51. Author: teedubbya | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 7:44AM EST | |
Congress should have taken care of this long ago. If only one party had control of all of congress and the White House. Maybe then it would get done.... oh wait a minute...,
Well Obama and not Hillary and stuff. |
52. Author: DrafterX | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 7:46AM EST | |
Ya... if only Obama would have built the wall he said he was gonna.. |
53. Author: teedubbya | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 7:48AM EST | |
By the way, listening to Rob Portman there are solutions if the orange idiot could just stop using immigrants as a scapegoat and quit being a demagogue for a moment.
And yes yes the other side blah blah blah
Then again he really doesn’t want a solution so he can use it to stoke his base. And there are many willing accomplices. |
54. Author: DrafterX | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 7:57AM EST | |
I thought the dems were using the childrens to make Trump look bad... that's what they are telling us... |
55. Author: teedubbya | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 9:05AM EST | |
Uh huh. |
56. Author: Buckwheat | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 9:27AM EST | |
ZRX1200 wrote:Who wants illegals to burn?
I thought the only party burning stuff was Democrats and crosses. You know, before lynchings Z, you're not up on current affairs in southern politics. Most of those cross burning Democrats joined the Republican party after LBJ's '64 Civil Rights Act. Why do you think that the South has more Republicans than most other regions? |
57. Author: teedubbya | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 9:33AM EST | |
It’s another intellectually dishonest reoccurring theme. In Zs case I think he does it to stir.
The whole southern strategy is fake news by the way. |
58. Author: DrafterX | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 9:43AM EST | |
True.. true.. lynyrd skynyrds were/are hippie liberals... |
59. Author: teedubbya | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 9:47AM EST | |
I bet you’ve had a f@g in your mouf before. |
60. Author: DrafterX | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 10:24AM EST | |
If you're referring to ciggs then ya... |
61. Author: victor809 | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 10:32AM EST | |
DrafterX wrote:If you're referring to ciggs then ya... Is ciggs a last name or first name? |
62. Author: teedubbya | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 11:12AM EST | |
Oh you mean the word has changed over time?
Does that happen? |
63. Author: DrafterX | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 12:47PM EST | |
Yes... remember when victor said he was Donning Gay apparel..?? Well now he says Donning there's a dude named Don involved... |
64. Author: izonfire | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 2:36PM EST | |
DrafterX wrote:Yes... remember when victor said he was Donning Gay apparel..?? Well now he says Donning there's a dude named Don involved... Does that involve projecting? Because he's been doing that lately... |
65. Author: delta1 | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 4:56PM EST | |
victor has been actively Donning here for about 2 1/2 years |
66. Author: RMAN4443 | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 4:57PM EST | |
delta1 wrote:victor has been actively Donning here for about 2 1/2 years Was that when he joined the boys swim team? |
67. Author: victor809 | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 5:00PM EST | |
RMAN4443 wrote:Was that when he joined the boys swim team? So.... you like to imagine me in a speedo... stalker alert.... |
68. Author: victor809 | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 5:01PM EST | |
delta1 wrote:victor has been actively Donning here for about 2 1/2 years That a new sex act? "The Donald"? actively sh$t on someone's face while screaming racist epithets? verb use - Donning? |
69. Author: delta1 | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 5:37PM EST | |
not quite as direct...thinking more along the lines of "calling someone out for actively sh$tting on someone's face while screaming racial epithets" |
70. Author: izonfire | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 6:17PM EST | |
victor809 wrote:So.... you like to imagine me in a speedo...
stalker alert.... Thought you liked the attention |
71. Author: Speyside | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 8:07PM EST | |
Donning has different meanings world wide. Take Russia, yellow showers. |
72. Author: teedubbya | Date: Tue, 7/16/2019, 8:10PM EST | |
And in the USA grabbing kitty cats |
73. Author: steve02 | Date: Wed, 7/17/2019, 10:47AM EST | |
Of course, 10k members of the email groups and ALL posted the same drivel? Of course not. That’s spurious logic. |
74. Author: delta1 | Date: Wed, 7/17/2019, 5:31PM EST | |
|
75. Author: borndead1 | Date: Fri, 7/19/2019, 11:14PM EST | |
If you are gonna use this one wacky act as an example of how Antifa is 'just as bad'...just look at the number of white supremacist terrorist attacks compared to the things Antifa has done, and STFU. |
76. Author: izonfire | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 1:40AM EST | |
Hate from any side should not be tolerated. Fucque the tit for tat. It needs to end |
77. Author: DrafterX | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 8:54AM EST | |
Antifas weren't innocent in Charlotte... |
78. Author: DrafterX | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 8:55AM EST | |
I blame Obama for the whole mess... |
79. Author: opelmanta1900 | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 12:51PM EST | |
borndead1 wrote:If you are gonna use this one wacky act as an example of how Antifa is 'just as bad'...just look at the number of white supremacist terrorist attacks compared to the things Antifa has done, and STFU. Lots of ways to manipulate that... You could look at white supremacist activity vs Antifa activity in the last few years and clearly see Antifa winning the award for coordinated violence... Probably smarter to admit both are groups of ignorant and/or stupid people with far too much time on their hands... |
80. Author: izonfire | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 3:06PM EST | |
DrafterX wrote:I blame Obama for the whole mess... An ObamaNation |
81. Author: tailgater | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 6:24PM EST | |
borndead1 wrote:If you are gonna use this one wacky act as an example of how Antifa is 'just as bad'...just look at the number of white supremacist terrorist attacks compared to the things Antifa has done, and STFU. Although I don't subscribe to the Boston Globe, I do get their news feed. If a white supremacist organizes a tupperware party, it makes the news. If antifa blows up a dozen buildings it isn't so much as a murmur. Don't mistake outrage over lopsided media coverage with outrage (or lack thereof) over dastardly deeds from either side. |
82. Author: izonfire | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 7:57PM EST | |
tailgater wrote:Don't mistake outrage over lopsided media coverage with outrage (or lack thereof) over dastardly deeds from either side The leftist media is a huge problem. And causes much of the distrust in the population |
83. Author: borndead1 | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 8:24PM EST | |
izonfire wrote:The leftist media is a huge problem. And causes much of the distrust in the population The media isn't "leftist". If they were, they wouldn't have given Obama as much of a pass on the things they are crucifying Trump about. Media corporations are CORPORATIONS. Their goal is to make a profit. They need views/clicks/purchases of newspapers. In today's 'outrage of the day' culture, it's outrageous headlines that get clicks and views, and therefore, eyes on advertisements. It reminds me of that study they did years ago where it was discovered that people who dislike Howard Stern listened to him longer than people who liked him. |
84. Author: borndead1 | Date: Sat, 7/20/2019, 8:28PM EST | |
tailgater wrote:Although I don't subscribe to the Boston Globe, I do get their news feed.
If a white supremacist organizes a tupperware party, it makes the news.
If antifa blows up a dozen buildings it isn't so much as a murmur.
Don't mistake outrage over lopsided media coverage with outrage (or lack thereof) over dastardly deeds from either side.
Like I've said in other comments, Antifa breaking some windows and punching some nazis in the head is not even on the same page as somebody walking into a black church or mosque and mowing people down with a gun. If you think Antifa is a bigger or even equal threat as white supremacists, I dunno what to tell you. |
85. Author: izonfire | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 12:19AM EST | |
borndead1 wrote:The media isn't "leftist". If they were, they wouldn't have given Obama as much of a pass on the things they are crucifying Trump about. Media corporations are CORPORATIONS. Their goal is to make a profit. They need views/clicks/purchases of newspapers. In today's 'outrage of the day' culture, it's outrageous headlines that get clicks and views, and therefore, eyes on advertisements. It reminds me of that study they did years ago where it was discovered that people who dislike Howard Stern listened to him longer than people who liked him. If you don't see the liberal slant in just about every news article out there, it's because you consciously choose to be eyes wide opened blind. From the headlines, to the content, to the emphasis, it's indisputable. And I know some damn good people on the conservative side that feel completely alienated. And from my liberal friends, they even feel the sting from the vilification of the white male. |
86. Author: frankj1 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 7:24AM EST | |
wrong is wrong. No real winners come from comparing the levels of wrong...but I do see many using each horror to prove the superiority and morality of their beliefs.
I am not immune. But I am working on it. |
87. Author: tailgater | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 7:59AM EST | |
borndead1 wrote:The media isn't "leftist". If they were, they wouldn't have given Obama as much of a pass on the things they are crucifying Trump about. Media corporations are CORPORATIONS. Their goal is to make a profit. They need views/clicks/purchases of newspapers. In today's 'outrage of the day' culture, it's outrageous headlines that get clicks and views, and therefore, eyes on advertisements. It reminds me of that study they did years ago where it was discovered that people who dislike Howard Stern listened to him longer than people who liked him. You realize that it's just as "outrageous" when a left leaning group creates a riot, versus the same for a supposedly right leaning group. Don't you? No, sir. The headlines are MADE outrageous (when necessary) based on the politics. Look no further than the headlines from CNN versus those from FoxNews. |
88. Author: tailgater | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 8:02AM EST | |
borndead1 wrote:Like I've said in other comments, Antifa breaking some windows and punching some nazis in the head is not even on the same page as somebody walking into a black church or mosque and mowing people down with a gun. If you think Antifa is a bigger or even equal threat as white supremacists, I dunno what to tell you. One more time for those who haven't comprehended (by choice or by ability I won't pretend to guess): I've not said anything to suggest the actions of one group is better or worse than the other. I'm showing how the public is spoon fed one side of the story. |
89. Author: tailgater | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 8:06AM EST | |
frankj1 wrote:wrong is wrong. No real winners come from comparing the levels of wrong...but I do see many using each horror to prove the superiority and morality of their beliefs.
I am not immune. But I am working on it. If I may make an accurate blanket statement: It's not OK for a group or a person to physically attack another innocent group or individual. If I fail to state the above prior to pointing out a dastardly deed perpetrated by the left, then please insert it where you see fit. Except for TW. He was too rough last time. |
90. Author: Speyside | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 8:47AM EST | |
This post was about ANTIFA. Why bring up white supremicists? They are not relevant to the post. The Khmer rouge were far worse than both, maybe we should discus them too. ANTIFA promotes violence. They are bad people. Perhaps Trump could have said there are bad people on both sides. Also don't give me this level of bad crap. An action that is bad is bad period. |
91. Author: Burner02 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 9:39AM EST | |
Antifa = Cowards with sticks that hide behind mask and helmets.
A really brave lot. |
92. Author: borndead1 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 10:50AM EST | |
Speyside wrote:This post was about ANTIFA. Why bring up white supremicists? Because Antifa, with the occasional exception, don't go around beating up random people. They were created in response to white supremacist Fascism in Europe.
They are not relevant to the post. They are relevant. See my answer above.
ANTIFA promotes violence. Against violent Fascists.
They are bad people. Some of them are, sure.
Also don't give me this level of bad crap. An action that is bad is bad period. Again...Antifa busting some windows and punching nazis is not the same thing as a nazi walking into a black church and shooting a bunch of people. |
93. Author: borndead1 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 10:56AM EST | |
tailgater wrote:You realize that it's just as "outrageous" when a left leaning group creates a riot, versus the same for a supposedly right leaning group. Don't you?
No, sir. The headlines are MADE outrageous (when necessary) based on the politics.
Look no further than the headlines from CNN versus those from FoxNews.
Fox News has a higher viewership than CNN and MSNBC combined. Could the argument be made, then, that cable news has a conservative slant rather than a liberal one? The argument I am making is that media corporations create a product for specific demographics, not because the CEO/writers/talking heads of that network have some political agenda (of course, some individuals do have agendas, but I seriously doubt that their board meetings are made up of ideological purists). Rupert Murdoch is a genius. He saw a hungry demographic (traditional American conservatives) and created a network to serve that demographic. One of the best business decisions in history. |
94. Author: opelmanta1900 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 10:58AM EST | |
Your point about what Antifa is and stands for is inaccurate...
I know the name anti-fascist throws it off a bit, but you should definitely look into their anarchist political affiliation, they're coordinated attacks on anyone with differing viewpoints, and exactly who it is they consider "facsist"... |
95. Author: borndead1 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 12:37PM EST | |
opelmanta1900 wrote:Your point about what Antifa is and stands for is inaccurate...
I know the name anti-fascist throws it off a bit, but you should definitely look into their anarchist political affiliation, they're coordinated attacks on anyone with differing viewpoints, and exactly who it is they consider "facsist"... Check it out. This is pretty simple. Let's say there's a protest/rally/demonstration or whatever. There are 'protesters' and 'counter-protesters'. If you're wearing a MAGA hat and a Trump shirt, and you're standing on the same side as dudes wearing swastika armbands and throwing up Zieg Heils, you're a f**king nazi. And there's a good chance that Antifa will try to kick your ass. |
96. Author: izonfire | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 12:39PM EST | |
frankj1 wrote:I am not immune. But I am working on it. Just get your shots already Frank. Sheesh... |
97. Author: Speyside | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 1:27PM EST | |
Pretty simple, this thread is about ANTIFA thugs. Andy Ngo is one example of the beat downs they put on people. Your position holds no logic in this thread. If the post was about white supremicists versus ANTIFA I would agree with you that the white supremicists are far worse. You are trying to segway this thread into something it isn't. If you see ANTIFA as hero's you are delusional. And please understand I hate Trump and think his MANGA core people are stupid. Those who stood with neo Nazi's aren't good people, but that doesn't make them neo Nazi's. BTW, there are no modern day Nazi's, they are called neo Nazi's. |
98. Author: borndead1 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 1:48PM EST | |
Speyside wrote:Pretty simple, this thread is about ANTIFA thugs. Andy Ngo is one example of the beat downs they put on people. Your position holds no logic in this thread. If the post was about white supremicists versus ANTIFA I would agree with you that the white supremicists are far worse. You are trying to segway this thread into something it isn't. If you see ANTIFA as hero's you are delusional. And please understand I hate Trump and think his MANGA core people are stupid. Those who stood with neo Nazi's aren't good people, but that doesn't make them neo Nazi's. BTW, there are no modern day Nazi's, they are called neo Nazi's. I never said that Antifa are heroes. My whole point is that they are not nearly as much of a threat as right wing snowflakes make them out to be. They are a threat to you if you are a fascist, nazi, or you stand on the same side of a demonstration alongside nazis. Here's an actually pretty decent breakdown of the Ngo story. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/7/3/20677645/antifa-portland-andy-ngo-proud-boys And there's an old German saying that goes something like, "If there's a nazi sitting at a table, and ten people are sitting there talking to him, you have a table of eleven nazis." |
99. Author: opelmanta1900 | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 2:08PM EST | |
borndead1 wrote:Check it out. This is pretty simple.
Let's say there's a protest/rally/demonstration or whatever. There are 'protesters' and 'counter-protesters'. If you're wearing a MAGA hat and a Trump shirt, and you're standing on the same side as dudes wearing swastika armbands and throwing up Zieg Heils, you're a f**king nazi. And there's a good chance that Antifa will try to kick your ass. That's not what a Nazi is but that's a perfect example of why Antifa is so terrible... Well done... |
100. Author: DrafterX | Date: Sun, 7/21/2019, 3:09PM EST | |
So, only nazis like statues... |