America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by Cavallo. 35 replies replies.
separation of church and state
65gtoman Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
Appears nowhere in the U.S. Constitution.
billyjackson Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 08-19-2002
Posts: 2,860
I think it is implicit in the 1st Amendment. Of course, part of the beauty and headache of the Constitution including the Bill of Rights is their need for interpretation. I for one believe the separation of Church and State is a good idea. However, I don't think we can or should separate religion and politics. People must vote their values. However, an institutionalized religion/church/etc. has historically been very problematic (IMO) and actually curbed freedom instead of enhanced it.
CWFoster Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
The founding fathers intended the separation of church and state to inhibit the government from sanctioning one religeon over another. It was NEVER meant to inhibit the PEOPLE from being able to pray, or demonstrate their faith (even on government property).
Cavallo Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
CWF: as a christian, i've never been stopped from praying any time, anywhere. i can pray in the middle of a court proceding. i can pray while playing basketball (well, when i COULD play b-ball! LOL).

does the govt. represent ALL citizens, though, when it allows one religion's statues, documents, idols, etc. to be placed in government agency halls? what happens if, say, a local judge is a buddhist and wants to place a big ol' statue of the rounded belly guy in the hall of the county courthouse? is that okay?

my religion is between my god and me. i don't want an atheist school teacher teaching my kids about jesus, and i don't want my pastor running my town hall. :)

antonio
CWFoster Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
please read my post, and do NOT read intent that is not there.

1) Some kids have lost the opportunity to speak at commencment addresses because they let it be known that they were going to thank God for the privledges thety've had, and for guidance in the future. Reason given, separation of church and state (can't "preach" on school property) right lost: 1st amendment, right of free speech. I could cite a dozen more examples, do you really want to read every one of them?

2) I said the government (and it's representatives) are FORBIDDEN to promote one religeon over another. It is wrong for a judge to place the ten commandments on display in the courthouse, but it is EQUALLY wrong to forbid the lawful congregation on public property (the courthouse lawn for instance) of private citizens to put on a nativity scene for Christmas. If the Buddhists want to do something simillar, they should have the same right!

I don't want an atheist teaching my kids about Jesus, or about relativistic moralism either! NOR do I want Jerry Fallwell telling me that smoking is a sin! But if you were praying in school, and weren't stopped, it's only because someone (the ACLU) didn't hear you. Read the Book of Daniel, and see what he did when told not to pray to his God. The fastest way to get christians to pray is tell them not to! :)
65gtoman Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/1/13/172143.shtml
CWFoster Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
gto, are yu trying to make my point, or yours? A school is an official outlet. The kids should be allowed to practice their religeon, but NOT have it taught to them there. As I recall, the program involved had students adopt muslim names, and study jihadist (Wahabi) writings, and "learn to identify" with the nice, friendly arab cultures. No mention was ever made to them that I ever heard of, that Saudi children are not only not required to learn how to identify with those of Western values, but the teaching of ANYTHING besides Islam is a criminal offense. During the first Gulf War, we could not even administer the last rites to mortally woulded troops while they were on Saudi soil (they graciously "compromised and would allow it in a helicopter in a hover ABOVE Saudi soil) As both a christian, and ESPECIALLY as an AMERICAN I get SICK of being told how intolerant my viewpoints are and I should keep them to myself;while those who have differing viewpoints are given a soapbax, and a boost to step up on it, and a megaphone, to announce what a hypocrite anyone who calls themselves a christian is. What's up with that?????
65gtoman Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
THE SQUEAKY WHEEL GETS THE OIL
Cavallo Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
CWF: when i was in high school, i was the president of our Teens For Christ extra-curricular group. same as any other group, we were allowed to meet on school grounds after school, before school, or at lunch. that group is still there, still same rules. though other groups have been added (they, too, have the same rules we did), that's not in any way stopped the TFC group (or the Fellowship of Christian Athletes) from meeting.

i can pray without moving my lips. in fact, weren't christians told that it was better to pray in private? that if we prayed in public, we would get our reward in public, but if we prayed in private, our reward would be from god, not man?

i do understand your concerns; i do. and i'm not trying to take anything away from your views. it's just been my experience that, as a christian, my freedom to pray in public has never been in question.

for the record, nothing stopped me from bowing my head and praying -- silently or aloud -- before a test, saying grace before lunch, etc. nothing stops others from doing so now. what they do not (and imo should not) have the right to do is make everyone ELSE be included in my praying.

antonio
Cavallo Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
oh -- and as for this b.s. going on in that california school, that's exactly how i call it. total b.s., totally inappropriate.

on the gulf war thing, CWF, man, all i can say is that it's a shame. i still don't understand why they are our "allies" in any way. :p sorry you guys had to deal with that s***.

antonio
CWFoster Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
In this Antonio, we are in COMPLETE agreement! I am just aggrivated over the people like Madeline Murray O'hare, and many others who ahave never been pressured to do anything who want to make all the rest of us not have access to public property for Nativity scenes, ect. I have yet to see even a "live" nativity scene where they were preaching hellfire or brimstone, and the only thing that might be construed as pressure is a sign inviting anyone to attend the church sponsoring the display. BEFORE anyone goes off on me! I am NOT advocating the access be granted ONLY to christian groups! BTW, there was a young lady who gave a convocation prayer before the football games played by her high school team, no one was told they HAD to pray, it wasn't forced, but the Courts forced her to stop, or if she wouldn't forced the school district to stop allowing her to use the PA system. There is also the question of witnessing. If you are the kind of person I think we all try to be, and you want to give God the credit (anything in me wothwhile, is just the Christ in me, cuz ME is a pretty mean character) You have to tell people who you represent, otherwise, yes, they think it's you, and you get the credit of men, but lose the credit from God, for taking the credit due Him. I hope this clarifies my views. I don't think the Christian viewponit should be the only one presented, but I don't see the ACLU going after the Buddists, the Hare Krishnas, or the Moslems. Check out how many times they've sought injunctions against Christians, and tell me we are not being targeted.
Cavallo Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
CWF: looks like you and i agree quite a bit, and i'll be the first to admit that i sometimes tread into the "niggling details" territory. :) for what it's worth, though, i've also not seen buddhists, jews, etc. trying to MANDATE things like prayer (or other religious practice) in school -- i have seen that, at least locally, from some christian groups. and that i'm not okay with.

but i will say that it does chap my hide when i see groups nosing in where there IS no problem. if Gopher High in Cattbutt, Alabama has a prayer over the P.A. system before a football game (as it happened in my high school), i've got no problem with that at all. after all, going to the game is optional in the first place. and if you don't want to bow your head, then don't.

but for a group to blow into town out of the blue and start yelling about lawsuits-- THAT i take issue with.

antonio
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
the reason the aclu goes after christians may be the same reason i find difficulty dealing with christians in both my personal and business life.

christians never shut up about their religeon.

i'm glad christians find peace and comfort in jesus and his teachings. but the inherent nature of go forth and spread the word is annoying to everyone else.

all the christians i have met and all the christians that post do the same thing. they tell you they are christians and go on about it endlessly.

why was it necesary for warner to tell the world that he was successful after the superbowl game and thank, out loud, "his personal savior. jesus". his god knows he is thankful. does his god require the spoken word in order to be satisfied.

i've been in restaurants where people bow their heads for a moment or two. i know they are praying and i see nothing wrong with what they are doing. if however, they have the need to speak out loud, what ever they are praying, they are in my space.

what other religeon other then christianity has the constant need to tell everyone else about the benifits of their belief system, which is if you accept christ as your personal savior, you will be saved.

i guess your definition of saved means, after you die you will go to heaven and not hell.

you are so involved in your beliefs, to your own good fortune, that you are almost required to spread the word. if you would just keep it to and among yourselves, no one would be telling you to shut up.
your god knows what's in your hearts.

does your god need the constant reenforcement of your belief or DO YOU.

nothing i have written is meant to demean any one's beliefs. i am simply trying to explain why the people that do not believe in jesus as their personal savior find you boring and annoying.

Cavallo Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
rick -- i'm not a proseletyzer (know i spelled THAT one wrong!), but there are many christians who believe that it's their DUTY to "preach the gospel" to anyone and everyone. i'm not of that persuasion, but i know of others who are.

there are other ways of bashing people over the head with religion other than "spreading the gospel" -- i've experienced this from people other than christians. i would also say, though, that there are other ways for christians to "spread the gospel" than getting up in people's faces and demanding, "IS JESUS CHRIST YOUR PERSONAL SAVIOR?!"

my view on christians "spreading the word" is also from the new testament/christian bible -- you will know the tree by the fruit it bears. if people see someone living a happy life, they will ASK what it's all about. and if christianity is the answer, there's your opportunity. but it drives me up a nut to go through an inquisition about my religious beliefs when i'm just walking down the street.

my wife is a jew. i'm a jew by birth right, i guess one would call it (still confused about how to express that). she grew up in jewish culture; i did not. for her, proseletyzing is like nails on a chalkboard, and we had a good discussion about that early on in our relationship when she explained that "jews don't recruit." in fact, even those non-jews who come to judaism on their own find that it's no easy thing to convert. likewise, growing up catholic, it's not a part of mainstream catholicism -- though there are evangelical catholics who do go out and "recruit."

for those who were/are not of a culture that does "recruit," it might be difficult to understand the whole concept. i'm very familiar with evangelical christians, and while i do "get it" from their perspective, it's no less annoying.

antonio
CWFoster Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
Rick- I'm sure you've noticed that unless the topic has to do with religeon, I don't go waving my faith aroundconstantly. I realize that you and others may get bored by it. BUT why does the ACLU protect the 1st Amendment rights of the KKK and the American Nazi Party to march in Skokie Ill (a predominantly Jewish community) where there is virtually NO ONE who wants to hear their hate rhetoric, but those "boring" people seem to have no standing under the same 1st Amendment? Why doesn't the ACLU want to protect THEIR rights? HMMMMMMM? All I'm suggesting is a little balance. At least the Evangelicals aren't advocating violence against those they don't agree with.
65gtoman Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
i find difficulty dealing with jews in both my personal and business life.

jews never shut up about their religeon.


all the jews i have met and all the jews that post do the same thing. they tell you they are jews and go on about it endlessly.
65gtoman Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
nothing i have written is meant to demean any one's beliefs
Cavallo Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
CWF: by and large, no, but i've had some pretty scary conversations with evangelicals about who they'd love to see shipped off to an island and then nuked -- from jews to gays to anyone not of the white race.

that's not to say they have a corner on the market of bigotry and outright hatred -- and in fact, some evangelicals i know have been very staunch proponents of isreal. but there are those who have some very serious things to say about who should even be "allowed" to *live* and hold some very dangerous notions in general.

i used to think that evangelicals were a very patriotic lot, but again, there are segments who fall in with neo-nazi ideologies.

speaking of, GTO, are you a "14 words" proponent?

antonio
65gtoman Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
RICK SAYS: i find difficulty dealing with christians in both my personal and business life.

christians never shut up about their religeon.

all the christians i have met and all the christians that post do the same thing. they tell you they are christians and go on about it endlessly

I SAY: i find difficulty dealing with jews in both my personal and business life.

jews never shut up about their religeon.


all the jews i have met and all the jews that post do the same thing. they tell you they are jews and go on about it endlessly.


BUT IM THE BIGOT NAZI


65gtoman Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
by the way Cavallo, im Jewish
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
65gtoman

do you understand the word shmuck?
65gtoman Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
RICKAMAVEN do you understand the word bigot?

RICKAMAVEN Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
65gtoman

yes and i am not. if you percieve me as a bigot, you can deal with your own misguided judgement.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
and that would make you a shmuck.
65gtoman Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=bigot

One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.
65gtoman Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
i find difficulty dealing with christians
christians never shut up about their religeon.
they tell you they are christians and go on about it endlessly

Let’s also add in your bigotry of anyone who dares support bush or happen to be republican.

You fit the word bigot to a tee. You think because you’re a Jewish atheist liberal that your not a bigot HA your one of the BIGGEST bigots on this board.
Cavallo Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
on another board, someone dared to mention that he had a very negative view of jews. in his view, jews were snotty and arrogant, had no sense of humor, yadda yadda, on and on.

a lot of people blasted him for this and called him an anti-semite.

after the initial name-calling, folks realized that he was talking about his PERSONAL experience with jews he had met and known. from there, a couple of jewish folks on the board (they hadn't announced this before, but it was never really relevant before) "came out" so to speak as jews. the "bigot" guy realized, "oh, hey, so i DO know jews who are not like what i said."

problem solved, minds opened, we all sang "kumbayah."

as a christian of jewish descent (for what that's worth), i'll say this: if rick's saying "this is what i've observed personally about christians," that means one thing and is not, imo, "bigotted."

if he means "all christians" are this that and the other, then yeah, imo, that is bigotted.

either way, i hope, rick, that you have experiences with christians that are different that the experiences you mentioned.

as a christian, i TOO have found that SOME christians get in-your-face about religion, go on and on about it and will flat out call you everything but a good man in their efforts to condemn you to hell. i don't think that makes me "bigotted" towards christians, though. do you?

GTO: re the 14 words -- you may be jewish, yes, but then again there are "jews for jesus" out there; i'd not be surprised to find "white power" jews in the world. :)

(btw -- no, i'm not a messianic jew)

antonio
65gtoman Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 06-12-2003
Posts: 858
i'd not be surprised to find "white power" jews in the world. :)

grow a brain. lol

grond Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 06-07-2003
Posts: 738
Rick,

"And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." Amen. (Matthew 28:18-20)"

We Christians were given the "Great Commission" to "spread the gospel to the ends of the Earth." My greatest shortcoming as a Christian is not doing that enough. Sorry if you're offended... and in our free society, you are not required to listed... but, by our beliefs, we are doing it for your own good. :)

Cheers,

grond
grond Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-07-2003
Posts: 738
make that "listen". :0
Cavallo Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
grond: but would you agree that there are more ways to spread that good word than accosting random people and demanding to know their relationship to god?

i subscribe to the old song, "and they'll know we are christians by our love, by our love..." :)
coda Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 07-27-2003
Posts: 623
People were tortured during the Inquisition for their "own good". Please don't help us any more.

(They didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition!)
ducati996 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 01-02-2000
Posts: 3,477
what coda said
dbguru Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2002
Posts: 1,300
After reading this thread, I'm encouraged that 95% of what is posted here is very thoughtful and coming from convictions which I respect regardless of whether you are a christian, jew or whatever. I really hope that we maintain an attitude of mutual respect in these types of discussions. There are a few statements here that go a bit outside of this and to those folks making those statements..tone it down a bit, okay!!

I really believe there is common sense and moral ground common to most mainstream religions and philosophies that is very important to recognize and appreciate. This recognition by our founding fathers was fundamental in the drafting of our constitution. I object to anyone saying their religion was the foundation for the Constitution outside of being a part of these common ideas. Religious freedom and separation may have different meanings, but I think the prevaling interpretation is that separation is an important requirement for religious freedom to flourish. Doesn't that make sense?
CWFoster Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
Dayum DB, you hit my point on the nail! :)
Cavallo Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
ayup! makes poifect sense to me. well said!
Users browsing this topic
Guest