Who is going to fulfil their obligation to attend court if they are afraid of deportation for doing the right thing- showing up when required to?

Thoughts?

rfenst wrote:

You think for a second that if a sitting judge is willing to harbor a criminal that you're really going to get a fair trial?

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Was he arrested for going to court or arrested for a different crime while at court?

We could improve court efficiency by no longer arresting people for crimes.

We could reduce prison populations by eliminating crimes.

HockeyDad wrote:

A$sinine.

rfenst wrote:

We actually did those things in California!

HockeyDad wrote:

Who is going to fulfil their obligation to attend court if they are afraid of deportation for doing the right thing- showing up when required to?

Thoughts?

rfenst wrote:

Who is going to fulfil their obligation to attend court if they are afraid of deportation for doing the right thing- showing up when required to?

Thoughts?

rfenst wrote:

If you come here illegally, wouldn’t you be on your best behavior and therefore avoid being arrested and the consequences of the crime?

8trackdisco wrote:

[-x

Um...they broke the law just by being here illegally. They're going to break laws.

The more you read up on this case...she deserves prison.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/15/delusional-leftists-compare-judge-indicted-for-helping-illegal-evade-arrest-to-harriet-tubman/ [/i]

DrMaddVibe wrote:

Maybe they should have done the paperwork and just come here legally..?? Or maybe they listened to the Dem operatives south of da border telling them how to beat the system... 🤔

DrafterX wrote:

What if they are there to be witnesses in a trial?

rfenst wrote:

You can’t make a juevos rancheros without cracking a few juevos.

Trump should use that defense…..I didn’t do ________ because I witnessed _______

You sound like those reporters trying to tell Tom Holman that he deported a 4 year old cancer patient.

ZRX1200 wrote:

What if they are there to be witnesses in a trial?

rfenst wrote:

I don't think it would make a difference where they were or why they were there if they're illegal... pretty sure I can't relocate to another country without permission from them.. if I tried and got caught I'm sure I'd be deported also.. I'm sure there's exceptions if I was there spending a lot of money.. 😟

DrafterX wrote:

So, let's say you have an auto crash injury and a trial. The only thing your sole, independent, critical witness to the crash who is an illegal alien, saw how it happened, but the other side still blames you fully for the crash and wants a zero ($0) verdict. The whole case is about how the crash happened, not even the extent of your conceded injuries. You only get one trial.

Your illegal eyewitness' testimony to the crash is critical and his testimony about what he saw is indisputable. He saw you do nothing wrong, but the other driver was speeding and ran a red light. You would be heavily dependent on that witness' and you'd lose your trial.


Don't you think it is unfair to you? That you would be unduly prejudiced?
You would lose your constitutional right to a fair trial, right?

rfenst wrote:

So, let's say you have an auto crash injury and a trial. The only thing your sole, independent, critical witness to the crash who is an illegal alien, saw how it happened, but the other side still blames you fully for the crash and wants a zero ($0) verdict. The whole case is about how the crash happened, not even the extent of your conceded injuries. You only get one trial.

Your illegal eyewitness' testimony to the crash is critical and his testimony about what he saw is indisputable. He saw you do nothing wrong, but the other driver was speeding and ran a red light. You would be heavily dependent on that witness' and you'd lose your trial.


Don't you think it is unfair to you? That you would be unduly prejudiced?
You would lose your constitutional right to a fair trial, right?

rfenst wrote: