America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by usahog. 1 reply replies.
Reg is Regs
THL Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-22-2002
Posts: 3,044
This is unverified by Snopes but nonetheless amusing.



If you have had an eye or ear full of regulations, read the following...
>I promise that you will also be entertained. This is an actual letter
>sent to a man named Ryan DeVries by the Michigan Department of
>Environmental Quality, State of Michigan. Wait till you read this guy's
>response-but read the State's letter before you get to the response letter.
>
>SUBJECT: DEQ File No.97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County
>
>Dear Mr. DeVries:
>
>It has come to the attention of the Department of Environmental Quality
>that there has been recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced
>parcel of property. You have been certified as the legal landowner
>and/or contractor who did the following unauthorized activity:
>
>Construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet
>stream of Spring Pond. A permit must be issued prior to the start of
>this type of activity. A review of the Department's files shows that no
>permits have been issued. Therefore, the Department has determined that
>this activity is in violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of
>the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the
>Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the
>Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
>
>The Department has been informed that one or both of the dams partially
>failed during a recent rain event, causing debris and flooding at
>downstream locations. We find that dams of this nature are inherently
>hazardous and cannot be permitted. The Department therefore orders you
>to cease and desist all activities at this location, and to restore the
>stream to a free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming
>the dams from the stream channel. All restoration work shall be
>completed no later than January 31, 2003.
>
>Please notify this office when the restoration has been completed so
>that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff. Failure
>to comply with this request or any further unauthorized activity on the
>site may result in this case being referred for elevated enforcement
>action. We anticipate and would appreciate your full cooperation in this
>matter.
>
>Please feel free to contact me at this office if you have any questions.
>
>Sincerely, David L. Price District Representative Land and Water
>Management Division
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>This is the actual response sent back by Mr. DeVries:
>
>Dear Mr. Price,
>
>Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County.
>
>Your certified letter dated 10/17/02 has been handed to me to respond
>to. I am the legal landowner but not the Contractor at 2088 Dagget,
>Pierson, Michigan. A couple of beavers are in the (State unauthorized)
>process of constructing and maintaining two wood "debris" dams across
>the outlet stream of my Spring Pond.
>
>While I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise their dam project, I
>think they would be highly offended that you call their skillful use of
>natures building materials "debris." I would like to challenge your
>department to attempt to emulate their dam project any time and/or any
>place you choose. I believe I can safely state there is no way you could
>ever match their dam skills, their dam resourcefulness, their dam
>ingenuity, their dam persistence, their dam determination and/or their
>dam work ethic.
>
>As to your request, I do not think the beavers are aware that they must
>first fill out a dam permit prior to the start of this type of dam activity.
>
>My first dam question to you is: (1) Are you trying to discriminate
>against my Spring Pond Beavers or (2) do you require all beavers
>throughout this State to conform to said dam request? If you are not
>discriminating against these particular beavers, through the Freedom of
>Information Act, I request completed copies of all those other
>applicable beaver dam permits that have been issued. Perhaps we will see
>if there really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and
>Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act
>451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of
>the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
>
>I have several concerns. My first concern is -- aren't the beavers
>entitled to legal representation? The Spring Pond Beavers are
>financially destitute and are unable to pay for said representation-so
>the State will have to provide them with a dam lawyer. The Department's
>dam concern that either one or both of the dams failed during a recent
>rain event causing flooding is proof that this is a natural occurrence,
>which the Department is required to protect.
>
>In other words, we should leave the Spring Pond Beavers alone rather
>than harassing them and calling their dam names. If you want the stream
>"restored" to a dam free-flow condition please contact the beavers --
>but if you are going to arrest them, they obviously did not pay any
>attention to your dam letter they being unable to read English. In my
>humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have a right to build their
>unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the grass is green and
>water flows downstream. They have more dam rights than I do to live and
>enjoy Spring Pond. If the Department of Natural Resources and
>Environmental Protection lives up to its name, it should protect the
>natural resources (Beavers) and the environment (Beavers' Dams).
>
>So, as far as the beavers and I are concerned, this dam case can be
>referred for more elevated enforcement action right now. Why wait until
>1/31/2003?
>
>The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the dam ice then and there will be
>no way for you or your dam staff to contact/harass them then.
>
>In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention to a real
>environmental quality (health) problem in the area. It is the bears!
>Bears are actually defecating in our woods. I definitely believe you
>should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave the beavers alone.
>If you are going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your step! (The
>bears are not careful where they dump!)
>
>Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being unable to
>contact you on your dam answering machine, I am sending this response to
>your dam office.
>
>Ryan DeVries
usahog Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
LMFAO!!!!!!

That is a Great Responce to what actually happens... I would say this letter would be Authenic no matter what snopes says LMAO!!!!

Great Post THL!!!

Hog
Users browsing this topic
Guest