DrMaddVibe
a year ago

I see 5thru12 against The Cackler

MaduroJorge wrote:




As well as #3.
View All Posts by User
Mr. Jones
a year ago
Like I have said before:

"I REFUSE to vote for someone who greenlighted an attempt to murder me"
Which happened over 9++ times from 2013-2018

Trump greenlighted me on jan.8, 2018 with my second ketamine drugging at the APPLACHIAN Brewing Co. In Harrisburg , PA during freaking "happy hour" at 5 pm daytime ( it could have been ROGUE SECRET SERVICE AND OR FBI-SSG AGENTS, BUT IT WAS ONE OR BOTH)
I was 50 miles away from my H.U.T. and I was A.L.O.N.E. , driving by myself...100% ATTEMPTED MURDER FOR SURE.

JOE STRANOSA ( AND BATHOUSE BARRY) TRIED TO MURDER ME OVER 9+ TIMES FROM 2013-2016...BIDEN DROPPED OUT OF ELECTION...

I was gonna vote for RFK. buy he dropped out a few weeks ago...
He may still be on the Pennsylvania Ballot?
If he is? I will vote for him and not regret it...

If he is not?
Well??? At least KAMALA has not tried to murder me ...
Yet???

I am in a quandry...
View All Posts by User
MACS
a year ago

Sure it is… that’s why the took it court and won all those cases based on the evidence provided right? Oh… wait… um, I mean that’s why they had a big press conference and released the evidence they promised over and over and over again right? Oh… wait… um… that’s why… oh nvm… we will just wait for it… 2 more weeks right?

drglnc wrote:



Oh, wait... the media would help exposing that, right? Yeah, nah. Atlanta can't account for more than 150k votes, right? Yup. Trucks/Vans were seen dumping bags in the middle of the night, right? Yup. Dominion voting machines have been hacked with nothing but a pen, right? Yup.

Y'all lefties love to throw "conspiracy theorist" around, but the conspiracy theorists have been right about damn near everything y'all said was a conspiracy theory.
View All Posts by User
RayR
a year ago
Wait a minute!. Rabid Lefty Lichtman said back in June that it would be ‘Foolhardy nonsense’ for the Democrats to replace Joe Biden. The keys did not fit I guess.
View All Posts by User
Brewha
a year ago
Didn't FoxNews have to pay Dominions Voting machines millions and million of dollars for lying about machine tampering in the election??
View All Posts by User
RayR
a year ago
Are you trying to hijack a thread again Brew?
View All Posts by User
Brewha
a year ago
What’s it to you Ray? I mean it’s not like you are noted for staying on topic.
View All Posts by User
RobertHively
a year ago
^

I'm with you there. Who cares about staying on topic. Eventually we'll get back there. They take it pretty seriously in the general discussion though.

When I started posting here I'd hope to get 1 or 2 real answers if I asked a question. The other 50 replies would be off topic, trolling, or down right masturba posting.

Fox prolly paid that money so they could stay in bidness. Cant question the empire.😟

View All Posts by User
ZRX1200
a year ago
I got you boo
View All Posts by User
RobertHively
a year ago

I got you boo

ZRX1200 wrote:




See, trolling. Perfectly acceptable.

I got you too baby. You and brew are both my boo. Love those esoteric ramblings in the EV van down by the rivah.
View All Posts by User
ZRX1200
a year ago
You don’t hear farts in my EV…..just crying.
View All Posts by User
RobertHively
a year ago
😞
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
a year ago
Allan Lichtman lies his face off for Kamala Harris



If Allan Lichtman, the supposed “prophet of presidential elections”, were honest about how he evaluated his own keys in an election, he would predict that Donald Trump would win instead of Kamala Harris. The following article from RedState reveals the metrics Lichtman uses to make his predictions, followed up by how he assessed each metric:

Party Mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previous midterm elections. FALSE
Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination. TRUE
Incumbency: The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president. FALSE
Third-party: There is no significant third-party or independent campaign. TRUE
Short-term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign. TRUE
Long-term economy: Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms. TRUE
Policy change: The incumbent administration effects [sic] major changes in national policy. TRUE
Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term. TRUE
Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal. TRUE
Incumbent charisma: The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. FALSE
Challenger charisma: The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero. TRUE
Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.

Let’s go through the list honestly though….

Number six should be FALSE, not true; people cannot afford to pay their bills because of high inflation. People cannot afford groceries. People are maxed out on their credit cards. A recent poll from American Thinker and Rasmussen Reports, conducted in a number of states, revealed that voters are overwhelmingly concerned about the economy first (even in blue states where Harris leads), followed by (illegal) immigration. Using one statistic to suggest a healthy “long-term economy” is completely misleading.

Number seven is subjective, but they clearly have affected major changes that are terrible and unpopular, including men playing women’s sports, the disastrous green initiatives, high inflation, and the open border. I would say this goes against Harris, so it should be false.

Number eight… what?! “There is no sustained social unrest during the term” except all the massive social unrest with Israel and Hamas, a reignited war in Ukraine, the open border, and skyrocketing crime; cities are literally being overrun by foreigners. This should be false.

Number nine… again, what?! What a joke to actually argue that there have been no “major” scandals from the Biden-Harris administration. They politicized the (in)Justice department to an unbelievable degree. Biden is the most corrupt president we have ever seen. They hid the pure incompetence of Biden for years. What about Hunter Biden? What about the “Border Czar” who has allowed more than ten million illegal aliens to illegally cross the border? Every big spending bill while trillions in debt? Afghanistan? This should clearly be false.

Number 11: Trump obviously has charisma, and he’s absolutely adored.

Donald Trump was cheered & USA chants broke out at the Alabama vs Georgia game when he appeared on the Jumbotron.

Tim Walz was booed & “Tampon Tim” chants broke out as Michigan & Minnesota fans were forced to wait outside in the rain so he could enter the stadium… pic.twitter.com/yPAWucKLK5
— Jon Root (@JonnyRoot_) September 29, 2024

And, Trump kept the world relatively peaceful. This should be false.

It is a joke for Lichtman to claim that he can’t determine whether 12 and 13 are true or false, which is what he does at the beginning of his piece. The world is a mess because of Biden and Harris and how they have built up the finances of Iran, the terrorists, and Russia. Both 12 and 13 are obviously false.

The total would be ten false and three true if Lichtman were honest instead of a Democrat campaign worker and shill.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/09/allan_lichtman_lies_his_face_off_for_kamala_harris.html 

Glad I wasn't the only one that thought this was a scripted shill fabrication.
View All Posts by User
DrMaddVibe
a year ago
This dude, Allan Lichtman...took it in the azz with his KEYS TO VICTORY mumbo jumbo.

The truth is always easier to tell than lies.
View All Posts by User
RayR
a year ago
Maybe he should try Tarot Cards next time.
View All Posts by User
MACS
a year ago

This dude, Allan Lichtman...took it in the azz with his KEYS TO VICTORY mumbo jumbo.

The truth is always easier to tell than lies.

DrMaddVibe wrote:



Yeah... and now his record is 9 of 11.

3 busloads of people that voted in NY and were headed to PA to vote again were stopped and arrested... no voter fraud, though.

Republicans had to get lawyers involved to allow republican overseers in some PA polling places... no fraud, though.

If we would all just get onboard with single day voting, with state issued voter ID and paper ballots then NOBODY would be able to question the results, now... would they?
View All Posts by User
jeebling
a year ago
^36 MACS I think the “too big to rig” idea has proven itself this time but what about future elections? I agree that we need a single day to vote, voter ID, paper ballots that are not destroyed but kept on record. I’m more skeptical than ever about the validity of the 2020 General election.
View All Posts by User
MACS
a year ago

^36 MACS I think the “too big to rig” idea has proven itself this time but what about future elections? I agree that we need a single day to vote, voter ID, paper ballots that are not destroyed but kept on record. I’m more skeptical than ever about the validity of the 2020 General election.

jeebling wrote:



Agreed... There is NO WAY I will ever believe 81 million people voted for Biden. And some states broke their own voting laws in 2020.

Look... my horse won this race and I STILL want the system fixed. I want everyone to be 100% sure the elections are legitimate. How do we do that?

Single day voting. Voter ID (free). Paper ballots to audit if there's a question. How can anyone not agree with this??
View All Posts by User
KingoftheCove
a year ago

Agreed... There is NO WAY I will ever believe 81 million people voted for Biden. And some states broke their own voting laws in 2020.

Look... my horse won this race and I STILL want the system fixed. I want everyone to be 100% sure the elections are legitimate. How do we do that?

Single day voting. Voter ID (free). Paper ballots to audit if there's a question. How can anyone not agree with this??

MACS wrote:


Great idea………….in theory.
The reality however, is that the logistics of getting 147,000,0000+ paper ballots hand turned in, in an 18 hour window?
-Difficult at best
-Costly
-Will REDUCE voter turnout………………dramatically.
-Will be vulnerable to fraud, intimidation, shenanigans, etc.

Great idea for a smallish town of 15,000 people.
The whole country?
Just do not think it is feasible.
View All Posts by User
MACS
a year ago

Great idea………….in theory.
The reality however, is that the logistics of getting 147,000,0000+ paper ballots hand turned in, in an 18 hour window?
-Difficult at best
-Costly
-Will REDUCE voter turnout………………dramatically.
-Will be vulnerable to fraud, intimidation, shenanigans, etc.

Great idea for a smallish town of 15,000 people.
The whole country?
Just do not think it is feasible.

KingoftheCove wrote:



Um... how did we used to do it?
View All Posts by User
Users browsing this topic
Mobile! Terms | Privacy | Contact Us | Help | © 1998-2026, CigarBid.com