America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 19 years ago by RICKAMAVEN. 14 replies replies.
FOLLOW THE BOUNCING $
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
http://www.andyfoulds.co.uk/amusement/bushv2.htm
Cavallo Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
i think i've been forwarded this over a dozen time in my email. the most popular was this one, but another has kerry's nose doing the $ chasing.

i understand that anti-bush and anti-kerry animated sites are fun -- have at it. it's not my cuppa joe, jibjab notwithstanding. at this point in the game, i'm more interested in seeing sites that provide evidence of substance on BOTH candidates, especially those sites without such an overt bias.

that said, enjoy -- and again, there's a kerry nose site out there somewhere, too.
weatherman98 Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 08-16-2002
Posts: 22
you may already have this site, but check out:
http://www.issues2000.org/Quiz.htm

after the quiz, dig deep into this site. Everytime I go there, I get caught up in the site - there's a TON of great info and before you know it, you'll know who you support in every political office (incl Supreme Court Justices!)
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
weatherman98

been there and i agree it is an excellent site.
Cavallo Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
just checked it out, w-man. thanks!

rick, where'd you end up on the political spectrum? :)
JonR Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
Yo Rick:

Your statement:

"in order to maintain my rights as a citizen, and because my i believe my country is in danger, and because there are some posters who actually care about their country and don't have the time that i have to research, i will continue to post what i believe are sites relevant to the current election.

these sites will present ideas contrary to the administration and it's voice on tv, fox news.

having said that, i will not respond to any posts that either agree or disagree with the authors of these articles. i choose not to get involved in the negative responses that are sure to follow, nor, to be fair, will i respond to anyone who finds the information of value.

i will respond to anyone that emails me with questions or information they wish to share. emails to me that attempt to be ugly or negative, will be deleted and ignored."

Nuff said.

JonR
Cavallo Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
jon -- i've seen you post this a few times, but where has rick not done what he said? he didn't say he wouldn't post anti-w sites; he said he wouldn't respond to things afterwards. if i'm missing something, kindly point it out to me? (here or in email if you'd rather -- BBELTRISI (at) ec.rr.com
Seth Gekko Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 01-30-2004
Posts: 2,311
Tony, at first I wondered that myself. . . . . my first reaction was to say: JonR. . huh???????

But, what I think he's attempting to do is to warn Rick that people are going offer their opinions on Rick's post, and that if Rick is a man of his word, he will refrain from responding to those responses. . . in other words, he's anticipating Ricks responses to the responses, and therefore responding to Rick's responses to the responses to Rick's original post. . . . or something. . . .
Cavallo Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
ahhhhhh, it's all crystal clear now! lol thanks, seth. :)
JonR Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
Yo Cav:

Yo Rick:

Your statement:

"in order to maintain my rights as a citizen, and because my i believe my country is in danger, and because there are some posters who actually care about their country and don't have the time that i have to research, i will continue to post what i believe are sites relevant to the current election.

these sites will present ideas contrary to the administration and it's voice on tv, fox news.

having said that, i will not respond to any posts that either agree or disagree with the authors of these articles. i choose not to get involved in the negative responses that are sure to follow, nor, to be fair, will i respond to anyone who finds the information of value.

i will respond to anyone that emails me with questions or information they wish to share. emails to me that attempt to be ugly or negative, will be deleted and ignored."

Nuff said.

JonR

Check out "HA HA HA " OR "Thankyou Mister President" posted by none other than RICKAMAVEN.

Rick is responding. So he is either feeble minded or his word doesn't mean jacksquat.

JonR
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
JonR

from my doctor:

"rick is feeble minded"
JonR Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
Yo Rick:

Can't argue with a doctors note.

A hearty welcome back, "Responding Rick".

JonR
Cavallo Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 01-05-2004
Posts: 2,796
he didn't say he wasn't going to continue to POST sites (in fact, he said that he would) -- only that he wouldn't respond to the commentary. until he flipped out his doc's note, he was doing just what he said he would do. :)
JonR Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
Yo Cav:

"having said that, i will not respond to any posts that either agree or disagree with the authors of these articles. i choose not to get involved in the negative responses that are sure to follow, nor, to be fair, will i respond to anyone who finds the information of value."


Rick responded in "HA HA HA" and "THANKYOU MR. PRESIDENT", the key word here is "RESPOND", not post.
Rick said he would not "RESPOND" to any of his own posts and he did "RESPOND".

JonR
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
JonR

i will be going to vegas next week for two or three weeks. what will you do without me?
Users browsing this topic
Guest