America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 12 years ago by Stinkdyr. 28 replies replies.
Fact That No One Likes Him May Be Hurting Romney
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#1 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 4:07 PM EST
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
February 8, 2012
Fact That No One Likes Him May Be Hurting Romney
Could Foil Bid to Become First Openly Assholic President

DENVER (The Borowitz Report) – Exit polls from last night’s Republican contests reveal that former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney’s key obstacle to gaining the GOP nomination is the fact that voters cannot stand him.

According to Davis Logsdon, who conducted the polls for the University of Minnesota’s Opinion Research Institute, “Despite his superb organization, funding, and ground game, Mitt Romney is having trouble overcoming the perception among voters that he is a ginormous ******.”

Mr. Logsdon said that these obstacles “could prove fatal to his historic bid to become the nation’s first openly assholic President.”

Exit polls taken last night bear out that theory, with a majority of voters agreeing with the statement, “I think Mitt Romney is so odious, I would rather vote for a random doofus I’ve never heard of who goes around in sweater vests.”

The beneficiary of that sentiment last night was former Sen. Rick Santorum, who told supporters at a victory rally in Missouri, "I support the rights of the unborn child until it's born and wants a gay marriage."

Speaking to supporters in Denver, Mr. Romney uttered what some political experts are calling a possible gaffe: “I don’t care about all the people who didn’t vote for me. They just envy my massive wealth. And poor people? They can curl up die, and I won’t lose a wink of sleep. I bet you a million crisp dollars from my vault in Geneva.”

mitt has been praying for an answer to the question "why don't people like me? ]
god said "i don't know why, but there is something about you that pisses me off too"
DrMaddVibe Offline
#2 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 4:09 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
I thought it was because he was just like our current President...who was just like our last President...who was just like the one before who was just like the last one before him.
DrafterX Offline
#3 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 4:11 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,582
Laugh
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 4:13 PM EST
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,582
I remembered why I don't watch Letterman anymore the other night... He was pretty harsh on Romney.. and he's not even president yet.. Letterman is obviously paranoid... Mellow
Stinkdyr Offline
#5 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 4:22 PM EST
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
DrMaddVibe wrote:
I thought it was because he was just like our current President...who was just like our last President...who was just like the one before who was just like the last one before him.






ed zachary !!!!!!!!



Herfing
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#6 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 4:23 PM EST
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
DrMaddVibe

you might as well avoid fornication in the future since you don't know a good F'ing from a bad one.
Rclay Offline
#7 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 5:20 PM EST
Joined: 10-30-2006
Posts: 1,813
It could be because He is a progressive and is on video stating it. He installed OBAMNEYCARE first and Obama copied off of him. He installed leftist liberal judges while Governer. His defense of the progressive agenda in his Administration is that the people wanted it, If he can't defend positions then on the state level, how will he do it as president?

He has had chance after chance to distance himself from past choices and he won't. If he's the Nom. I will vote for him. It is the lesser of two evils as always.

Even Ron Paul would win if he looked like a Hawk on Defense, but He won't. I do not understand these politicians. They don't have to do anything other than say, "yes, Romneycare was a bad idea, and I should not have done it." and he would gain great traction. Ron Paul could say, "I will defend this country against all foes aggressively." and he would possibly win.


BO GRITZ 2012!!!!!!!!!!



HockeyDad Offline
#8 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 5:25 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,190
Ron Paul will defend the country. I think you have defense and offense confused. Common mistake.
Rclay Offline
#9 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 5:27 PM EST
Joined: 10-30-2006
Posts: 1,813
HockeyDad wrote:
Ron Paul will defend the country. I think you have defense and offense confused. Common mistake.



I'm not saying that he would not, I am saying that is the overwhelming opinion reached by almost everyone I talk to about Paul. If he would pound that in I think people would give him the job.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#10 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 5:40 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
DrMaddVibe

you might as well avoid fornication in the future since you don't know a good F'ing from a bad one.



Actually I do know a good one from a bad one.

I can hook you up with the bad one. She's about your same height and mental capacity!
HockeyDad Offline
#11 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 5:46 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,190
They just aren't articulating well. Ron Paul is a bit of an isolationist and does not believe in militarily imposing the USA's will on other countries or using the US military to advance a globalist agenda.

Some people's idea of defense is sorta like an Italian walking down the street with a pack of cigarettes rolled up in his sleeve looking at people saying "Hey, you looking at me? You wanna fight? Right now, make a move."
HockeyDad Offline
#12 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 5:47 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,190
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Actually I do know a good one from a bad one.

I can hook you up with the bad one. She's about your same height and mental capacity!




Oh you wouldn't dare.........?
fiddler898 Offline
#13 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 5:47 PM EST
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
^#1. At least you got God right.
Rclay Offline
#14 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 6:08 PM EST
Joined: 10-30-2006
Posts: 1,813
HockeyDad wrote:
They just aren't articulating well. Ron Paul is a bit of an isolationist and does not believe in militarily imposing the USA's will on other countries or using the US military to advance a globalist agenda.

Some people's idea of defense is sorta like an Italian walking down the street with a pack of cigarettes rolled up in his sleeve looking at people saying "Hey, you looking at me? You wanna fight? Right now, make a move."



People want a president that will kick @$$ when the need arises. Reagan did not look like an aggressive man, but they knew he would defend us against all comers.

China is building a huge deep water navy, they are a threat, Russia is not our friend as Putin wants the USSR back. Iran's leaders have a death wish. the Saudis don't like us.

Our way of life is unique in history and it goes against the grain of the Oligarchies & strong-man style of governments in most other countries, regardless of what they call themselves. I think people know that and they want a leader willing to defend us.



wheelrite Offline
#15 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 7:18 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
Nobody likes Ron Paul either,,,
HockeyDad Offline
#16 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 8:08 PM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,190
Rclay wrote:
People want a president that will kick @$$ when the need arises. Reagan did not look like an aggressive man, but they knew he would defend us against all comers.

China is building a huge deep water navy, they are a threat, Russia is not our friend as Putin wants the USSR back. Iran's leaders have a death wish. the Saudis don't like us.



So do you actually think some of the presidential candidates would not defend the USA if it were attacked by China, Russia, Iran or Saudi Arabia? We would just hand them the keys?

Or are you looking for a candidate who would have no problem firing the fire shot against any of those countries if he/she got the urge?

Again, defense versus offense.
wheelrite Offline
#17 Posted: Wed, Feb 8 2012, 9:22 PM EST
Joined: 11-01-2006
Posts: 50,119
HockeyDad wrote:
So do you actually think some of the presidential candidates would not defend the USA if it were attacked by China, Russia, Iran or Saudi Arabia? We would just hand them the keys?

Or are you looking for a candidate who would have no problem firing the fire shot against any of those countries if he/she got the urge?

Again, defense versus offense.

Obama would not...
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#18 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 2:25 AM EST
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
Rclay 7

what is obama care. what does it do and who gets hurt by it.

what is medicare and should i like it.

the progressive agenda freed the slaves, gave women the right to vote and eqal pay, and
created the equal rights amendment. isn't that good?
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#19 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 2:29 AM EST
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
DrMaddVibe

how much?

does she make house calls?

master card or visa?
ZRX1200 Offline
#20 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 2:35 AM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,661
Progressives freed the slaves?



I thought it was gubmint cheese and hot wings....
DrMaddVibe Offline
#21 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 7:05 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
DrMaddVibe

how much?

does she make house calls?

master card or visa?



I'm not her pimp...just betting on the cigars you smoke...the cars you drive...the clothes you wear...you couldn't afford it.
HockeyDad Offline
#22 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 7:32 AM EST
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,190
Did Rickamaven just say giving women the right to vote was a good thing?!
Rclay Offline
#23 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 7:50 AM EST
Joined: 10-30-2006
Posts: 1,813
Rick18- if you need any help with the facts below I can point you towards some great books.
the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists, in contrast to the pro-slavery Democratic Party. Abraham Lincoln, a Republican President, won the Civil War and freed the slaves.
In 1922, Democrats in the Senate filibustered a Republican attempt to make lynching a federal crime.
FDR nominated former Klansman Hugo Black to the Supreme Court.
George Wallsce was a progressive democrat.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964? That's where the Democrats showed their open minds and Republicans were proven to be racists. Right? Wrong. 82% of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 versus only 64% of Democrats.
Susan B Anthomy was a republican. Here's a quote from her,  “I voted for the Republicans. They gave us the vote”.
A Democrat controlled senate defeated the passage of the 19th amendment four times. A republican controlled house had to pass it.
Thirty-six states ratified the Amendment. Twenty-six states had Republican legislatures and ratified the Amendment. Nine states voted against its ratification—eight of those states had Democratic legislatures.
Even before the Amendment was part of the Constitution, twelve states, all with Republican congresses, had conferred suffrage rights on women.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#24 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 8:06 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
Rclay wrote:
Rick18- if you need any help with the facts below I can point you towards some great books.
the Republican Party was founded by anti-slavery activists, in contrast to the pro-slavery Democratic Party. Abraham Lincoln, a Republican President, won the Civil War and freed the slaves.
In 1922, Democrats in the Senate filibustered a Republican attempt to make lynching a federal crime.
FDR nominated former Klansman Hugo Black to the Supreme Court.
George Wallsce was a progressive democrat.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964? That's where the Democrats showed their open minds and Republicans were proven to be racists. Right? Wrong. 82% of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 versus only 64% of Democrats.
Susan B Anthomy was a republican. Here's a quote from her,  “I voted for the Republicans. They gave us the vote”.
A Democrat controlled senate defeated the passage of the 19th amendment four times. A republican controlled house had to pass it.
Thirty-six states ratified the Amendment. Twenty-six states had Republican legislatures and ratified the Amendment. Nine states voted against its ratification—eight of those states had Democratic legislatures.
Even before the Amendment was part of the Constitution, twelve states, all with Republican congresses, had conferred suffrage rights on women.




All of that is well and good, and I'ma gonna let ya finish...BUT...he lived it!


Not only that but he had to be put in barracks as some pseudo ethnic/religious experiment the Industrial Military Complex was conducting. Many gave some...some gave all. Iced tea and lemonade that is.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#25 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 8:07 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
Rclay 7

what is obama care. what does it do and who gets hurt by it.

what is medicare and should i like it.

the progressive agenda freed the slaves, gave women the right to vote and eqal pay, and
created the equal rights amendment. isn't that good?





LMMFAO!!!!!


...at how WRONG you have it!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#26 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 8:09 AM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,554
HockeyDad wrote:
Did Rickamaven just say giving women the right to vote was a good thing?!



Next thing ya know he'll be saying Hillary and Palin aren't ****.
Rclay Offline
#27 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 8:36 AM EST
Joined: 10-30-2006
Posts: 1,813
DMV #24 - I've lived all of the open-mindedness of the progressives. At every turn they promise one thing and deliver the opposite. I see it as coming Down to no respect for human life. Equals do not need to be controlled so heavy as the dems want to control us. They believe all are beneath them and need their control. Ain't no hatred like a liberal progressive's hatred, cause a liberal progressive's hatred don't stop.
Stinkdyr Offline
#28 Posted: Thu, Feb 9 2012, 9:03 AM EST
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
Freedom.............whatta radical concept.


Herfing
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top