Frontline on PBS( yes, I know, public TV, liberal bias, and to clear the air I am a souther Democrat)
aired a report that was critical of Donald Rumsfeld as Secy of Defense.
Essentially, the report focused on Rumsfeld's personality for dispatching anyone who disagrees with him. The report focused on how Colin Powell and other develope the "Powell Doctrine" that was designed to prevent another sitatuation like Vietnam occurring. I am going to summarize as saying the policy as "don't go in until you know your way out."
From what I saw in the report, Colin Powell, and another 4 star Army General whose name I recall but cannot (-----insky ?)have essentially been excluded by Rumsfeld. He relies on anther undersecretary who follows a belief in small, highly equipped forces rejecting the 4 star Army Generals view that wars are won by boots on sand. And, we did not deploy enough troops after taking Iraq to control Iraq.
From my view, it appears the General had some sound points that were summarily dismissed since he disagreed with Rumsfeld and his undersecretary. I believe this General has since retired.
From my view, George Bush could make a decisive move in his new administration by installing a new Secy of Defense.
Since most of the veterans here may have served under Powell and others, wondered what you think. I believe some of the report is online.
Not trying to argue politics. I support the troops fully. I have great respected for veterans present and future. And part of this respect is, as a citizen, being concerned that civilian bureaucrats do not put American soldiers unnecessarily in harms way, or when they are in harms way, they have what they need to solve the problem and come home.
CParker
CParker
