ZRX1200 wrote:I've had liberal and conservative teachers.
Both exhibited the same lack of ability to keep political affiliation to themselves.
+1 +1
One of the problems it causes is found in the nature and purpose of education. The purpose of education is NOT to learn "facts". Yeah, facts can be useful... and a certain amount of facts are required for any given subject (some more than others), but the underlying goal of education is to teach us to THINK critically about the world around us, to learn methodologies for solving problems and interacting with society.
I can't say that I have ever used the facts I had to learn in Calculus... it's just not a subject I've needed in my life. But the principles behind calculus, understanding the mathematical impact of rates of change in the real world, this IS something I use often in life, even if I don't need to calculate it myself.
And this is where a disproportionate bias in education is so problematic. If the majority of your instruction in systems and methodologies for critical thinking comes from far left or far right teachers, you are much less likely to be able to logically process the alternative viewpoint and include it in your own where appropriate. This creates super liberals and super conservatives who are unable to identify the faulty parts of their ideology and temper it with bits and pieces of other viewpoints.
And that is why I feel that an education system strongly biased towards a liberal agenda is not only severely disadvantaging to those unfortunate to go through it, but it also damages the liberal agenda itself, creating drones instead of thinkers and followers instead of leaders.
(as background, I went to 3 different college campuses in the past and I am currently finished with my degrees. there is no doubt whatsoever that the majority of my professors were strongly biased towards the left.)