America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQJoar17jyo&feature=emb_logo&fbclid=IwAR38xN6NBJ0cCdY4JvhKZ_a6hqAwORhXoEAJBuRKnrVSM4choqCEC4qsQJY

Everyone is smitten with this farce.

Adam Schiff has the worst resting crazy MF face I’ve ever seen.

And I’ve been to Pelican Bay (for work I cannot openly discuss).

Tittums, obviously you shouldn't be criticized for being a Trump supporter. You're being an A hole is so much worse. Yet I would criticize you for your stupidity, but that's just me.

Pretty sure everything you based your decision on there was incorrect....

So... uh... that's like... just your opinion man.....

None of what you said is even peripherally related to the impeachment. So.... not sure why you are focusing on it as justification for not having an impeached president....

And half of what you stated is incorrect (the last half) and the other half is... a hodgepodge.

So you're using mostly inaccurate and completely irrelevant arguments to defend something that is completely unrelated to them.

the more info that emerges, the worse it looks...
it goes back to Poison Rudy and Parnas plotting to get the Ambassador out of the way and makes a lot of the testimony from Taylor et al more credible than it already appeared.

all he had to do was recall her, no reasons needed, totally agree.

So the firing itself isn't the real issue but the story emerging about why he was advised to do so is another dot that connects...that she would have been a "problem" in the way of the real acts being looked at as, to be kind, "questionable".

And to be very clear the red herrings are the fake stories tossed out about Biden and Ukraine having the server...which was conceived by PUTIN! How "red" do you need?

Not sure how the *server* fits, but Biden issues are certainly not fake. One may argue the relevance, but the facts themselves are plain as day.

98.2% of the world knows why Biden (who was representing their wishes and our very publicly known Official Foreign Policy)
warned about holding back aid.
Never was about leaving his kid alone.

In fact the threat to withhold, according to the world, was because the corrupt Ukrainian Investigator failed to really investigate corruption which included, Hunter's company! They had been "cleared" by him along with other favors he did for other corrupt oligarchs.

Biden's withholding would have potentially put his son's employer at risk, the opposite of what people repeating Trump's debunked nonsense fail to understand.

Where's Rudy?

definitely should have gone the subpoena/court route. I agree.

All I heard as to why they did not was that it would have then been tied up until well after the coming election.
I say, so what? Either you know you have a case or you don't. As it looks now, the assertions likely would have been backed up by previously unreleased yet leaking documents/phone calls/etc. Maybe even positively corroborated by Bolton and another one or two direct witnesses.

When I saw that strategy (to not press for testimony and documents) on day one, and knowing it would take a nuke to get the Senate to convict, it affirmed my original opinion for censure, not impeachment, and let the Dems get a candidate who could win in November. They did none of those things.

All that aside, it's hard to ignore everything coming out. But they banked on the fact that the Senate not only could but would call for new evidence and testimony as history was strongly on their side for this happening.

Sometimes you lose when you gamble.

No removal

Bloomberg will take votes away from the Dummycraps because he is slamming Trump at every turn

Bottom line: no socialists in the WH and


TRUMP 2020!!!!!

So a communist instead of a socialist?

President Putin

It's not only ok it's a duty to route out all the corrupt swampers. I don't want to live in an America that investigates Trump and ignores the Bidens, the corrupt CIA, FBI and other swamp critters.
Has everyone seen the Looney tunes clip with roadrunner (tweetus Maximus and Sciff T coyote) hilarious!

I certainly hope you are not so naïve to think that he's the only POTUS to ever manipulate government finances to his advantage. His crime was picking disloyal subordinates. You know that, I know that and the whole world knows that. Never in my 54 years have I seen the number of leaks by high level staff under any other administration. Had that been the case in previous administrations, this wouldn't even be a blip on the radar.

There is no smoking gun. No one has stated first hand that he withheld those funds until an investigation into the Bidens was launched.

For emphasis, let me state it again and again and again and again:

There has been ABSOLUTLY ZERO direct evidence presented to prove this wicked deed.

There has been ABSOLUTLY ZERO direct evidence presented to prove this wicked deed.

There has been ABSOLUTLY ZERO direct evidence presented to prove this wicked deed.

There has been ABSOLUTLY ZERO direct evidence presented to prove this wicked deed.


Notice I didn't say he was innocent. Just saying this isn't the first time the Office of President has been abused.

So once again I ask if this is were we want to be at this time? House Democrats created an Article of Impeachment out of something that should be decided by the Judicial branch. House Democrats ignored due process with it's impeachment inquiry. This in of itself should be considered a Constitutional crisis.

This has been a sham since day one. The DEM's know they can't prove a damn thing without some direct evidence. So they created a huge smokescreen consisting of what they wanted, but not what could be proven. They did this to harm Trump. Nothing more, nothing less. As Pelosi said when announcing the Articles about how they had been doing it for two and a half years. Yet, the alleged event didn't occur until we were well into those two and a half years.

Again I'm not saying I condone the alleged action. I'm just not blind to the fact that this has been going on since the days of George Washington. I'm also saying that we don't live in such a granular society and that we don't get the kernel without beating off the chaff.

You’re not normal

what if it was 2015, and it was Obama who did all the things that Trump did, and it was Trump who Obama wanted investigated...

Yet Obama, the hypocritical media, and many on the left had no problem with the FBI investigating Trump's campaign in an attempt to influence the 2016 election.

David

Did you see that part about no bias? Not sure what to call Strock & Page’s behavior if it’s not biased. BTW, you do realize fact-check.org is a left leaning organization?

yes...to describe the opening of the investigation or decision-making during it.

The involvement of Strzok and Page did not lead to the start/opening of the investigation nor contributed any decision making to it: they played small parts near the beginning of Mueller's investigation and they were immediately relieved of any further involvement immediately after their bias was revealed. I know you have a law enforcement background and are pretty savvy about law enforcement personnel in general...you would agree that most professional law enforcement personnel are conservatives, and most make every effort to not let their own personal political opinions surface during their work...

The biggest deal with the IG's report was the number of inconsistencies in the FBI's process for obtaining a FISA warrant. If they don't clean that up, then can we ever trust any federal law enforcement investigation to get and use warrants from the FISA courts, without consistent and perhaps invasive and crippling oversight/verification...and by whom?

I'm always skeptical about letting any law enforcement agencies, let alone the top federal agency, get permission to conduct secret surveillance of anyone, including Americans, but in the age of terrorism, in the aftermath of 9/11 that may be a necessary evil to prevent other attacks.


Factcheck has a loftier reputation, and was trusted by the right when they ruled Obama was wrong for accusing Romney of being a vulture capitalist....I guess it is perceived differently, depending on the decisions of "fact" they make...it is odd that we now have become a society where "facts" are always in dispute...

I’ve met LEO’s across the political spectrum. More importantly though I’ve seen the fallout of what a few vindictive LEO’s did to rivals. My first employer was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison. He died while incarcerated after serving 20 or so years in prison. The case was a setup from the start. I seen many other cases overthrown when secrets were spilled. On the other hand, I think you are being very generous in regards to Stozk and Page. Though the may now have helped initiate the investigation IIRC Strozk was one of the senior members of the team.

of course the FBI has a long history of questionable conduct, but mostly in protecting the status quo while going after minorities and people on the "margins" of our society...most cons were fine with that...

to be fair, in any contested investigation, there can be reviews, and the IG did one here...