America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DadZilla3. 37 replies replies.
Tighten The Yoke...Bite The Bit!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
Bernanke Goes All In: What It Means for You

In an unprecedented and controversial move, the Federal Reserve today announced the initiation of an open-ended round of Quantitative Easing (QE3) and extended the period for which it will keep rates between 0 and 1/4% to mid-2015.

Here is the paragraph from the FOMC statement that sums it up:

"....The Committee agreed today to increase policy accommodation by purchasing additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month. The Committee also will continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in June, and it is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. These actions...should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative."
Translating from Fed-Speak, the purchase of mortgage-backed securities is Quantitative Easing. Unlike QE1 and QE2, no dollar amount or time-limit was placed on the program. The Fed essentially announced it will be purchasing $40 billion in MBS per month until further notice.

This is a monster, huge, gargantuan change from prior operations. QE1 "cost" $1.7 trillion. QE2 was half a trillion, give or take. The new plan isn't really QE3, because it's never scheduled to end. It is an entirely different, frightening animal.

What makes it scary is contained in the next paragraph:

If the outlook for the labor market does not improve substantially, the Committee will continue its purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities, undertake additional asset purchases, and employ its other policy tools as appropriate until such improvement is achieved in a context of price stability. In determining the size, pace, and composition of its asset purchases, the Committee will, as always, take appropriate account of the likely efficacy and costs of such purchases.

Employment is weak and is expected to be despite the Fed's best efforts. In response, the Fed is opening the spigots even further and vowing to continue to do so until this failed strategy starts working. There's a certain willful spunkiness to the plan, but in terms of economics it's little short of bizarre.

Bottom Line: The Fed has made up new rules by lifting all restraints on existing policies. Should they desire different stimulus, the Fed will need to invent a whole new policy. It's a bullish move in the sense that pouring more money into the system inflates values. Stocks, gold, oil... basically everything except the dollar "should" go up in value.

Longer term we're now way, way into unknown territory. As Bernanke himself often says, monetary policy isn't a panacea. Then again, the same man just gave the economy the biggest injection it's ever seen. How will it all end? Literally nobody knows, but for now stocks are higher, bears are furious and bulls are giddily confused.
Also, the president just got re-elected. But that's a for a different column

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/breakout/bernanke-goes-means-180402117.html



They're trying to buy an election...see it for what it is!
jojoc Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-05-2007
Posts: 6,272
if that's the case, they should have done this a few months ago. too late for this to have any real effect (other than see, we are doing something).



Agree that there is no real way to predict how much inflation this will cause over the next 10 years or so. If they have been unable to "stimulate" the economy by dumping trillions of dollars into the market, do they really think they will be able to prevent massive inflation by taking the money back?
pdxstogieman Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
Both parties are trying to buy the election, They're just approaching different sellers.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
pdxstogieman wrote:
Both parties are trying to buy the election, They're just approaching different sellers.



The only ONE party the Federal Reserve is supporting here.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
Marc Faber: If I Were Bernanke, I Would Resign

Central bankers are “counterfeit money printers” and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke should resign for messing up the U.S. economy so badly, Marc Faber, author of the Gloom, Doom and Boom, told CNBC on Friday.

He said Bernanke was one of the main proponents of an ultra-expansionist economic monetary policy that was to blame for the latest financial crisis.

“If I had messed up as badly as Bernanke I would for sure resign. The mandate of the Fed to boost asset prices and thereby create wealth is ludicrous — it doesn’t work that way. It’s a temporary boost followed by a crash,” Faber said.

Faber, who rose to prominence after predicting the 1987 financial crash report and dubbed "Dr Doom" for his negative predictions, said: “This unlimited QE (quantitative easing) , buying mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and continuing operation twist has the implication of simply having asset prices go up and the money flows down to the Mayfair economy,” Faber said.

A Mayfair economy is one which benefits the wealthier and better off in society. Faber said this latest round of QE would not help the “man on the street”.

“QE helps rich people whose asset prices go up and whose net worth then increases but it doesn’t flow to the man on the street who is faced with higher costs of living with price rises. You just have a small economy that is booming but the majority of the economy is damaged by QE,” he said.

Bernanke announced on Thursday that the Fed would buy $40 billion a month in MBS, giving the impression that this time around there would be no time limit to the program, which would only stop once a sustained uptick in employment is visible.

“The money printers are responsible for this crisis. If we continue with this expansionist monetary policy we won’t be facing a fiscal cliff it will be a fiscal grand canyon,” he added.

Mike Konczal, fellow at the Roosevelt Institute disagreed claiming that this latest round of QE — aggressive as it was — would expand the scope of Federal Reserve policy and was “great for main street”. Crucially, he said, it tackles the issue of employment which would underpin future wealth.


“If anything, monetary policy has been too tight in recent years. We’ve seen a collapse in GDP growth, no wage growth and huge rises in unemployment. Wealth is collapsing because of a collapse in the housing market and prolonged, mass unemployment ,” Konczal said.

Faber poured scorn on the notion that QE helps the economy, declaring that commentators like Konczal would have said the same in 2001 when low interest rates led to the biggest housing bubble in the United States. That in turn led to the financial crisis of 2008.

“If we have an economic crisis in the Western world it’s because the government makes up 50 percent or more of the economy. This is a cancer that is taking away people’s freedom,” he said.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/49029923



But hey...it's okay...EVERYONE is doing it! Riight?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/bofa-sees-fed-assets-surpassing-5-trillion-2015-leading-3350-gold-and-190-crude



More lighthearted reading...but hey...we're only talking about kids and grandkids that are slaves to debt. Oh, did I forget to mention that EVERYTHING goes up...food...fuel...clothes...education...everything except your paycheck. Those on Wall Street need to keep those down so you don't get uppity...besides...there's no crime being committed! If there was there would be a perp walk so long it would stretch from Wall Street all the way to California!
bloody spaniard Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Buying mortgage backed securities is the answer to our economic woes... BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!LOL

What's next- negative interest rates??!!Drool

Not to get off too far from the topic, Doc, this sequestration business is killing a lot of businesses. It's a giant mausoleum out there.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
bloody spaniard wrote:
Buying mortgage backed securities is the answer to our economic woes... BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!LOL

What's next- negative interest rates??!!Drool

Not to get off too far from the topic, Doc, this sequestration business is killing a lot of businesses. It's a giant mausoleum out there.



Not from Wall Street it isn't. It's bidnezz as usual. Not for the Federal Reserve...it's BOOMTOWN! A virtual goldrush scenario.

An entity that is UNANSWERABLE to ANYONE in government is DESTROYING America and even on this thread...we have.."Uh...(removes finger from nose and wipes it on shirt), everyone is doin' it...what's the big deal? I'm gonna wait for the movie version...books make my head hurt"...look at them...ignoring the problem and still thinking this is some game to be won and lost like Checkers or Chess...as long as THEIR side wins. Little to the see the damage.

"I love my country, I fear my government" - Mark Scott, radio talkshow host...RIP
pdxstogieman Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
Oh, the real answer is spending an even higher % of GDP on the MIlitary/Industrial complex. That's a recipe for success too. Those are the sellers Mitt wants to buy the election from.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
pdxstogieman wrote:
Oh, the real answer is spending an even higher % of GDP on the MIlitary/Industrial complex. That's a recipe for success too. Those are the sellers Mitt wants to buy the election from.



See..Bloody...the ol' US vs THEM...look at them with disgust. They want the same failed policies. They want the demise of America. They can't help themselves. The sugar high is too great. They really really want Hope and Change. They think if they buy him more time at the trough they'll get theirs.
rumraider Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 08-05-2012
Posts: 727
There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice, or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves. Nations and large bodies of men, never. John Adams, letter to John Taylor (15 April 1814).

ZRX1200 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,731
End the Fed.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
rumraider wrote:
There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty. When clear prospects are opened before vanity, pride, avarice, or ambition, for their easy gratification, it is hard for the most considerate philosophers and the most conscientious moralists to resist the temptation. Individuals have conquered themselves. Nations and large bodies of men, never. John Adams, letter to John Taylor (15 April 1814).




We had a man running that can quote the Constitution from memory. His record is one based off of it.

America turned their back on such a man. This man, despite his delegate count wasn't even allowed to speak at the RNC! Many know why he wasn't allowed to speak. He'd shake the establishment. The order must be preserved for the sake of the proles. Can't upset the apple cart.

We really are in the end times for this nation. It cannot stand against the debt racked up. The ponzi scheme has worn out it's welcome and the rich are getting richer. America will not have a rebellion. We're too lazy for that. The conditioning and response has been installed and there's no going back. The Romans had their Coliseum and games to distract it's citizenry. We have NASCAR and TV. The lowest common denominator now rules the roost. Forget critical thinking...you get laughed at or get looks of bewilderment from most. The system we know is crumbling. It's falling down.

The grand experiment our Founding Fathers created has been prostituted. We've whored out our beliefs for those of other nations so we could maintain a dominance. We have bases around the world and are stretched paper thin to the point that we cannot cover where we stand. Just like the Romans and their Great Britain outposts...they were put out there...they thought everyone wanted to be a Roman...just like we think Freedom and Democracy is what people want. We're in nations that don't even value human life...hell, we don't even value human life! Look no farther than the abortion mills that have done their deed to wreck havoc on the Ponzi scheme...a right to "choose" wiped out an entire generation that was supposed to keep the game afoot!

Sad.

Sad that this once great nation, so much promise will be extinguished. The world won't be a better place with us not in it. Freedom had it's time. People didn't choose wisely. They put blind faith in thier leadership to do the right thing. Instead we got sold out for a quick buck. NAFTA treaties...buyouts/bailouts...everyone in a clamor to get aboard the lifeboats with as much loot as they can carry. Look around. The signs are all there. We're not better off from 4 years ago...we're not better off than 10 years ago. It's been a rapid decline down the death spiral. Debt vs GDP, add in a bloated military that's being stretched further than any other nation's military and we're paying rogue nations BILLIONS of dollars for what?

Our Founding Fathers would shoot the leadership on the White House lawn for the treasonous acts that have been allowed to pervade our nation. We're weaken now than when we were under any crown. We did it to ourselves. I'm reminded of Charleston Heston in "Planet of the Apes" at the very end of the movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5R_pS0h5Qk
DrMaddVibe Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
ZRX1200 wrote:
End the Fed.



Yeah.

We had a candidate that wanted that.

Instead we get to choose between that man that shot Bin Laden or the guy with 13 wives.

One guy as a record of sheer utter failure and came in with a sugar high of Hope and Change...and in this corner we have the man that saved the Olympics...yea!

Oh what joy.

I'm not thrilled at all. THESE are our choices? THEM?

There's a part of me that actually would enjoy seeing the Kenyan King get his blessed second crack at transforming America. Just to put us out of our misery faster!
ZRX1200 Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,731
Good laughs to be had at sycophant apologists.
rumraider Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 08-05-2012
Posts: 727
Someone wiser than I said "it's just a big schit sandwich and we're all gonna take a bite."
ZRX1200 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,731
White bread and marbled rye.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
rumraider wrote:
Someone wiser than I said "it's just a big schit sandwich and we're all gonna take a bite."



Bite or nibble...it's still the same sammich!

ram27bat
bloody spaniard Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
NAFTA, the great whoooooooshing sound and all the jobs that were either outsourced or taken over by foreigners who immigrated here & were willing to work for less... Oh well, afterall we ARE lazy, arrogant, xenophobic, unwilling to work hard yada yada yada. Sounds like the litany of scum elitists & self-serving apologists who got their steady teat.

Doc, the military industrial complex is certainly bloated and unpatriotic in that if our Government doesn't feed the beast with wars it'll sell it's wares to the highest bidder. Having said that, it IS necessary provided it is put to defending domestic borders, protecting citizens abroad, even allies when our national interests are served as well but NOT European oil needs, waterways/routes we rarely use, nation building for opportunist religious zealots who hate us, etc..

The left is the left. They will always argue as one-worlders against the interests of this country but even a broken clock is right twice day.

One thing that I'm sure about, is that if the incumbent gets a second term, we will be irreparably damaged.
With a viable electable alternative such as Romney we can at least stall for time & delay the inevitable.
Paul/Johnson/3rd party voters mean well but are only securing our quicker demise. That's it. Well at least they'll have their memories of the "good principled fight" as they are ****ting in coffee cans and going down to the river to wash up before feasting on rat.
bloody spaniard Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
My apologies if I came across as a sarcastic drama queen in the previous post. Old habits are hard to break I suppose.Blushing

Of one thing I'm sure, the professional political bureaucracy which has ruled us for at least the last 8 years has had NO clue! They are bleeding us dry and we are running out of reserves, ie. credit lines.Beer
DrMaddVibe Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
Centralized banking is the enemy of a free society.

They seek to enslave by betting against the losers and doubling with the winners.

Moe Greene couldn't have devised a more win-win scenario!
DadZilla3 Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves. - Norm Franz
rfenst Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,601
ZRX1200 wrote:
White bread and marbled rye.


You have to ask?
How about mayo with your pastrami sandwich?
rfenst Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,601
DadZilla3 wrote:
Gold is the money of kings; silver is the money of gentlemen; barter is the money of peasants; but debt is the money of slaves. - Norm Franz


So, what is "leverage"?
pdxstogieman Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
rfenst wrote:
So, what is "leverage"?


The money of grifters
ZRX1200 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,731
Robert I wasn't asking.

I was joking about the two pieces of bread in Amerika's **** sammich.


BTW it better come with a kick ass pickle! I love a rueben.
bloody spaniard Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
rfenst wrote:
So, what is "leverage"?



Negotiations with your mother-in-law's kidnappers. BWAAAAHAHAHA!Mellow
pdxstogieman Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
bloody spaniard wrote:
Negotiations with your mother-in-law's kidnappers. BWAAAAHAHAHA!Mellow


Touche!
bobsnook Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-02-2006
Posts: 279
easy money
DadZilla3 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
rfenst wrote:
So, what is "leverage"?

Ask ****** Fuld. Or Hank Paulson. Or anybody who was associated with Lehman Brothers, LTCM, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, AIG, Washington Mutual, or Barings Bank.

Or anybody in the U.S. Treasury Department.
rfenst Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,601
DadZilla3 wrote:
Ask ****** Fuld. Or Hank Paulson. Or anybody who was associated with Lehman Brothers, LTCM, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, AIG, Washington Mutual, or Barings Bank.

Or anybody in the U.S. Treasury Department.


So, leverage is a bad thing?
Stinkdyr Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
Bernanke figures that if Greenspan "The Great Inflator" could firk things up this badly so far by overprinting the USD, then dialing it up to TURBO should fix it!

Beer
DrMaddVibe Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
Stinkdyr wrote:
Bernanke figures that if Greenspan "The Great Inflator" could firk things up this badly so far by overprinting the USD, then dialing it up to TURBO should fix it!

Beer



The Keynesians...despite being dead wrong on everything they've done...are now in panic mode doubling down.

They won't be happy until they crash EVERYTHING.

EVERYWHERE.

They have to to preserve the notion that they're right, and that they always have been!

I've been paying attention to China...it's going to make Greece (faking all of their economic news and getting busted!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-09-23/greece-caught-underreporting-its-budget-deficit-nearly-50) look responsible!

When France and Great Britain find out what Germany already knows regarding Greece...we could be looking at a possible WWIII. When China has to admit to their own ahem..."accounting irregularities"...well, let's just say they'll do EVERYTHING under the sun first before they admit they were..."wrong".

No, we had a real chance to take down the Federal Reserve chokehold on America but we weren't ready for that man or the pain it would inflict. No, it's all unicorn rides, lollipops and rainbows...mix in American Karaoke and Dancing with the NASCAR stars...throw in a little redmeat like the NFL and MMA cage fighting and VIOLA...the masses stay tuned to THAT...instead of what's really important!

Besides...there's that whole US vs THEM...unreal debacle that happens every 4 years to distract us.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
The Fed Is Systematically Destroying Social Security And The Retirement Plans Of Millions



The Social Security trust fund needs to earn interest to achieve levels that will preserve it till 2033; with interest rates close to zero, the trust fun is projected to be depleted ten years earlier - by 2023. By law, the money deposited in the SS trust fund must be invested in U.S. government securities, so it cannot just be thrown into the stock market. In order for SS Ponzi to work, the trust fund, invested in government securities, needs to produce healthy returns. It won't; it can't. Thanks QE-genie Bernanke. ~ Ilene


Last week the mainstream media hailed QE3 as the "quick fix" that the U.S. economy desperately needs, but the truth is that the policies that the Federal Reserve is pursuing are going to be absolutely devastating for our senior citizens. By keeping interest rates at exceptionally low levels, the Federal Reserve is absolutely crushing savers and is systematically destroying Social Security.

Meanwhile, the inflation that QE3 will cause is going to be absolutely crippling for the millions upon millions of retired Americans that are on a fixed income. Sadly, most elderly Americans have no idea what the Federal Reserve is doing to their financial futures. Most Americans that are approaching retirement age have not adequately saved for retirement, and the Social Security system that they are depending on is going to completely and totally collapse in the coming years.

Right now, approximately 56 million Americans are collecting Social Security benefits. By 2035, that number is projected to grow to a whopping 91 million. By law, the Social Security trust fund must be invested in U.S. government securities. But thanks to the low interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve, the average interest rate on those securities just keeps dropping and dropping.

The trustees of the Social Security system had projected that the Social Security trust fund would be completely gone by 2033, but because of the Fed policy of keeping interest rates exceptionally low for the foreseeable future it is now being projected by some analysts that Social Security will be bankrupt by 2023. Overall, the Social Security system is facing a 134 trillion dollar shortfall over the next 75 years. Yes, you read that correctly. The collapse of Social Security is inevitable, and the foolish policies of the Federal Reserve are going to make that collapse happen much more rapidly.

The only way that the Social Security system is going to be able to stay solvent is for the Social Security trust fund to earn a healthy level of interest.

By law, all money deposited in the Social Security trust fund must be invested in U.S. government securities. The following is from the official website of the Social Security Administration....

By law, income to the trust funds must be invested, on a daily basis, in securities guaranteed as to both principal and interest by the Federal government. All securities held by the trust funds are "special issues" of the United States Treasury. Such securities are available only to the trust funds.

.

In the past, the trust funds have held marketable Treasury securities, which are available to the general public. Unlike marketable securities, special issues can be redeemed at any time at face value. Marketable securities are subject to the forces of the open market and may suffer a loss, or enjoy a gain, if sold before maturity. Investment in special issues gives the trust funds the same flexibility as holding cash.

So in order for the Social Security Ponzi scheme to work, those investments in government securities need to produce healthy returns.

Unfortunately, the ultra-low interest rate policy of the Federal Reserve is making this impossible.

The average rate of interest earned by the Social Security trust fund has declined from 6.1 percent in January 2003 to 3.9 percent today, and it is going to continue to go even lower as long as the Fed continues to keep interest rates super low.

A recent article by Bruce Krasting detailed how this works. Just check out the following example....

$135 billion of old bonds matured this year. This money was rolled over into new bonds with a yield of only 1.375%. The average yield on the maturing securities was 5.64%. The drop in yield on the new securities lowers SSA’s income by $5.7B annually. Over the fifteen year term of the investments, that comes to a lumpy $86 billion.

So what happens when the Social Security trust fund runs dry?

As Bruce Krasting also noted, all Social Security payments would immediately be cut by 25 percent.....

Anyone who is 55 or older should be worried about this. Based on current law, all SS benefit payments must be cut by (approximately) 25% when the TF is exhausted. This will affect 72 million people. The economic consequences will be severe.

In other words, it would be a complete and total nightmare.

Sadly, the truth is that the Social Security trust fund might not even make it into the next decade. Most Social Security trust fund projections assume that there will be no recessions and that there will be a very healthy rate of growth for the U.S. economy over the next decade.

So what happens if we have another major recession or worse?

And most Americans know that something is up with Social Security. According to a Gallup survey, 67 percent of all Americans believe that there will be a Social Security crisis within 10 years.

Part of the problem is that there are way too many people retiring and not nearly enough workers to support them.

Back in 1950, each retiree's Social Security benefit was paid for by 16 U.S. workers. But now things are much different. According to new data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are now only 1.75 full-time private sector workers for each person that is receiving Social Security benefits in the United States.

And remember, the number of Americans drawing on Social Security will increase by another 35 million by the year 2035.

Another factor that is rapidly becoming a major problem is the growth of the Social Security disability program.

Since 2008, 3.6 million more Americans have been added to the rolls of the Social Security disability insurance program.

Today, more than 8.7 million Americans are collecting Social Security disability payments.

So how does this compare to the past?

Back in August 1967, there were approximately 65 workers for each American that was collecting Social Security disability payments.

Today, there are only 16.2 workers for each American that is collecting Social Security disability payments.

The Social Security Ponzi scheme is rapidly approaching a crisis point.

Sadly, the Federal Reserve has made it incredibly difficult to save for your own retirement.

Millions upon millions of Baby Boomers that diligently saved money for retirement are finding that their savings accounts are paying out next to nothing thanks to the ultra-low interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve.

The following is one example of how the low interest rate policies of the Fed have completely devastated the retirement plans of many elderly Americans....

You can understand the impact of the invisible tax on the elderly by watching the decline of interest income from $50,000 invested in a five-year Treasury obligation. As recently as 2000, this would have yielded about 6.15 percent and an interest income of $3,075 a year. Now the same obligation is yielding 0.7 percent and an interest income of $350 a year. This is the lowest yield on this maturity of Treasury debt since the Federal Reserve started keeping an index of the yields in 1953.

But it's more than a low interest rate. It's an income decline of nearly 89 percent in just 12 years.

And after you account for inflation, those that put money into savings accounts today are actually losing money.

Of course most Americans have not saved up much money for retirement anyway. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, 46 percent of all American workers have less than $10,000 saved for retirement, and 29 percent of all American workers have less than $1,000 saved for retirement.

Overall, a study conducted by Boston College's Center for Retirement Research discovered that American workers are $6.6 trillion short of what they need to retire comfortably.

So needless to say, we have a major problem.

Baby Boomers are just starting to retire and the Social Security system is still solvent at the moment, and yet the number of elderly Americans that are experiencing financial problems is already soaring.

For example, between 1991 and 2007 the number of Americans between the ages of 65 and 74 that filed for bankruptcy rose by a staggering 178 percent.

Also, at this point one out of every six elderly Americans is already living below the federal poverty line.

So how bad are things going to be when Social Security collapses?

That is frightening to think about.

In the short-term, millions upon millions of retired Americans that are living on fixed incomes are going to be absolutely crushed by the inflation that QE3 is going to cause.

Just like we saw with QE1 and QE2, a lot of the money from QE3 is going to end up in agricultural commodities and oil. That means that retirees (and all the rest of us) are going to end up paying more for food at the supermarket and gasoline at the pump.

But those on fixed incomes are not going to see a corresponding increase in their incomes. That means that their standards of living will go down.

Things are tough for retirees right now, but they are going to get a lot tougher.

Right now, there are somewhere around 40 million senior citizens. By 2050 that number is projected to increase to 89 million.

So how will our society cope with more than twice as many senior citizens?

Sadly, we will likely never get to find out.

The truth is that our system is almost certainly going to totally collapse long before then.

We are rapidly approaching a financial crisis unlike anything we have ever seen before in U.S. history, and the foolish policies of the Federal Reserve just keep making things even worse.


http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-09-24/fed-systematically-destroying-social-security-and-retirement-plans-millions




But...but..we've got a printing press!horse
DadZilla3 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
DrMaddVibe wrote:
No, it's all unicorn rides, lollipops and rainbows...mix in American Karaoke and Dancing with the NASCAR stars...throw in a little redmeat like the NFL and MMA cage fighting and VIOLA...the masses stay tuned to THAT...instead of what's really important!


Would that we had a candidate with the cojones to say that in a campaign speech on national television.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,735
We had one that said NAFTA was a giant sucking sound...the crazy old "grandma" in the basement was the National Debt and he was marginalized.


He didn't exactly help his cause by quitting and then re-entering the race...and picking a sack of dirty laundry for a running mate BUT he did dare the American populace to think of the issues that are killing her now.

Imagine for one second if we were free enough to actually have all of the candidates that are running for office speak on national tv for the debates...NO TIME LIMITS...simple rules...if Candidate A talks about an issue for 30 minutes to get his point across, each and every other candidate get the same time to do so too! See the debates for what they are...Corporate Networks that have already given the questions to the candidates. It's all scripted. It comes down to who has the better tan in the studio lights...who's hair looks better on camera...a GOTCHA moment where someone might misspeak a fact off the cuff...and who can forget those non-partisan YouTube questions asked my party chairman's with a different hairstyle to hide it all away from John Q. Sixpack and little Suzy Homemaker.

Makes anyone want to puke.

THIS is what we get? THIS? Not better nor different ideas...THIS?

Its really no wonder that http://www.internationalliving-magazine.com is soo damned appealing!
DadZilla3 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
DrMaddVibe wrote:
We had one that said NAFTA was a giant sucking sound...the crazy old "grandma" in the basement was the National Debt and he was marginalized.

And remember back in 1992 when Pat Buchanan was running in the Republican primaries and scared the hell out of the liberals and moderates of both parties with his far out, crazy we-have-to-rein-in-the-big-banks and we-have-to-stop-getting-embroiled-in-Middle-East-politics campaign rhetoric?

Back in 1992 that was...9 years before 9/11 and 16 years before the economic collapse of 2008.

Yeah, we were told, what a whacko out of touch right-winger.
Users browsing this topic
Guest