America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 2 years ago by Sunoverbeach. 21 replies replies.
Alert-Liberal Supreme Court Justices Have the Democrat Cancer
zitotczito Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 08-21-2006
Posts: 6,441
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/liberal-supreme-court-justices-spread-covid-19-misinformation

Liberal Supreme Court justices spread COVID-19 misinformation
by Kaylee McGhee White, Commentary Writer | | January 07, 2022 02:18 PM

"Justices Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor confirmed during Friday’s oral arguments that they are firmly in favor of President Joe Biden’s private sector vaccine mandate. However, the facts they relied upon to make their case were flat-out wrong.

Kagan began by claiming “the best way” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 is “for people to get vaccinated,” and the “second best way” is to “wear masks.” Neither claim is true. While the vaccines appear to slow the spread of COVID-19 and reduce the chance of death, there is absolutely no evidence that they prevent transmission, especially not against the much more contagious omicron variant.

The cloth masks mandated in different parts of the country don’t prevent the spread of the virus either, as several public health experts have recently admitted.

"Cloth masks aren't going to provide a lot of protection. That's the bottom line. This is an airborne illness. We now understand that, and a cloth mask is not going to protect you from a virus that spreads through airborne transmission. It could protect better through droplet transmission, something like the flu, but not something like this coronavirus," the Food and Drug Administration’s former Commissioner Scott Gottlieb said last week.


Breyer continued to spread misinformation by falsely claiming that 750 million people — there are only 330 million people living in the United States — tested positive for COVID-19 on Thursday. That would mean every single one of us tested positive for COVID-19 on Thursday twice.

Breyer then implied, like Kagan before him, that Biden’s vaccine mandate would bring the number of daily cases down to zero. Again, this is not true. Fully vaccinated and boosted adults are testing positive for COVID-19 at about the same rate as unvaccinated people, which means everyone is going to get the virus one way or the other, vaccinated or unvaccinated. Data show unvaccinated people are more likely to suffer worse outcomes than those who are vaccinated if all other factors are equal.

But the worst falsehoods by far came from Sotomayor, who claimed the omicron variant is just as deadly as the delta variant and that more than 100,000 children have been hospitalized by COVID-19, with “many” on ventilators.

Where in the world is Sotomayor getting her news? Every single public health expert who has weighed in on this virus has acknowledged that omicron is far less severe than delta was, even though omicron is more contagious.

Regarding her claim about children, I have absolutely no idea where she’s getting that 100,000 figure. The current national pediatric COVID-19 census from the Department of Health and Human Services shows 3,342 children with COVID-19 in hospitals. And, as Anthony Fauci admitted last week, there is a huge difference between children hospitalized by COVID-19 and those hospitalized with COVID-19. The vast majority of pediatric cases are from children hospitalized with COVID-19, meaning they were hospitalized by something else first and happened to test positive at about that same time.

"If you look at the children [who] are hospitalized, many of them are hospitalized with COVID as opposed to because of COVID," Fauci said last week. "What we mean by that is that if a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID, and they get counted as a COVID-hospitalized individual, when in fact, they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or something like that."

It is impossible to take seriously the arguments from people who can’t be bothered to get their facts straight first. That especially applies to Supreme Court justices, who are charged with making important legal decisions that affect every single one of us. Kagan, Breyer, and Sotomayor proved on Friday that they either don’t care about the facts or they just don’t care to be taken seriously."

********

It is very clear that Kagan, Breyer, and Sotomayor have the Democrat cancer. The cancer has caused them to become halfwitted. Education and reasoning mean nothing once you get the Democrat cancer.
drglnc Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 04-01-2019
Posts: 706
A lot of people are saying they got this information from the very smart, very stable genius that teach at Trump University. I’ve heard they graduated CUMloud or at least that’s what I heard.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,647
Why can't you hear a pterodactyl go to the bathroom?
The pee is silent
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,535
Mellow
frankj1 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,211
DrafterX wrote:
Mellow

you missed nothing...

ready to get back to work?
Speyside2 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,358
I don't know, SCOTUS may be a bit much for yous guys. Maybe a strategy session or three with Jonsey?
ZRX1200 Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,580
They’re robots.
Sunoverbeach Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,647
Why don't crabs donate?
'Cause they're shellfish
RayR Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
These progtard judges should be arrested for legal malpractice and impersonating medical quacks.
RayR Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
It's “in the public interest.”! fog
Authoritarian talk by another Supreme Court Judge.


Stephen Breyer is Corrupt

by Thomas DiLorenzo

Quote:
It was reported yesterday that during oral arguments before the supreme court Justice Stephen Breyer said that it is inconceivable that blocking Biden’s vaccine mandate for private employers is “in the public interest.”

First of all, there is no such thing as “the public interest.” There are some 330 million people in the U.S. and we all have our interests. This is especially true regarding the “vaccine” mandate since everyone knows that there are millions of members of the public who oppose it. That’s why the issue is before the court.

Breyer knows this. He knows there are tradeoffs here, but speaks as though there are not, and that allowing the mandate will benefit every single American — the “public.” Such talk is the language of Rousseau, the intellectual godfather of communism, who claimed that there exists some mysterious “general will” that only a select few understand, and because of that understanding they are somehow empowered to use whatever force, coercion, and violence that they can muster to impose that “general will” on all of society.

More...

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/stephen-breyer-is-corrupt/
Sunoverbeach Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,647
How do you organize a space themed party?
You planet
RayR Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
More Supreme Court Quackery...


Supreme Court justices make puzzling claims about COVID stats in challenges to vaccine mandates
Justice Sotomayor wildly overstates child hospitalizations with COVID. Justice Breyer claim about unvaccinated hospitalizations appears to be pre-Omicron.


Justice Sotomayor wildly overstates child hospitalizations with COVID. Justice Breyer claim about unvaccinated hospitalizations appears to be pre-Omicron.

Quote:
President Biden's assertion that COVID-19 remains a "pandemic of the unvaccinated" may be challenged by ongoing global research, but not by certain members of the U.S. Supreme Court.

In oral arguments Friday, liberal justices made questionable and unchallenged factual assertions to defend the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) healthcare worker vaccine mandate.

The National Federation of Independent Businesses and Ohio are seeking a halt to the Jan. 10 enforcement deadline given by OSHA, while Missouri and Louisiana want the high court to keep in place injunctions against CMS by trial courts.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor repeatedly denied the OSHA mandate was a "mandate" because of the test option, but her claim that 100,000 children were in "serious condition" with COVID — more than the total number hospitalized since August — drew particular bafflement.

More...

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/supreme-court-justices-make-puzzling-claims-about-covid-stats-challenges
Speyside2 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,358
I never thought we would see it, but whump there it is. SCOTUS is now political.
HockeyDad Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,119
Speyside2 wrote:
I never thought we would see it, but whump there it is. SCOTUS is now political.



Now it is political? I thought one of the big topics this year is to pack the Supreme Court with Democrats.
RayR Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
When hasn't the SCOTUS been political? Judicial tyrants have always emerged, not judging the actions of the other branches by the constitution, instead swayed by party and principles contrary to their oath to defend the constitution.
That's right HD, the very idea of packing the Supreme Court with Democrats was blatantly a political coup attempt itself.

Thomas Jefferson on Judicial Tyranny
By: Tenth Amendment|Published on: Jun 4, 2012

Quote:
Thomas Jefferson, a stanch advocate of decentralized power, recognized that a federal government empowered to judge the extent of its own authority was one that would never remain limited in size or scope. Because of this, the power of the federal judiciary was always of great concern to him. The following is a small, but representative, sample of a number of Jefferson’s views on the power of the judicial branch of the federal government.

He said judicial tyranny made the Constitution “a thing of wax.”

If [as the Federalists say] “the judiciary is the last resort in relation to the other departments of the government,” … , then indeed is our Constitution a complete felo de so. … The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they may please. It should be remembered, as an axiom of eternal truth in politics, that whatever power in any government is independent, is absolute also; in theory only, at first, while the spirit of the people is up, but in practice, as fast as that relaxes. Independence can be trusted nowhere but with the people in mass. They are inherently independent of all but moral law … — Letter to Judge Spencer Roane, Nov. 1819

Jefferson was plainly alarmed by the possibility of judicial tyranny.

You seem to consider the judges the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges … and their power [are] the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and are not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves … . When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally, they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The exemption of the judges from that is quite dangerous enough. I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people themselves. …. — Letter to Mr. Jarvis, Sept, 1820

More...

https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/06/04/thomas-jefferson-on-judicial-tyranny/
rfenst Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,251
Speyside2 wrote:
I never thought we would see it, but whump there it is. SCOTUS is now political.
the Supreme SCOTUS has always been "political."

(Oral argument is merely the very first time the Justices get together on the case primarily to listen to the lawyers' arguments- after each Justice has prepared separately in advance (hopefully) in his/her own manner. It's just an introductory conversation. That's all. The work (maybe 95%) takes place behind the scenes.)
Speyside2 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,358
Picking a Supreme Court Justice is a lot like crossing a river...
It all comes down to Roe v Wade
Sunoverbeach Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,647
Why did the invisible man turn down a job?
He couldn't see himself doing it
Speyside2 Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,358
Not like this Robert. SCOTUS should not vote based on conservative bull**** or liberal bull****.
RayR Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 07-20-2020
Posts: 8,881
Speyside2 wrote:
Not like this Robert. SCOTUS should not vote based on conservative bull**** or liberal bull****.


But they do, don't they?
Which is why Jefferson was spot on, they cannot be and should not be the "ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions"
Sunoverbeach Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2017
Posts: 14,647
Did you hear about the restaurant on the moon?
Great food. No atmosphere
Users browsing this topic
Guest