America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 2 years ago by bgz. 23 replies replies.
Worse Than Useless...
RayR Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
I know..you were thinking this was going to be exclusively about Joe and Kamala.

CDC Finally Trashes the Phony Baloney PCR Test . . .
Thomas DiLorenzo

Quote:
. . . just as Senile Joe, who is after all a senile old fool, was instructed to order 500 million more to be distributed beginning next week. “Health experts” — the ones who have been lying to you through their teeth 24/7 for the past two years — are reportedly saying that 500 million is not nearly enough.

Here’s the info on the CDC trashing its own PCR test; here’s an article about Senile Joe’s latest last grasp to hang on to totalitarian power.

It’s all about terrorizing a sufficient number of Dumbass Americanus to “justify” another round of vote fraud by mail in November.

Links at https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/cdc-finally-trashes-the-phony-baloney-pcr-test/


Bombshell: CDC No Longer Recognizes the PCR Test As a Valid Method for Detecting “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases”?

In the Course of the Next TWO DAYS the PCR test in the US will be Declared Invalid?

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, December 31, 2021

Quote:
“The PCR is a Process. It does not tell you that you are sick”. Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, … under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients. .Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.

Summary

The PCR Smoking Gun?

As of January 1, 2022, the CDC in a request to the FDA withdraws it’s endorsement of the RT-PCR test.

The CDC acknowledges (with innuendos) that the PCR test does not effectively differentiate between Covid-19 and Seasonal Influenza.

Amply documented and analyzed by numerous scientists, the RT-PCR test does not detect or identify SARS-CoV-2 and its variants.

While the CDC does not officially acknowledge that the RT-PCR test is invalid, it nonetheless calls for it to be withdrawn.

It is worth noting that almost a year ago, in January 2021, the WHO also questioned the validity of the PCR test which it had itself put forth at the very outset of the covid crisis.

If the PCR test is invalid as suggested by the CDC’s statement, the 260 Million so-called “Confirmed Covid-19 Cases” collected and tabulated Worldwide since the outset of the alleged pandemic are meaningless.

There is no Pandemic.

More...

https://www.globalresearch.ca/bombshell-cdc-no-longer-recognizes-the-pcr-test-as-a-valid-method-for-detecting-confirmed-covid-19-cases/5765179
ZRX1200 Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
The Gold Standard!
Palama Online
#3 Posted:
Joined: 02-05-2013
Posts: 23,627
I thought this thread was gonna be about Celtic. Gonz
ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
The only test he can light up is a breathalyzer.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,650
I just watched a documentary about beavers. It was the best dam show I ever saw
rfenst Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Fact check: CDC is withdrawing its PCR COVID-19 test, but not because it confuses viruses

USA TODAY

The claim: CDC withdraws use of PCR test, admits it can't distinguish between flu and COVID-19
A widely shared claim on social media has brought the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's decision to retire its PCR test for COVID-19 back into the spotlight.

"CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus," reads the screenshot of a Gateway Pundit headline posted on Instagram on Dec. 29.

The Gateway Pundit article, posted the same day, refers to the CDC's decision in July to withdraw the PCR test in 2022 that the agency created. The screenshot was liked more than 1,000 times in less than 24 hours. Other posts also received hundreds of likes in just a few hours.

But the claim badly mangles the facts.

The CDC's PCR test will be removed from the list of tests under emergency use authorization because the demand for it has decreased with the authorization of other diagnostic tests – not because it confuses viruses. Experts say the test would not show false positives for COVID-19 if the person only had the flu.

USA TODAY reached out to the user who posted the claim and to Gateway Pundit for comment.

CDC's PCR test does not confuse COVID-19 and flu
The Gateway Pundit article claims the CDC admitted the soon-to-be-retired PCR test "can not differentiate between the flu and COVID virus."

It claimed flu cases were so low in 2020, then, because the test was counting flu cases as COVID-19. But that's nonsense. Gateway Pundit was misunderstanding the use of the term differentiate.

In an August news release, the CDC wrote the PCR test was specifically designed only to detect the viral genetic material of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 – not influenza, which causes the flu.

"It does not detect influenza or differentiate between influenza and SARS-CoV-2," the website states.

In other words, it's not that the test can't tell the two apart, it's that the test was designed only to detect COVID-19. The CDC spelled this one by noting someone with the flu would not create a false positive for COVID-19 with this test.

Experts told USA TODAY in July it's "technically impossible" for the CDC's PCR test to confuse SARS-CoV-2 and the influenza virus.

PCR tests identify and amplify converted viral RNA until the virus's genetic makeup can be detected and analyzed.

In this case, since the CDC's PCR test was made to only identify SARS-Cov-2, it cannot detect or confuse the genetic sequences of another virus such as influenza, according to Dr. Petros Giannikopoulos, medical director of the Innovative Genomics Institute’s COVID-19 testing consortium.

CDC withdrawing PCR test to focus on other goals
On July 21, the CDC announced it would withdraw the request for an emergency use authorization for the agency-developed PCR test after Dec. 31.

The test will be removed because the Food and Drug Administration, which is in charge of approving the use of medical devices and vaccines, has authorized "hundreds" of other COVID-specific tests similar to the CDC's, the agency said in an Aug. 2 clarification after the announcement sparked confusion.

"CDC began distributing the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel to fill a gap," the release said. "The wide availability of other SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests means that the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel is no longer filling an unmet need."

The discontinuation, which only applies to the CDC-manufactured test and not other diagnostic tests authorized for use by the FDA, would also let the CDC "focus its resources on public health surveillance testing and other response activities," according to the release.

Jasmine Reed, a CDC spokeswoman, told USA TODAY in July the agency also wanted to encourage laboratories to start using tests that can detect the influenza virus and COVID-19 in the same swab to conserve time and resources.

The CDC has its own test that can detect and differentiate COVID-19 and the influenza A and B viruses. That test is not being withdrawn.

USA TODAY reached out to the CDC for comment.

Our rating: False
Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that the CDC withdrew the use of its PCR test and admitted it can't distinguish between the flu and COVID-19. The CDC is withdrawing the test, but it has nothing to do with the flu. The agency-created PCR test simply isn't needed because hundreds of tests from private companies have addressed this need and been approved by the FDA. The CDC test properly showed positive results only for COVID-19; a person with the flu could not test positive for COVID-19 using the CDC test, experts say.


Our fact-check sources:
The Gateway Pundit, Dec. 29, Huge. CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flue and COVID Virus
CDC, July 21, Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing
CDC, Aug. 2, Lab Alert: Clarifications about the Retirement of the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCov) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
USA TODAY, July 29, Fact check: CDC test doesn't conflate COVID-19 virus with influenza
CDC, Oct. 6, Multiplex Assay for Flu & SARS-CoV-2
Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/12/30/fact-check-cdcs-pcr-test-withdrawn-after-dec-31/9053100002/
Speyside2 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,360
Robert, you trust USA TODAY over Gateway Pundit? That is a stretch.
RayR Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
Let's see, CDC says:

"CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses."

Regime toilet paper article in USA TODAY says, they didn't really mean that?

I interpret their words differently because of the way those words are arranged and stuff to mean "We've been caught by scientists not on the regime payroll, our PCR test really sucked, so we recommend that youuz guys switch the less sucky FDA tests"

Whatever works...COVID Inc. needs to keep the money flowing
rfenst Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,255
Speyside2 wrote:
Robert, you trust USA TODAY over Gateway Pundit? That is a stretch.

I don't use USA Today, except for an occasional quick check up/update.
RMAN4443 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 09-29-2016
Posts: 7,683
Sunoverbeach wrote:
I just watched a documentary about beavers. It was the best dam show I ever saw

watching Porn again??...and I did saw what you did thereApplause
MACS Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
Sunoverbeach wrote:
I just watched a documentary about beavers. It was the best dam show I ever saw


RMAN4443 wrote:
watching Porn again??...and I did saw what you did thereApplause


No... that one would have been something like this...

I just watched a documentary about beavers. It was the best clam show I ever saw!

wheel,,,
KingoftheCove Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-08-2011
Posts: 7,631
MACS wrote:
No... that one would have been something like this...

I just watched a documentary about beavers. It was the best clam show I ever saw!

wheel,,,

Heh heh..
RIP Wheel...
Dg west deptford Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 05-25-2019
Posts: 2,836
I always thought testing for virus DNA was stupid.

Why not test for antibodies instead?

Showing a test result that may or may not prove that you have or don't have the virus at any given moment tells you less than nothing.

But I guess dummies like throwing money away on worse than useless tests.

Follow the money because the "science" doesn't follow the science
RayR Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
Flawed testing procedures are about jacking up the number of cases so the dictators can scare the proles and make it easier to impose their draconian mandates and plunder them.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,650
Don't worry if you miss a gym session. Everything will work out
deadeyedick Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 03-13-2003
Posts: 17,075
It's amazing how much exercise and extra fries sound alike.
MACS Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 02-26-2004
Posts: 79,747
I'm so good at sleeping that I do it with my eyes closed.
tonygraz Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,231
Dg west deptford wrote:
I always thought testing for virus DNA was stupid....


Only because your's is not human.
ZRX1200 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
Tony doesn’t believe in evolution.
tonygraz Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,231
I've seen some of you guys.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,650
I used to work in a shoe recycling shop. It was sole destroying
ZRX1200 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,582
That’s lower than my bunions.

And Tony’s old man balls.
bgz Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 07-29-2014
Posts: 13,023
ZRX1200 wrote:
That’s lower than my bunions.

And Tony’s old man balls.


So it's between your bunions, and Tony's balls?

Man... TMI!!!! TMFI!!!!!!
Users browsing this topic
Guest