America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

You can't be serious! Do you have amnesia?

I think Bill Maher is hilarious and his show is very entertaining. I enjoyed watching it when we used to get HBO.

FuzzNJ, how many "Teabaggers are racists" threads have you started?

Zero. 99% positive.

I am glad that FuzzNJ no longer thinks that teabaggers are racists.

Hey Poindexter......you just got shoved out on the playground AGAIN.This is your response????????Who's fault is it.....YOURS MORON.



Ron

Poor Fuzzy....

Didn't say that either.

So you have no examples of being called racist for opposing Obama's policies, and no examples of where I started threads saying tea-baggers are racist. Just like to throw crap out there and when called on it back off?

Frankj1 I hear what your saying. Maher has supported BHO and never has said one good word about any republican or third party member that I know of. You seem to have forgotten the part of your post about him being a liberatarian and wasn't a liberal. You brought that up sir.

I never said I have been called a racist for any reason. I have black friends.

You are a racister. You think people on this board and teabaggers everywhere are racist and have admitted that. The only reason you came into any contact with them is because of arguing over Obama's policies. It is just that simple.

I appreciate your perceived victim-hood but if you call a person's statement racist, you can't really claim you aren't calling them a racist.

Sorry.

Who cares whether he is a libertarian or a "liberal" (how ever you may define the term)? Who cares who he supported or who he hasn't? Who cares whether he has said one good word about a Republican or third-party candidate or member? The guy is a comedian who uses irony, satire and hypocrisy to make some people laugh. There isn't much more to it than that. Those who don't like him need not watch him.

I disagree Robert......Maher is a downright dirty basturd.I do not find him humorous in the least.Haven't watched the show ever.....mostly youtube clips is where my opinion comes from.


Ron

Oh, I absolutely can and have.

Maybe the person just didn't realize that what they were saying sounded racist and once given another perspective thinks, oh yeah, I can see it that way. It's happened to me too. A friend says that doesn't sound right. Usually it has to do with women though, saying girl accidentally instead of woman when I was in college was one that comes immediately to mind.

I have black,brown and white friends......a black step son.......a mulatto daughter-in-law.....a hispanic son-in-law.....and an Asian wife.....no room for racism in my life.Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

My comment about Mr Cain was intended to provoke thought.How are you and your liberal party going to smear an upstanding,intelligent,conservative black man from Georgia.....who BTW sounds black.That'll drive libs infugginsane.LMAO


Ron

Intended to provoke thought? lmfao. There is no reason to smear the dude. No one's even talking about him at all. He's got no chance anyway. No one has even talked about him here at all, but you already assume when a liber does it's going to be racist? And he 'sounds black'? Oh good lord. I'm the racist? Dude you are one seriously f'd up person.

Z...I used to watch Maher alot, not so much the last few years but once in a while. The man used to call himself a Libertarian...he had no use for either major party. I'm sure neither of us really care how he votes. But when Ron Paul first showed up on the public radar Maher did publicly push people to consider some, if not all, of his visions for a better way of governing. And he did this as a reaction to what was happening with American leadership at the time...in his opinion it was bad. That didn't pass the lefty litmus test, wouldn't you agree?

Attacking republicans when they clearly stray from the ideals they claim are their identity does not make anyone a lib, it makes them accurate critics. And it is absolutely what they should do if their role is public commentary. And when the same person attacks democrats when they are idiotic or hypocritical, it makes him an accurate critic again.

I'm more worried about people that want to shut up opposition...seems like the ultimate anti-American position to me. Without the "great debate" we are no better than any one-party dominated society, far left or far right!

there is so much effed up stuff in this thread from Fuzzy i dont have enough time in the day to go through each line to offer the commen sense and factual rebuttles.

I would be anti-Somali pirates...............except that I am shaking in fear that the illiberal lefties will call me racist.

I dunno. Most of your idiotic comments and beliefs insult the intelligent of most around here.

Maybe if you got a clue, you wouldn't be so despised.

It is the third year in a row the federal government has taken in more than it spent, and has paid down the debt. The last time the U.S. government had a third consecutive year of national debt reduction was 1949, said the official.

The federal budget surplus for fiscal year 1999 was $122.7 billion, and $69.2 billion for fiscal year 1998. Those back-to-back surpluses, the first since 1957, allowed the Treasury to pay down $138 billion in national debt.

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/27/clinton.surplus/

Nor could you with anything that would resemble a logical argument, but that's ok. I probably couldn't racially profile someone renting a car. We all have our strengths and weaknesses.

lmao, all caps and everything. I don't like that law either. But you do know it's not just Democrats who support legislation like this, right? Laws like this have been proposed and are spreading all over the country. States are losing a lot of tax revenue to other states from sales over the internet. I used to buy cigarettes from Switzerland, but that was stopped years ago because no one was getting taxes from it. Same concept with the banning of internet poker, which was mostly heralded by the right and criticized by (gulp) Barney Frank. But go on your rant if it makes you feel better.

Maybe I am wrong, but I think Fuzz is a victim of fuzzy math.

Go to the U.S. Treasury website: http://www.ustreas.gov/

Click on "Bureaus": Takes you to http://www.ustreas.gov/bureaus/

Click on "Bureau of the Public Debt": Takes you to http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/

Scroll down to the section "The U.S. Public Debt" and click on "See the U.S. Public Debt to the Penny."

This takes you to the link http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np


Verifying this is as simple as accessing the U.S. Treasury website where the national debt is updated daily and a history of the debt since January 1993 can be obtained. Considering the government's fiscal year ends on the last day of September each year, and considering Clinton's budget proposal in 1993 took effect in October 1993 and concluded September 1994 (FY1994), here's the national debt at the end of each year of Clinton Budgets:


Fiscal
Year Year
Ending National Debt
FY1993 09/30/1993 $4.411488 trillion
FY1994 09/30/1994 $4.692749 trillion
FY1995 09/29/1995 $4.973982 trillion
FY1996 09/30/1996 $5.224810 trillion
FY1997 09/30/1997 $5.413146 trillion
FY1998 09/30/1998 $5.526193 trillion
FY1999 09/30/1999 $5.656270 trillion
FY2000 09/29/2000 $5.674178 trillion



As can clearly be seen, in no year did the national debt go down, nor did Clinton leave President Bush with a surplus that Bush subsequently turned into a deficit.