America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 20 years ago by CWFoster. 21 replies replies.
Paul Harvey's Review of Passion of Christ...
usahog Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Paul Harvey's Review of Mel Gibson's 'Passion of Christ'
Folks: From the man who originated 'The Rest of the Story'..

Paul Harvey's words:
I really did not know what to expect. I was thrilled to have been invited to a private viewing of Mel Gibson's film "The Passion," but I had also read all the cautious articles and spin. I grew up in a Jewish town and owe much of my own faith journey to the influence.

I have a life long, deeply held aversion to anything that might even indirectly encourage any form of anti-Semitic thought, language or actions. I arrived at the private viewing for "The Passion", held in Washington DC and greeted some familiar faces. The environment was typically Washingtonian, with people greeting you with a smile but seeming to look beyond you, having an agenda beyond the words.

The film was very briefly introduced, without fanfare, and then the room darkened. From the gripping opening scene in the Garden of Gethsemane, to the very human and tender portrayal of the earthly ministry of Jesus, through the betrayal, the arrest, the scourging, the way of the cross, the encounter with the thieves, the surrender on the Cross, until the final scene in the empty tomb, this was not simply a movie; it was an encounter, unlike anything I have ever experienced.

In addition to being a masterpiece of film-making and an artistic triumph, "The Passion" evoked more deep reflection, sorrow and emotional reaction within me than anything since my wedding, my ordination or the birth of my children. Frankly, I will never be the same.

When the film concluded, this "invitation only" gathering of "movers and shakers" in Washington, DC were shaking indeed, but this time from sobbing. I am not sure there was a dry eye in the place. The crowd that had been glad-handing before the film was now eerily silent. No one could speak because words were woefully inadequate. We had experienced a kind of art that is a rarity in life, the kind that makes heaven touch earth. One scene in the film has now been forever etched in my mind. A brutalized, wounded Jesus was soon to fall again under the weight of the cross. His mother had made her way along the Via Della Rosa. As she ran to him, she flashed back to a memory of Jesus as a child, falling in the dirt road outside of their home. Just as she reached to protect him from the fall, she was now reaching to touch his wounded adult face. Jesus looked at her with intensely probing and passionately loving eyes (and at all of us through the screen) and said "Behold I make all things new." These are words taken from the last Book of the New Testament, the Book of Revelation.

Suddenly, the purpose of the pain was so clear and the wounds, that earlier in the film had been so difficult to see in His face, His back, indeed all over His body, became intensely beautiful. They had been borne voluntarily for love. At the end of the film, after we had all had a chance to recover, a! question and answer period ensued. The unanimous praise for the film, from a rather diverse crowd, was as astounding as the compliments were effusive. The questions included the one question that seems to follow this film, even though it has not yet even been released. "Why is this film considered by some to be "anti-Semitic?"

Frankly, having now experienced (you do not "view" this film) "the Passion" it is a question that is impossible to answer. A law professor whom I admire sat in front of me. He raised his hand and responded "After watching this film, I do not understand how anyone can insinuate that it even remotely presents that the Jews killed Jesus. It doesn't." He continued "It made me realize that my sins killed Jesus" I agree. There is not a scintilla of anti-Semitism to be found anywhere in this powerful film. If there were, I would be among the first to decry it. It faithfully tells the Gospel story in a dramatically beautiful, sensitive and profoundly engaging way. Those who are alleging otherwise have either not seen the film or have another agenda behind their protestations.

This is not a "Christian" film, in the sense that it will appeal only to those who identify themselves as followers of Jesus Christ. It is a deeply human, beautiful story that will deeply touch all men and women. It is a profound work of art. Yes, its producer is a Catholic Christian and thankfully has remained faithful to the Gospel text; if that is no longer acceptable behavior than we are all in trouble.
History demands that we remain faithful to the story and Christians have a right to tell it. After all, we believe that it is the greatest story ever told and that its message is for all men and women. The greatest right is the right to hear the truth.

We would all be well advised to remember that the Gospel narratives to which "The Passion" is so faithful were written by Jewish men who followed a Jewish Rabbi whose life and teaching have forever changed the history of the world. The problem is not the message but those who have distorted it and used it for hate rather than love. The solution is not to censor the message, but rather to promote the kind of gift of love that is Mel Gibson's filmmaking masterpiece, "The Passion." It should be seen by as many people as possible. I intend to do everything I can to make sure that is the case. I am passionate about "The Passion." You will be as well.
Cavallo Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
thanks for posting the review of this film. i do hope it's the case that the controversy is groundless (in terms of it "promoting anti-semetic violence," which is what i was told about it.

i'll see the film for myself before i comment on it; to do otherwise would be mere speculation.
SpikeMaduro Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 01-27-2004
Posts: 600
Our minister has seen the film.
His reaction?
Don't miss it for the world!
Liz62803 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 01-21-2004
Posts: 2,921
I have utmost respect for Paul Harvey - if he says it is rubbish what they are saying about the film then it is rubbish, I find that these groups that are always crying foul about films, books, music, etc have a boring existence and in order to have entertainment in their lives they have to do stuff like this. Makes me sick that people are willing to stir up undue chaos - seeing the proverbial pink elephant when it is only gray. -smh- these people NEED A HOBBY - maybe we should send them a gar and get them hooked like we are and they will then leave everybody ALONE! sheesh
jjohnson28 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
Love Paul Harvey! Haven't listened to him live in at least 20 years or more(I'm a So Cal transplant from the mid-west).Could one of you kind souls direct me to a live internet link somewhere? I'm actually surprised he's still kickin' these days myself...LOL

Nice post Hog!

JJ
djheater Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 12-29-2003
Posts: 169
Snopes reports it as false.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/passion.asp

Don't believe everything you read in e-mail
djheater Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 12-29-2003
Posts: 169
Sorry,

That's not to say that it's not a good review.

Cheers,

David
jjohnson28 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
BAN djheater!

J/K DJ...LOL

JJ
djheater Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 12-29-2003
Posts: 169
For the record, I'm a huge Paul harvey fan, which is perhaps why I was not convinced he worte this. I would find it hard to believe he would see the film much less publish a review of it.

He's kind of a redneck Studs Turkel, and I mean that in the kindest possible way.
JonR Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
I believe everything I read on the internet that way I'm at least 50% right. I also believe the Pope viewed and gave the movie a big thumbs up even though his staff said he never viewed the movie. JonR
usahog Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
Personally I will give Mel Gibson a Big Thumbs Up just for having the Balls to put together a film like this in the face of the **** he has to be around in HollWE WOOD!!!!!!!!

and cannot wait for the show to hit the theaters!!!

Hog
jjohnson28 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
Hey, you're all missing the most important issue here. Jimbo(Me), needs a link to "Live Paul Harvey DAMNIT!...LOL

JJ
usahog Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
LOL JJ

not sure where to look... try yahoo/Paul Harvey Live

Hog
jjohnson28 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
Whaazzzupp Russ?
usahog Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 12-06-1999
Posts: 22,691
working on our web page info.. to get our business up and rolling... been working on some shelves and things for Smithbw in the shop.. their coming allong really good.. how bout you???

Hog
Gene363 Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 01-24-2003
Posts: 30,834
It is an actual review if not from Paul Harvey, the real author is Kenith A. Foumier.

Here is the original review:

http://www.christianity.com/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID5339|CHID14|CIID1615818,00.html

Keith A Fournier is a constitutional lawyer and a graduate of the John Paul II Institute of the Lateran University, Franciscan University and the University of Pittsburgh. He holds degrees in Philosophy, theology and law. He has been a champion of religious liberty and appeared as co-counsel in major cases at the United States Supreme Court. He is the author of seven books and, along with his law practice, serves as the president of both the "Your Catholic Voice Foundation" and "Common Good".

Snops said,

"Origins: The piece cited above is indeed a review penned by someone who attended a screening of the movie, The Passion, producer/director Mel Gibson's upcoming film about the last twelve hours in the life of Jesus. (The movie is due to open on 25 February 2004.) However, the review is not the work of long-time radio commentator Paul Harvey; it was written by Keith A Fournier, a "constitutional lawyer and a graduate of the John Paul II Institute of the Lateran University, Franciscan University and the University of Pittsburgh."

Paul Harvey has a web site here:

http://www.paulharvey.com/
Liz62803 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 01-21-2004
Posts: 2,921
well at least it is an actual review - albeit not from paul harvey but an actual review if you know what I mean lol
hoagie55 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 03-01-2003
Posts: 909
djheater,

"I would find it hard to believe he would see the film much less publish a review of it."

Why do you find it difficult to believe that he would see the film? I bet you that a lot of people will be seeing this movie whom you do not think would see it. It is avery powerful, or so my wife told me. She ws fortunate enough to see a preview of it before the final cut several weeks ago. Mel Gibson attended the preview and went thru a series of Q&A as well. He is a very humble man who decided to share somethinig dear to him.

Matt
HockeyDad Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
I was thinking about going to see this movie but you all have spoiled the ending!
Cavallo Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
from what i hear, the audience gets to choose its own ending... if ya know what i mean. :D

looking at the movie's site, i wonder why gibson chose to cast a WOMAN as the devil. what's up with that?
THL Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 10-22-2002
Posts: 3,044
I heard that the car chase is almost as good as the one in "Bullitt!"
CWFoster Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
As I understand it, the controversy involves the prospect of Anti-Semitism being fanned by the portrayal of the Jews as the killers of Christ. Let's see, they DID kill Christ! But then Christ was also a Jew! And if they had not killed him, prophesy would not have been fulfilled, and the Old Testament would have been flawed, and God would be fallible. As God knew what would happen to his only Son when he sent Him, it was God who killed Him! And by His Sacrifice, made atonement for us all!
The Nazis, and Kluckers who would use this as an excuse to forment Anti-Semitism, would find another reason anyway, as they truly NEED no reason to be stupid!
Users browsing this topic
Guest