America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 3 years ago by tonygraz. 257 replies replies.
6 Pages<123456>
WSJ Opinion: We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April
teedubbya Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Gene363 wrote:
No, he isn't and calling him names won't change anything, you can only change you.



So he will always be a poopy head?
izonfire Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
teedubbya wrote:
But none of this changes the fact MACS is a poopy head and eats donkey turds.

and that recognition makes me sad...
teedubbya Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Me too
MACS Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Don't be sad... Herfing
delta1 Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
despite being a poopy head and ill-informed, MACS is still dreamy and has great taste in cigars and adult beverages... which compensates for all his faults
MACS Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
delta1 wrote:
despite being a poopy head and ill-informed, MACS is still dreamy and has great taste in cigars and adult beverages... which compensates for all his faults


Ya know I sold my boat, right? LOL
Gene363 Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,799
MACS wrote:
Ya know I sold my boat, right? LOL


He meant, "dream crusher" you monster. LOL
frankj1 Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
MACS wrote:
Ya know I sold my boat, right? LOL

now I'm glad I burned my initials on it...wif the Q d O morning cigar you supplied!!

J/K, but what an unforgettable day.
tailgater Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
And yet the very same folks that have been so vocally wrong all along continue to be vocal and continue to be wrong.

This was predictable and still is. As far as viruses go this is vanilla in terms of acting as expected. The science has been on it but largely ignored by not only those that don’t know any better but also by some in power that do. The vax is a pretty cool triumph of tech and knowledge gained over the last decade or so. Fascinating. It’s not new. Application to this virus is.

Had we not fought against the science and against each other in the interest of politics, alleged freedom and ignorance many of the lives lost would not have been. We, the US have embarrassed ourselves on this one. Our politics knee capped our exceptional abilities. The least common denominator knuckle draggers over influenced things.

But let’s continue the same crap. That’s why I don’t buy early heard immunity. Even with the vaccine it takes human decision making. I’m working directly on vax hesitancy, distribution, coordination, storage, public messaging etc

And those that say this as nothing but the flu (wrong), nothing but a tool to beat trump (wrong) and it would go away after the election (wrong) or that masks are worthless (wrong) and the government wants us to wear them just to scare and control us (wrong) are still out there. Not to mention the idiots that thought we’d just get to a natural herd immunity if we do nothing and 99% live so what’s the problem? They are still out there.

Vax itself is worthless vax in arms is the fix. But there is a rather large vocal cabal of truly uninformed idiots that have made trying to make progress against this pandemic more difficult the entire way. And they still are. It’s as if their superpower is to create their own personal amnesia about how wrong they have been in order to be so sure they are right now and to vocally say so.

Folks don’t ever seem to look backwards and reflect internally on how they might improve in the future. And we continue to repeat the nonsense.

It is so frustrating because there is a roadmap to manage this thing. It’s not even an entirely new road map. This may be new to you but it has been known for some time by those in the field. Folks just dont like the map or are somehow convinced they know more than those evil experts. This could have cost us less in terms of lives, long term health and quality of life implications (most important) dollars and long term inconvenience or perceived loss of freedom. We made a difficult situation more difficult with our stubbornness, ignorance and selfishness cloaked as independence.



The author uses numbers and logic. Maybe he's wrong. But it makes sense. It's almost scary that everyone doesn't think like him once it's presented.
But we're being told. By media. By liberal politicians. By hack Fauci.
We're being told it will be longer.
So we ignore when facts are presented and we deny them by using our feelings.

Read the opinion piece by the John Hopkins doctor. Think about what he is saying regarding Christmas travel and the declining stats. Read his opinion on natural immunity. Look at the statistics he presents.
You constantly tell us how you know more than we do on this subject.
Tell us where this doctor's numbers are wrong.

Should be easy.





tailgater Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
This has been predictable. Predictable doesn’t mean every inch of it or I can tell you the answer next Tuesday is 12. Predictable in that it’s been pretty easy to model and fits a predictable pattern. As we learn more the models adjust.

This really has been vanilla and would have been a great test of the pandemic plans that were in place but thrown out by pure politics. The models have been so spit on they even accurately predicted outcomes of poor decision making along the way. Folks claimed the model was wrong up front, made bad decisions then tried to claim the models wrong in the tail end. It was their own doing lol.

For anyone looking at and preparing for things like this for decades rather than minutes it a has been surreal in how it played out as expected based on changing variables and decision points.



Please. Using late inning hindsight doesn't mean the early months were predictable. Back then we were told (by the experts) that it couldn't be predicted. Now we're told that they called it the whole time?

You keep saying things like that and you might even convince yourself.
teedubbya Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
You and I have a very different foundation from which we work from on this subject. Our information comes from very different places and frequencies and our experience varies greatly on the subject. I’ve been immersed in this for a long time and understand the modeling pretty well and what changing variables and unknown elements effect.

Some of my language you don’t understand and try to discredit in ways that make sense to you, but not to folks immersed in the subject. You don’t know enough to recognize that. But it’s odd you would then doubt or unsuccessfully ridicule someone that knows way more than you on a subject when you really don’t have the knowledge to do so or even enough to know how to go about it.

This is a pretty vanilla pretty predictable virus compared to what it could have been or to what others are. That doesn’t mean next Tuesday the answer is 12. That’s not how it works but you don’t understand the core meaning of what I’m saying and don’t really want to. It’s not an insult, we all have our core competencies and things we understand really well through experience, education and interest. This isn’t yours. It is mine and has been for several decades.

If you were seriously trying to improve your foundation on the subject I’d engage but you aren’t. You are trying to tear down mine. The problem is you don’t even know the right questions let alone if the answers are correct or not. It’s really not worth engaging with you and giving merit where there is none.

As for arguing with an opinion piece for your gratification even when you wouldn’t understand the argument no thanks. If I want to argue with this doctor I can and would directly. With him, at his level. It’s the environment I’m in every day and it wouldn’t phase me. I’ve been working on the subject every day with docs such as this (many from Hopkins but not him) for a long time. Covid for a year or so but pandemic planning and public health for many many years.

This stuff is not new to me or a passing hobby. The same is true from this doctor. He is entitled to his educated opinion. I work with many many doctors like him across the country who have varying opinions. And we do argue, but it’s not really arguing. If you’ve ever been involved in grand rounds you’d understand. It’s not trying to bring them down it’s to discuss all info on the table. His is not a new argument or one that hasn’t been discussed by me or others.

Believe what you want, but you’re base on the subject is very weak. I won’t argue with you because it’s a waste of time and you really don’t want to learn from someone that knows way more than you on the subject.

If you really want to learn it’s going to take time. Put in the time. I’d even help. But not if you start with telling me I’m wrong and dont know what I’m talking about. You could learn from me but you won’t.
teedubbya Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
By the way that’s enough lol. I’ll try really hard not to engage you in the subject. It’s not worth either of our time.
tonygraz Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,231
Right on TW - you can't fix stupid.
frankj1 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
Tim-

have heard some talk and then today read (Boston Sunday Globe Ideas section) a piece by Ellen Ruppel Shell...Pardee Center for The Study of the Longer-Range Future at Boston University...
regarding the belief that giving a first dose to twice as many people would be more effective in preventing deaths and hospitalizations than fully (two doses) vaccinating half as many people.

She also states that this should be preferred because a gap between shots longer than manufacturers' suggestions of 3 and 4 weeks is almost certainly going to be an even stronger immunity provider, maybe even as long a gap as 3 or 4 months.

She says the reason manufacturers' have not suggested that is because they did not have the time to study that scenario, and some other stuff...but it has been seen in other vaccines that even longer intervals improved efficacy.

I assume you are aware of this school of thought, if not the author herself?
tailgater Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
teedubbya wrote:
You and I have a very different foundation from which we work from on this subject. Our information comes from very different places and frequencies and our experience varies greatly on the subject. I’ve been immersed in this for a long time and understand the modeling pretty well and what changing variables and unknown elements effect.

Some of my language you don’t understand and try to discredit in ways that make sense to you, but not to folks immersed in the subject. You don’t know enough to recognize that. But it’s odd you would then doubt or unsuccessfully ridicule someone that knows way more than you on a subject when you really don’t have the knowledge to do so or even enough to know how to go about it.

This is a pretty vanilla pretty predictable virus compared to what it could have been or to what others are. That doesn’t mean next Tuesday the answer is 12. That’s not how it works but you don’t understand the core meaning of what I’m saying and don’t really want to. It’s not an insult, we all have our core competencies and things we understand really well through experience, education and interest. This isn’t yours. It is mine and has been for several decades.

If you were seriously trying to improve your foundation on the subject I’d engage but you aren’t. You are trying to tear down mine. The problem is you don’t even know the right questions let alone if the answers are correct or not. It’s really not worth engaging with you and giving merit where there is none.

As for arguing with an opinion piece for your gratification even when you wouldn’t understand the argument no thanks. If I want to argue with this doctor I can and would directly. With him, at his level. It’s the environment I’m in every day and it wouldn’t phase me. I’ve been working on the subject every day with docs such as this (many from Hopkins but not him) for a long time. Covid for a year or so but pandemic planning and public health for many many years.

This stuff is not new to me or a passing hobby. The same is true from this doctor. He is entitled to his educated opinion. I work with many many doctors like him across the country who have varying opinions. And we do argue, but it’s not really arguing. If you’ve ever been involved in grand rounds you’d understand. It’s not trying to bring them down it’s to discuss all info on the table. His is not a new argument or one that hasn’t been discussed by me or others.

Believe what you want, but you’re base on the subject is very weak. I won’t argue with you because it’s a waste of time and you really don’t want to learn from someone that knows way more than you on the subject.

If you really want to learn it’s going to take time. Put in the time. I’d even help. But not if you start with telling me I’m wrong and dont know what I’m talking about. You could learn from me but you won’t.



I'm not asking you to argue with anyone.
I've asked HOW he's wrong.
Because you said he was (defacto, since I said he might be right).

You tell us how smart you are on this subject. How you know it so well. How we can't "understand" it like you.
Yet you cower when called to task.

Sorry to expose you.

Don't continue to be such a self righteous know it all.
And stop feeling sorry for yourself when I call you out.

Here is the current tally:
You have repeatedly said I was wrong. I've asked you to tell me why. You responded with "I know more about this than you". Nothing of substance. NOTHING.

Meanwhile, I have never called you wrong. Yet you cry that I have. You say it directly. And it's a lie.
Another lie.

For crying out loud. Stop SAYING how much you know and start SHOWING it.




teedubbya Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
*rolling eyes*. Ok.

MACS Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
teedubbya wrote:
*rolling eyes*. Ok.


That's how ya do it! Sarcasm
delta1 Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
tail said to TW: "Meanwhile, I have never called you wrong."

...the way you insult everybody, including TW, who disagrees with you is how you show people you're calling them wrong...



but, back to OP: in this case, I'm not dismissing the "herd immunity by April" theory...our infection rate and death rate leads all modern advanced nations...so even if we have not officially adopted a herd immunity response, enough Americans dismissed the public health recommendations to wear masks, socially distance, avoid large gatherings in closed and open spaces that we've spread the virus much faster and more than if everyone got behind the safety measures...so some (many) folks have been behaving like our goal was herd immunity

and we were never serious about coronavirus like China, South Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand...all nations who've avoided the catastrophic illness, hospitalization and death rates we've suffered because they isolated and quarantined peeps with positive tests and did contact tracing while we didn't...

by April 2021 nearly 600,000 Americans will have died...that's about 10 times the number of people that would die in a year with the worse flu season ...if we do achieve some level of herd immunity, will that have been a price everyone was willing to pay when this all started?
MACS Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Had we skipped the draconian lockdowns and opted for information and allowing the public to decide for themselves (freedom) we’d have herd immunity already.
delta1 Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
nope...

Sweden tried...and failed...at what cost?

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-prageru-sweden-herd-immunit/fact-check-sweden-has-not-achieved-herd-immunity-is-not-proof-that-lockdowns-are-useless-idUSKBN28C2R7



individuals who choose to exercise their freedoms can get sick and infect and possibly kill others, especially if they live with, or in close proximity to, others...
rfenst Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
MACS wrote:
Had we skipped the draconian lockdowns and opted for information and allowing the public to decide for themselves (freedom) we’d have herd immunity already.

Maybe. Hindsight is 20/20.
Smooth light Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 06-26-2020
Posts: 3,598
COMMON SENSE : sure beats political mumbo jumbo and agendas. Scientist protecting their budgets too.
delta1 Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
and hardly anybody who's studied this expects to achieve herd immunity by April...


end of summer, when everybody has access to vaccines? maybe we'll have herd immunity then if enough people are willing to take the vaccine...like in Israel...
teedubbya Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
We would not have had herd immunity by now. We need the vaccine to help get there. There was no natural herd immunity coming without even more sickness and death.

Frank to your question it is an interesting theory and could have some merit. We discussed that in a call with one of the creators of the tech.

Unfortunately the VAX were not studied that way and no one will go out on that limb without some cover. Some might be coming much like the relaxed cooling requirements. But I don’t really know where it will land. It’s not to be discounted up front. The j&j vax could make an impact sooner even with less efficacy but there is something weird going on there.

We keep wanting immunity by Easter.
teedubbya Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I’m telling ya the models have been amazingly accurate (not perfect they never can be) since day 1. And when action or inaction were factored in they held up very well. They were a warning that was dismissed and this became worse and worse as predicted based on our approach.

We screwed the pooch and let politics drive this resulting in many more deaths than necessary.

But we are where we are. The disinformation needs to stop or die down and we can do this. We will do this. We just need to keep our eye on the ball.
Speyside Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2015
Posts: 13,106
He was not talking about antibody heard immunity. He was talking about T cell heard immunity. These are entirely different from each other. People who survived the Spanish flu were found to have T cell immunity as long as 80 years later.
teedubbya Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Agreed Spey. What’s your take on the distinction in this instance.

By the way I’m completely for being transparent on information and data. That would be a refreshing change from what we’ve experienced throughout this pandemic. We’ve been experiencing the opposite.
tailgater Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
tail said to TW: "Meanwhile, I have never called you wrong."

...the way you insult everybody, including TW, who disagrees with you is how you show people you're calling them wrong...


?


Nope. Not this time.
Read the posts. You and I can't understand like he does. The others are wrong. And he can't say why. Only that he's close to it. Insulting? I hope so. But only for shining the light of day.
You want to hook your wagon to that train, I won't stop you.
tailgater Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
delta1 wrote:
nope...

Sweden tried...and failed...at what cost?

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-prageru-sweden-herd-immunit/fact-check-sweden-has-not-achieved-herd-immunity-is-not-proof-that-lockdowns-are-useless-idUSKBN28C2R7



individuals who choose to exercise their freedoms can get sick and infect and possibly kill others, especially if they live with, or in close proximity to, others...


Sweden has better numbers than NY State.
Better than many in Europe.
Worse than other Scandinavian states, but the way people responded to their approach would leave one to speculate they'd be much worse off by now.
tailgater Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185

If you read the WSJ opinion piece, and if you listen to the John Hopkins doctor speak on the subject, it's refreshing.
In a seeming contradiction, this same doctor was among the first to push in favor of masks.
He was an early voice calling for stricter measures to contain the virus.
Now he's viewing the data and explaining how the vaccine and natural immunity are working together to achieve the herd immunity we all are anxious for.


There are thousands of models on how this virus could have progressed.
Nobody knew which one(s) would be the most accurate.
Anyone could pick the models that fit best after the fact.
Fauci could have used those many times over the past year.


MACS Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
tailgater wrote:
Nope. Not this time.
Read the posts. You and I can't understand like he does. The others are wrong. And he can't say why. Only that he's close to it. Insulting? I hope so. But only for shining the light of day.
You want to hook your wagon to that train, I won't stop you.


It's the Cbid proximity rule, bruh.
Mr. Jones Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2005
Posts: 19,419
Wellllll....

Here's my TWO CENTS....


I'M PRETTY SURE I HAD COVID IN MID DECEMBER OF 2020 TILL Jan./Feb. 2021... It was a brutal cough, tiredness,
Low grade fever for 4-6 weeks, my stomach muscles hurt so bad from coughing at night I could barely get out of bed...

Then I took amoxicillin for 10-14 days and it was all better...
Since then, I have been OUT IN THE PUBLIC ALMOST EVERY FREAKIN DAY...all thru this lockdown B.S...
I have been digging in trash cans almost non-stop since
May 2020 till today 2-24-21 with no gloves, but plenty of anti bacterial wipes and hand gel...I have not lived in a bubble,
I have been in contact with hundreds of people everyday almost...I don't do "curbside" or "CONTACTLESS"
Anything, I eat out at least 2-4 times a week since August 2020, I did flea markets all summer and fall of 2020,
I shopped for my own food, bought my own beer, went thrifting almost every other day...banks, gas stations, bars
You name it, I went in person all the time...

If you took my blood and tested it...I bet you'd find some
Really SUPER ASS ANTIBODIES FOR COVID-19 BIGTIME...you could
PROLLY make a vaccine outta my blood I bet...

These people who holed up for 12 months were idiots if you ask me...
izonfire Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
Mr. Jones wrote:
Wellllll....

Here's my TWO CENTS....


I'M PRETTY SURE I HAD COVID IN MID DECEMBER OF 2020 TILL Jan./Feb. 2021... It was a brutal cough, tiredness,
Low grade fever for 4-6 weeks, my stomach muscles hurt so bad from coughing at night I could barely get out of bed...

Then I took amoxicillin for 10-14 days and it was all better...
Since then, I have been OUT IN THE PUBLIC ALMOST EVERY FREAKIN DAY...all thru this lockdown B.S...
I have been digging in trash cans almost non-stop since
May 2020 till today 2-24-21 with no gloves, but plenty of anti bacterial wipes and hand gel...I have not lived in a bubble,
I have been in contact with hundreds of people everyday almost...I don't do "curbside" or "CONTACTLESS"
Anything, I eat out at least 2-4 times a week since August 2020, I did flea markets all summer and fall of 2020,
I shopped for my own food, bought my own beer, went thrifting almost every other day...banks, gas stations, bars
You name it, I went in person all the time...

If you took my blood and tested it...I bet you'd find some
Really SUPER ASS ANTIBODIES FOR COVID-19 BIGTIME...you could
PROLLY make a vaccine outta my blood I bet...

These people who holed up for 12 months were idiots if you ask me...

You sound like one hell of a super-spreader...
BuckyB93 Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,165
He's got tiger blood, man. Adonis DNA. Dying's for fools, dying's for amateurs.
teedubbya Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I would encourage folks to read the thread. Pay attention to who said what when and draw your own conclusions.

My post #15 was in reference to post 13 that I don’t buy immunity by April and made fun of MACS with a deek joke for good measure. It wasn’t just to disagree with someone who hadn’t posted in the thread yet and chose to quote me later. The MACS part was just a cheap shot. I don’t really believe he sucks deek or eats donkey turds.

I took post 60 as calling me wrong and and accusing me of using late inning hindsight when I didn’t. I guess the “You keep saying things like that and you might even convince yourself.” through me off. I took it as calling me wrong and disagreeing. Forgive me if the quote is not exact I don’t want to bother to find it and make it exact. If it wasn’t calling me wrong then so be it.

I’ve been intimately involved with the modeling all along and watched things develop real time. There is no late inning picking and choosing going on. That’s made up nonsense. Just watching decision points and developments and remodeling accordingly. It’s how it works. Some models have been more accurate or precise than others but this has been a textbook pandemic for the type of virus believe it or not. That has different meaning than some apply to it but oh well I can’t help that. We all have our level of understanding.

Meh if anyone wants to believe my take on the virus somehow hinges on an individual in here rather than my profession and what I’ve been working on every day, and I just want to disagree with them even though I weighed in first, and for some reason I’m just lying and don’t know what I’m talking about so be it. I guess you’ve got me. I’ve been exposed.

But read the whole thing objectively and I doubt that’s where you land.

It’s really silly, and I won’t be goaded into a stupid argument at that level.

I hope we have immunity by April. I would love to be wrong.
tonygraz Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,231
I thought what you originally said about MACS was true.
izonfire Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 12-09-2013
Posts: 8,644
teedubbya wrote:
...........................................The MACS part was just a cheap shot. I don’t really believe he sucks deek or eats donkey turds.
.............................................

And now that recognition makes me sad.
Like Tony, I believed in you.

Now I don't know what to think...
teedubbya Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Well I lied. It’s for you to figure out when and why.
tonygraz Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,231
Any info on the new variant they found in Cal and NY ?
HockeyDad Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,120
At least we eradicated the flu this year.
HockeyDad Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,120
tonygraz wrote:
Any info on the new variant they found in Cal and NY ?


The California variant is just awful. It’s vegan, it’s receptors are shaped like man buns, and it is woke and all about raising awareness.
teedubbya Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It’s been named 2021-mAcS but will soon be changed to MACS-21 and everyone will have to remain in their houses to avoid him. Luckily he will be the only one required to wear a mask and for that we are all grateful.
delta1 Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 11-23-2011
Posts: 28,778
ok...think you are lying now....

why? cuz MACS said you are doopid and he wants to keel you
frankj1 Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
HockeyDad wrote:
The California variant is just awful. It’s vegan, it’s receptors are shaped like man buns, and it is woke and all about raising awareness.

oh how I wish I thought of this...
teedubbya Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Just pretend that you did and proclaim victory lol. Gaslighting is in vogue.
RobertHively Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,817
HockeyDad wrote:
The California variant is just awful. It’s vegan, it’s receptors are shaped like man buns, and it is woke and all about raising awareness.


Lol! Now even I'm worried.
frankj1 Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,215
RobertHively wrote:
Lol! Now even I'm worried.

Huh. Given a choice of cbid Libertarians, I would have figure rayr for the man bun
MACS Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Huh... seems I missed a few of you fockers making jokes at my expense. I'd have shown up sooner to express my outrage, but then I'd be lying, too. Applause
tonygraz Offline
#99 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,231
At least we didn't make fun of your dog.
RobertHively Offline
#100 Posted:
Joined: 01-14-2015
Posts: 1,817
frankj1 wrote:
Huh. Given a choice of cbid Libertarians, I would have figure rayr for the man bun


No man bun here, but HD's report on the California variant is discouraging.

I'm worried about the California "progressive" plague spreading to the rest of the United States.

The FOGS got the Covid-19 worry covered.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages<123456>