America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 2 years ago by ZRX1200. 12 replies replies.
Milley defends his calls to Chinese
rfenst Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,096
Some in Congress accuse general of overstepping duties

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The top U.S. military officer on Wednesday defended the phone calls he made to his Chinese counterpart in the turbulent final months of Donald Trump’s presidency, saying the conversations were intended to convey “reassurance” to the Chinese military and were in line with his responsibilities as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Some in Congress accused Gen. Mark Milley of having overstepped his authority and urged President Joe Biden to fire him, but Biden indicated Wednesday he stands behind Milley.

“I have great confidence in Gen. Milley,” Biden said when asked by a reporter whether Milley had done the right thing.
In a written statement, Milley’s spokesman, Col. Dave Butler, said Milley acted within his authority as the most senior uniformed adviser to the president and to the secretary of defense.

“His calls with the Chinese and others in October and January were in keeping with these duties and responsibilities conveying reassurance in order to maintain strategic stability,” Butler said. “All calls from the chairman to his counterparts, including those reported, are staffed, coordinated and communicated with the Department of Defense and the interagency.”


The Milley phone calls were described in excerpts from the forthcoming book “Peril” by Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Robert Costa. The book says Milley told Gen. Li Zuocheng of the People’s Liberation Army that he would warn his counterpart in the event of a U.S. attack.

Milley was appointed chairman of the Joint Chiefs in 2019 by Trump and kept on by Biden. In that position Milley does not command any troops but rather is an adviser to the president and to the secretary of defense. John Kirby, spokesman for Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, said Austin has “complete and utter trust and confidence in Gen. Milley.”

The book by Woodward and Costa reported that Milley, fearful of Trump’s actions in his final weeks as president, twice called his Chinese counterpart to assure him that the United States was not going to attack China. One call took place on Oct. 30, 2020, four days before the election that Trump lost. The second call was on Jan. 8, 2021, less than two weeks before Biden’s inauguration and just two days after the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol by supporters of Trump.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of the book. Details from the book, which is set to be released next week, were first reported by The Washington Post on Tuesday.

Trump said Milley should be tried for treason if it was true Milley had promised Li that he would warn him in the event of a U.S. attack.

“General Li, I want to assure you that the American government is stable and everything is going to be okay,” Milley told him in the first call, according to the book. “We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.”
“If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise,” Milley reportedly said.

In his statement Wednesday, Milley’s spokesman did not directly address this aspect of the call but said Milley regularly communicates with his counterparts across the globe, including in China and Russia, to reduce tensions, provide clarity and avoid “unintended consequences or conflict.”

Milley spoke with a number of other military leaders around the world after the Jan. 6 riot, including from the United Kingdom, Russia and Pakistan. A readout of those calls in January referred to “several” other counterparts that he spoke to with similar messages of reassurance that the U.S. government was strong and in control.

The second call was meant to placate Chinese fears about the events of Jan. 6. But the book reports that Li wasn’t as easily assuaged, even after Milley promised him: “We are 100 percent steady. Everything’s fine. But democracy can be sloppy sometimes.”


Trump responded Tuesday with a sharply worded statement dismissing Milley as a “Dumbass” and insisting he never considered attacking China.

Still, he said that if the report was true, “I assume he would be tried for TREASON in that he would have been dealing with his Chinese counterpart behind the President’s back and telling China that he would be giving them notification ‘of an attack.’ Can’t do that!”

Milley believed the president suffered a mental decline after the election, agreeing with a view shared by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in a phone call they had Jan. 8, according to officials. Milley also asked senior officers to swear an “oath” that Milley had to be involved if Trump gave an order to launch nuclear weapons, according to the book.

[b]In the statement Wednesday, Milley’s spokesman said Milley had conferred with the senior officers about nuclear weapons protocols “to remind uniformed leaders in the Pentagon of the long-established and robust procedures in light of media reporting on the subject.” Butler, the spokesman, appeared to be referring to news reports of the Jan. 8 Milley-Pelosi phone call. Butler did not address whether Milley had insisted he be part of the nuclear weapons procedures.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,301
He compromised and insane. He did it to himself and needs to be relived of command and court martialed.

http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part1/chapter5&edition=prelim
rfenst Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,096
DrMaddVibe wrote:
He compromised and insane. He did it to himself and needs to be relived of command and court martialed.

http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part1/chapter5&edition=prelim

That is the new code that takes law in 2022, nevertheless I could not find a criminal law violation in that statute.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,301
rfenst wrote:
That is the new code that takes law in 2022, nevertheless I could not find a criminal law violation in that statute.



No, that's from their webpage and how the Joint Chiefs of Staff are supposed to operate. It does not state "create backchannels" in them. It's actually by the numbers. When in doubt, fall back on your Oath of Enlistment.

His calls would also be recorded, just like the President's. Release the transcripts of them.
MACS Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,584
"would warn his counterpart in the event of a U.S. attack."

That's flat out treason. No other way to describe that. None.
DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,506
Many would pay lots of monies for that info.... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,143
Well…..Trump might have done it.

He did insight a coup.
DrafterX Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,506
I'm pretty sure the protest at da Capitol started before Trump was finished speaking that day... Mellow
MACS Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,584
Brewha wrote:
Well…..Trump might have done it.

He did insight a coup.


You're wrong twice! There was no coup, and he didn't incite one.
ZRX1200 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,473
LMAO!
BuckyB93 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,110
Maybe Brew has some incite that nobody else nose about.
ZRX1200 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,473
Be niece, he’s a fart smeller…..
Users browsing this topic
Guest