America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 13 years ago by snowwolf777. 89 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
ONCE AGAIN PRESIDENT OBAMA WINS THE LAST HAND AND TAKES HOME THE TROPHY
wheelrite Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

WHERE DOES THAT SUGGEST OR IMPLY THAT YOU CAN GO TO A PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH CARRYING A 15 SHOT AUTOMATIC PISTOL AND AND A MACHINE GUN ON YOUR SHOULDER



dude,,,

you are an idiot..
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
Freemasons among the U.S. Founding Fathers

Some people think that almost all the Founding Fathers were
Freemasons, and others that very few were. On the following
websites you can find information about which of the Founding
Fathers, signers of the Declaration of Independence, signers of
the Constitution, and Generals in the Continental Army under
Washington, were Masons.

Signers of the Declaration of Independence who were
Freemasons

Signers of the U.S. Constitution who were Freemasons

Generals in the Continental Army under George Washington
who were Freemasons

In summary:
Category Total Number Involved Number & Percent Who
Were Freemasons
Signers of the Declaration of Independence 56 9 -- 16%
Signers of the U.S. Constitution 39 13 -- 33%
Generals in the Continental Army 74 33 -- 46%
ZRX1200 Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,682
You didn't sign it Rick?

POOPIE OUTRAGE!!!
wheelrite Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
Freemasons among the U.S. Founding Fathers

Some people think that almost all the Founding Fathers were
Freemasons, and others that very few were. On the following
websites you can find information about which of the Founding
Fathers, signers of the Declaration of Independence, signers of
the Constitution, and Generals in the Continental Army under
Washington, were Masons.

Signers of the Declaration of Independence who were
Freemasons

Signers of the U.S. Constitution who were Freemasons

Generals in the Continental Army under George Washington
who were Freemasons

In summary:
Category Total Number Involved Number & Percent Who
Were Freemasons
Signers of the Declaration of Independence 56 9 -- 16%
Signers of the U.S. Constitution 39 13 -- 33%
Generals in the Continental Army 74 33 -- 46%



The Freemasons have made tremendous contributions to society for centuries...


Rick go join Acorn,,,
DadZilla3 Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
RICKAMAVEN wrote:

you can use any cliche you want, but it doesn't tell us
anything.


You have to appreciate the irony of that statement, coming at the end of a string of socialist cliches.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
#8

IT WAS A WIN FOR EQUAL RIGHTS
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
daveincincy

FRANKLY THE REPORT FROM THE TROOPS THEMSELVES INDICTED THEY COULD CARE LESS..

MORE IMPORTANT WE WON'T BE THROWING OUT MEN AND/OR WOMEN WHO ARE QUALIFIED TO PERFORM THEIR DUTIES. ANDS WHO ARE WILLING TO DIE FOR THEIR COUNTRY. THE FIRST DEAD TROOP IN IRAQ WAS GAY.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
dude,,,

you are an idiot.

NO, Y0U ARE. WHERE DOES IT SAY OR IMPLY WHAT I ASKED. APPARENTLY YOUR ANSWER IS "YOU ARE AN IDIOT. THAT'S NOT AN ANSWER IT'S THE AVOIDANCE OF AN ANSWER.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
Man, that sounds like "National Treasure" or "The DaVinci Code"



Total lib mental implosion is a beautiful thing to watch.
wheelrite Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Man, that sounds like "National Treasure" or "The DaVinci Code"



Total lib mental implosion is a beautiful thing to watch.


it's called dementia..
DrMaddVibe Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
wheelrite wrote:
it's called dementia..



God bless you!Herfing
HockeyDad Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
The freemasons rigged the 2000 Presidential election.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
HockeyDad wrote:
The freemasons rigged the 2000 Presidential election.



I thought it was the PMRC???Eh?
snowwolf777 Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL PARKING AT THE AIRPORTS IN AND NEAR DC, FOR CONGRESSPEOPLE AND SENATORS?



Same place it mandates special parking places for pregnant women at my local super market. They also have parking for fuel-efficient cars, and parking for "the recently injured" next to the handicapped spots.

That's why I park my hemi Durango right next to the front door in the preggo slot at the Piggly-Wiggly.

Dancing
rfenst Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,473
This is quite a thread!
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
Robert

i hope you have enjoyed the thread. i find i can turn on the fox propaganda channel and listen to a bunch of loony toons, and watch a group of bleached blonds with short skirts talking about thing they don't understand, or come here to listen to their audience. it's like listening to both sides of a phone conversation.

someone just broke the thread to include" hemi Durango" and "preggo slot" and "Piggly-Wiggly."

i am sort of sure the hemi durango is a vehicle. and i have shopped at piggly wigglys, they are no trader joes, but they are nice grocery stores,

preggo slot is a mystery to me. i don't think the reference is to the birth canal, but i don't know what a preggo is or why it has a special parking slot..
DrMaddVibe Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
THEY CALL HIM TATER SALAD!!!!
HockeyDad Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
First they got the right to vote. Now they go on TV with bleached blonde hair and speak.

It was a slippery slope.
ZRX1200 Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,682
WHY DO YOU HATE WOMEN RICK???
snowwolf777 Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL PARKING AT THE AIRPORTS IN AND NEAR DC, FOR CONGRESSPEOPLE AND SENATORS?


Awww, I'm sorry for interrupting what will surely be the crowning post over the doorway of your memorial library.

Let me break it down into something that works on your level:

The Constitution doesn't provide for the parking spots. The airport just wanted to do it, so they did it. It's like a local thing. Unless the signs mention "White Congressmen Only" I think they're OK. Maybe you could foil up and go on PMS NBC to express your parking sign outrage to Keith Overbite. I'm sure any episode that features you will spike his ratings out of the single digits.

While we're at it, are we just going to chuck the concept of conduct unbecoming from the military, since they can apparently no longer set conduct? Or are we just going to exclude all other potential special interests from being able to do what they want in the military, because all you personally care about is gays?

DrMaddVibe Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
snowwolf777 wrote:
Awww, I'm sorry for interrupting what will surely be the crowning post over the doorway of your memorial library.

Let me break it down into something that works on your level:

The Constitution doesn't provide for the parking spots. The airport just wanted to do it, so they did it. It's like a local thing. Unless the signs mention "White Congressmen Only" I think they're OK. Maybe you could foil up and go on PMS NBC to express your parking sign outrage to Keith Overbite. I'm sure any episode that features you will spike his ratings out of the single digits.

While we're at it, are we just going to chuck the concept of conduct unbecoming from the military, since they can apparently no longer set conduct? Or are we just going to exclude all other potential special interests from being able to do what they want in the military, because all you personally care about is gays?




Now THIS post is C&P material!
leonardo Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 06-26-2007
Posts: 911
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION DOES IT PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL PARKING AT THE AIRPORTS IN AND NEAR DC, FOR CONGRESSPEOPLE AND SENATORS?


That is a good point; I don't think that's in the constitution. I don't think the word "congresspeople" is anywhere in the constitution either.
leonardo Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 06-26-2007
Posts: 911
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
Freemasons among the U.S. Founding Fathers

Some people think that almost all the Founding Fathers were
Freemasons, and others that very few were. On the following
websites you can find information about which of the Founding
Fathers, signers of the Declaration of Independence, signers of
the Constitution, and Generals in the Continental Army under
Washington, were Masons.

Signers of the Declaration of Independence who were
Freemasons

Signers of the U.S. Constitution who were Freemasons

Generals in the Continental Army under George Washington
who were Freemasons

In summary:
Category Total Number Involved Number & Percent Who
Were Freemasons
Signers of the Declaration of Independence 56 9 -- 16%
Signers of the U.S. Constitution 39 13 -- 33%
Generals in the Continental Army 74 33 -- 46%


Did you post this because you think it's a good thing, or a bad thing, or was it just for edumacation purposes? I heard Freemasons didn't like Catholics, so maybe a good thing?
jackconrad Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
Um to belitle a point. They didn't park in those spaces when they wrote the Constitution Because they knew the horses had a habit of shatting there..
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
leonardo

i posted it because the freemasons are a secret society that exercises some control over the laws, and i don't like the idea of secret societes controlling what i am allowed to do.
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
wheelrite

is there anything that you claim to know about that is accurate?

the republicans pushed through the tax cut for the wealthy with a
provision it would have served it's purpose by 2011, rewarding his contributors and would
expire.

read and learn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_tax_cuts.

if allowed to expire taxes would return to their regular status
and the billions the wealthy got because they bought bush like a
basket of corn cost the country billions of dollars and made
deficit spending a new program for the wealthy of the country.
VaMtnMan Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 06-25-2007
Posts: 3,743
Wow, and here I thought Obama, and both the house and senate, were controlled by the Democrats. How could the Republicans push them around like that. Oh yea thats right, Obama was the one who worked this deal out. He sold you out Ricky. Damn Tin Foil Hat didn't help now, did it? And you know what else sucks. More Democrats voted for it then Republicans. Ricky, maybe the Republicans are yours freinds. By the way Ricky, they have known for what, like 9 years that these were going to expire. Why did they wait until the last moment to bring this up? They sold you out.

"In the end, the House vote wasn’t close, with 139 Democrats joining 138 Republicans to approve the bill. The Senate passed the bill comfortably as well Wednesday, 81 to 19."

http://politisite.com/2010/12/17/more-democrats-voted-for-bush-tax-cuts-than-republicans-passes-house-goes-to-obama-for-signature/
HockeyDad Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
Upper class rocks!

Scoreboard, we won again and bought Obama like a basket of corn!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
It passes right through ya!!!Brick wall
leonardo Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 06-26-2007
Posts: 911
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
leonardo

i posted it because the freemasons are a secret society that exercises some control over the laws, and i don't like the idea of secret societes controlling what i am allowed to do.


But what you posted was from a long time ago, right? They did have some control then, and it seems they did a pretty good job with the Declaration and the Constitution and Revolutionary War, right? Are you saying this secret society still exercises control over the laws? What are the current percentages of Freemasons in power?

I wonder if President Obama a Prince Hall Mason...
HockeyDad Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
98.2%
wheelrite Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
wheelrite

is there anything that you claim to know about that is accurate?

the republicans pushed through the tax cut for the wealthy with a
provision it would have served it's purpose by 2011, rewarding his contributors and would
expire.

read and learn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_tax_cuts.

if allowed to expire taxes would return to their regular status
and the billions the wealthy got because they bought bush like a
basket of corn cost the country billions of dollars and made
deficit spending a new program for the wealthy of the country.



Rick define "Regular Status"

Since you pay NO taxes.You owe me big time.

So pay up Methuselah...
wheelrite Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Rick,,,

FYI..

after the Bush tax cuts there were RECORD tax receipts for the Govt.

"The Laffer Curve"

The Laffer curve is a graphical representation of tax revenue as a function of the tax rate. It is named after Arthur Laffer, an influential economist behind the tax cuts of President Ronald Reagan.

The Laffer curve shows that tax revenue is zero when the tax rate is zero percent, but that tax revenue also falls to zero when the tax rate reaches 100 percent, as people increasingly shift to nontaxable income, tax shelters, tax evasion, and leisure. At some tax rate between zero and 100 percent, the government collects maximum tax revenue. For a government that seeks to maximize tax revenue, this is the optimum tax rate. When the tax rate is below the optimum, the government can increase tax revenue by increasing the tax rate; but when the tax rate is above the optimum, the government can increase tax revenue only by decreasing the tax rate. This is a specific application of the general economic principle of changing marginal rates of substitution, in this case, of the substitution for alternatives to earning taxable income.

President John F. Kennedy explained the principle behind the Laffer curve in his address to the Economic Club of New York on December 14, 1962:

“ In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now.[1] ”

Few economists dispute the general principle of the Laffer curve..

HockeyDad Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,213
This is why the Democrats killed Kennedy.



The Laffer Curve is outdated and far too simplistic in a global economy.
wheelrite Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
HockeyDad wrote:
This is why the Democrats killed Kennedy.



The Laffer Curve is outdated and far too simplistic in a global economy.


Sinatra killed Kennedy cuz he left Marlyn sloppy and stuff...
BigAlnAZ Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 04-14-2006
Posts: 359
Anyone here remember that Barak signed the sChip tax legislation? Do you like paying more for cigars because the socialists want more free stuff? Only one more year of his nonsense and we can get back to normalcy.
ZRX1200 Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,682
^ yes we want normal not quite so Marxist globalism again........


WOO HOO!!!!

Is there any room on your frontrunner coatails HD, I want in.
wheelrite Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
BigAlnAZ wrote:
Anyone here remember that Barak signed the sChip tax legislation? Do you like paying more for cigars because the socialists want more free stuff? Only one more year of his nonsense and we can get back to normalcy.



Sadly he won't leave office until Jan,2013. So,it's actually 2 more years
snowwolf777 Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 06-03-2000
Posts: 4,082
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
leonardo

i posted it because the freemasons are a secret society that exercises some control over the laws, and i don't like the idea of secret societes controlling what i am allowed to do.



Really? And it didn't bother you that your a-hole pals in Congress passed a health care "reform" law where they told us we couldn't know what was in the bill until we let them pass it?

Think
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12