donutboy2000
15 years ago

gringococolo

half a term sarah, and half ass parent. didn't even know her daughter well enough to teach her how to avoid prenncy

RICKAMAVEN wrote:



rick,

She's inside of your head !

THE VOICES ARE SARAH PALIN !!!!!!
tweoijfoi
15 years ago

I demand that women serve in direct combat. Anybody that disagrees with me is a chauvinist. Your daughters should die for country. If there is a draft, women and sole surviving sons should not be exempt either.

gringococolo wrote:



Women are--generally--physically weaker and less agressive. This makes them inferior to men for physically challenging tasks (like fights). Men, overall, are simply better for the front-line role.

Can you say the same about gays? Have there been any proof that they are inferior soldiers?


I also believe that homosexuals have the right to move into your house and if you do not like their behavior, too bad you need to get over it.

gringococolo wrote:


Move in to my house? Huh?

If you are referencing how they will be moving into the barracks, since when have soldiers had a choice about who moves in or not? Maybe racists would like to keep blacks out of the barracks. Maybe they have to get over it.



I think Gov Palin should move into RICKAMAVENS house. If you don't agree with her - too bad. You should be mature enough too handle it, and I have the right to tell you who and what values you should accept in your house.

gringococolo wrote:



Again... ???


If you do not accept any of these assumptions you are a liar and do not support either the American Soldier or DADT.

gringococolo wrote:



tweoijfoi
15 years ago

I'm guessing you have difficulty reading.

chiefburg wrote:



Sometimes yeah. 😰

As I said, I don't care if gays serve openly. I'm not suggesting to postpone indefinately (where did you get that idea????).

chiefburg wrote:



My appologies. I make assumptions sometimes. Forgive me? 🙏


Are you in the military?

chiefburg wrote:



No.


Do you hear what military people say every day about gays?

chiefburg wrote:



No.


Do you support the senseless death of gays for the purpose of just rescinding DADT without proper preparation? Trust me - this will be rescinded and gays will be able to serve openly. But, we need do our homework first. We need to educate and prepare the million-plus military people so mayhem doesn't ensue.

chiefburg wrote:



I'm all for education. They should start it now. But how much education do you propose? More than a day's worth? How much is enough to convince those you claim will murder countless gays to not murder them?


Are you ready to have Obama stand trial for murder? He'd surely be responsible for the countless deaths if he thinks a stroke of the pen will fix thousands of years of hate and discontent towards gays.

chiefburg wrote:



Will Bush stand trial for murder? (I don't want him to, just saying...)
HockeyDad
15 years ago
Will Bill Clinton stand trial for "The List"?
gringococolo
15 years ago
Marines' leader: Keep policy on gays in military
By ELLIOT SPAGAT, Associated Press Elliot Spagat, Associated Press
28 mins ago

.SAN DIEGO – The new commandant of the U.S. Marines Corps said Saturday that now is the wrong time to overturn the "don't ask, don't tell" policy prohibiting gays from openly serving in the military, as U.S. troops remain in the thick of war in Afghanistan.

"There's risk involved; I'm trying to determine how to measure that risk," Gen. James Amos said. "This is not a social thing. This is combat effectiveness. That's what the country pays its Marines to do."

Last month, the Pentagon was forced to lift its ban on openly serving gays for eight days after a federal judge in California ordered the military to do so. The Justice Department has appealed, and a federal appeals court granted a temporary stay of the injunction.

Amos said the policy's repeal may have unique consequences for the Marines, which is exempt from a Defense Department rule for troops to have private living quarters except at basic training or officer candidate schools. The Marines puts two people in each room to promote a sense of unity.

"There is nothing more intimate than young men and young women — and when you talk of infantry, we're talking our young men — laying out, sleeping alongside of one another and sharing death, fear and loss of brothers," he said. "I don't know what the effect of that will be on cohesion. I mean, that's what we're looking at. It's unit cohesion, it's combat effectiveness."

Amos, who began his assignment last month, said he was reviewing preliminary findings of an internal Pentagon survey of the policy that was sent out to about 400,000 troops and another 150,000 family members. He will make recommendations to Defense Secretary Robert Gates later this month.

Amos declined to comment on the survey results, though portions have been leaked to reporters. Most troops and their families think the policy could be done away with, according to officials familiar with its findings who spoke on condition of anonymity because the results had not been released.

Amos said his top priority was success in Afghanistan — no matter how many people or how much equipment is required — and that he didn't expect any pullback in Marine forces over the next year.

President Barack Obama wants to start to reduce the number of U.S. troops in July, if conditions on the ground allow.

Amos said the U.S. effort is showing progress, pointing to improved security in the Nawa district, but that more work lies ahead in allowing the Afghan army and police to gain control of the country.

"The Marine Corps will stay the way it is (in Afghanistan) right now for probably at least the next year," he said.

He said he expects the Marines to shrink from its current size of 202,000 after leaving Afghanistan, but that "we need (the current numbers) now."

Amos, 63, spoke with reporters in a wide-ranging interview during a Southern California visit to mark the Marines' 235th birthday. He addressed other subjects:

• A living Marine who served in Afghanistan has been recommended for a Medal of Honor. The Marine Corps has had only one Medal of Honor recipient, stirring controversy due to its heavy fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Amos' predecessor, Gen. James Conway, made the recommendation last month to the secretary of the Navy, and it must eventually be approved by Obama. Amos said a report on the Marine's actions brought tears to his eyes.

• The fate of the amphibious Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle should be known in January or February. Gates, who is scrutinizing military spending in a search for roughly $10 billion in annual savings, has expressed doubts about a $13.2 billion plan for the Marines to buy large number of vehicles starting in 2012.

• The number of suicides in the Marines this year is "markedly below" the same period last year. In 2009, the Marines had 52 suicides, the highest rate of any branch.

"I don't want anyone to walk out of here and say we've turned the corner and the Marine Corps has figured it out," he said. "That is not the case. This is hard."






But I suppose he will just be called a homophope for it.
Users browsing this topic