teedubbya wrote:I miss potts. I actually enjoyed his verbosity. Seriously though I never had an issue with him. Sure he was normally horribly horribly wrong but he always apologized and I found him to be an alright dude.
I mean... he was never nasty, which is ... unusual... for this board.
But that horribly horribly wrong part, combined with a desire to write dickensian length posts trying to defend his wrongness made him difficult.... that and his overbearing christian morality... I believe at one point we had an argument where his stance was that sex for anything other than reproduction, and outside of religiously ordained marriage should be outlawed....
seriously... you simply can't be friends with that.
My final straw in taking him seriously was the paragraphs he wrote defending an inherently incorrect mathematical stance. something as simple as not correctly understanding how averages work.