America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by cwilhelmi. 56 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
What the Hell is This Part DOOooooooooo
usahog Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
BREAKING NEWS WMD's in Iraq????
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_399454,00050004.htm

Kuwait foils smuggling of chemicals, bio warheads from Iraq
Associated Press
Kuwait City, October 2

Kuwaiti security authorities have foiled an attempt to smuggle $60 million worth of chemical weapons and biological warheads from Iraq to an unnamed European country, a Kuwaiti newspaper said on Wednesday.
The pro-Government Al-Siyassah, quoting an unnamed security source, said the suspects had been watched by security since they arrived in Kuwait and were arrested "in due time." It did not say when or how the smugglers entered Kuwait or when they were arrested.

The paper said the smugglers might have had accomplices inside Kuwait. It said Interior Minister Sheik Nawwaf Al Ahmed Al Sabah would hand over the smuggled weapons to an FBI agent at a news conference, but did not say when.

Government officials could not be immediately reached for comment.

Iraqi Interior Minister Nouri Al-Badran met on Tuesday with Sheik Nawwaf and discussed cooperation between the two countries in security matters. His visit is the first by an Iraqi interior minister to Kuwait since 1990.

More to Come!!!!!

Hog
Tobasco Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2003
Posts: 2,809


Hhhmmmm...weapons of mass destuction? how can this be?

Well, we,ve only found countless numbers of mass graves, small arms buried all over, and a fleet of fighter planes buried.

But, I know its some kinda gimmick from the Bush camp. We all know that he made all this stuff up. We went to war for nothing, and here is more proof of our stupidity.

Wow, you Dems are always right. I'm sorry that I even suspected those religious muslims, of doing wrong. We sure are a bunch of paranoid Conservatives. Once again I apologize...

Hehehe!!

Mag

ikonoklast7 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-13-2003
Posts: 683
It's about time some of this **** turned up.

Now Dubya can get all those nay-sayers off his back.
usahog Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Ikono... what do we do about Syria???

this is only the **** that got into a US Friendly Country... what about all the **** that was smuggled into Syria??? and the Syrian gov. paying for the Jihads against US Soldiers and Americans???

Can we get on with the Ass Whipins Now????
Cuz there's a War on Terror ya'll know??

and it's costin everyone Billions to be Taking the Fight to them, instead of waiting for lets say, the Old Sear's Towers to Collapse because a couple of 767's slammed em!!!!! while we waited to see if anything else happend and saved our Economy!!!

Hog
DrMaddVibe Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,516
What about the oil? Can't forget the oil! That's the best one, it gets me laughing every time...that is until I have to fill up my SUV!
uncleb Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 11-13-2002
Posts: 1,326
Not doubting the validity of this but how come I cannot find any mention of this anywhere on any of the news outlets (FOXNEWS, MSNBC, USATODAY, ETC.)? I tried the attached link and it doesn't seem to open.
I would think that if this was true that the Bush team would be making sure that it is front page. Can anyone provide another link that covers this story?
RDC Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 01-21-2000
Posts: 5,874
Shhhhh, dont let Rick read this! He wouldn't believe it anyway I guess.
usahog Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34881

do you really think this is what the White House,Senete and Pentagon want out in the Media???

you gotta learn how to dig for the info better!!!!

Hog
uncleb Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 11-13-2002
Posts: 1,326
Yes, I absolutley think this is what the White House,Senete and Pentagon would want to publicize seeing how hard they are getting hammered for not finding any WMD in Iraq.
usahog Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Then you are Blind.... and I say that with Facts to back up the Claim!!!!!!


Hog
uncleb Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 11-13-2002
Posts: 1,326
What am i missing. Why wouldn't they want to publicize that there were, in fact, WMD's in Iraq.

Please restore my sight Oh Great One.
choner Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-04-2003
Posts: 876
I actually agree with uncleb, this is something that the higher ups would love to publicise. But I'm pretty sure this was a little sugar coated by the small Kuwaiti newspaper which probably had no real proof. I love that the story says "unnamed european country", "unnamed security source", "no details about suspect", "no time was given about press conference,".

There's really no meat to the story as of now, just some small "pro-government" newspaper printing the story. I'll wait and see if this unfolds.

And Mag, you can probably find mass graves in several other countries if you really look, maybe Cambodia, North Korea, Iran, and probably a few of the Eastern European areas. And I hope we didn't go to war because they buried small arms and planes in the ground.

Just my 2 cents.

choner


choner
usahog Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
I've already given you the Facts on Why to Not make this a Big Issue... and I don't give a **** if your Dem. or Rep. Liberal or Conservative... Left or Right handed... how many posts have I posted links after links on Gulf War Syndrom... and Veterans are still coming home with unknown Symptoms from something or Other...you need more links or can you add things up??
I ain't your Great One... But I will tell ya I like to walk in his shadow and allow him to guide me!!!!
just type in my user handle in search and read up on the Gulf War and Veterans!!!! your answer as to WHY is sitting right there!!!!!

Hog
usahog Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/pest_final/index.html

http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/

http://www.military.com/NewsContent?file=FL_gulf_092303

http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/veterans/default2g.htm

here's some light on the Big Picture....

Hog
uncleb Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 11-13-2002
Posts: 1,326
!!!!! !!!!! !!!!!
!!!!!

B
usahog Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Glad to see I left you Speachless Unc.

you must have gotten the picture eh???

Good
Hog
uncleb Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 11-13-2002
Posts: 1,326
Hog,

You really do give yourslef way too much credit. You do make me laugh but you never leave me speechless.

B.
usahog Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
No I really don't Uncleb.... I guess you just really don't get it... either that or you really don't give a ****!!! I'm guessing the Latter part!!!!!

Hog
usahog Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Two Iraqi Scientists Were Shot For Helping U.S., Kay Says
12:23 AM EDT | 8:23 AM Iraq | Posted By Alan
Taiwan News Day continues, with more from eTaiwan.com:
http://www.command-post.org/iraq_index.html
Two Iraqi scientists were shot in Baghdad after they talked to the U.S.-led team hunting weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and others believe they will be in danger if they collaborate in the search, Washington's chief weapons inspector David Kay said on Friday ...

... Some Iraqi scientists have sought relocation in the United States out of fear for the safety of their families, and others who want to stay in Iraq seek security guarantees, Kay told reporters on a conference call. "They believe they are in genuine danger ... if they collaborate with us," he said.

One scientist was "assassinated literally hours after meeting" with a member of the WMD-hunting team, killed by a single shot to the back of his head outside his apartment, Kay said. There were no signs of robbery.

Another scientist, who was "really golden for us," was shot six times but survived, he said. Kay declined to name them.

this couldn't have anything to do with why it's taking so long to uncover the WoMD's that I would bet are many of them are sitting in Syria!!!

Oh and like I said before you Critisize the web link... your going to hear more coming out of Over Sea's news reports then you will the US News!!!

Hog
usahog Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
update on Kay's assesment that didn't hit the Media circuts... But can we believe transcripts from the CIA's website???
http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html

Enjoy!!!!
Hog
usahog Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
here's more to read up on...

http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/

Hog
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
usahog

take a deep breath and then write your response in your word program. when you have finished, look over your text and see if you have said everything on your mind. copy and paste on the board.

unless you just like typing your name.
usahog Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
This one needs to stay on Top... So when someone says Well Where's the WOMD's??? they can refer them to this site with the Latest Release on whats been found...
Reading it for themselves will shut them UP!!!!

update on Kay's assesment that didn't hit the Media circuts... But can we believe transcripts from the CIA's website???

http://www.cia.gov/cia/public_affairs/speeches/2003/david_kay_10022003.html

Hog
usahog Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Rick I like Typing my Name LMAO!!!!

your ploy to try and divert the Issue didn't work...

You Asked for the Where the WOMD's Are... There right there in the Website posted above!!!!
Read and Enjoy!!!!

Hog
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
ok
cwilhelmi Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
Hog - Why would the White house not be releasing this when they have proof, don't you think it would help GWB get some pressure off of him and the administration?? Until they release something with real proof they're just going to catch more crap, and shred any substance to this stuff your posting since they're not using it.
usahog Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
CWil the article I posted above is released it's public information on the CIA's Web site... the Question is.. is why is the Media beating the drums to a Negative against the Bush Administration and their not releasing any of this Information out to the Public?? in this day and age... if you want to find it.. you can with Computer Technology, just have to know where to look... and really you have to have a care to look also....
Less thought put into it... the better it is for all... more or less stated....

after a Military Veterans return home and all the ticker tape and Yellow Ribbons are gone... and dust settles... Who really Cares??? a month or two later???
I asked in a post months back... how many Military Members have we lost in Afganistan since the War on Terror Started?? when did the War on Terror Start??

no one knows and not many had answers even when I gave the web sites to look it up... we're still losing members just about every day there... but you don't see it Plastered on the front page like you do the **** in Iraq and the Poor Military Members are dropping right and left... Thus it Angers American people.. who do not really see the scope of the whole
lets use the word "Big Picture" Ross Parot!!!
what everyone normally gets out of media these days is Bias BS to fill the pages... Negative Bush's War and we shouldn't be there... the real fact hiding here... is even years later military folks are coming down with sickness's Unexplained... and then they... The Military Members have to Proove what caused this... until then they just cannot function right... I've also posted links to these events....Connections ETC...
the Senate forced by the VA and other Organizations Years into Studies have Spent Billions to try and find out whats up with this...

Now I ask you... and anyone else for that Matter... what if folks in America started coming down with Symptoms... unknown to the cause... and it became an epedimic (sp) and started spreading across the country...Diagnosis and studies are done.. know one knows for sure what it is (sounds like Aids Huh?) anyways different Metabiliziums (sp) in different folks.. so their effected in different ways... one neighbor drops dead over night where you yourself lives a few years but then your brothers and sisters become infected and within Months there Gone..... then what... would you call this a Crisis???
I'm Curious to what peoples reaction to this would be???
Rick? CWil? Mag? anyone else?

Hog
usahog Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
CWil you asked me a Question and I answered you...

I also asked you one back???

Hog
cwilhelmi Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
You didn't really answer the question though. If they've found WMD then the administration should/would be all over it to take pressure off. WMD are not chemical weapons or biological weapons, they are nuclear weapons.

In your link David Kay said this,"Despite evidence of Saddam's continued ambition to acquire nuclear weapons, to date we have not uncovered evidence that Iraq undertook significant post-1998 steps to actually build nuclear weapons or produce fissile material."

So Kay is saying they have found no evidence of WMD yet, right???



You keep posting stuff about the chemical effects and assume that no one cares, well I do care but it seems hard to really understand what's going on. It is obviously not an imagined illness, we have people who are sick and there needs to be something done, but from what I've read there has been no cross contamination to siblings, spouses, etc.. of any kind. It doesn't seem to be an epidemic that's crawling accross our country as the scenario you mentioned, so there's really no need to answer your question.
HockeyDad Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Chris,

It seems you have broken ranks from the Democratic Party and mainstream media and have now defined WMD as only nuclear. Is there a threshold on deaths to quantify when something is a weapon of mass destruction as compared to just a regular weapon of standard destruction? Over the last century, international treaty efforts seem to have specifically gone after chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons as WMD. ...Just curious as to your definition? How about a 1000 people in a single shot?

http://www.kdp.pp.se/chemical.html is a Kurdish website that could shed some light but it is not for the squeemish.

Also, did you ever figure out why Bill Clinton and George W. Bush seem to have reached the exact same opinion on Iraq and their threat to the United States. Let me refresh your memory with the following:

"Good evening. Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programmes and its military capacity to threaten its neighbours."

"The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world."

"The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government - a government ready to live in peace with its neighbours, a government that respects the rights of its people. Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort. We will strengthen our engagement with the full range of Iraqi opposition forces and work with them effectively and prudently."

The previous three quotes all come from President Bill Clinton's speech to the nation, December 16, 1998.

Sounds like a George W Bush speech....?
cwilhelmi Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
HockeyDad - If you read Hog's link they do the delineation between the weapons, not me...
HockeyDad Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Chris,

The Kay report refers to WMD as nuclear, biological, and chemical. Your statement was "WMD are not chemical weapons or biological weapons, they are nuclear weapons."
cwilhelmi Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
HockeyDad - After re-reading the Kay document you are right as far as his definition of WMD. I have always asumed WMD basically meant nuclear weapons.

I guess the real point is this, if it was such an immediate threat to the US then there should be fully functional and ready to deploy weapons, and this is what has not been found. Kay mentions plans and research but until there's something that shows an immediate threat then the risk assesment doesn't match what we were told when this war started.
usahog Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
HockeyDad it isn't going to do any good to argue with him about what he stated... the KAY Report is on IRAQ's WMD's All not just Nuclier... he only viewed a bit of it rather then read the whole... and it is an official Site of the findings to Date...

I think Rick even agreed with his "Ok" answer???

"You keep posting stuff about the chemical effects and assume that no one cares, well I do care but it seems hard to really understand what's going on. It is obviously not an imagined illness, we have people who are sick and there needs to be something done, but from what I've read there has been no cross contamination to siblings, spouses, etc.. of any kind. It doesn't seem to be an epidemic that's crawling accross our country as the scenario you mentioned, so there's really no need to answer your question."
(It doesn't seem to be an epidemic that's crawling accross our country as the scenario you mentioned, so there's really no need to answer your question) Exactly what I wanted to hear you Say... the reason there isn't this crawling across our Country is because the Bush Administration and The Military Kept any of this from Happening (So Far)... even though the threat is real it hasn't hit our country like it could very easly had... but our Military Members are coming in contact with some ****... and it is destroying their lives... slowly but surely... and why don't we see this happening to all these Iraqi People also? effecting them??? because they have yet to be accounted for after a regime who did not give a **** for their own people.... there are also 1000's of these people effected by this crap....

You Asked where's the WMD's I just gave you the Factual Link to your Answer... I'm sorry your reading through it!!!!!

walk out your door and picture a warehouse 50 sq miles in size.. with over 600,000 Tons of soda cans in it...Coke, Pepsi, Mt Dew,mr Pibb, dr pepper, any kind you can Imagine.. then it's your job along with a dozen other people... hell we'll give you 30 people split up on 3 shifts.. your mission is to find every "Dented" Sprite Can in the Stock... how long do you think this would take you? owe wait a minute you need to add your working in 120-130 degree heat inside a closed up warehouse minimal or no lighting (remember they were and still are without power to many places over there) and then add you Protective Chemical Gear (Because you'll need that in case you come across some WMD's) say Nerve Agent that has leaked...You Have know Idea what the Nerve or Blister Agent does to you... and even the pictures on the site HockyDad posted doesn't give Justic... Imagine the Aggony of these people trying to stay alive and knowing their Dead already???

So with all that said and all these folks.. how long would it take you to dig up every dented sprite can out of that mess... Oh and when your done there's still another 129 more buildings comparable in size and quantity!!!!

Hog
usahog Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Catching Crap is easy to Brush off to the Public Cwil... telling Military Members there's a damn good chance you may come down with something thats going to kill you maybe in the next year to 10 years...

You think everyone who signs on the dotted line is going to stay with their commitment to the service??

I would but thats just me... I'm Nutts remember!!!!
but there would be tons of folks heading out the gates... simply on Speculations and proven facts in the past previous War in Iraq 1990-1991...


one more thing... in what I wrote above... it's like this... look at use Military Members as the Scrubbing Bubbles Men and Women who clean your Toilet Bowls... we do the work so you don't have to!!!!
We Take the Brunt So you don't have to!!!!
Stop siding with the Media on Bias Bull**** and stand Proud for the Military memebers guarding your Freedoms...

and I ain't talking about me...

Hog
usahog Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
"I guess the real point is this, if it was such an immediate threat to the US then there should be fully functional and ready to deploy weapons, and this is what has not been found. Kay mentions plans and research but until there's something that shows an immediate threat then the risk assesment doesn't match what we were told when this war started."

Chris, remember the Anthrax Scare??? it was real it happend and how and where did the Anthrax come from???

and that **** fit right in an envelope... was it functional and was it in an operational deploment of a weapon???

OK... thats what we Prevented!!!!!

Hog
cwilhelmi Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
Hog - I'm not siding with the media or against the military, you're reading much more into it than you should. And don't you think part of the reason I want to make sure we went over there for the right reasons is so that more of our military members don't have to die for a war that we may have started for the wrong reasons???

You can't seem to separate questioning the government and the administration from hating our troops and supporting the terrorists. These do not always lump together!! I love and support our military members and that's part of the reason I question going into Iraq!!

The antrax analogy is a very weak attempt at proving immediate danger, there's so many countries that could have done that, and it wasn't exactly an attempt at "mass distruction".
usahog Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
CWil, I give Up... you are so Pessimistic with your View about all this even when you have the facts in your Hand...

"You can't seem to separate questioning the government and the administration from hating our troops and supporting the terrorists."
What are you talking about here?? who's supporting the terrorists?

How can you say the Anthrax anology was weak? this is exactly what the Government has been protecting us from... and who else in the world would want to cause greater harm to Americans then Saddam Hussain and his Group... it wasn't like he needed the money for his Bio Chemical crap... the one stran of Anthrax that was at the Senetors Office was traced back to Weapons Grade and "LINKED" to Iraqi's Saddam Hussains crap... and you want to call this Weak....
We are the Great White Satan to his Group just like Osama's Group.... and in the Northern Part Of Iraq in the first Wave of our Advancements into Iraq this last time... Our Special forces along with Kurdish Rebels Wiped out Numerious known Terrorist Groups... but those kinds of things you didn't hear on CNN or any local Media... or if you did it was very little... but there are sites to back these Facts up....
but you want to believe what you want to believe..

I know the Media is for a fact ruining the War Efforts and endangering our Troops with their Liberal Bias News coverage on the whole damn thing!!!!

Hog
HockeyDad Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Chris,

The President of the United States made a decision based on a perceived immediate threat. You have a differing opinion on that threat. Fair enough. Because the President acted, you'll never really be able to know how immediate the threat was.

It is fine that you differ with the President on the definition of immediate threat unless it is merely an axe to grind. Here is a test... On 9-11-01 the World Trade Center towers were destroyed by a terrorist attack, I think all would agreed to this except maybe the French, wait that was the Pentagon. At what point was the World Trade Center under immediate threat?

A. 3 seconds before impact by the first plane.
B. When the airliners were hijacked.
C. When the hijackers boarded the planes.
D. When the hijackers cleared airport security.
E. When the "Go" order was given to attack.
F. When the hijackers enrolled in flight schools.
G. When the hijackers entered the US.
H. When the plan was developed and started.
I. When a truck bombed exploded in the WTC.

We probably all have differing opinions on when the immediate threat started. Intervention at many points would have prevented the attack and we would have never known of the threat. We know all about it now.

Did you ever figure out why Bill Clinton and George W. Bush seem to have reached the exact same opinion on Iraq and their threat to the United States and why Clinton came out in support of the decision? This is an important detail in the grand scheme of things.

You also missed the question on what is a weapon of mass destruction.....If one shot kills 1000 people, is it a weapon of mass destruction or weapon of normal destruction? Keep in mind a nuclear bomb dropped in a vacant desert area kills nobody. Is it still a weapon of mass destruction or just a sand melter?

Here's another tidbit for you. In 1999, the Depart of Defense under President Clinton funded a secret effort to attempt to build a weapons grade anthrax facility in the US. It was staffed by real scientists from our defensive testing facilities and the goal was to see if the purchases to build it would evade detection. By 2000, it had produced one pound of simulated anthrax and had evaded all detection. Some parts were even bought at Lowes. The simulated anthax was a biological weapon that actually is used as a common pesticide worldwide. The process of making it is idential to anthrax except you start with a different germ. As discovered by UN weapons inspectors in the mid-1980s, the main Iraqi anthrax production facility was disguised as making this exact same biological pesticide.

In 2001 the US suffered an anthrax attack that was done with weapons grade material. Somebody knew what they were doing. The crime is unsolved. Was it a knowledgable nutcase or perhaps a test run? Is there an immediate threat right now? Why isn't anybody complaining about that one instead of bickering on party line ideology and posturing for the 2004 election?
usahog Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
HockyDad, I pick (H) for the answer "Clever how you lined up the correct answer with the first letter to your Handle!!!"

"Is there an immediate threat right now?" Your Damn Right There IS

"Why isn't anybody complaining about that one instead of bickering on party line ideology and posturing for the 2004 election?"
I've been Bitching and Complaining about this since 2001

The Reason why no one else is complaining is simple. because Bush took the Fight to the Terrorist, therefore people's feelings are, there isn't an immediate threat on their Livelihood... it's not happening right here or near to them.... So why bother
Actually HockyDad thats a good thing... because that lets the "American Soldiers" Know the Job is being taken care of and the War on Terror is Effective!!!! it's not a waist or a drain on the System and this Includes the War in Iraq!!!!

Great Post HockyDad!!!!!

I must get your Snailer!!!!

Hog
cwilhelmi Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
HockeyDad - Your "threat" question is too subjective, but it sounded like our intel failed and allowed the rest to happen

I don't care why GWB and BC may sound the same, I don't remember discussing Clinton on this thread, I thought it was about why we attacked Iraq this year and the "immediate" threat the posed to us.

I'm sure there is a technical definition of WMD that the military has, and I'm sure it's based on potential destruction, what is this a setup for...

Yes, anthrax is easy to make and VERY danderous, I understand that. This detracts from your points if anyone could have made it...

In order to make Anthrax viable as a mass destruction weapon it has to have a delivery vehicle. The mail system won't work because it will be caught before long and the damage minimized. This means a missile or something which most nutcases don't have...

I'm done on this
usahog Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
CWil? How did the Japanies Terrorist Group do there damage in 1994?

or do you even recall that one happening??

Hog
usahog Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Jesus Chris... you go on a defensive whenever Clinton is mentioned in any situation and then you block out everything else around the Issues...

what HockyDad is trying to Say... even Clinton Like GWB also viewed what possible threat Saddam Hussains Iraq had on the Western World...

you didn't answer my Question on the Japanies Terrorists in 1994... let me refresh your Memory...
they used Syrin Gas in the Subway Tunnels in the Rypongi (sp) District in Tokyo Japan.. set up with a timer system so it would go off during business hours.. that District they set this up in is one of the Busiest districts in Tokyo or Japan for that matter during rush hour of Business... it killed quite a few people.. but the thing about it... know one knew in advance that this was going to happen... and it was not a large quantity of Syrin.. it wouldn't take much to start creating Havock in the United States... something here or there... major areas rural areas etc... I personally think Our President and Our Military and the War on Terror Campain has been very successful and combating this Threat (Including Iraq because Saddam was known for having and using at his leasure these Weapons Of Mass Distruction. He would have given the **** away if he knew the Terrorists were going to use it against the "Great Satan" Western World) they have kept it off American Soils and Protecting American's Lives and Livelihoods!!!!

you can bitch and moan all you want.. but the FACT is... the Plan is working and there's still a long road to hoe.. With all Americans sticking together We Will Prevail!!!!!!!!!!

Hog
cwilhelmi Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
"Japanese" terrorists with "saran" gas yes I remember, let's bomb Japan then, they pose an immediate threat, right???

please use spell check, you're KILLING me before the terrorists even have a chance!! ;-)

I don't care about Clinton, how f*cking hard is that to understand, all you guys can do is bring him up and assume that since he and GWB agreed that everyone should. Not that easy!! I'm not going on the defensive, I'm saying that if using Clinton is the best you can do then don't even respond!!

Hog - here's a statement, do you agree with it or not?
As americans it's our duty to question our government if we think they have acted wrongly! After all they are representatives for us, not for their own devices.

What are your thoughts?
usahog Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
"As americans it's our duty to question our government if we think they have acted wrongly! After all they are representatives for us, not for their own devices." Yep I Believe whole Hartedly with that... but I do not hold a Blind Vengence against our Government for actions I do not know the whole facts on... and one more thing.. I don't Trust our Media Circuit right down to Rush Limball or G Gordon Liddy... but they do bring up some Interesting Facts on whats really going on in America Other then whats being passed along through CNN/Fox/ABC/NBC or any other system out there..If I want to know if something is Factual I research it.... Where's my Buddy Spiney???


"What are your thoughts?" I Think Ignorance is Bliss!!!!!!

Hog
cwilhelmi Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
Then why do you attack people who do their duty, or do you just say that they are "hold(ing) a Blind Vengence against our Government for actions I(they) do not know the whole facts on"?

I do not think I'm holding blind vengance, I'm questioning and being berrated for it.

The media is a joke, too much money and too much opinion instead of objective facts.

You're definitely right though, ignorance is bliss... LOL
usahog Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Chris you are closing your Eye's to the Facts in this Thread Given to you and you still want to argue some other Bull**** off the Topic. anything to create a fog over what is actually and has actually taken place in this country and the world for that matter... I don't give a **** about how you feel about Bush or Clinton.. the Subject here is the WOMD's and why Iraq.. Clinton during his term and all his Advisors and Intelegence people were telling him the same thing as Bush was getting from his Advisors and his Intelegence people... Thus when the "War on Terror" Started (and we didn't start it 911 Remember??) Iraq because of their past denials for over 12 years clear back in the 80's was an immediate threat because as I stated and others have also..Saddam's Capabilities and the known use of them along with his long track record of denieing any UN sanctions on the Issues of WMD Including his wanting to build Nukes... was just one more Hurdle...

that smart ass comment about bomb the Japanies Next.. another Ploy I see of diverting the real Issue... I was on that F*ckin Subway system less than 24 hours earlier I kept the newspapers, subway tickets, pictures, and my Hog Rock T-Shirt that me and 6 others ventured down to Rigungi District in Tokyo to visit just the evening before this crap was unleashed...
"what I was saying to you is this" you don't know and wouldn't know until it was way to late if you've been affected by something like this!!! say Giants Stadium or going to the NFL football game.. anywhere anytime this kind of crap could happen... Don't play it down like it's a F*cking Cold or Flu like your previous posts have been...

You Have to give Credit to the War on Terror and the Military Men and Women who are out there putting their lives on the Line Defending this Crap from Happening to you!!!! and slamming the Bush Administration for whats going on until you've got the Facts on the Whole Situation... and then if you want to continue to slam it.. then you are not only slamming his efforts but also every Military members Efforts out there trying to make our Living a Better place then what it was on 911...

As far as my Typing/spelling... well I get my Point across and if you can't deal with that then don't bother reading my posts...I viewed this as you trying again to change the Topic of this Thread

Hog
cwilhelmi Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
This is going nowhere so I'm not going to respond anymore, but I will say that the spelling thing was a joke, nothing more...
usahog Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
I Agree.. You had the Facts dropped in your lap and it pissed you off.. in a Valent attempt to distract the real Issue on this Thread your Distraction Failed.. you Don't want to give any Credit to Bush's Administation and or the Military for the Efforts to Keep America Free of Terrorist Threats...
Thats just a shun on your part... Thank God not all people in America feel the same Way... and We Will Prevail!!!!!!

Hog
cwilhelmi Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
Are you reading my posts?? I acknowledged the facts of the article and asked a simple question as to the immediate threat of what they have found. After all, we were told that there was an immediate threat, if they can prove that there was an immediate threat, which may be hard as Hockeydad stated, then there was obvious justification for going into Iraq. I'm not so naive as to believe that peace is the only answer and we never have to fight for it.

I also stated that supporting the administration and supporting the troops are not one in the same, I have never and will never speak bad of or wish ill our troops. I hold more respect for them that I can adequately convey; if for no other reason than that they do what I cannot, protect America and everything that makes it great. Don't put words in my mouth on this anymore!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>