America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 19 years ago by ducati996. 9 replies replies.
Kerry
SteveS Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
On Thursday, the Bush campaign launched a web video entitled “Kerry's Coalition of the Wild-eyed”. The video featured Democrats who support John Kerry making negative and baseless attacks against the President. Interspersed in the video were segments of two ads that appeared on a website sponsored by MoveOn.org - a group campaigning for Kerry - in January.

On Friday night, John Kerry's campaign denounced our use of these ads, and called that use "disgusting."

The Kerry campaign says, "The use of Hitler by any campaign, politician or party is simply wrong."

Personally, I agree. These ads, like much of the hate-filled, angry rhetoric of Kerry's coalition of the Wild-eyed, ARE disgusting.

But, where was Kerry's disgust when he hired the man responsible for encouraging the production of these ads as part of a MoveOn contest - to run the Kerry campaign's internet operation?

Where was John Kerry's sense of outrage when Al Gore, just yesterday afternoon, compared the Bush Administration to the Nazis saying, "The Administration works closely with a network of 'rapid response' digital Brown Shirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors for 'undermining support for our troops.'"

Where was John Kerry's anger when Al Gore in May spoke of "Bush's Gulag"?

Why has John Kerry not denounced Democrat Party donor George Soros for comparing the Bush Administration to Nazis. Soros stated, "When I hear Bush say, 'You're either with us or against us,' it reminds me of the Germans. It conjures up memories of Nazi slogans on the walls, Der Feind Hort mit ('The enemy is listening')."

And finally, why has Kerry not spoken out against that gob of unspeakable s**t Michael Moore who last October compared the Patriot Act to Mein Kampf?

IMO, it's simply because, as usual, Kerry wants to have it both ways …
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
SteveS

"wants to have it both ways"

before marriage, i knew a woamn named harriet who fits your description.
CWFoster Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
But Steve! They CAN'T be hypocrites! They're liberals! You have to be conservative to be a hypocrite!
bloody spaniard Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
I've voted conservative Repulican all of my life but I've had enough. He's no Ronald Reagan.

Conservative botls, give Kerry or Nader a look 'n see before you crank the lever on someone who is outsourcing jobs NONSTOP & has NO clue. This corporate boot-lick wonder is all for a one-world government. He sees nothing wrong with Corporate welfare & wants to build up foreign economies at OUR expense.

The former US embassador to India has also convinced this puppet-head to send many of our computer engineering jobs to India in return for a stronger ally against our next world war opponent, China. He's also focusing on setting up a "CAFTA" which will open the flood gates to cheap Central American wearables and farm goods. This will further destroy what remains of our textile base & independent farms.

You'll see what I mean if he gets a second term.
Luckily for us, Kerry will win if he chooses the right running mate (Edwards?).

Many of his conservative base is abandoning this well-meaning cretin.

blood
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
who is this kerry persson, everyone is talking about. i thought it was vote bush, yes or no.

if we vote no, is this kerry person the new leader?

if so i would like to vet him.

kerry person: are you now, or have you ever been a pedophile?

kerry person: have you ever beaten your wife, and if so have you stopped?

kerry person: do you work and play well with others?

that's all the questions i have.
SteveS Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
There are substantial differences between GWB and Kerry, and the fact of the matter is, America can’t afford Kerry.
We afford his ideas of higher taxes at a time when we are growing the economy and creating jobs, but most of all, we can’t afford his concepts of treating terrorism like a law enforcement matter.

From taxes to jobs, from health care to energy and national security, John Kerry would be a freaking disaster in the White House!
xibbumbero Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2002
Posts: 12,535
I'm not so sure on the growing economy,did you read last months labor stats?
I hope that after this election is over,that the polarization of America can come to an end,at least temporaraly. The mud slinging and unscrupulous tactics used by both parties is the main cause,IMO. It is showing everywhere,including BB's. X
johnfs Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 01-01-2003
Posts: 2,992
Politicky...yawn, boring!
428cj Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 04-26-2003
Posts: 741
Actually Rick, I have a voting idea for you all. Everyone out there who's AGAINST Bush (but not FOR anyone) should just stay home and not vote. That way you won't be voting for anyone you don't like.

Sounds good to me. Problem solved?
ducati996 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 01-02-2000
Posts: 3,475
Nazi's are a funny thing. I dated a very smart (graduated top of Eva Braun's gymnasium) German woman a long time ago (1986-19890). When I went to Germany, her 86 year old grand aunts hated me (Bombing). I asked, "where they NAZI'S?" no answer. My conclusion...they were all NAZI'S when it was popular. But Burtesgarden was FANTASTIC!!
Users browsing this topic
Guest