That is interesting.

Story sounds less like big cover up and more like Machiavelli.

The story was interesting as presented. And the attorney for the security guard (Joiner) sure was damning. Very interesting.

Interesting enough that my mind went directly to WTF was the FBI doing and why? This is damning. Finally a legitimate arrow at the FBI. I was ready to thank DMV for the story. Fascinating.

But then my mind went to why did the video abruptly stop mid story (almost mid sentence, not quite, but it was awkwardly abrupt) rather than continue when it was pretty clear there was more in the newscast. Its as if there was more someone didn't want us to hear. Did the government cut it short because it was so damning. Censor the fox reporting? Or was it a twitter limitation. But what an odd amount of time to allow. It was at a very odd timestamp.

Then my mind went to wait.... this was 4 years or more ago.... why would there not be more info in that time and why would this be a breaking thing in the twitterverse in 2021. It was in the open (fox news) and we have other branches of government other than this one that was under the Trump administration (I think... didn't check). What about congress or the courts? Now I'm getting really mad. Defcon Mad at our lousy system of government and our lousy country. There was a Christian reverend that said god damn the united states (or America..cant recall) and that pizzed me off. We still talk about it when we talk about his influence on Bammy (in between claiming Bammy is a Muslim) But if this stuff is true does he have a point?

But then I thought....Hmmm I wonder if folks are being played for some agenda. Simple folks that won't look more and will just run with the questions.... always the questions.....questions.... just asking questions...not sayin...just askin

It's all so confusing.

Turns out there is more info. The security guards case was dismissed. Congress looked at it too. I have no doubt due to the nature of the FBI they do some unsavory things and definitely need a check. But I also have no issue with them infiltrating extremist groups. Its sort of their job. Bang the drum.

Here is the dismissal. Twitter is a great source of entertainment just not news. Highly manipulated. And I wonder why. Who would want to weaken our institutions through fueling distrust? And what rubes willingly fall for it? Then I thought most people don't have the 2 minutes it took to look deeper so I thought I'd help.

https://casetext.com/case/joiner-v-united-states-11 

You are welcome.

Damn.... TW actually read and set the record straight... coulda had a thread here lol.

nah.... its still a thing... you know a thing

Ya... I get it... good devil bad devil. What shoulder you want?

Tdub, I found the same information but wasn't interest in correcting anything. I DGAF about self adgendizing posts that only look to create agreement with their POV. Other than my own of course.

But it's still a thing right? You know a thing?

Valid points in this article that dares to even talk about this at the forefront and the ostriches here that want to bury their heads in the sand and believe it's not happening...the usual mouth breathers. Everyone sees you for what you are.

The questions raised by the Revolver News reporting, which none of these smug FBI defenders and guardians of the liberal consensus can answer, remain:

How is it remotely credible that the FBI did not have informants in these three groups that they have been identifying as major threats for years, especially given the reporting that the leader of the Proud Boys — conveniently arrested the day before January 6 — was an FBI informant in the past, along with the confirmed reporting that the FBI had multiple informants in the Michigan Three Percenters case?

Why are low-level protesters being charged with major crimes while the alleged organizers of this riot and the leaders of these groups have not been?

Why are enormous amounts of video surveillance footage from January 6 still being concealed?

What happened to the alleged planting of pipe bombs near the Capitol?

Why did the FBI not take more aggressive action given the once-denied but now-confirmed fact that the social media platform Parler sent the FBI advanced warnings of specific plots to use violence at the Capitol?



If the FBI had advanced knowledge of what was being plotted yet did nothing to stop the attack, it raises numerous possibilities about why that is. It could be that they just had yet another “intelligence failure” of the kind that they claimed caused them to miss the 9/11 attack and therefore need massive new surveillance authorities, budget increases, and new Patriot-Act-type laws to fix it. It could be that they allowed the riot to happen because they did not take it seriously enough or because some of them supported the cause behind it, or because they realized that there would be benefits to the security state if it happened. Or it could be that they were using those operatives under their control to plot with, direct, and drive the attack -- as they have done so many times in the past — and allowed it to happen out of either negligence or intent.


Nobody is claiming to know the answers to those questions, including Revolver News, Carlson, or anyone else. Instead, they are doing the work of actual journalists — pointing out the gaping holes in the public record about what we do and do not know about an event that is being exploited to launch a new domestic War on Terror, prompt massive new police and security state spending, and empower and justify new domestic surveillance and censorship authorities. Anyone not asking these questions or, worse, trying to delegitmize them, is a propagandist and has no business calling themselves a journalist.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/questions-about-fbis-role-16-are-mocked-because-fbi-shapes-liberal-corporate-media 

Lol, all I got out of that whole piece was parler ratted out the Q-Tards...


Hahahahahahahahaha

Up to the inauguration Barr ran the DOJ. That is why no reasonable actions were taken during that whole time frame. It all was his call. It is interesting that even Parlor knows how dangerous the situation was. Qtards rule!!!

That's because you lack critical thinking skills.

Take a harder look as to who set up and runs Parler...you might understand why.

LMFAO even harder!!!

You... telling me that?!?!?!

OMFG, too funny.

You made my day dude, really.

Questions always questions not sayin just askin

This message is brought to you by the letter Q

Parlor or Parler ?

So parlors and parlers are bad... stay away from both.

Revolver is doing some excellent reporting. Here they document 5 cases of FBI collusion beyond denial.

They highlight these 5 events that most have either forgot about or don't even know.

The First World Trade Center Bombing
Garland, Texas Shooting
Hal Turner
COINTELPRO
The Herald Square Bomber

The above cases only touch the surface of the FBI’s long history of entrapment/incitement schemes. Indeed, the more we learn about the FBI and the national security state generally, the more we are compelled to wonder whether they exist to do anything BUT conspire against the American people.

Stay tuned as Revolver continues to break news on the latest chapter of the FBI and national security state’s shame and infamy.

https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/five-cases-of-fbi-incitement/ [/i]

Very well stated. They are truly the American Gestapo or Stasi. I keep hearing about the honorable, hard working rank and file, but where are the mass resignations as the truth of this dangerous, corrupt DemonRAT organization has been revealed?

Very well stated. They are truly the American Gestapo or Stasi. I keep hearing about the honorable, hard working rank and file, but where are the mass resignations as the truth of this dangerous, corrupt DemonRAT organization has been revealed?