heh, Bill's cuts in our military were responsible for the economic success in the mid 90s? Really!? Amazing, then all Bush needs to do is follow suite. If he cut the military, it would be a tremendous boost to the economy? I don't understand. This isn't adding up for me. It goes back to the point I was trying to make which is basically (IMO), Clinton was "lucky". He was in the office at a time of economic prosperity. He did not cause it, but he claims credit for it. Bush has taken abuse for causing the recession even though it is documented that it began before he was in office. Added to that 9/11, and the deflation of the tech bubble in the market, and some of the scandals that rocked corporate America (Enron, Worldcom, etc...). Still in all, we're pulling back on track, and why is this? Our president cut taxes, which stimulated the economy. Our president kicked ass on countries "directly AND indirectly responsible for terrorist attacks on America and our interests around the world". Our president didn't just do lip service to the problems while get getting lip service... He made and continues to make difficult and sometimes politically unpopular decisions to do what is best for America. Our country is on the rebound, we took a punch in the nads, and we're getting back on our feet whether the terrorists like it or not, whether the blame-America-first crowd likes it or not, whether the libs like it or not, we're coming back baby!!