bear his name, but did show selfies that resembled known photos of him.

Twitter took the account down late Sunday, fueling speculation that it belonged to the gunman. The killer also appeared to support 2020 Democratic presidential contender Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, according to The Associated Press.

Film at 11... Think


SHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
We're trying to stick with a white nationalist theme here!
Get with the program...
DrafterX Offline
#164 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,534
Mass shootings have been around longer than social media... Mellow
dstieger Offline
#165 Posted:
Joined: 06-22-2007
Posts: 10,889
I got confused....I thought the gun discussion was in the threepeat thread...isn't this the nutjob and supremacist thread?.....I can't keep up some days
opelmanta1900 Offline
#166 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
delta1 wrote:
I've never entertained any ideas about committing a mass murder, so I wouldn't know what to look for...the "experts" who've studied imprisoned mass murderers have been unsuccessful in developing anything other than a generic profile that would fit millions of similar folks in the general population...


I think we are on two different wave lengths on this one... I would never suggest that the ordinary man could predict future mass murderers based on profiling... Nor am I suggesting that's why anyone should read these manifestos...

I am suggesting that the same poorly thought out opinions that often motivate these perpetrators also motivate many others - albeit to far less heinous actions...

If we can pull those opinions out of the shadows and debate them in the light of day, we might have a chance at defeating them... More will come, as they always have, but logic doesn't need rest...
victor809 Offline
#167 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
I think we are on two different wave lengths on this one... I would never suggest that the ordinary man could predict future mass murderers based on profiling... Nor am I suggesting that's why anyone should read these manifestos...

I am suggesting that the same poorly thought out opinions that often motivate these perpetrators also motivate many others - albeit to far less heinous actions...

If we can pull those opinions out of the shadows and debate them in the light of day, we might have a chance at defeating them... More will come, as they always have, but logic doesn't need rest...


That has actually not proven to be correct.

The past 20 years has been an experiment in discussing bad and dumb ideas to death. It's called the internet. If anything, we've seen an increase in these idiots acting on dumb ideas.

I don't advocate shutting anything down, I'm fine with people discussing dumb ideas in a public forum. But it has appeared to me that this has normalized the ideas. The people with these ideas don't feel isolated and "wrong", instead they're finding a few thousand people across the nation with the same dumb idea and that emboldens them.

If you want to take a less controversial stance, think of your flat-earthers.... 20 years ago they were conspiracy freaks who lived in basements somewhere and never discussed their dumb idea with anyone else. Now, they have been able to connect with other idiots around the US/world and have public gatherings to meet once a year. They reinforce each other's dumb ideas and shelter each other from having to actually learn the truth.

We were probably better off when neo nazis and flat-earthers didn't feel like they had a place in society. But that's fine...
fishinguitarman Offline
#168 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,148
That’s why they call them opinions opel! Well stated
opelmanta1900 Offline
#169 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
victor809 wrote:


If you want to take a less controversial stance, think of your flat-earthers.... 20 years ago they were conspiracy freaks who lived in basements somewhere and never discussed their dumb idea with anyone else. Now, they have been able to connect with other idiots around the US/world and have public gatherings to meet once a year. They reinforce each other's dumb ideas and shelter each other from having to actually learn the truth....


Quite the opposite... 20 years ago they sat in their parents basement unopposed because few people knew they existed...

Now, their bad opinions have seen the light of logic... Few people are unaware of the existence of flat earthers or the flaws in their beliefs... They're a dying breed, soon to be extinct, or at the very least, long dormant...
opelmanta1900 Offline
#170 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Really appreciate you making my point for me Victor...
teedubbya Offline
#171 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
My problem is they used to be the fringe. Now they’ve been mainstreamed and too many folks are comfortable with the overlap.

They used to be easier to identify because good folks used to run from them like the plague. The communication mechanism is secondary or tertiary to me.
victor809 Offline
#172 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Quite the opposite... 20 years ago they sat in their parents basement unopposed because few people knew they existed...

Now, their bad opinions have seen the light of logic... Few people are unaware of the existence of flat earthers or the flaws in their beliefs... They're a dying breed, soon to be extinct, or at the very least, long dormant...


do you think they're dying?

You could be right, but I'd have to ask for proof. We're seeing more of them publicly. We ridicule them... but that hasn't changed a single opinion of one.

Same could be said of the neo nazis.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#173 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Who is seeing more of them? And more of them than when?

Check YouTube... There was a surge... It has passed... They're not dying... Their dumb ideas are...
fishinguitarman Offline
#174 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2006
Posts: 69,148
Some people like to see people die. In fact they laugh about it!
victor809 Offline
#175 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Who is seeing more of them? And more of them than when?

Check YouTube... There was a surge... It has passed... They're not dying... Their dumb ideas are...



I mean.... maybe I'm wrong, but they have annual gatherings. This is not normal for something that's fringey and being mocked into obsolescence.

I don't see any evidence it's dying out... you seem to think it is. I'm curious why.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#176 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
Did you check YouTube? What's been published more in the last - say 6 months? Flat earth conspiracy videos or videos debunking the ideas behind flat earth?

And which of those videos is more likely to influence young boys and girls forming their opinions in the pressure chamber of their friends opinions?
victor809 Offline
#177 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Did you check YouTube? What's been published more in the last - say 6 months? Flat earth conspiracy videos or videos debunking the ideas behind flat earth?

And which of those videos is more likely to influence young boys and girls forming their opinions in the pressure chamber of their friends opinions?


Dunno.
Fewer videos posted doesn't mean fewer people believe.... I can't find any good data.... wikipedia says there's an "internet resurgence" but I don't see hard data to back it up. There was some .gov survey done a few years ago, but it doesn't have historical data to compare to... so the results are useless from an "increasing/decreasing" standpoint.

There are a number of societies mentioned in the wikipedia site, so I'm sure if we were to track membership to these societies that would tell us if it's increasing or decreasing... but that's a lot of effort.

what I'm getting at is this... even if they're a bunch of idiots putting out ridiculous youtube videos that you don't find credible... doesn't mean others won't buy in. We've watch people buy in to some of the most nonsensical crap ever in the past years... hell, you can look at the manifesto starting this thread.... that's not the writings of someone with strong decision making skills.
teedubbya Offline
#178 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I don’t know about the you tube research but recent hearings with the fbi and a few other national security heads suggest the opposite. Ive not seen any of them suggest it’s peaked and waining. In fact they say the opposite.

And the usual caveat for the folks that don’t want to think so suggest media brainwashing on everyone but them.... I’m one of the geeks that watches testimony and reads transcripts. I also read a lot of regs. It’s a weird thing.

teedubbya Offline
#179 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
As for the press if I remember right just last week an ex fbi official wrote something to the effect that there’s been a spike in activity, a hesitancy to address it and we can expect violence. His timing was gratuitous but he was right.

Can’t remember his name but I’ll find it. I read it and blew it off but then remembered it following the shooting.
delta1 Offline
#180 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
Feds are very concerned about domestic terrorism, especially the embrace of white supremacy ideologies that promote hate and violence against minorities...opel mentioned 8ch...never heard of it until now... but CloudFair the company that provided server space for it just cancelled it because the company CEO was disturbed by what was happening there...but was OK until people got killed...

sure, exposing hateful rhetoric can cause pushback by decent folks...but it can also attract more followers...

and we all thought that we had ended the scourge of white supremacy when we defeated Nazi Germany nearly 75 years ago...what keeps that heart beating?

I don't know the answer...I'm a big supporter of the 1st Amendment and the freedoms we all enjoy...but I also don't have to subject myself to random thoughts by a proven idiot nutjob...heck, I hated to read poems written by high school classmates who were my friends...

maybe the price we pay for all these freedoms is the uncertainty that some freedom loving nutjob could take any of us out at any given moment...so treat every second as a precious gift...
frankj1 Offline
#181 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
delta1 wrote:
Feds are very concerned about domestic terrorism, especially the embrace of white supremacy ideologies that promote hate and violence against minorities...opel mentioned 8ch...never heard of it until now... but CloudFair the company that provided server space for it just cancelled it because the company CEO was disturbed by what was happening there...but was OK until people got killed...

sure, exposing hateful rhetoric can cause pushback by decent folks...but it can also attract more followers...

and we all thought that we had ended the scourge of white supremacy when we defeated Nazi Germany nearly 75 years ago...what keeps that heart beating?

I don't know the answer...I'm a big supporter of the 1st Amendment and the freedoms we all enjoy...but I also don't have to subject myself to random thoughts by a proven idiot nutjob...heck, I hated to read poems written by high school classmates who were my friends...

maybe the price we pay for all these freedoms is the uncertainty that some freedom loving nutjob could take any of us out at any given moment...so treat every second as a precious gift...

1) post 9/11 stats say that approximately the same number of lives have been lost on American soil to Islamic terrorism
as from loosely (if at all) connected groups of far right ideologists...102 and 109 since 2002.

However, the Feds do not spend anything even close to the same in terms of money. weapons, manpower, intelligence efforts...and the position of top counterterrorism adviser was downgraded last year so that they no longer report directly to the president (from interview with Lisa Monaco who held that position under Obama).

The point is not if right wing or left wing fringe lunatics are worse than the other side, it's that the Feds are not nearly as concerned about domestic terrorism.

2) I may be in the vast minority (until recent events) but I have known for a long time that Jewish watchdog groups that keep tabs on the up and down activity of nazi and other superiority style hate groups' activity has been met with yawns for years...have even heard/read irritated pleas for the Jews to stop using their bleating to create guilt about a "dead" issue.
So I never thought it was eradicated.

Constant vigilance is the only way to protect the freedoms we don't always like to bestow on others...their freedom to think and say is protected...but not their painful or murderous actions.

I may edit after posting as my thoughts were flooded, so hold off for a minute or two...
frankj1 Offline
#182 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
I'm good with it.
opelmanta1900 Offline
#183 Posted:
Joined: 01-10-2012
Posts: 13,954
teedubbya wrote:
I don’t know about the you tube research but recent hearings with the fbi and a few other national security heads suggest the opposite. Ive not seen any of them suggest it’s peaked and waining. In fact they say the opposite.

And the usual caveat for the folks that don’t want to think so suggest media brainwashing on everyone but them.... I’m one of the geeks that watches testimony and reads transcripts. I also read a lot of regs. It’s a weird thing.


Why is the fbi meeting with flat earth people?
ZRX1200 Offline
#184 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,558
Crazy I know, I can’t say that!!!! 20k laws have done so much though, I bet I’m not licking boots he’d enough. Frank what laws stop criminals?

A study that talks post 911 I wonder why. Resources? I wonder how many incidents were AVERTED. Because I can tell you incidents the other way got worse DUE TO FBI involvement to get stats.....

Do you understand psychopaths?

We’ve both voted for them
frankj1 Offline
#185 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
ZRX1200 wrote:
Crazy I know, I can’t say that!!!! 20k laws have done so much though, I bet I’m not licking boots he’d enough. Frank what laws stop criminals?

A study that talks post 911 I wonder why. Resources? I wonder how many incidents were AVERTED. Because I can tell you incidents the other way got worse DUE TO FBI involvement to get stats.....

Do you understand psychopaths?

We’ve both voted for them

chit, man. you can say anything to me.

we could always allow law enforcement to randomly stop and frisk, or search houses etc in our search for safety.
But then we'd have the freedom of your typical Putin supporter. Oops, I meant Fatty fat, oops, I did it again.

I'm not sure laws are preventive, but I don't think throwing in jay walking in a discussion like this does more than obscure the specifics here.

and at this point, I must confess that I'd have to reread the thread to remember what point I am defending.
My last drink tasted like...another.
ZRX1200 Offline
#186 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,558
LMAO I wasn’t talking about jaywalking, I was talking about ANY infraction really. People still break the law, and the law itself is an enforcement action and punishment itself does more with the repercussions than a “law”. I know the internet is a scary place especially with ol’ Z around......


Ты не любишь путина?
frankj1 Offline
#187 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
fatty can hit the high notes
frankj1 Offline
#188 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
how many lives have been saved by anarchy?

don't think this means I'm sober, but it came to me so I typed it.
victor809 Offline
#189 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
delta1 wrote:


maybe the price we pay for all these freedoms is the uncertainty that some freedom loving nutjob could take any of us out at any given moment...so treat every second as a precious gift...


This.

We hold our lives too precious.
victor809 Offline
#190 Posted:
Joined: 10-14-2011
Posts: 23,866
opelmanta1900 wrote:
Why is the fbi meeting with flat earth people?


I think tw got confused between our talk regarding flat earthers and neo nazis.... to be fair we were all over the place. I sorta just let him run with it.
izonfire Offline
#191 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
If they share any similarities in ideologies, then they’re all Nazis
teedubbya Offline
#192 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Yea I didn’t think you were talking flat earthers... missed that part.

I take no issue with them since they are right and stuff
delta1 Offline
#193 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,772
FBI and DoJ recently announced the serious threat of domestic terrorism/violence to the US by white supremacist organizations...full circle...we're back to where we were pre-9-1-1...


RMAN4443 Offline
#194 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
So, we're back to where it was , way way before Trump entered the race...Think
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234