America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by CWFoster. 11 replies replies.
PATRIOT ACT: Law's use causing concerns
usahog Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
http://reviewjournal.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&expire=&urlID=8164533&fb=Y&partnerID=565
Use of statute in corruption case unprecedented, attorneys contend

By J.M. KALIL and
STEVE TETREAULT
REVIEW-JOURNAL



The investigation of strip club owner Michael Galardi and numerous politicians appears to be the first time federal authorities have used the Patriot Act in a public corruption probe.

Government officials said Tuesday they knew of no other instances in which federal agents investigating allegations such as racketeering and bribery of politicians have employed the act.

"I don't know that it's been used in a public corruption case before this," said Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the Justice Department.

An attorney for one of the defendants in the Galardi case said he researched the matter for hours Tuesday and came to the same conclusion.

"I have discussed this with lawyers all over the country, and if the government has done this before, then this is definitely the first time it has come to light," said Las Vegas attorney Dominic Gentile, who represents former Clark County Commissioner Lance Malone, Galardi's lobbyist.

Two of Nevada's lawmakers blasted the FBI for employing the act in the Galardi probe, saying the agency overstepped its bounds.

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Congress intended the Patriot Act to help federal authorities root out threats from terrorists and spies after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

"The law was intended for activities related to terrorism and not to naked women," said Reid, who as minority whip is the second most powerful Democrat in the Senate.

"Let me say, with Galardi and his whole gang, I don't condone, appreciate or support all their nakedness. But having said that, I haven't heard anyone say at any time he was involved with terrorism."

Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., said she was preparing an inquiry to the FBI about its guidelines for using the Patriot Act in cases that don't involve terrorism. The law makes it easy for citizens' rights to be abused, she said.

"It was never my intention that the Patriot Act be used for garden-variety crimes and investigations," Berkley said.

But Corallo insisted lawmakers were fully aware the Patriot Act had far-reaching implications beyond fighting terrorism when the legislation was adopted in October 2001.

"I think probably a lot of members (of Congress) were only interested in the anti-terrorism measures," Corallo said. "But when the Judiciary Committee sat down, both Republicans and Democrats, they obviously discussed the applications, that certain provisions could be used in regular criminal investigations."

Federal authorities confirmed Monday the FBI used the Patriot Act to get financial information in its probe of Galardi and his dealings with current and former politicians in Southern Nevada.

"It was used appropriately by the FBI and was clearly within the legal parameters of the statute," said Special Agent Jim Stern of the Las Vegas field office of the FBI.

One source said two Las Vegas stockbrokers were faxed subpoenas Oct. 28 asking for records for many of those identified as either a target or subject of the investigation.

That list includes Galardi, owner of Jaguars and Cheetah's topless clubs; Malone; former Commissioner Erin Kenny; County Commission Chairwoman Mary Kincaid-Chauncey; former County Commission Chairman Dario Herrera; and former Las Vegas City Councilman Michael McDonald, defeated for re-election in June.

A second source confirmed that stockbrokers had been faxed subpoenas asking for information on Galardi, Malone, Kenny, Kincaid-Chauncey, Herrera, McDonald and at least one of the former politicians' spouses.

That source said the subpoena appeared to be a search for hidden proceeds that could be used as evidence of bribery. A source also indicated that records on Las Vegas City Councilman Michael Mack were sought.

Sources said the FBI sought the records under Section 314 of the act. That section allows federal investigators to obtain information from any financial institution regarding the accounts of people "engaged in or reasonably suspected, based on credible evidence, of engaging in terrorist acts or money laundering activities."

Gentile, Malone's attorney, said he plans to mount a legal challenge once he confirms the Patriot Act was used to investigate his client. "My research today indicates that this is the first time the government has used Section 314 in a purely white-collar criminal investigation."

Attorney General John Ashcroft has touted the law as an effective homeland security tool, but coalitions of civil libertarians and conservatives concerned about a too-powerful federal government have led criticism against it.

Corallo said federal law enforcement officials have no qualms about using the act to pursue an array of criminal investigations that have nothing to do with terrorism, such as child pornography, drug trafficking and money laundering.

"I think most of the American people think the Patriot Act is a good thing and it's not affecting their civil liberties at all, and that the government should use any constitutional and legal tools it can, whether it's going after garden-variety criminals or terrorists."

But Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, expressed outrage at Corallo's suggestion that lawmakers were largely aware the Patriot Act's provisions would equip the FBI with new investigative tools beyond the scope of terrorism investigations.

"Those comments are disingenuous at best and do little to inspire confidence that the act won't be systematically abused," Peck said.

Rep. Jim Gibbons, R-Nev., said it may be too soon to weigh its application to a Nevada investigation that still is largely under wraps. Prosecutors have announced no indictments.

Citing the ongoing investigation, Sen. John Ensign and Rep. Jon Porter, both R-Nev., declined to be interviewed.

Porter was not in Congress when lawmakers approved the Patriot Act, but the other four Nevada lawmakers voted as part of large majorities in favor of the measure.

The Patriot Act will expire in 2005 unless Congress renews it. "More activity like this is going to cause us to take a close look at what was passed," Reid said of the law being invoked in the Galardi probe.


Review-Journal writer Carri Geer Thevenot contributed to this report. Stephens Washington Bureau chief Steve Tetreault reported from Washington, D.C.

Homebrew Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
This is exactly why I have spoken out about the Patriot act. I believe that this case will probably challenge the patriot act, before the supreme court, and the whole patriot act will be found Unconstitutional. Thank God. This power grab, by Ashcroft, will be over, and he will be put in his place.
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
P.S.
Thanks for posting this. USAhog.
phenix007 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2002
Posts: 245
brew...I somewhat agree that the concerns about the act are to a large extent becoming true as to effect...However I do not agree that that was the inital intent of the administration...just an expected result of 9/11....the implementation as is soo often the case has gotten a little out of hand...don't think we need to throw out the act but do need to reign it in and protect against abuse...phenix
Homebrew Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
Then why is Ashcroft pushing to expand the powers, given under the patriot act, and make it permanent?
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
phenix007 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2002
Posts: 245
Becausethat's his job and it gives him a very strong tool to do it...he SHOULDbe an advocate for it..with opponents to hold him in check....my biggest concern is it's use in areas where it was never intended....I believe it should be extended given the state of affairs and the threats from terrorists organizations ....but...modified in a way to limit it's application to the scope to which it was intended....too many times it has been used where there is no terrorists issue involved...Phenix
Homebrew Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
My concerns, as well. But I disagree, as to that being his job. Every Public servants FIRST JOB, is to protect the Constitution. Not ignore it, or rewrite it. I am sorry, but if you take away our rights, then the terrorist win. Osama Bin Laden, would love for the 9-11 attacks to result a loss of freedoms, and protections, in the name of the war on terrorism.
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
fudge Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 12-04-2003
Posts: 444
Amen Homebrew
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
sorry, but i agree with all of you and i curse the democrats, republicans, and independents that put so much power in a mad man.

ashcroft is a bigger danger then anyone. he is a loaded gun with some serious problems.

but he says he is a good christian,. does that count for anything? no he isn't and no it doesn't.
CWFoster Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
WOW a concensus! I am as much against terrorism as anyone (being in the military) but I think we also need to continue being Americans, and start worring about being "good little Germans". Many of the good points raised during the arguement for the Patriot Act were also raised to point up the neccssity of imbuing the Chancellor of the Nationalist Socialst Party with unprecedented powers. This was right before Hitler disbanded the Reichstag and became a dictator. I said when the Act was first proposed that I thought Bush's motives were honest, and his intentions hororable, but who knows who might have that power when he's gone? I lying traitor like W.J.Clinton? The man who siced the IRS on the NRA EVERY year for seven years?!?!? We do NOT need to empower the federal government to this extent! I think a good compromise is to allow our intelligence agencies and our military do what they think needs to be done overseas, and stop whining about the Constitutional rights of people who were never citizens, have never been in the US, and whose only desire is to destroy us.
Homebrew Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
Well Put CWFoster.
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
fudge Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 12-04-2003
Posts: 444
Rick, I couldn't agree more about Ashcroft. He is frightening.

Zed
CWFoster Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
I don't like hime either, but he doesn't scare me as much as Janet Reno did.
Users browsing this topic
Guest