America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 21 years ago by E-Chick. 14 replies replies.
Customs Service Working to Prevent Nuke-in-the-Box
jjohnson28 Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
http://www.cnsnews.com/Politics.asp



I personally think it's a step in the right direction,what do you think?
[email protected] Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2002
Posts: 9,719
We ARE assuming that the nukes weren't already brought over here prior to 911 ...

... for all we (the docile public) know, there could have already been a threat that was intended to have taken place, but it somehow was either interceded; or just didn't work.

American people as a whole are still the most lame (and lazy) society in the world.
Nobody wants to do, or have done to them, anything that interferes with their 'civil liberties'.
IMHO, I don't give a damn if you have to wait 15 extra minutes at the airport.
I don't care about racial profiling - I certainly wouldn't waste my time looking for a Irishman in yet another drunken rage and the local pub when it was just reported that a group of middle eastern males just 'jacked a plane or were planning on cracking the Hoover Dam; furthermore, I certainly wouldn't have my men questioning a blonde haired male regarding a rape allegation when it was reported that the perp was speaking in Spanish or was black. If I were supposed to do that, then why couldn't I, in a line-up, have 9 men with red hair and beards stand up amongst the perp - now THAT would be discrimination - wouldn't it? Isn't that what a line-up is? Isn't it a racial profiling of sorts? Ya' all don't hear the criminals bitching about that system do you....
... they're happy that we are required to dress them all the same, find the same/similar builds, dark or light hair.

Think about this also ... 100% of ALL criminals APPROVE of Gun Control Laws as well....
- it makes their jobs just a little bit easier.

How many Grandmothers would get their purses stolen in NY City every day if 2 out of every 3 muggers were getting shot in the back and killed?

Everything we've ever had we assume to the norm and we bitch and cry about change and how we are 'repressed' or something like that. I don't believe any of it - we are what we make of our lives and our society is a direct reflection of the stupidity of our peers.

I still say, let's open up safe houses across the country ...
..provide clean needles and free drugs to all the junkies ...
- and make sure that 1 out of every 20 'free hits' was an intentional lethal dosage.... I'm betting that within a year ... our drug wars would half-over, our children safer in school, our mothers safer walking down the streets and society better off because some stupid **** can no longer reproduce and keep infecting the gene pool.....
CJBully Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 07-31-2002
Posts: 753
it seems the gene pool in some parts of the country is already a little shallow...
jjohnson28 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
Whoa! Jimmy you definitely lost me on the killing drug addicts thing. You sir, are fuggin out there!
cwilhelmi Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
yeah no $hit, way out there!!


that link points towards "GOP Vulnerable In Bush Country, Analysts Say" am I safe to assume this is an outdated link??
CJBully Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 07-31-2002
Posts: 753
what also scares the bejeezus out of me is that there are people out there that believe the same should be done to tobacco users...
cwilhelmi Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
cj - yep, kind of nazi'ish
jjohnson28 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
Ha! Rick must of sabotaged my link.Here's the story.





Customs Service Working to Prevent 'Nuke-in-the-Box'
By Jeff Johnson
CNSNews.com Congressional Bureau Chief
August 27, 2002



Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - The commissioner of the U.S. Customs Service said Monday that America's borders are safer from the threat of terrorists sneaking a weapon of mass destruction into the United States, but much work remains to be done.



Commissioner Robert Bonner told an audience at the Center for Strategic and International Studies that the Customs Service (USCS) began deploying personnel today in its newest program to prevent terrorists from using the ocean cargo transportation system to attack American targets.



"It's an 'insurance policy' against terrorism," he said. "We don't want to wait for the 'nuke-in-the-box.'"



The "Container Security Initiative" (CSI) program assigns American agents to inspect and secure selected cargo containers bound for U.S. ports before those containers are loaded onto ships at their point of origin.



Using a computerized database of information about all shipments bound for the U.S., intelligence analysts will identify potentially "high-risk" shipments. Those containers will then be subjected to advanced electronic testing - for radiation, explosives, concealed passengers, and other contraband - and even searched by hand if necessary. Once the container has been cleared by USCS inspectors, it will be sealed and sent on to it U.S. destination where it can be immediately released to its intended recipient.



"It's a system that not only provides a substantial increase in security," he explained, "but one that also facilitates trade, allows it to move more efficiently, and more quickly than it did prior to 9/11."



One way CSI achieves that goal is by working during the "down time" between when a cargo container arrives at the port and when it is scheduled to be loaded onboard a ship. The period, usually two to five days, allows USCS personnel ample time to analyze the manifest of the container's contents and to determine whether it merits further scrutiny.



Twenty of the world's busiest ports were picked to be the initial participants in the CSI program. These "mega-ports" were chosen because nearly 70 percent of the 5.7 million cargo containers entering the U.S. annually pass through them.



Currently, five countries - Canada, the Netherlands, France, Belgium, and Germany - have signed agreements to participate. Singapore has verbally committed to the program. Participating countries that wish to do so can also send their customs inspectors to the U.S. to examine cargo bound for their ports. So far, Canada is the only nation to utilize the reciprocal nature of the agreements.



Bonner said he expects to be signing agreements with "several other governments" to participate in the CSI program "in the next few weeks." While he did not have a cost estimate for the USCS teams' deployment, he described the cost of a five- to ten-member team stationed at a foreign port as "peanuts" compared to the "profound" consequences of a successful terrorist infiltration.



"If terrorists used a sea container to conceal and smuggle a weapon of mass destruction into a port of the United States and detonated that container, the impact on global trade and the global economy would be immediate, and it would be devastating," Bonner warned. "All nations would be affected."



Proposed new regulations will also require more specific disclosures of a container's contents and earlier filing of those disclosures. Bonner said such rules are "essential for CSI to succeed." Those new regulations would apply to all cargo shipped to the U.S., however, not just containers originating from CSI-participant ports.



Another program instituted by the USCS is the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT). Private industry is helping the government improve security throughout the supply chain of foreign-made goods shipped into the U.S.



The partnership allows major U.S. importers, carriers, customs brokers, and others to meet minimum standards for security of the shipments they facilitate from foreign to U.S. ports.



"In return, these companies that partner with U.S. Customs," Bonner explained, "will be given the fast lane through our land border crossings, and through our seaports."



In late January of 2002, General Motors, Target Stores, Sara Lee, Ford, Daimler-Chrysler, BP-Amoco, and Motorola joined C-TPAT as "charter members." Currently, more than 400 companies have signed on to the program.



Bonner, who took office just 13 days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, is intent on continuing the improvements to the Customs Service and to supporting President Bush's initiative for the creation of a Department of Homeland Security.



"Our systems should be more secure, but they should also be better and more efficient than they were bore 9/11," Bonner concluded. "Even with all that we've done so far, I'm still not satisfied. There's much more that we need to do."





RICKAMAVEN Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
jjohnson28

"Ha! Rick must of sabotaged my link."

it's all my fault

[email protected] Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2002
Posts: 9,719
I still say give the junkies 'freebies' and let them overdose ....

Fewer crimes,
Fewer crack-babies
Lower unemployment rate
Less dealers pushing drugs on our children,
Less violence,
A financial boost to Social Security,
Less welfare recipients overall,
Decreased transmission/spreading of aids,
Better education available to our children in schools ....

... just my opinion - but you know it's true .....
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
: [email protected]

i can't believe you understand the liberal point of view on this subject.

eliminate the profit motive and you will eliminate the dealers and ultimately only the junkies themselves will be affected by their problem.

if they are going to kill themselves with the drugs, we should ask them to leave the general population and have a sort of elephant graveyard for them.

taking away the profit from the drug dealers might force them to think about real jobs. it's radical but it can work.

you do have the dea against legalizing any drug. they might have to spend their time enforcing laws that are more important.

CJBully Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-31-2002
Posts: 753
Rick, touche!
cwilhelmi Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
yep! By decriminalizing the drugs and treating then like some of the legal drugs, like alcohol, you take away most of the criminal elements associated with aquiring the drugs. You still have the people who don't know how to say when and these are the ones that suffer. As far as I'm concerned I can give a flying f*ck if someone goes home and smokes a joint, as long as they don't do it while they're working. Same rules and regs as alcohol...
jjohnson28 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 09-12-2000
Posts: 7,914
No Jimmy you were advocting making "sure that 1 out of every 20 'free hits' was an intentional lethal dosage" Thus killing them by some sort of twisted lottery. Rick,I've known for quite some time that you were twisted I just didn't think you were that twisted.
E-Chick Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2002
Posts: 4,877
Legalize it all...it'll just be watered down whatever...a guy goes and pays for sex/gets caught/thrown in jail/loses his job, but the hallowed priest molests kids and gets away...pretty soon we'll all be buyin' (or pushin') on the streets something we take for granted today...I LOVE my gas powered lawn mower and leaf blower...you got a gallon of gas I can score off ya?
Users browsing this topic
Guest