teedubbya wrote:I’m not sure why the efficacy of a specific drug is political at all.
and it was one (two maybe) of so many that are being looked into.
Had he mentioned another instead, we'd have accumulated hundreds of posts saying we are all lined up politically when we refuse to believe he is correct about a different miracle cure, which exposes an inability to understand critical thought.
turns out the commie from Michigas that he saved had already been on the wonder drug before for Lyme Disease.
And there is neither a liberal nor conservative explanation as to why that may matter.
So weird that one can get accused of rooting against a potential cure when one wants to wait for science to agree the cure won't kill us. It's a symptom of the political climate he has fostered when all thoughts and prayers should be going toward a cure that will be nonpartisan whether he mentions it or not.
All patients of Dr. Trump need to calm down. Let him finish his thorough testing. The rest of us hope that drug works as well as he and Pudding Mittens believe...or one of the other dozen or so drugs in consideration. Who gives a crap. Find a cure/prevention/vaccine!