America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by tailgater. 22 replies replies.
IF YOU DON'T READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
any response will simply prove the point.

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2003/10/we_558_01.html
HockeyDad Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
I take it that you don't want a response!

Unfortunately, this article is simply more class warfare politics and this has become the key plank in the entire Democratic Party platform, perhaps even the only plank, and it has been failing miserably. The message that Republicans are only for the rich and Democrats are for everyone else and should get your vote by default should eliminate the possibility of any Republican getting elected anywhere based on sheer demographics alone, if people believed it.

The assumption that the article makes regarding the "Nascar Dads" follows right in line with this class warfare thinking. The article is quick to point out the decline in perceived power this group has had in the last thirty years and more specifically claims it has been hurt the most by the current administration. Therefore the group should vote Democrat but through some magic or trickery still supports Bush. The demographic just should vote Democrat, why don't they get it?

A glaring point the article fails to touch on because it would not follow the conventional party thinking is, has the Democratic Party done anything in the past thirty years or even more specifically during the Clinton years to help this demographic. Perhaps the demographic is voting Republican because it sees that as the lesser of two evils.

The Democratic Party needs to develop a platform that earns the respect and support of all the demographics that they chose to favor. If they want the support of demographic groups, the party should actually try to do things to help those groups, not just stake their claim on them because they are not rich. The party gave away the elections in 2002 because they thought anti-Bush and anti-rich would be enough. The party needs to work on a plan, an agenda, and things they stand for and will actually work towards. Right now the Democratic Party is just the party of the "anti-issue" and the Republican Party is picking and chosing all the issues for the Democrats to be "anti".

This article is just more of the same unfortunately. Why don't these "Nascar Dads" get it and just vote Democrat like all the other good, well-behaved demographics. It doesn't matter if the party actually does anything for them, they're not rich so they should be our votes automatically.

Now what are the Democrats going to actually do for the demographic or any other demographic to earn their votes?
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
i did not want the standard "oh yea, well clinton was a disgrace and george is a genius." i did want a response and your's is excellent.

do you think that, however well intentioned, assuming any senators were well intentioned, become enamored of their the "position". they call each other the honorable senator from ---. they become more then mortals. they become demi-gods and are more interested in maintaining the title then actually the responsibility they have assumed when they were elected.

without getting into the hypocricy of the leaders on both sides, look at daschle.

he professes to be the leader of the democrats and yet never opens his mouth to critisize bush or offer any solutions. his job is to set an agenda that will help americans in whatever capacity the government can. he might as well be a republican, or a libertarian, or a member of any party because he simply want's to make no waves and maintain his "honerable" title.

the republicans at least are a cohesive unit, even though i don't like what their direction is.

boss tweed was no more corrupt then the people in washington are now, but he built libraries, schools, and hospitals.
65gtoman Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
anti-war protesters are unpatriotic and disloyal, and their actions border on treason.

protesters creating negative, uninformed public opinion against the president, thereby harming the war effort of the troops.
Arab demonstrations and Arab polls must be disregarded; otherwise, we are letting enemy propaganda and enemy opinion call the shots about how we fight the war
The troops are fighting for the protesters’ right to protest – but to protest at the right time, which is not during wartime.
The protesters are supporting Saddam Hussein, who forbids protests and even kills protesters. They are being led and manipulated by the Old Left Communist helpers from the Vietnam War.
The vast majority of American people support President Bush and the war effort, but the media wrongly build up the anti-war protesters and make them appear more important and powerful than they are.
The Socialist-Communist organizers of these protest demonstrations will never stop trying to bring down the U.S. government

AVB Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 05-21-2003
Posts: 995
I didn't think there were any "yes men" left but I guess I wrong. Must be nepotism instead.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
65gtoman

i am not patriotic because i am against war?

i believe that was part of the nazi propaganda. i can't believe anyone can accept anything you say.

"The Socialist-Communist organizers of these protest demonstrations will never stop trying to bring down the U.S. government" haven't heard anything so dumb since the mcarthy hearings.

are you very young or simply uninformed?
65gtoman Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Letter to the Editor
The Washington Times
June 7, 1995




(Dear Hillary)

During the past several months in the American press, the Democrats have frequently denounced the Republicans as Nazis due to their attempts to control runaway federal spending. How very ironic. I remember the Nazis. Let me share a little about them and recall some of their exploits.

First of all, "Nazi" was gutter slang for the verb "to nationalize". The Bider-Mienhoff gang gave themselves this moniker during their early struggles. The official title of the Nazi Party was "The National Socialist Workers Party of Germany". Hitler and the Brownshirts advocated the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, national resources, manufacturing, distribution and law enforcement.

Hitler came to power by turning the working class, unemployed, and academic elite against the conservative republic. After der fuhrer's election ceased being a political conspiracy and was transformed into a fashionable social phenomenon, pary membership was especially popular with educators, bureaucrats, and the press. Being a Nazi was politically correct. They called themselves "The Children of the New Age of World Order" and looked down their noses at everyone else. As Hitler accrued more power, he referred to his critics as "The Dark Forces of Anarchy and Hatred". Anyone who questioned Nazi high-handedness in the German press was branded a "Conservative Reactionary". Joseph Goebbels, minister of communications, proclaimed a "New World Order".

The Nazi reign of terror began with false news reports on the Jews, Bohemians and Gypses who were said to be arming themselves to overthrow the "New World Order" and Hitler demanded that all good people register their guns so that they wouldn't fall into the hands of "terrorists and madmen". Right wing fanatics of the "Old Order" who protested firearms registration were arrested by the S.S. and put in jail for "fomenting hatred against the Government of the German people".

Then the Reichstag (government building) was blown up and Hitler ram-rodded an "Emergency Anti-Terrorist Act" through Parliament that gave the Gestapo extraordinary powers. The leader then declared that for the well-being of the German people, all private firearms were to be confiscated by the Gestapo and the Wermotten (federal law enforcement and military). German citizens who refused to surrender their guns when the "jack-boots" (Gestapo) came calling, were murdered in their homes. By the way, the Gestapo were the federal marshals' service of the Third Reich. The S.W.A.T. team was invented and perfected by the Gestapo to break into the homes of the enemies of the German people.

When the Policia Bewakken, or local police, refused to take away guns from townsfolk, they themselves were disarmed and dragged out into the street and shot to death by the S.A. and the S.S. Those were Nazi versions of the B.A.T.F. and the F.B.I. When several local ministers spoke out against these atrocities, they were imprisoned and never seen again.

The Gestapo began to confiscate and seize the homes, businesses, bank accounts, and personal belongings of wealthy conservative citizes who had prospered in the old Republic. Pamphleteers who urged revolt against the Nazis were shot on site by national law enforcement and the military. Gypsies and Jews were detained and sent to labor camps. Mountain roads throughout central Europe were closed to prevent the escape of fugitives into the wilderness, and to prevent the movement and concealment of partisan resistance fighters.

Public schools rewrote history and Hitler youth groups taught the children to report their parents to their teachers for anti-Nazi remarks. Such parents disappeared. Pagan animism became the state religion of the Third Reich and Christians were widely condemned as "right wing fanatics".

Millions of books were burned first and then people. Millions of them burned in huge ovens after they were first gassed to death. Unmarried women were paid large sums of money to have babies out of wedlock and then given medals for it. Evil was declared as being good, and good was condemned as being evil. World Order was coming and the German people were going to be the "peacekeepers".

Yes, indeed(Hillary), I remember the Nazis and they weren't Republicans, or "right wing", or "patriots" or "militias". They were Socialist monsters.

Thomas Colton Ruthford

Steve*R Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 07-23-2001
Posts: 1,858
65gtoman: I hope you realize that reprint has been floating around the web since it was printed, over eight years ago. It's important to point out that the author, though named, has never been interviewed or personally identified. There has been much conjecture that the letter, itself, was a college class project in propoganda and disinformation. It carefully mixes some facts with some fictions in such a way, that the premise is supported by many fallacies.

If you study the rise of what was translated in English as "National Socialism" you'll learn that the number #1 political enemy of Hitler's people were the socialists and communists. National Socialism in Germany was fascism at its ultimate. There is no comparison in the American experience, other than the fringe reactionary right.

Please go back to watching Magnum P.I.
dustinderwind Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 11-28-2003
Posts: 11
Steve R you are the man. I will never understand how these people can believe that it is unpatriotic to be anti-war. Being an AMERICAN is about enjoying a level of PERSONAL FREEDOM to do and say as we please, when we please. Although I was born in this country, if things ever go sour enough, I will be the first to get the hell out of here. As for people who think it is treason to protest the war, or anything else, perhaps you are living in the wrong country AND the wrong century.
MDavis Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2003
Posts: 94
Five generations of my family have served during time of war. My great grandfather in the Civil War, my grandfather in the Spanish American War, my father in WWII, myself during the Vietnam era, my son in Somalia and Bosnia. Three of those had/have combat related disabilities. My thirteen year old grandson is debating whether to go Army or Air Force. I don't support the war in Iraq. I dare anyone to call me unpatriotic!!

If I recall the "right" screamed bloody murder when we went into Somalia,Bosnia/Kosov because we were "nation building". Where's that same indignation on Iraq where we are bragging about rebuilding that nation in our image. What do we do if the free and fair election we fighting for results in the ****e majority taking power and taking Iraq down the "theocracy" path? Do we call a "redo" and start all over??
MDavis Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2003
Posts: 94
Five generations of my family have served during time of war. My great grandfather in the Civil War, my grandfather in the Spanish American War, my father in WWII, myself during the Vietnam era, my son in Somalia and Bosnia. Three of those had/have combat related disabilities. My thirteen year old grandson is debating whether to go Army or Air Force. I don't support the war in Iraq. I dare anyone to call me unpatriotic!!

If I recall the "right" screamed bloody murder when we went into Somalia,Bosnia/Kosov because we were "nation building". Where's that same indignation on Iraq where we are bragging about rebuilding that nation in our image. What do we do if the free and fair election we fighting for results in the ****e majority taking power and taking Iraq down the "theocracy" path? Do we call a "redo" and start all over??
MDavis Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 11-11-2003
Posts: 94
Ooops!
tailgater Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Dusty,
You've misunderstood the old saying:
"When the going gets tough, the tough get going"

That was not intended to mean "run away like a little baby"

Hope that clears things up.

RICKAMAVEN Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
dustinderwind

things have gone sour, but i am not leaving. i stand and fight for what i believe in on these boards and my contacts with people.
Homebrew Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
OK.
Now I have to speak out.
ONLY FASCIST BASTARDS ARE AGAINST FREEDOM OF SPEECH, whether it agrees with them or not. My opinion, is that GWB is a fascist, as was Hitler and Mussolini. I am conservative, way different than a Fascist, and way different from a Liberal. I used to be a republican, but GWB, and the right wing of the Republican party has driven me away from the party. I am now a Libertarian. Several things point to the republican party going to Fascism. The Patriot act. Written by Republicans, but passed by both parties, on emotion alone. 9-11 had us all in an emotional state. By the time anyone had a chance to read it, it was law. Hopefully the Supreme court will overturn it. As is the only constitutional option. It is our duty, to disagree with a fascist movement, whether they call us Unamerican or not, as they are the ones who are UnAmerican.
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
JonR Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
Oh yeah, well Clinton was a disgrace and George W. Bush is a genius. JonR
65gtoman Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
http://www.cpusa.org/
Homebrew Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
Hey JonR,
Great arguement, LOL. I know you are but what am I. LOL
GTO, what the hell has the Communist party got to do with the topic of this thread????????
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
P.S. Just because I'm neither Liberal nor communist doesn't mean that I have to back Bush, and Co.
Homebrew Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
Damn,
I was hoping for someone to rebutt my statements, but typical Republican redherring, and a ludicrous response, by way of a link to the Commie website. I guess I expected too much from the Blind followers of GWB.
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
P.S. Here come the unintelligable Flames. LOL
65gtoman Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
http://www.cpusa.org/article/static/511/

Are we unpatriotic?
Other Socialist parties?
Misconceptions?
Conspiracy theories?
Environment: Our view?
Socialism in America?
Communism and Socialism?
Are we against religion?
65gtoman Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
http://www.cpusa.org/article/archive/11/
Homebrew Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 02-11-2003
Posts: 11,885
Hey GTO,
Still trying to figure out what all of the threads have as far as relavance.
Later
Dave (A.K.A. Homebrew)
tailgater Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Dave,
Since I was 18, I was enrolled as "independent" (or unenrolled as they now call it).
Until about 3 years ago when I changed it to Republican to reflect my voting preference over the long haul.

I dissagree with much that the Republicans have done, but even if I feel the current group has swayed from the true Republican platform I know that my voting will reflect MY viewpoints.
In other words, there is no need to bail.

And I like the prospect of the Libertarian party, but I'm afraid that the cutting of ALL non-essential govermental functions would eventually lead to a huge swing in the opposite direction. Read: Socialism.

Let's face it, the Patriot Act would not be needed if the current laws allowed for common sense. None of the 9-11 pilots could even have been investigated without some civil rights violation which I'm sure the ACLU would have pursued.
The concept of the Patriot Act may be scary, but the intent is pure.

Users browsing this topic
Guest