America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by pgje51. 74 replies replies.
Poll Question : WHY?
Choice Votes Statistics
AL- Quaeda 0 0 %
Russia 0 0 %
Iran 1 9 %
Taliban 0 0 %
China 5 45 %
Hugo Chavez 0 0 %
Syria 0 0 %
Hockeydad 4 36 %
Bobby Bowden 0 0 %
Conneticut 1 9 %
Total 11 100%

2 Pages12>
WHY are our Drones falling out of the sky?
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
jackconrad Offline
#1 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:21 PM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
????????????????????????????????????????
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:24 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
ethanol..... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#3 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:26 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
Whistle


Maybe Israel is behind it!
Nicar Offline
#4 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:27 PM EST
Joined: 03-18-2010
Posts: 14,972
they getting shot down.....
DrafterX Offline
#5 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:38 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Nicar wrote:
they getting shot down.....




no way man... Shame on you
it was clogged fuel injectors from poorly refined ethanol that brought them down... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#6 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:39 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
An acquaintance of my got his Predator drone shot down over Bosnia.

Don't worry....he was uninjured.
ZRX1200 Offline
#7 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:48 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
I smell a buying opportunity!

Were gonna have to reinvest in the MIC to retain drone superiority!
Lancaster6802 Offline
#8 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:55 PM EST
Joined: 10-20-2011
Posts: 7,255
Too many Gurkhas exploding into the air
Mrs.Tank Offline
#9 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 4:58 PM EST
Joined: 02-15-2005
Posts: 10,047
budget cuts.
HockeyDad Offline
#10 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 6:04 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
Mrs.Tank wrote:
budget cuts.


Drones are funded from park & rec and library funds?

Sounds like we need to raise taxes on the middle class!

Pilot-less outrage.
rfenst Offline
#11 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 6:27 PM EST
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,349
Why can't they just blow them up before anyone else gets a hold of them?
ZRX1200 Offline
#12 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 6:50 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Well if they can't "self destruct" then we would have to launch a middle into a sovereign nation......right?


Big cowboy move there.
ZRX1200 Offline
#13 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 6:50 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Missle (dammed phone)
HockeyDad Offline
#14 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 6:56 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
If we give drones the ability to know when to self destruct, the next thing you know we'll have SkyNet.
BuckyB93 Offline
#15 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 7:44 PM EST
Joined: 07-16-2004
Posts: 14,216
1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2) A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.
Mrs.Tank Offline
#16 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 8:23 PM EST
Joined: 02-15-2005
Posts: 10,047
#5 is alive....
jackconrad Offline
#17 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 9:18 PM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
What happened to LiNDA hAMILTON'S FACE ANYHOW?
fiddler898 Offline
#18 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 9:29 PM EST
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
I had to vote for Connecticut because it was almost spelled right.
DrafterX Offline
#19 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 9:41 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Prolly cell phones.... Mellow
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 10:02 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Was prolly that Bassard Alec baldwin... Mad
DadZilla3 Offline
#21 Posted: Tue, Dec 13 2011, 10:18 PM EST
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
It's all Bush's fault.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#22 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 7:51 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
Gave away the helicopter stealth technology in the Bin Laden raid and now we're giving the drone technology away.


I heard China is knocking a few million off the debt for the little peek.
FuzzNJ Offline
#23 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 9:50 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Gave away the helicopter stealth technology in the Bin Laden raid and now we're giving the drone technology away.


I heard China is knocking a few million off the debt for the little peek.



China got a bunch of our technology from our plane in 2001 already. Remember that incident where Bush was trying to get back the plane and crew before the Chinese tore the plane apart?
ZRX1200 Offline
#24 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:00 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
#21 already called your shot.......I'd say you're predictable but that would be easy.
FuzzNJ Offline
#25 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:23 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
#21 already called your shot.......I'd say you're predictable but that would be easy.


You interpret that as blaming Bush for the crashing drone? Really?
ZRX1200 Offline
#26 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:27 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
Sell a snickerdoodle and buy a clue.

No I consider it deflection.
HockeyDad Offline
#27 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:28 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,160
Outrage indicator moving to DEFCON 4.
FuzzNJ Offline
#28 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:37 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
Sell a snickerdoodle and buy a clue.

No I consider it deflection.



You know that not everything I post needs to be analyzed. A lot of times it's just conversation. China was brought up and it made me think of that incident. To me it's a logical continuation of the conversation and not some 'evil plan' or anything. This bs was old a long time ago dude.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#29 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:39 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
China got a bunch of our technology from our plane in 2001 already. Remember that incident where Bush was trying to get back the plane and crew before the Chinese tore the plane apart?



It was on a POS vintage plane. The tech they gained was all on the Communication and Electronic Counter Measure side.

STFU about things you know NOTHING about!
DrafterX Offline
#30 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:39 AM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
FuzzNJ wrote:
You know that not everything I post needs to be analyzed. A lot of times it's just conversation. China was brought up and it made me think of that incident. To me it's a logical continuation of the conversation and not some 'evil plan' or anything. This bs was old a long time ago dude.



Think

so.. uhh... How's the weather up there..?? Huh
DrMaddVibe Offline
#31 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:40 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
You know that not everything I post needs to be analyzed. A lot of times it's just conversation. China was brought up and it made me think of that incident. To me it's a logical continuation of the conversation and not some 'evil plan' or anything. This bs was old a long time ago dude.



No, really it's a bunch of crap that you type up without thinking. Sometimes you scour the interwebs for an article to back up your poor beliefs system.
FuzzNJ Offline
#32 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:55 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
It was on a POS vintage plane. The tech they gained was all on the Communication and Electronic Counter Measure side.

STFU about things you know NOTHING about!



You are so cute. Vintage plane? lmao. I bet it was using 1970 technology too? This sh*t is so silly and stupid dude. A drone crashes during Obama's administration and it's horrible because our technology is in the enemy's hands and it's Obama's fault. A plane is forced down in enemy territory, crew held hostage, China gets the technology and it's nothing and no mention of Bush. It was a huge incident at the time and why I remembered it. Hell 9/11 happened under Bush and it was Clinton's fault according to 'conservatives'.

WTF?

It's hilariously transparent and one of the reasons I decided to post the incident when China was mentioned since I knew your response would be forthcoming.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#33 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 10:58 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
You are so cute. Vintage plane? lmao. I bet it was using 1970 technology too? This sh*t is so silly and stupid dude. A drone crashes during Obama's administration and it's horrible because our technology is in the enemy's hands and it's Obama's fault. A plane is forced down in enemy territory, crew held hostage, China gets the technology and it's nothing and no mention of Bush. It was a huge incident at the time and why I remembered it. Hell 9/11 happened under Bush and it was Clinton's fault according to 'conservatives'.

WTF?

It's hilariously transparent and one of the reasons I decided to post the incident when China was mentioned since I knew your response would be forthcoming.



You really are a moron.
FuzzNJ Offline
#34 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:03 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
You really are a moron.


Hugs and kisses.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#35 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:04 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
What plane was that on Snickerdoodles?

I'm waiting.

PS...it was also forced down...UNLIKE THE DRONES!
ZRX1200 Offline
#36 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:05 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
It musta been a "stealth" communications plane.......
DrMaddVibe Offline
#37 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:08 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
ZRX1200 wrote:
It musta been a "stealth" communications plane.......



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hainan_Island_incident
FuzzNJ Offline
#38 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:12 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
What plane was that on Snickerdoodles?

I'm waiting.

PS...it was also forced down...UNLIKE THE DRONES!



Lol, I said it was forced down in my post. It is obvious you don't actually read what I post, just get the gist and attack. So being forced down by an enemy country is better then a crash of an unmanned drone? Got it.

Hugs and kisses.
ZRX1200 Offline
#39 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:13 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
We don't know the drone wasn't forced down. The Chinese shot it down with a laser into a proxy country to gain the technology. They knew Soetoro didn't have the balls to blow it up.
FuzzNJ Offline
#40 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:14 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hainan_Island_incident


DrMaddVibe wrote:
No, really it's a bunch of crap that you type up without thinking. Sometimes you scour the interwebs for an article to back up your poor beliefs system.





Dude. Riding bikes without a helmet is bad, mmmmkay?

And Wiki? lol
FuzzNJ Offline
#41 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:15 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
We don't know the drone wasn't forced down. The Chinese shot it down with a laser into a proxy country to gain the technology. They knew Soetoro didn't have the balls to blow it up.


Okay, what is this? Jesus H. Christ on a pogo stick dude. Reads like a post from a schitzo.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#42 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:16 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
Dude. Riding bikes without a helmet is bad, mmmmkay?

And Wiki? lol



I suppose it beats you riding the bus with your football helmet, but I digress.

The plane was from the 1960's...that is what you could call vintage. Wiki has that correct, and the incident is right there for you to look at in one nice place. One could look other places for more information like FoxNews for instance.d'oh!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#43 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:17 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
Okay, what is this? Jesus H. Christ on a pogo stick dude. Reads like a post from a schitzo.



/cue the Twilight Them, er...the Snickerdoodles Anthem.horse
jackconrad Offline
#44 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:30 AM EST
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
There is no concern about the Drone being analyzed by Iran because it was loaded with a precautionary Ham Samwhich !
FuzzNJ Offline
#45 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:34 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
The plane was from the 1960's...that is what you could call vintage. Wiki has that correct, and the incident is right there for you to look at in one nice place. One could look other places for more information like FoxNews for instance.d'oh!


FuzzNJ wrote:
You are so cute. Vintage plane? lmao. I bet it was using 1970 technology too?




This entire conversation is ridiculous and I don't understand the disparity you see between the two incidents except which party had the presidency at the time, and I'm done discussing it.

Hugs and kisses.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#46 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:35 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
jackconrad wrote:
There is no concern about the Drone being analyzed by Iran because it was loaded with a precautionary Ham Samwhich !



I thought they were just too damned lazy?Frying pan
DrMaddVibe Offline
#47 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:36 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
This entire conversation is ridiculous and I don't understand the disparity you see between the two incidents except which party had the presidency at the time, and I'm done discussing it.

Hugs and kisses.



That's because you have NOTHING to offer.

You interrupted a conversation with your normal political hack slant.

Too bad facts got in the way...AGAIN.

Don't forget to fasten your chinstrap...you're always in for a bumpy ride Corky!
ZRX1200 Offline
#48 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:47 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,628
You can't walk on water with a pogo stick ..........
FuzzNJ Offline
#49 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:48 AM EST
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Gave away the helicopter stealth technology in the Bin Laden raid and now we're giving the drone technology away.


I heard China is knocking a few million off the debt for the little peek.


DrMaddVibe wrote:
You interrupted a conversation with your normal political hack slant.

Too bad facts got in the way...AGAIN.


Again, you are so adorable. Is it hard to be an a$$hole all the time or does it come naturally. (dmv response: I know you are, but what am I)

Your 'fact' is that it was vintage and not something the Chinese would want to gather intelligence from. That's just simply not true and an opinion arrived to from 'your normal political hack slant'.

Hugs and kisses Laquanda.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#50 Posted: Wed, Dec 14 2011, 11:49 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,498
FuzzNJ wrote:
Is it hard to be an a$$hole all the time or does it come naturally.



Are you asking or telling?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Back to Top