America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by buffallo. 5 replies replies.
Tapping Iraqi oil
usahog Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
http://www.theweekmagazine.com/briefing.asp?a_id=387

Tapping Iraqi oil
The U.S. now controls Iraq’s oil fields. Who will benefit when the oil starts flowing again?

How much oil is in Iraq?
An ocean of it. Iraq has at least 112 billion barrels of high-quality crude under its sands, about a tenth of the world’s supply. That’s enough to satisfy the world’s energy needs for a decade. Only Saudi Arabia, with 264 billion barrels, has greater known reserves. But Iraq has vast expanses of territory waiting to be explored. Only 2,000 wells have been drilled in the country, compared to 1 million in Texas. Industry experts estimate that Iraq might be sitting on as much as 300 billion barrels of oil.

So why aren’t Iraqis rich?
Saddam Hussein must take the blame. For two decades, he was more interested in expanding his power than developing Iraq’s wealth. He launched two ruinous wars on his neighbors Iran and Kuwait, and ran up a $100 billion debt. Saddam also made Iraq a pariah nation prohibited from selling its oil abroad. After the Persian Gulf War, Iraqi oil production dropped from 3.5 million barrels a day to near zero. The United Nations authorized a resumption of petroleum exports in 1995 under the oil-for-food program, and by the eve of the American-led invasion, Iraq was exporting about 2.5 million barrels per day, roughly 3 percent of the world’s supply. Seventy percent of the proceeds went to food, medicine, and other essentials, which nearly two-thirds of Iraqis depended on for survival.

What happens now?
First, billions must be invested to get the oil fields back in working order and to drill new wells. Coalition forces managed to protect most of the existing wells from sabotage, but the damage from 20 years of neglect had already been done. Saddam Hussein’s government spent little on maintenance, and equipment is “rusted, corroded, outdated, cannibalized, and improvised,” one expert said. “The pipelines are leaking lakes, refineries are dumping toxic waste,” said Nathaniel Kern, a Middle East analyst. “It is a broken-down industry.” But with a little tender loving care, the Bush administration estimates, the Iraqi oil industry could return to prewar production levels by the end of the year. Industry analysts believe that if Iraq invests $8 billion, it could reach its 1980 output of 3.5 million barrels per day in three years.

Who will have control of that oil?
The White House has promised to put Iraqis in charge as soon as possible. “It’s their oil,” Vice President ****** Cheney said. “It’s their resource.” Administration officials have said they will hand control of oil sales over to the provisional government, called the Interim Iraqi Authority, which is expected to be set up in six months. But Iraqi control will not be absolute. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage recently said that Iraq’s new Energy Ministry will be run, “by and large, by Iraqis, with coalition advice.” That advice will be clear and firm: Iraq should spend the entire annual revenues from oil—about $20 billion—on the reconstruction of Iraq’s roads, power plants, hospitals, pipelines, and other infrastructure.

Will American companies profit?
It seems very likely that they will. Already, a subsidiary of Halliburton, Vice President Cheney’s old company, has been hired for $600 million to put out a handful of oil-well fires set by fleeing Iraqi soldiers, and to patch up equipment needed to get the crude flowing again. Once that work is complete, Iraq will need foreign expertise to drill and pump its oil fields. In recent years, Saddam’s government signed multibillion-dollar contracts with Russian, Chinese, and French companies to develop oil fields in southern and central Iraq. But Iraqi opposition groups now jockeying for power say they want to tear up those contracts. American and British companies would “definitely be favored” in new deals, said Faisal Qaragholi of the London-based Iraqi National Congress, “because they stood by the Iraqi people.” That’s music to the ears of U.S. oil executives like David O’Reilly of ChevronTexaco Corp., who says, “We would certainly be interested.”

When will the oil flow again?
Several major diplomatic hurdles must be cleared first. Technically, Iraq is prohibited from selling its oil or other products until United Nations sanctions are lifted. That gives the Russians and French some leverage over what happens next. The Russians are demanding that Iraq honor its contracts with Lukoil, and the Russian company has threatened a $20 billion lawsuit against any company that takes over its project to develop Iraqi oil fields. But experts say Lukoil may be willing to sell its rights to a U.S. company for $2 billion or $3 billion. Appeasing Russia’s government will be more expensive: The Iraqis owe the Russians a total of more than $10 billion. Before voting to lift sanctions, the Russians want a promise that the new Iraqi government won’t declare earlier debts null and void. The French, meanwhile, are demanding a piece of the reconstruction pie in return for lifting the sanctions.

What if the sanctions aren’t lifted?
The U.S. and the United Kingdom are looking for ways to circumvent the U.N. If the Security Council does not quickly authorize Iraq to get back in business, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said, “we will find legal solutions so that oil will be sold and the proceeds can go to the Iraqi people.” That could prompt a legal challenge that could slow or stop Iraqi oil sales for months. Most analysts think that since this is ultimately a matter of dollars and cents, a deal will be cut with Russia and France to lift the sanctions. “It’s a good negotiating position for Russia and France to take,” says industry analyst Stephen O’Sullivan. “We’re are looking at some sort of horse-trading here.”

Could Iraq bust OPEC?
Once Iraq’s oil begins flowing, it could have a major impact on the per-barrel price of oil. With its enormous reserves, Iraq could triple its oil production, pump out 9 million barrels a day, and destroy OPEC’s ability to control prices at between $23 and $28 a barrel. Iraq could “bring OPEC to its knees,” said Fadhil Chalabi, a former official in the Iraqi Oil Ministry. Prices, he said, could drop as low as $8 a barrel. For the West, it’s an enticing fantasy, but it probably won’t happen. Iraqi oil will certainly add to the overall supply, and tend to keep prices down. But any major increase in Iraqi production will take as much as $30 billion in investment and a decade of work. In the short run, other OPEC nations are fine-tuned to compensate for any increase in production, and could compensate by cutting their own. Over the long term, the new Iraqi government is unlikely to turn its back on other Arab nations and try to destroy OPEC, no matter how grateful it might be to the U.S. and Britain. “Iraq was a founding member of OPEC,” says Amy Myers Jaffe of the James Baker III Institute in Houston. “You can’t eradicate a country’s history because they have a new government.”

Hog
wekikther4wer Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 07-12-2003
Posts: 408
The war was about oil.

The Russians, the French and the oil companies that invest in the reconstruction and modernization of the oil infrastructure will get theirs first.

The Iraqi people will get screwed again, it'll just be a different di(k this time.

Whoever becomes the Democratic frontrunner for the presidential nomination will likely be in bed with the oil companies.
buffallo Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 09-25-2003
Posts: 197
Well, the oil isnt running yet, so who knows what will happen. I understand paying debts.. but this is a different kind of beast..

Good part of it is that the people are out of the Saddam regime.
usahog Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
wekikther4wer
"The war was about oil."
your the first one who has stepped up and made this statement in a long time... I can see you don't read much in the news.. even the media quit beating their drums to this account....

"The Russians, the French and the oil companies that invest in the reconstruction and modernization of the oil infrastructure will get theirs first."

Russia is getting Help from the US of A to be able to tap their Own Oil Infrastructures on their Oil Reserves.. the French in no way are going to Benifit from the Iraqi new Government... that came out in the News from one of the Iraqi Top Officials of the Newly based Government a few weeks back...

Let your fingers do the surfing it's a snap... get back up to the ballfield becuase what you posted as knowledgeble Information above is way off Base!!!!!!

Hog
wekikther4wer Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-12-2003
Posts: 408
Wait a second Hog.

The article you posted points out that the Russians and the French will get theirs, one way or another. If they don't get it from the Iraqis directly, they'll get it through the UN.

"Most analysts think that since this is ultimately a matter of dollars and cents, a deal will be cut with Russia and France to lift the sanctions. “It’s a good negotiating position for Russia and France to take,” says industry analyst Stephen O’Sullivan. “We’re are looking at some sort of horse-trading here.” "

If I'm way off base, does that mean the article you posted is way off base? If it is, why did you post it?

There are dictators all over the world that destabalize their geographic reasons, but we went after the one sitting on hundreds of billions of barrels of oil in a strategically important part of the world.

That said, it still needed to be done, sooner or later. Not the first time our president has used the military to look after our national interests and it won't be the last.

If only our leaders could come right out and tell us the truth up front. Instead they have to skirt around it and give us popular reasons for their actions, reasons that we will accept to justify their actions.
buffallo Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 09-25-2003
Posts: 197
Wek, You need to research your history a little bit.. You say we went after Saddam because of his oil.. Remember why we went into Desert Storm?? He tried to occupy.. etc.. So we removed him.. Then while Clinton was in office, he let the UN inspectors get kicked out.. So when Bush was elected he wanted to put the inspectors back in.. remember any of this.. this led to Saddam leading the inspectors on a wild goose chase. Then we said enough with this a$$hole.. any of this ring a bell...

It was not like we flipped a coin as said.. ok heads we kill Saddam, tails we attack N. Korea.. but wait.. there is more oil with Saddam.. ohh ok.. we will use a two headed coin.. heads wins.. yeah....

Ezell
Users browsing this topic
Guest