America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Tea Party Nation, the ones who held the tea party convention where Palin was the keynote speaker, has a solution to help the economy. They want every small business owner to take this pledge:

"I, an American small business owner, part of the class that produces the vast majority of real, wealth producing jobs in this country, hereby resolve that I will not hire a single person until this war against business and my country is stopped."

"I hereby declare that my job creation potential is now ceased."

"I'm on strike!"

Another difference between the OWS'rs and the teabaggers. One group is looking for solutions, the other looking to make things worse.

Although they may not hire anyone there was no mention of firing or laying off, so these jobs would be under the administrations mythical saved or mantained category. Still doing better than the fleabags then. But of course on group can take a stand and it is the greatest movement of all time and another's attempt at what?

The pledge has absolutely no teeth because the action it calls for has already happened.

Is it really obvious?

If employers want to hire more people and create additional jobs, that is their business and prerogative.

Like I said, the pledge has no teeth. It is describing what has already happened from small businesses right on up to the largest corporations.

Poor Obama......

I know but look at all the racist crackers trying to ruin his historic presidency. Shame shame.

At least I know he's to classy a guy to use any of this to further divide the country for his benefit.

No one is questioning their 'prerogative' or right to hire or not hire, not at all. It certainly is their right. So this is just another attempt on your part to deflect and misrepresent etc. Or it could be, and I am beginning to think this is the real reason, you are just not as smart as I thought you were and you may actually think as illogically as you act on this board. I seriously thought at one point you were just playing a dumb guy on purpose just to play devil's advocate but you are doing WAY too good a job of it as of late.

It's the attitude that is behind such an idea from the people who market themselves as the 'real' Americans, the patriotic, the moral, the just the backbone, etc and the 'liberals' are horrible 'commies', dirty, anti-American, etc. that would come up with such an idea. An idea that is meant to hurt the economy to make a political point. Isn't that what they are accusing the OWS'rs of trying to do?

And you can sit there and justify it somehow. It's like there is a huge wild-fire and they are telling their 'people' to not help put it out unless they get their way. Real patriotic. These people have shown themselves, once again, to be nothing but a bunch of whining, anti-american juveniles whose 'principles' are only 'object to anything a Democratic person may want', regardless of how stupid or hypocritical it sounds.

USA!

How is not hiring hurting the economy? A business is there to make money, they hire when there product or service is needed, not to be a revenue stream for the government. The decision is theirs.

Reality can be a downer in your world.

Can you ever manage to type something without being a flaming douche bag? Any time someone isn't lockstep in agreement with you, this is always the result.

More insults from FuzzNJ. Stomp your feet and wave your fist! Surely the masses that read this but don't join in are in 100% agreement with you. If you open the front door they will arrive and join your Occupy The Couch movement.

When I read in the OP's original post about how OWS'rs where searching for solutions, I almost spewed coffee all over my keyboard. Hilarious stuff there, Cookieboy.

If you're going to tell one, you have to make it at least remotely possible to believe.

Plenty of liberals have capital.

So do plenty of "conservatives". They both likely earned it by generally understanding when it is the right time(s) to take on the additional risk and expense of new employees.

The problem with your premise is that it's OK to compare OWS with the Tea Party.
The two have very little in common.

But to humor you, we can address the issue here.
This particular tea party subgroup has created a pledge that is based on spite. No other groups around the country have openly embraced this pledge. I am personally opposed to it.

But understand this:
If this pledge were instituted tomorrow, the Tea Party and their small businesses would still provide MORE jobs (albeit current ones) then the OWS.
And the two groups would create the same number of new ones.

So your point is?

You, and others, are doing a great job making it for me.

No, don't be ridiculous.

It's not hidden, this isn't a 'where's waldo' trick or some complicated logical puzzle or anything. The answer to your question is in plain sight and has been addressed several times and in this very thread. Don't get involved if you can't keep up and don't ask me to hold your hand.

I was given pause by the vision of Americas Christian Solders, marching down the streets of our land, bringing justice and liberty for all. Kicking down the doors of the wicked with the boot of righteousness for His name sake! Pummeling the heathen with the butt of an AK47 that they might know the wrath of the Almighty – and sending the Godless to hell!

Is Charlton Heston still alive?

Another ringing endorsement for OWS!


http://www.breitbart.tv/david-duke-endorses-occupywallstreet/

Yet another link to MLK and Ghandi!


Hey Dave...don't forget to bring your own toilet paper! Nobody likes brown Twinkles!!!!

How DARE you point out the obvious!

Errr – right. Of Course.
Uh, that’s why they are using it to pummel with (?)

So now it matters? Exactly my point. Tailgater, get it now?

And here I was just goofing on the total absurdity of it all especially when he's been attempting to link MLK and Ghandi to whatever the hell the OWS'ers are about...brings in David Duke as a jab to the Tea Party and then when Duke stands with the OWS'ers...Well, I guess it matters.


Get it?