America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 19 years ago by snowwolf777. 17 replies replies.
OH, Did we say thaaaaaatttttt?
EI Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-29-2002
Posts: 5,069
It is amazing how the facts are unimportant to so many, and how soon they forget! >
>"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
>develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
>is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
>
>"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
>want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
>destruction program." - President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
>
>Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
>here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
>chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
>security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
>
>"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten time
>since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb
>18,1998
>
>
>"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the US
>Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
>appropriate,
>air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
>the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
>programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin
>(D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry (D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998
>
>"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
>destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
>has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi
>(D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
>
>"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
>destruction and palaces for his cronies." > - Madeline Albright, Clinton
>Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
>
>"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
>programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
>continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
>continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of
>a
>licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
>the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bush, Signed by
>Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001
>
>"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat
>to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of
>the
>United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of
>delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
>
>"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
>weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
>
>"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
>deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is
>in
>power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
>
>"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
>weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
>
>"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
>confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
>biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
>build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
>reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd
>(D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
>
>"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
>to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
>that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
>and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct.
>9,2002
>
>
>"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
>to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
>next five years .. We also should remember we have always underestimated
>the
>progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."-
>Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
>
>"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years,
>every
>significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
>chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
>refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
>
>"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
>that
>Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
>stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
>also
>given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda
>members.. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
>continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
>and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton
>(D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
>
>"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
>Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
>the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob
>Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
>
>"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
>murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime .. He presents a
>particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
>miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
>continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
>.
>So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"
>-
>Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
>
>SO NOW EVERY ONE OF THESE SAME DEMOCRATS SAY PRESIDENT BUSH LIED--THAT
>THERE
>NEVER WERE ANY WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND HE TOOK US TO WAR
>UNNECESSARILY!
CWFoster Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
How DARE you try to confuse the people with facts!

I've been trying to say what I think the Republicans haven't the nerve to say for all this time. They don't want to admit that while they did the right thing, they vaccillated too long, and Pandoras box was left open too long. The weapons of mass destruction were there, that is a historical FACT. They haven't been found, that is a present FACT. They HAD to go somewhere! If they are in Syria, Iran, or elsewhere, it's just a leg on a journey that will eventually lead to us! The liberals who are now accusing the President of lying will no doubt blame him when they turn up in New YorK City, or downtown Los Angeles at rush hour someday. We should have taken care of Saddam in '93, as soon as he violated the terms of the cease-fire. But we allowed things to drag on, and I'm sure he saw the writing on the wall and made some contingency to get the weapons out to those who would avenge his fall from power. Who will be to blame? France, germany, Russia, and the U. F**King N. for insisting that we try to talk the problem to death, and negotiate with someone who had demonstrated time and time again that he would NOT negotiate in good faith!
snowwolf777 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
Nice work pulling all that together, EI. Now if we could only get CNN (the Clinton News Network) or PMSNBC or one of the Big Three liberal nightly news channels to bring that up, we'd be all set.

Still, you aren't going to change the Bush haters. You go in and take care of business and you're a hawk and doing it for political gain. You don't go in and take care of business and they say you're putting the country at risk because you can't make the hard decisions.

Kerry can't remember what he said yesterday. Edwards in his daily job life makes a living out of lying, twisting and shading facts. They do make a great team. God save us if they make the White House.
Charlie Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
WHAT SNOWWOLF SAID........DOUBLED!

Charlie
EI Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-29-2002
Posts: 5,069
Note the absence of comments from the NEO-LIBS
or as I like to call them , The, Just Left of Lenin Lemmings
EI Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-29-2002
Posts: 5,069
Regarding the above post.
Thats what we like to call a pot stirer
hehehehe
dbguru Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2002
Posts: 1,300
No, actually I work just 2 blocks south of Lenin.. (or at least his statue). Here is the link...

http://www.seattlephotographs.com/photos/fremont/sweet/fremont_lenin_409.htm

Right next to the pinko Taco Del Mar I had my Burrito at lunch.

Yeh... were all commies here... Guess its time for you to resurrect Joe McCarthy.... Or even better.... get the Panzers rolling....

dbguru Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2002
Posts: 1,300
Here something much simpler to ponder
Try this out....

Google on : You get (as of 3pm 7/13/04) :

Bush lies 1,940,000 pages
Kerry lies 578,000 pages

Bush flips : 32,200 pages
Kerry flips : 13,400 pages

Bush flip flops 53,500 pages
Kerry flip flops : 33,200 pages

Bush Murders 215,000 pages
Kerry Murders 71,200 pages

Bush Steals 101,000 pages
Kerry Steals 39,000 pages

Bush Insanity 165,000 pages
Kerry Insanity 44,900 pages

OK just to stir to the left and keep the pot from scorching...

DB
dbguru Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2002
Posts: 1,300
For even better examples of lies and deceipt I found this link one of hundreds that were very interesting

http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0302/S00061.htm


EI Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-29-2002
Posts: 5,069
http://www.seattlephotographs.com/photos/fremont/sweet/fremont_lenin_409.htm

great picture.. even the flag is displayed backwards
Says a lot for seattle

And as for the other site. Talking about Bush'e deceit while having a pop up link for Farenheit 911. Now the pot is scorched black and so is the kettle
EI Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 06-29-2002
Posts: 5,069
http://www.roadsideamerica.com/attract/WASEAlenin.html

The lenin statue in seattle begged an answer
dbguru Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2002
Posts: 1,300
Says a lot about the Fremont district of Seattle... a very unique area where many of you neo-cons would be most uncomfortable in. (unless you take a fancy to female armpit hair, bookstores devoted to Bush slamming, head shops, nude bodypainted bicyclists, drug inspired art galleries, fish tacos, organic grocery stores and vegan cuisine from Thailand) Actually even the conservatives here find this district quite interesting.

(note: I just happen to work in Fremont/Seattle but live in a much more conservative suburb called Kirkland near to where the Seahawks practice)
snowwolf777 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
You're right. Fish tacos and hairy women and illegal drugs don't interest me. If that makes me a neocon, so be it. I'll still sleep tonight.

E-Chick Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2002
Posts: 4,877
What? No SNOPES.com on this post???

God, I miss Reagan...

Marla
SteveS Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 01-13-2002
Posts: 8,751
Nothin' wrong with a good fish taco ...
Sylance Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2003
Posts: 592
dbguru lives his life based on how many search results Google returns. He believes that if Google says there’s content out there it must be true and therefore lives his life accordingly. I’m only assuming this because this isn't the first time he's used this argument to back up his beliefs. Seems kind of silly to me because Google is very easily manipulated, but hey… I’ll go along.

dbguru, I got some more search results to run your life with… enjoy:

pee against the wind = 117,000 results
finger in a light socket = 80,900 results
cooking with spam = 283,000 results
loving the motor vehicle division = 124,000 results

And last but not least:
google runs my life = 241,000
snowwolf777 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
LOL at Sylance!
snowwolf777 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
Waste of time: 3,470,000 Google hits.
Users browsing this topic
Guest