America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 5 hours ago by Speyside2. 1174 replies replies.
24 Pages«<456789101112>»
Electric vehicles - what does the future hold?
frankj1 Offline
#351 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,221
HockeyDad wrote:
When you purchase special green energy contracts to lower your greenhouse gas emissions, they actually run special power lines that are colored green to your property. Next time you are looking at power lines you’ll prolly spot them!

Huh!
All this time I thought those were Eruv lines...

oh well, more sinning on my permanent record.
Stogie1020 Offline
#352 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,317
Thanks Frank, appreciate the link. I think that was one of the articles I saw. Seems like the power company is committing to more hydro to source their electricity, and the developer is committing to only using electricity for all physical plant. Not sure that equates to exactly what the press releases say, but I guess they can say whatever they want.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#353 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Brewha wrote:
Then there is the maintenance advantage.

With a gas car you get to take time out and pay for:
Oil changes
Tune ups
Air filter changes
Radiator flush
Transmission service
Stopping at the ga$ stations
Serpentine belt replacements
and so on...


In a battery electric, you got:
Tires
Wiper blades
Wiper fluid
Blinker fluid (BMW only)


Wow...that's gotta be great selling points for millennials. Too bad it doesn't come with a soy latte dispenser instead of fart noises. They'd all pile in for those! Another great feature for EVs would've been an EVdollar! You know, to rival the devaluation of the Petrodollar which will in turn crater the US dollar and our purchase power with it. Which our current President did all by himself.

While we're talking about dollars, you love to go on about paying only 20 cents to the dollar. The current energy costs are rising 15.8% nationwide with no end in sight due to the current administration and states like California outlawing ICE's..If you were to buy a $25,000 ICE auto and saved $20K, that $20K would pay for almost 5000 gallons of gas. Even at $4.00 a gallon and if your MPG were over 25 MPG...that's close to 140K miles. You come off like a real trend follower and want to bleed cutting edge but your forgetting Tesla batteries are over 20K to replace. At least that's the cost right now and purchasing new (because who wants a refurb riight?). According to what I can find Tesla is claiming their batteries (sucks to be the other manufacturers!) will last 300,000 to 500,000 miles, or 1,500 battery cycles! That's incredible. Really is, sounds too good to be true. We all know if something is too good to be true..well you know. That's provided you're only driving the car 40 miles a day which in my world...just isn't a possibility and one would really be drinking the kool-aid with 2 straws to go all-in with that perfect scenario! I firmly believe that with those numbers it isn't for most either. Given that I keep my vehicles around for more than 10 years already the math really isn't working out. Why gas would have to climb over $20.00 a gallon in order to make an EV worth it. Never mind the reality that it won't haul 15/20 bales of hay and bags of feed much less pull a 30' 3 horse slant with living quarters trailer! If gasoline goes up that much, the horse is sounding like the viable winner.
Brewha Offline
#354 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Wow...that's gotta be great selling points for millennials. Too bad it doesn't come with a soy latte dispenser instead of fart noises. They'd all pile in for those! Another great feature for EVs would've been an EVdollar! You know, to rival the devaluation of the Petrodollar which will in turn crater the US dollar and our purchase power with it. Which our current President did all by himself.

While we're talking about dollars, you love to go on about paying only 20 cents to the dollar. The current energy costs are rising 15.8% nationwide with no end in sight due to the current administration and states like California outlawing ICE's..If you were to buy a $25,000 ICE auto and saved $20K, that $20K would pay for almost 5000 gallons of gas. Even at $4.00 a gallon and if your MPG were over 25 MPG...that's close to 140K miles. You come off like a real trend follower and want to bleed cutting edge but your forgetting Tesla batteries are over 20K to replace. At least that's the cost right now and purchasing new (because who wants a refurb riight?). According to what I can find Tesla is claiming their batteries (sucks to be the other manufacturers!) will last 300,000 to 500,000 miles, or 1,500 battery cycles! That's incredible. Really is, sounds too good to be true. We all know if something is too good to be true..well you know. That's provided you're only driving the car 40 miles a day which in my world...just isn't a possibility and one would really be drinking the kool-aid with 2 straws to go all-in with that perfect scenario! I firmly believe that with those numbers it isn't for most either. Given that I keep my vehicles around for more than 10 years already the math really isn't working out. Why gas would have to climb over $20.00 a gallon in order to make an EV worth it. Never mind the reality that it won't haul 15/20 bales of hay and bags of feed much less pull a 30' 3 horse slant with living quarters trailer! If gasoline goes up that much, the horse is sounding like the viable winner.

Actually, saying you would rather ride a horse than drive an EV's really suits you. Maybe you could get a bumper sticker.
Nah - the horse wouldn't like that...

So an EV does not meet you needs - fine.
You don't want to own one - kewl.
You don't believe the economy or longevity numbers - groovy.

So what is your ax to grind? Sounds like you don't even have a dog in this fight - so why do you care?
Are you a Social Justice Warrior?
Protecting us from the rampant evils of twenty first century technology.....
DrMaddVibe Offline
#355 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Brewha wrote:
Actually, saying you would rather ride a horse than drive an EV's really suits you. Maybe you could get a bumper sticker.
Nah - the horse wouldn't like that...

So an EV does not meet you needs - fine.
You don't want to own one - kewl.
You don't believe the economy or longevity numbers - groovy.

So what is your ax to grind? Sounds like you don't even have a dog in this fight - so why do you care?
Are you a Social Justice Warrior?
Protecting us from the rampant evils of twenty first century technology.....



No "axe" to grind at all. It's a scam being perpetuated upon the American taxpayer. If you cannot see that then you're worse off than I ever imagined. You can be all proud of your new purchase, but just like the jabs you were lock stepped with the Covid mandates. Government forcing anything upon anyone is Tyranny. They don't make good decisions. Look, you don't like it when I post articles and you don't like it when I post from the hip...I'm not following some trendy shiny new thing like you did.

YOU are the SJW. Look at the thread title. Its not called "Brewha's Magical Farting Mobile". You were bought in with Covid and now with EV. I'm not protecting anyone from anything. Just like Covid, common sense should kick in. At least one would like to believe. Not with you though. Masks, jabs, and now buy an electric car. American auto manufacturer's tried like hell to adhere with new CAFE standards but DC kept moving the goalposts at both ends. One could make a case for killing off the Auto manufacturing industry as a whole. Seriously, how much skilled labor is going into Tesla? It's almost all computer aided assembly vs say the Big 3. Once you kill off the "golden goose" you don't get to just walk away and go "Well, we tried though".
Stogie1020 Offline
#356 Posted:
Joined: 12-19-2019
Posts: 5,317
DMV,
Quote:
It's a scam being perpetuated upon the American taxpayer.


case in point: https://www.cigarbid.com...sts/667803/Green-is-Red-
DrMaddVibe Offline
#357 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Stogie1020 wrote:


I became acutely aware of our government picking winners and losers with Solyndra. $535 million in federal loan guarantees and they took the money and ran.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-solyndra-probe-charges/exclusive-criminal-charges-against-solyndra-founder-are-unlikely-sources-idUSBRE96A12H20130711

and


When the government tries to pick winners and losers in the marketplace, like the Obama-Biden administration did in 2009, taxpayers often get to foot the bill.

Critics say that any new infrastructure spending on green energy must have three components:

1. The companies and projects must be vetted and transparent.

2. Funds must be targeted to agreed-upon bipartisan infrastructure objectives unlike in 2009, when Republicans overwhelmingly opposed the legislation.

3. After the funds are spent and the projects built, everything gets an audit.

Otherwise, the only green in the green energy bill will be the taxpayer money down the drain.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/04/12/remembering-solyndra--how-many-570m-green-energy-failures-are-hidden-inside-bidens-instructure-proposal/?sh=5ec8a20e2672
Brewha Offline
#358 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
DrMaddVibe wrote:
No "axe" to grind at all. It's a scam being perpetuated upon the American taxpayer. If you cannot see that then you're worse off than I ever imagined. You can be all proud of your new purchase, but just like the jabs you were lock stepped with the Covid mandates. Government forcing anything upon anyone is Tyranny. They don't make good decisions. Look, you don't like it when I post articles and you don't like it when I post from the hip...I'm not following some trendy shiny new thing like you did.

YOU are the SJW. Look at the thread title. Its not called "Brewha's Magical Farting Mobile". You were bought in with Covid and now with EV. I'm not protecting anyone from anything. Just like Covid, common sense should kick in. At least one would like to believe. Not with you though. Masks, jabs, and now buy an electric car. American auto manufacturer's tried like hell to adhere with new CAFE standards but DC kept moving the goalposts at both ends. One could make a case for killing off the Auto manufacturing industry as a whole. Seriously, how much skilled labor is going into Tesla? It's almost all computer aided assembly vs say the Big 3. Once you kill off the "golden goose" you don't get to just walk away and go "Well, we tried though".


Like Unleaded gas?
Seat belts, or basically any law, right?

All of the US manufactures are investing heavily to compete in the EV sector. And if they don't, or don't make it - good riddance!
Free market baby, Yah!

You really should respect the market, you know.





What is this "common sense" thing you speak of?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#359 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Brewha wrote:
Like Unleaded gas?
Seat belts, or basically any law, right?

All of the US manufactures are investing heavily to compete in the EV sector. And if they don't, or don't make it - good riddance!
Free market baby, Yah!

You really should respect the market, you know.





What is this "common sense" thing you speak of?



Hmmm...I really thought you were intelligent.

You're not. You're a lemming.
Brewha Offline
#360 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Hmmm...I really thought you were intelligent.

You're not. You're a lemming.

Doctor Madd Vibe, you cut me to the quick.

Me in my little Model 3 driving off the cliff of the Green Conspiracy. Along with an ever growing crowd of other EV lemmings. I feel most sorry for the ones in the BMW’s (but that’s a whole nother thread).

Yes - poor us.



I suppose that you cast yourself as a modern day Cassandra.
Things did not go so well for her, you know.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#361 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Brewha wrote:
Doctor Madd Vibe, you cut me to the quick.

Me in my little Model 3 driving off the cliff of the Green Conspiracy. Along with an ever growing crowd of other EV lemmings. I feel most sorry for the ones in the BMW’s (but that’s a whole nother thread).

Yes - poor us.



I suppose that you cast yourself as a modern day Cassandra.
Things did not go so well for her, you know.



Feel free to believe whatever you want in your fantastical government funded farting mobile.
Brewha Offline
#362 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Feel free to believe whatever you want in your fantastical government funded farting mobile.

Your envy is palpable.
tonygraz Offline
#363 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,242
I think the non-doctor is vibrating envy while he drives around in his gas guzzling ice cream truck.
Brewha Offline
#364 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Madagascar syndrome.
Brewha Offline
#365 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
More predictions about the Future of EVs.

The cost will drop. EV’s are a lot simpler to build than ICE cars. Right now, the low production and cost of tooling has them as being typically more expensive than ICE. IN the next years as production increases and competition grows they will get a lot cheaper.

China will beat us for a time. China has a terrible air pollution problem and both a people and government that want/need EV’s. Car companies like BYD, Nio, and Wuling are starting to produce genuinely cost-effective cars sale sale in China. Even Tesla Shanghai is feeling the pressure.

Stores and Apartments will have car charges. Locally stores like Whole Foods and Kohl’s already have chargers for their customers – some are free. Even Top Golf as a charger in the parking lot. And in the higher rent districts today, people favor and apartment with a level 2 hookup – This will spread down the food chain in the coming years.

The cost difference between fueling and EV and an ICE will grow. In the next 10-20 years, as the car population shift to electric, people will buy less gas and the cost of distributing gas will grow. The lower sales mean less profit, so the sales margins will creep up to.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#366 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Think

Boy howdy...if I would've plunked down the luxury rate these cars are going at right now...and they're being discounted hard...might be a bit "disenfranchised"...but hey, with the National Debt soaring...tack this rebate to it.

Those fart sounds make any difference up in the purchase price!!!
Brewha Offline
#367 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Free Market, baby!

Just think of the tax credit as our little slice of large businesses paying zero tax.
Feels better, don't it?
Gene363 Offline
#368 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,810
Do the math and check the geography, Peter Zaihan.

Joe Rogan: “EV’s Are A Disaster". Will Electric Vehicles Be Around For The Long Term?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KFxoNiT51Y
DrMaddVibe Offline
#369 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Brewha wrote:
Free Market, baby!

Just think of the tax credit as our little slice of large businesses paying zero tax.
Feels better, don't it?



Not only did you vote for this but now you're bragging about getting took on your fantastical fart mobile?

Only you.

DrMaddVibe Offline
#370 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Gene363 wrote:
Do the math and check the geography, Peter Zaihan.

Joe Rogan: “EV’s Are A Disaster". Will Electric Vehicles Be Around For The Long Term?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KFxoNiT51Y


I listened to part of it but to be honest I love to watch rather than listen to Joe Rogan. While listening his vocal inflections are awesome. They do a magnificent job with the guests too. Just something though seeing Joe get worked up or excited about that just doesn't translate well to radio.

As we see manufacturers pricing themselves out of marketshare Tesla will remain viable the longest. The last ones to the party will have to give away or be part of some rebate progam. Government tried to use them for public works and it failed. Curious to see how Amazon fares toting around parcel all day with them. I'm not a fan of putting the purchase of a car on the backs of people that don't want one...don't need one and didn't ask for one.

Look at the trendy fanboi, though. This is how he believes a free marketplace operates. Bragging about it with a boisterous braggadocio. Just like the emperor's new clothes...he really sees how magnificent it is...spellbound and refusing to follow common sense. Then again he told us to wear masks because we'll kill grandma...quarantine the unvaccinated and get boosted so...you'd want to believe common sense would override what the government mandates. We'll let this play out and wait until the next WEF talking point rears its ugly head and the same band of followers will carry the buckets for them.
burning_sticks Offline
#371 Posted:
Joined: 08-17-2020
Posts: 152
Brewha wrote:
Free Market, baby!

Just think of the tax credit as our little slice of large businesses paying zero tax.
Feels better, don't it?

You do realize taxes are a business expense don't you? Raising tax on business/corporations just inflates the price of goods.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#372 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
burning_sticks wrote:
You do realize taxes are a business expense don't you? Raising tax on business/corporations just inflates the price of goods.



Shhh
tonygraz Offline
#373 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2008
Posts: 20,242
burning_sticks wrote:
You do realize taxes are a business expense don't you? Raising tax on business/corporations just inflates the price of goods.


We cut business taxes a president ago and I don't see where prices didn't go up.
..
Abrignac Offline
#374 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,268
tonygraz wrote:
We cut business taxes a president ago and I don't see where prices didn't go up.
..


Not a zero sum game Tony. One of the reasons prices went up was the cost of fuel. Fuel is involved in every step from procuring raw materials, through production and all the way to the consumer. When diesel prices spiked it drove up the cost of everything.

And with that you are a COMPLETE idiot if you don’t think corporate taxes are passed on to the consumer. Stock prices ebb and flow on earnings and P&L’s. If taxes go up and revenue doesn’t then margins decrease taking share price down with it. Not only are those taxes passed to the consumer, but they are also inflated so that not only is the tax covered but, so is the margin on the added tax expense.
Brewha Offline
#375 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Gene363 wrote:
Do the math and check the geography, Peter Zaihan.

Joe Rogan: “EV’s Are A Disaster". Will Electric Vehicles Be Around For The Long Term?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KFxoNiT51Y

Peter Zaihan is a “political scientist” who earns a living writing books. What he says in the videos is eloquent, but not particularly accurate or relevant.

He talked about the “technology not being ready”. I will ponder what he means next time I go for a drive….
Brewha Offline
#376 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
burning_sticks wrote:
You do realize taxes are a business expense don't you? Raising tax on business/corporations just inflates the price of goods.

So you are happy people can get an EV tax credit or not so much?

You know what subsidizing goods does mean the companies can make more….
Brewha Offline
#377 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
I have noticed, like in the Zaihan interview, the belief or mis-conception that the population going to EV’s is like flipping a switch. That is could happen in the next few years.

The transition will take decades. Even if you cannot buy and ICE vehicle in California starting in 2035 there will still be ICE cars and trucks everywhere. And you can just get one in another state.

BuckyB93 Offline
#378 Posted:
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,183
So for people who need a car and EVs don't work or are impractical for their situation, your answer is "too franking bad... just buy an ICE car in another state."
Brewha Offline
#379 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
BuckyB93 wrote:
So for people who need a car and EVs don't work or are impractical for their situation, your answer is "just buy an ICE car in another state?"

No. Even in California, 12 years from now, you’ll be able to buy a gas powered car. Plug-in Hybrid Electrics (PHEV). Not to mention used. Realize that this is like phasing out leaded gas. It takes a long time.

Besides, with all the new trucks and cars coming out in the next 12 years it is reasonable to assume that there will be a few for every use case. And if not - I really would expect the law to have exceptions for special use cases.

I remember being told for years that I would have to replace my HVAC. System because Freon would soon not be available. Kinda of a pizzer. But years before push came to shove the unit needed to be replaced anyway. The upshot however was that dispite my b1tching about no Freon, the new unit is way more efficient and saves me a ton of money each month. Kinda like EVs….




But the “you can’t get one here” mandate is nothing new. Here in texas I could not buy a Tesla and had to order it from another state. Texas law does not allow you to buy from a manufacturer - only an independent dealer - to “protect the consumer”. Texas does love it’s irony. Texas was happy to collect the sales tax when I registered it as a new vehicle - what a shocker!
Brewha Offline
#380 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Abrignac wrote:
Not a zero sum game Tony. One of the reasons prices went up was the cost of fuel. Fuel is involved in every step from procuring raw materials, through production and all the way to the consumer. When diesel prices spiked it drove up the cost of everything.

And with that you are a COMPLETE idiot if you don’t think corporate taxes are passed on to the consumer. Stock prices ebb and flow on earnings and P&L’s. If taxes go up and revenue doesn’t then margins decrease taking share price down with it. Not only are those taxes passed to the consumer, but they are also inflated so that not only is the tax covered but, so is the margin on the added tax expense.

But hey - GOOD NEWS - Gas and Oil companies are showing record profits this year!



Just curious, do you think we would be better off if only workers wages were taxed and companies were all tax free?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#381 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Brewha wrote:
But hey - GOOD NEWS - Gas and Oil companies are showing record profits this year!



Just curious, do you think we would be better off if only workers wages were taxed and companies were all tax free?


Oh silly, just because our Clown In Chief wants to cap and stymie production doesn't mean the World isn't going to snap up the supply!!!


5 Reasons Biden’s Electric Vehicles Are A Boondoggle



President Joe Biden touted electric vehicles as the solution to climate change again Tuesday night during his State of the Union address.

President Joe Biden touted electric vehicles as the solution to climate change again Tuesday night during his State of the Union address.

“We’re building 500,000 vehicle charging stations installed across the country by tens of thousands of IBEW workers,” Biden said, “and helping families save more than $1,000 a year with tax credits for the purchase of electric vehicles and energy-efficient appliances.”

Those tax credits, however, aren’t as green as they seem.

EVs Are a Green Illusion

The process to manufacture electric vehicles is so environmentally toxic between the mining and assembly that it takes years of driving before emissions are reduced, according to a deep dive by RealClear Investigations in October.

“The electric car’s biggest disadvantage on greenhouse gas emissions is the production of an EV battery, which requires energy-intensive mining and processing, and generates twice as much carbon emissions as the manufacture of an internal combustion engine,” RealClear reported. “This means that the EV starts off with a bigger carbon footprint than a gasoline-powered car when it rolls off the assembly line and takes time to catch up to a gasoline-powered car.”

Even then, the American power grid used to charge the car still relies primarily on fossil fuels. In other words, the car runs on coal.

Some studies have shown electric vehicles are even worse for the environment than gas-powered vehicles.

[READ: Studies Show The Electric Vehicles Democrats Insist You Buy Are Worse For The Environment And Lower Quality]

EVs Aren’t Cheap

The average transaction price for an electric car in September was $65,291, according to Kelley Blue Book, just $1,000 shy of the average luxury car. According to the U.S. Census Bureau last year, median household income was just below $71,000, meaning an electric vehicle costs a year’s worth of wages for many Americans. Add inflation to the mix, driven by reckless government spending to encourage rich consumers to buy electric cars, and the average American wouldn’t dream of buying a Tesla any time soon.

EV Subsidies Are Gifts to the Rich

The dubiously named Inflation Reduction Act extended up to $7,500 in federal subsidies for the purchase of an electric car. That only brings the price down to $58,000. In August, Ford responded to the new subsidies by raising the price of its electric pickups.

Researchers at UC-Berkeley found in 2016 that “clean” energy tax credits have historically benefitted the upper class, with 90 percent of all credits on electric vehicles enjoyed by those in the top income quintile.

The massive subsidies at the expense of, say, a Wyoming rancher who could use a new pickup don’t even cover what’s needed to develop a market appetite to replace gas-powered vehicles. According to research from the National Bureau of Economic Research in 2021, subsidies would have to reach more than “$30,000 per car” to achieve a 50 percent market share of electric vehicles in 2035.

EVs Are Vulnerable to Global Supply Chains

More problems with electric vehicles pertain to problems with American mining. China holds the world hostage when it comes to mineral refinement and battery production. Beijing presides over half the global electric car battery market while the U.S. lags behind and continues to shut down major mining projects.

EVs Aren’t Reliable

New York and California have both passed laws to ban new gas-powered car sales by 2035. The image below best sums up how drivers will be at the mercy of state regulators to travel once residents are prohibited from buying whatever car they want.

When California was faced with a record-breaking heat wave last summer, state regulators begged residents not to charge their cars to avoid breaking the power grid. The request came days after policymakers moved to ban gas-powered cars over the following 13 years.

If residents can still charge their vehicles produced by China, they had better hope their batteries last. Replacing an electric car battery can cost between $4,000 and $20,000. The weight of the batteries, meanwhile, wears out the tires 20 percent faster than gas-powered alternatives.


Toot toot though!
Brewha Offline
#382 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Oh silly, just because our Clown In Chief wants to cap and stymie production doesn't mean the World isn't going to snap up the supply!!!


5 Reasons Biden’s Electric Vehicles Are A Boondoggle



President Joe Biden touted electric vehicles as the solution to climate change again Tuesday night during his State of the Union address.

President Joe Biden touted electric vehicles as the solution to climate change again Tuesday night during his State of the Union address.

“We’re building 500,000 vehicle charging stations installed across the country by tens of thousands of IBEW workers,” Biden said, “and helping families save more than $1,000 a year with tax credits for the purchase of electric vehicles and energy-efficient appliances.”

Those tax credits, however, aren’t as green as they seem.

EVs Are a Green Illusion

The process to manufacture electric vehicles is so environmentally toxic between the mining and assembly that it takes years of driving before emissions are reduced, according to a deep dive by RealClear Investigations in October.

“The electric car’s biggest disadvantage on greenhouse gas emissions is the production of an EV battery, which requires energy-intensive mining and processing, and generates twice as much carbon emissions as the manufacture of an internal combustion engine,” RealClear reported. “This means that the EV starts off with a bigger carbon footprint than a gasoline-powered car when it rolls off the assembly line and takes time to catch up to a gasoline-powered car.”

Even then, the American power grid used to charge the car still relies primarily on fossil fuels. In other words, the car runs on coal.

Some studies have shown electric vehicles are even worse for the environment than gas-powered vehicles.

[READ: Studies Show The Electric Vehicles Democrats Insist You Buy Are Worse For The Environment And Lower Quality]

EVs Aren’t Cheap

The average transaction price for an electric car in September was $65,291, according to Kelley Blue Book, just $1,000 shy of the average luxury car. According to the U.S. Census Bureau last year, median household income was just below $71,000, meaning an electric vehicle costs a year’s worth of wages for many Americans. Add inflation to the mix, driven by reckless government spending to encourage rich consumers to buy electric cars, and the average American wouldn’t dream of buying a Tesla any time soon.

EV Subsidies Are Gifts to the Rich

The dubiously named Inflation Reduction Act extended up to $7,500 in federal subsidies for the purchase of an electric car. That only brings the price down to $58,000. In August, Ford responded to the new subsidies by raising the price of its electric pickups.

Researchers at UC-Berkeley found in 2016 that “clean” energy tax credits have historically benefitted the upper class, with 90 percent of all credits on electric vehicles enjoyed by those in the top income quintile.

The massive subsidies at the expense of, say, a Wyoming rancher who could use a new pickup don’t even cover what’s needed to develop a market appetite to replace gas-powered vehicles. According to research from the National Bureau of Economic Research in 2021, subsidies would have to reach more than “$30,000 per car” to achieve a 50 percent market share of electric vehicles in 2035.

EVs Are Vulnerable to Global Supply Chains

More problems with electric vehicles pertain to problems with American mining. China holds the world hostage when it comes to mineral refinement and battery production. Beijing presides over half the global electric car battery market while the U.S. lags behind and continues to shut down major mining projects.

EVs Aren’t Reliable

New York and California have both passed laws to ban new gas-powered car sales by 2035. The image below best sums up how drivers will be at the mercy of state regulators to travel once residents are prohibited from buying whatever car they want.

When California was faced with a record-breaking heat wave last summer, state regulators begged residents not to charge their cars to avoid breaking the power grid. The request came days after policymakers moved to ban gas-powered cars over the following 13 years.

If residents can still charge their vehicles produced by China, they had better hope their batteries last. Replacing an electric car battery can cost between $4,000 and $20,000. The weight of the batteries, meanwhile, wears out the tires 20 percent faster than gas-powered alternatives.


Toot toot though!


Even a New York City sewer line would have trouble moving the amount of crap above.

EVs Are a Green Illusion - common myth debunked by the EPA.

EVs Aren’t Cheap - You can buy an new Tesla for $43,490 - $7,500 = $35,990. Average price of a new car is $48,681

EV Subsidies Are Gifts to the Rich - the tax break is only for people making less than $150k a year.

EVs Are Vulnerable to Global Supply Chains - Like all cars and baby formula?

EVs Aren’t Reliable - EV's have less moving parts, need less service and have longer service lives. Or maybe they were just talking about BMW's...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#383 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
That's all based on a sewer called NYC. It took all of 5 minutes to illustrate how horrible your post was.


Brewha wrote:
Even a New York City sewer line would have trouble moving the amount of crap above.


Brewha wrote:
EVs Are a Green Illusion - common myth debunked by the EPA.


https://publicintegrity.org/environment/most-of-the-epas-pollution-estimates-are-unreliable-so-why-is-everyone-still-using-them/

Brewha wrote:
EVs Aren’t Cheap - You can buy an new Tesla for $43,490 - $7,500 = $35,990. Average price of a new car is $48,681


That's the cheap ass version the wannabe trenders hop in because they fooled their wives out of mini-vans! Plus you didn't factor in total costs of the vehicle.

Brewha wrote:
EV Subsidies Are Gifts to the Rich - the tax break is only for people making less than $150k a year.


https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/credits-for-new-electric-vehicles-purchased-in-2022-or-before

Brewha wrote:
EVs Are Vulnerable to Global Supply Chains - Like all cars and baby formula?


All cars do not use the battery components necessary for the EV controlled by the CPC. Baby formula? What a desperate claw that was.

Brewha wrote:
EVs Aren’t Reliable - EV's have less moving parts, need less service and have longer service lives. Or maybe they were just talking about BMW's...


Yes, because according to you the EV...has less moving parts? It still has a power plant it uses as an engine. Another word salad I'm accustomed to reading from the likes of you.
Brewha Offline
#384 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
See, I knew you would just open the sewer again.

So, you can't trust the EPA - I knew that was coming. Took you long enough.

You can't admit that you don't know what EV's cost - go check the price of a Chevy Bolt - I double dog dare yah.

You cannot read tax code - prolly can't trust the IRS either.

All new cars use microchips - do you read the news?

If you would stop to look, electric motors have less part than gas motors - and no transitions. Have you ever seen an electric motor?




Face it D - you just don't like them and are willing to make up sh1t to support your uninformed opinion.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#385 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,407
Brewha wrote:
Face it D - you just don't like them and are willing to make up sh1t to support your uninformed opinion.



If you'd read you'd see that the articles are from people actually working in the area of expertise. That's one of the reasons I post articles. Most of the time the articles are from supposed "experts" and sometimes they're opinion pieces where they've done cursory research. What would they get out of lying? Why would I lie? They can be wrong, and I could be wrong but no pumpkin...not this time.

Like I even put in this thread...at one time I advocated for the US government to out and out buy Tesla to make it a VW (car for the people) for all. I backed off the idea. Changed my mind. Not recently either. You do know that GM had EV's in the late 80's and early 90s? No. Too bad. They did and couldn't get it to marketplace to maintain profits. I was all over GM in the late 80's and early 90s'. I can actually say with 100% accuracy that I had been in each and every General Motors manufacturing, supply and foundries (to include locomotive and tank sites!) as well as testing sites in the North American hemisphere (for you that's Mexico, the US and Canada) and the coveted engineering site in Warren, MI. Been there, done that and hung around guys that I was lucky to have spent time with to share conversations about cars and EV's in general. When you want to come from a "uniformed" opinion stop projecting and looking in your mirror.
Abrignac Offline
#386 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,268
Brewha wrote:
But hey - GOOD NEWS - Gas and Oil companies are showing record profits this year!



Just curious, do you think we would be better off if only workers wages were taxed and companies were all tax free?


An interesting question. In a perfect world I’d say yes. But, such doesn’t exist. The only way I’d agree to that is if all profits had to be distributed in a taxable fashion.

As far as record profits, of course they reported record profits. But, as I stated earlier that’s a shell game. You and your fellow alarmist use that hyperbole to engage in class warfare. Profits ebb and flow. Margins percentages tell the real story. BYW, do you have a 401 k. If so, STFU because you like anyone else who does is benefiting from those record profits. Pot meet kettle.
Brewha Offline
#387 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Abrignac wrote:
An interesting question. In a perfect world I’d say yes. But, such doesn’t exist. The only way I’d agree to that is if all profits had to be distributed in a taxable fashion.

As far as record profits, of course they reported record profits. But, as I stated earlier that’s a shell game. You and your fellow alarmist use that hyperbole to engage in class warfare. Profits ebb and flow. Margins percentages tell the real story. BYW, do you have a 401 k. If so, STFU because you like anyone else who does is benefiting from those record profits. Pot meet kettle.


Saying Oil and Gas companies posted record profits is "alarmist...class warfare"? sounds like you have a bit of an ax to grind.

The struggle of class against class is a political struggle. Telling those who raise concerns about the politics of taxation to STFU is a pretty conservative approach to politics - meaning rude. You want to carry that tax burden for companies - have at it 'ol boy.

Me, I'm here to extol the virtues of the obviously misunderstood new technologies. Not that everyone is going to "get it" any time soon - but sooner or later people will start to figure it out. Politics notwithstanding.
HockeyDad Offline
#388 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Ah yes…the taste of Brewha’s tears.


London (CNN)

BP (BP), Chevron (CVX), ExxonMobil, Shell and Total (TOT)Energies raked in a record $199.3 billion in profits in 2022, benefiting from the surge in oil and gas prices that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

TotalEnergies capped off the historic series of earnings Wednesday when it reported annual profit of $36.2 billion, more than double the previous year’s earnings.

This extraordinary increase in profits has been replicated across the other Western energy giants, and shareholders have been rewarded with enormous windfalls.
Brewha Offline
#389 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
DrMaddVibe wrote:
If you'd read you'd see that the articles are from people actually working in the area of expertise. That's one of the reasons I post articles. Most of the time the articles are from supposed "experts" and sometimes they're opinion pieces where they've done cursory research. What would they get out of lying? Why would I lie? They can be wrong, and I could be wrong but no pumpkin...not this time.

Like I even put in this thread...at one time I advocated for the US government to out and out buy Tesla to make it a VW (car for the people) for all. I backed off the idea. Changed my mind. Not recently either. You do know that GM had EV's in the late 80's and early 90s? No. Too bad. They did and couldn't get it to marketplace to maintain profits. I was all over GM in the late 80's and early 90s'. I can actually say with 100% accuracy that I had been in each and every General Motors manufacturing, supply and foundries (to include locomotive and tank sites!) as well as testing sites in the North American hemisphere (for you that's Mexico, the US and Canada) and the coveted engineering site in Warren, MI. Been there, done that and hung around guys that I was lucky to have spent time with to share conversations about cars and EV's in general. When you want to come from a "uniformed" opinion stop projecting and looking in your mirror.


What would they get out of lying??? You sir are plenty smart enough to know that steering public option on issues is big business. With opinions sold as facts, fact stacking, even lying - why not - big money at stake here. And there is big cash and fame to be had by simply selling what some what to hear. Alex Jones ain't poor you know.

I am fully aware of GM's EV-1. It was great. And the fact that GM chose not to peruse it, or could not make it work, are interesting 20th century stories to explore. But his is today. GM, Ford, and everyone else (everyone to speak of that is) are going all in on EV's.

Show me a car company that is not going EV and I will show you a loser.

Now you may think I'm dead azz wrong. You may think I know nuthin' bout nuthin'.
But you squat and watch - EV's are the future.
Brewha Offline
#390 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
HockeyDad wrote:
Ah yes…the taste of Brewha’s tears.


London (CNN)

BP (BP), Chevron (CVX), ExxonMobil, Shell and Total (TOT)Energies raked in a record $199.3 billion in profits in 2022, benefiting from the surge in oil and gas prices that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

TotalEnergies capped off the historic series of earnings Wednesday when it reported annual profit of $36.2 billion, more than double the previous year’s earnings.

This extraordinary increase in profits has been replicated across the other Western energy giants, and shareholders have been rewarded with enormous windfalls.

Don't you have a day job?
Abrignac Offline
#391 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,268
Brewha wrote:
Saying Oil and Gas companies posted record profits is "alarmist...class warfare"? sounds like you have a bit of an ax to grind.

The struggle of class against class is a political struggle. Telling those who raise concerns about the politics of taxation to STFU is a pretty conservative approach to politics - meaning rude. You want to carry that tax burden for companies - have at it 'ol boy.

Me, I'm here to extol the virtues of the obviously misunderstood new technologies. Not that everyone is going to "get it" any time soon - but sooner or later people will start to figure it out. Politics notwithstanding.


Again you’re using hyperbole. Did these conglomerates have record profits due to increasing their profit margin or were said profits based on the same margin yet increased revenue?

BTW, you didn’t answer my question. Do you have a 401k? If so, did you refuse the earnings posted by energy sector company company stock held by your 401k? Enquiring minds want to know.
HockeyDad Offline
#392 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,128
Brewha wrote:
Don't you have a day job?


Yes, in green energy. I took the afternoon off though. Chin up buckaroo…



Feb 8 (Reuters) - Tesla Inc's (TSLA.O) Model Y and Model 3 electric vehicles were the top-sellers in California last year, outselling Toyota Motor Corp's (7203.T) RAV4 and Camry models, according to an industry body report.

It is the first time a Tesla model topped the annual sales list in California, a major vehicle market where one in five cars is electric.

Austin, Texas-based Tesla sold 87,257 Model Y electric sport utility vehicles and 78,934 Model 3 electric sedans last year, while Toyota sold 59,794 units of its RAV4 SUV and 55,967 of its Camry sedans, the California New Car Dealers Association said in its report.
Brewha Offline
#393 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Abrignac wrote:
Again you’re using hyperbole. Did these conglomerates have record profits due to increasing their profit margin or were said profits based on the same margin yet increased revenue?

BTW, you didn’t answer my question. Do you have a 401k? If so, did you refuse the earnings posted by energy sector company company stock held by your 401k? Enquiring minds want to know.


The point is people cry about the cost of gas, blame the administration, while these heavily subsides companies pay little tax and set record profits. Not that the good people working in the oil and gas field are not good Americans - profit is always good. By either method - don't you think?

Yes I have a 401k. Who in their right minds would refuse profits from companies they subsidies and invest in?

btw, I'm not sure you are using the word hyperbole correctly....
Abrignac Offline
#394 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,268
Brewha wrote:
The point is people cry about the cost of gas, blame the administration, while these heavily subsides companies pay little tax and set record profits. Not that the good people working in the oil and gas field are not good Americans - profit is always good. By either method - don't you think?

Yes I have a 401k. Who in their right minds would refuse profits from companies they subsidies and invest in?

btw, I'm not sure you are using the word hyperbole correctly....


Well I have no problem with record profits as long as see my statement above.

I think I’m using it correctly. I do so in response to you harping on record profits without considering where they are doing something more nefarious than before or just benefiting from the here and now.

I high brings me back in o my stfu comment. You’re b1tching about it but, I don’t see you turning down the fruits.
plinytheelder Offline
#395 Posted:
Joined: 10-24-2006
Posts: 8,837
My only comment on this whole topic is:

Are you going to tell us that the development of the ICE hasn't happened? Of course it has, for over 100 years. Imagine how far electric cars would be if THEY had gone through a 100 years of development. Look how far battery technology has gotten in a short time...

Unless, you believe that the inventors of the last century had all the answers and there is no way to improve on what they did. On that, I believe a better way to power a car exists, and will be developed and put the entire discussion to rest.
Brewha Offline
#396 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Abrignac wrote:
Well I have no problem with record profits as long as see my statement above.

I think I’m using it correctly. I do so in response to you harping on record profits without considering where they are doing something more nefarious than before or just benefiting from the here and now.

I high brings me back in o my stfu comment. You’re b1tching about it but, I don’t see you turning down the fruits.

Bitching Sir, is as American as it gets....

And I still think they price gouge us.
Gene363 Offline
#397 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,810
Is this the new, but unsanctioned 500?
Abrignac Offline
#398 Posted:
Joined: 02-24-2012
Posts: 17,268
Brewha wrote:
Bitching Sir, is as American as it gets....

And I still think they price gouge us.


You drive an electric car. They’re not price gouging you so stop b1tching.

Brewha Offline
#399 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,167
Abrignac wrote:
You drive an electric car. They’re not price gouging you so stop b1tching.


My wife drive a gas car. So I will b1tch on her behalf - and the good of the American people!

You know, I think you are trying to infringe on freedom of speech….Think
Speyside2 Offline
#400 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2021
Posts: 2,367
It's a lonnnnnnnnnng ways off. The concept of a fusion powered electric car is interesting. It sure would be great to see in my lifetime.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
24 Pages«<456789101112>»