ZRX1200 wrote:I hope you laughed at my sarcasm.....
I listened to him interviewed on NPR a longtime before the circus started and he makes some good points (for my views) but I think he's too liberal for a majority of the base offsetting middle gains. He's closest to Barry Soetoro of the R candidates and of Barry wasn't so bad I think he would have a better shot.
All the R candidates have redeeming qualities, just the little problem of most belonging to one party rule with different flavored syrup.
But I'm just a Ron Paul kinda guy so what do I know. It worth what it cost ya!
loved it as sarcasm, and so quick I was caught off guard. shoulda known you'd be out there.
I don't mean to suggest he'd garner much support from the small sampling here as THE answer, but he seems like the logical choice if Reps want to take the office away from Obama. Looking at the bigger picture, he may be the only one running from either party who could actually work cross party, the idea being that stalemate and dogma are the things really hindering positive direction.
Yeah, he has a couple things that match up with Paul, couple that match others too. Face it, no one can ever get every issue they want unless they simply want dictatorship. What are people willing to let go of to have what's most important to them?
Still think it will be Newt, though he always has that self destruct button within reach.