America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 19 years ago by snowwolf777. 12 replies replies.
ARTICLE BY BILL MOYERS
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
Bill Moyers Retiring From TV Journalism

"I was just in the editing room, working on the last piece," Bill Moyers says. "I thought: `I've done this so many times, and each one is as difficult as the last one.' Maybe finally I've broken the habit."

It hasn't been so much a habit for Moyers as a truth-telling mission during his three decades as a TV journalist. But come next week, he will sign off from "Now," the weekly PBS newsmagazine he began in 2002, as, at age 70, he retires from television.

"I'm going out telling the story that I think is the biggest story of our time: how the right-wing media has become a partisan propaganda arm of the Republican National Committee," says Moyers. "We have an ideological press that's interested in the election of Republicans, and a mainstream press that's interested in the bottom line. Therefore, we don't have a vigilant, independent press whose interest is the American people."

For that, his absence after the Dec. 17 "Now" will be all the more keenly felt: Moyers' interest has always been the American people.

A humanist who's at home with subjects ranging from the power of myth to media consolidation, from drug addiction to modern dance, from religion to environmental abuse, Moyers has produced hundreds of hours of diverse programming on issues that others shortchange, sidestep or simply fail to notice. And through it all, he has looked upon his audience not as targeted consumers, or as voters split along a Red State-Blue State divide, but as his fellow citizens.

He's a citizen-journalist with a robust background, this Texas native who, early on, earned a divinity degree (he's an ordained Baptist minister) then served as special assistant to President Johnson, and for several years was publisher of the Long Island newspaper Newsday.

In 1971, he came to public television as host of "This Week" and "Bill Moyers' Journal," and, next, joined CBS News to do similarly civic-minded programming.

Then in 1986 he and his wife, Judith Davidson Moyers, became their own bosses by forming Public Affairs Television, an independent shop that has not only produced documentaries such as "A Walk Through the 20th Century," "Healing and the Mind" and "A Gathering of Men with Robert Bly," but also paid for them through its own fund-raising efforts.

"Judith and I will take several months to catch our breath," says Moyers during a recent conversation at the soon-to-be-vacated office he rents at Thirteen/WNET's Manhattan headquarters. "Then I will think about the Last Act _ capital L, capital A _ of my life."

He does have one immediate project: a book he will write about his years with Johnson. But he has no TV ventures in mind.

With his days at "Now" ticking down, Moyers voices pride in that series, which, upon its premiere three years ago, he envisioned as "a flexible format for ideas and conversation, reportage and debate." Now reaching 2.4 million viewers weekly with its breaking-news currency and contemplative pace, "Now" will continue with his worthy co-host, David Brancaccio, taking over. (It airs Fridays at 8:30 p.m. EST; check local listings.)

"It has gained traction," says Moyers _ if only by default, in an era where most TV journalism gravitates toward the sensational or trivial. "As the networks have raced to the bottom, it is very easy to stand out if you just do good journalism. We've been trying to do good journalism, and it filled a real void."

One example of typically good journalism on "Now" not long ago: an in-depth look at the record of President Bush's nominee for secretary of state, Condoleeza Rice, who in her current post as national security adviser "dreadfully misjudged the terrorist threat leading up to 9/11, and then misled America and the world about the case for invading Iraq," as Moyers concluded.

It was the sort of report unlikely to be found on most newscasts, and even less likely to endear a reporter to the powers-that-be, on whose good graces the media has grown all too reliant. But Moyers believes that challenging those in power is a journalist's duty _ and, consequently, his.

"What they're really objecting to is not my ideology," he says in his thoughtful, almost pastoral manner. "I'd be doing this if the Democrats were in power. It's not that I'm a liberal, it really isn't. It's the fact that I'm doing journalism that isn't determined by the establishment.

"You don't get rewarded in commercial broadcasting for trying to tell the truth about the institutions of power in this country," he goes on. "I think my peers in commercial television are talented and devoted journalists, but they've chosen to work in a corporate mainstream that trims their talent to fit the corporate nature of American life. And you do not get rewarded for telling the hard truths about America in a profit-seeking environment."

Through his own devices, Moyers has been the journalist he wanted to be, while honored for it with more than 30 Emmys and 10 Peabody awards.

"I've just been doing the kind of journalism that ought to be done, IF you had the opportunity to do it," he insists. "The fight has been to create that opportunity and that independence."

It's been a fight he fought well. But where will tomorrow's Bill Moyers come from?

"We have got to nurture the spirit of independent journalism in this country," he warns in reply, "or we'll not save capitalism from its own excesses, and we'll not save democracy from its own inertia."
THL Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-22-2002
Posts: 3,044
And from his perspective as a liberal (read his columns) I'm sure that he feels that this is true. The problem is he approaches from the left and thinks he is approaching from the middle. Go through that article and substiute the word "left" for "right" and "Democrat" for "Republican" and it would ring just as true to a right wing audience. It should read,"a search for truth as he sees it!"
EI Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-29-2002
Posts: 5,069
another liberal media hack bites the dust.

anyone see a pattern here?
JonR Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 02-19-2002
Posts: 9,740
I heard moyer and little danny blather are going to co-write a book called, "What's the frequency kerry".

LOL

JonR
Charlie Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2002
Posts: 39,751
Bill Moyers will not be missed by me.....that is for sure! A far left extreme, liberal hack from the word go!

Good riddance

Charlie
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
EI
JonR
Charlie

three peas in a pod.
lukin Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-31-2004
Posts: 2,205
while I agree with the idea that he is a liberal hack...his interview with famed mythologist Joseph Campbell is to me (as an English teacher and mythology nut) some of the most entertaining television I have ever watched. I have the interview on tape, and the transcript to read. For that alone I won't lump him with the likes of Rather and Brokaw
Thom Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 12-08-2003
Posts: 6,117
It was because of Bill Moyers that I went into media. He has an un-matched on-air presence, and a true gift of relating to people.
You may not agree with his politics, but his is no hack.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
lukin

why was it necessary to add "hack" to liberal.
pabloescabar Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 02-25-2005
Posts: 30,183
I use ta be a Hack myself, back in the day. hey the pay was great...
eleltea Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 03-03-2002
Posts: 4,562
Rickamaven, are you suggesting the phrase is redundant?
lukin Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 03-31-2004
Posts: 2,205
I add hack to liberal because though he and others pretend that they are objective and unbiased, they clearly are subjective and liberal. If thats who they want to be then fine...but don't pretend otherwise. Don't pretend that you are something that you are not. Many people like to slam Fox News and some of the people they regularly have on their network such as Sean Hannity and Bill O' Reilly. However they aren't pretending that they are objective reporters. Instead they clearly favor one side over the other and they make statements as such. Moyers, Rather, Brokaw, Lehrer and the rest pretend that they are something that their not. They are not objective journalists, they are people with an agenda.
snowwolf777 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
I walked away from the business (print-J)in 1985 because it was so left-wing liberal. Young, old, it didn't matter. They were all leftist, liberal. The material was, whenever possible, slanted as such. We (the paper, not me) preached objectivity on the outside, and secretly pushed the whole program left on the inside. The agenda was better hidden back then. Now it's so obvious. It's all left or right now, with very little objective MOTR.

I had an opinion column when I was in my mid-20s. The readers of the paper were always shocked to meet me in person. The assumption from my writing tone was that I was in my 60s. No one believed you could be young and conservative. Thankfully that has changed for the better.
Users browsing this topic
Guest