America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

It is the loony left, they are allowed. The old saying do as I say not as I do kinda thing.

Same is same. Wrong.

I've never seen anything like it.He's the pied piper.............................fools just follow blindly along.



Ron

Don't worry, at his current rate, he'll unite us again. Just like Bush did.

which one is offering the most free stuff..??

I don't think arguing the tax codes is really class warfare, I think it's pure politics. I want my people represented even if it is at the expense of yours.

Too bad in my case my people means semiretarded obese midgets. But hey wheel and I need to stick together.

I'm not really an Iron Maiden fan. I did try. I think lemme would kill bruce with one punch.

no cone for X....

What do you mean by 'You People'..??

HA! What a short memory you have. You don't remember the previous administration and their supporters saying 'liberals' support and encourage terrorism? Honestly though, that's just a highlight. Your entire premise is right wing media based and bullsh!t.

The talk back then about "liberals supporting terrorists" was in response to specific examples whenever they occurred.
It was not a mantra that was repeated by the administration.

Don't confuse Rush Limbaugh and his ilk with the white house.

My premise stands.
Obama, unlike any of his contemporarys, is simply unable to speak for over 10 minutes without vilifying the wealthy or the republicans.

During a campaign this is acceptable behavior.
But throughout an entire term?
If you agree with Obama that's fine. But if you refuse to accept this as fact then you're only kidding yourself.

As for media based? I've not heard anyone from the media make the points that I've made.

By the way Tailgater...

As a republican I am against abortion and birth control except for............................











































Yo mamma

Liberals support terrorists? WTF dude. And you are questioning my intelligence?

If you disagree with Obama that's fine. But you refuse to accept the fact that liberals are not terrorists.

What's really sad is how many people truly think there's a difference.

Keep your eye on the dancing girls and jugglers America, while your pockets are picked.

Yes, the Alphabet Soup game. Watch American Idol and catch up on what Snooki and Paris wear while you pay 4.60 at the pump.

Taking one side is a dangerous game that's killing America.

Shackles?

Like Bondage/S&M ?

you're a sick puppy...

You respond to my posts without putting them into the perspective that they were intended (ie: a retort to your prior comments).


Here's the deal, plain and simple:
Obama himself, along with his entire administration, have repeatedly and continually referred to the republicans as the enemy. This has been nonstop since the day he took office. He has also adopted an unwritten policy to vilify the wealthy, through words and other means (for instance, siding with the occupy movement mere months after slamming the tea party).

Bush, nor anyone that I can remember prior to him, never did this except maybe during a campaign speech here and there. His "with us or against us" mantra was not aimed at democrats. He may have p*ssed off few liberal countries with that remark, but he wasn't trying to divide the country by political leaning, by class, or by race.

I am not speaking about the media. My posts are entirely about the POTUS and his administration.


And don't bother with the "oh yeah? well the GOP is evil too".
This may be true, but it has nothing to do with the subject at hand.
Obama is purposely creating a divide virtually every time he speaks.

OBAMA TRUTH TEAM TO THE RESCUE!!!!

That's a fun and predictable response.
The fact that it has nothing to do with the conversation at hand is likely just do to the fact that Obama's message is indefensible outside a campaign.
I light of this, I guess I can't blame you for choosing this tactic.

Carry on.

You were able to predict I was going to make fun of you? Wow, what talent. You Kreskin? How could anyone have predicted that move on my part?

You're ridiculous.

Once again the conversation is reduced to my party is better than yours. It's this kind of senseless Rah Rah additude that is going to bring America to its knees. This isn't pro sports folks. Your playing into the hands Of both parties. As long as your fighting they win. If we could ever agree they would be is serious trouble. And they would have to actually do the job instead of stealing from us at e very turn.But that's not going to happen so long as you drink the Koll Aid...

When you can't defend, deflect deflect deflect.

Obama doesn't even WANT to be the president for those who are conservative.
He repeatedly calls the republicans "them".
He has tried repeatedly to divide the country.
But instead of discussing this on the thread that was designated for such discussion, you resort to name calling.

Bravo.
You're nothing, if not consistent.

You keep saying that my side is guilty of the same.
But they are not.
Hell, that's the premise of my initial post.
This president, BHO, is the ONLY one in my adult life that has resorted to these tactics (outside of the aforementioned campaign trail).
Your example of Bush's "with us or against us" has already been dismissed since his target audience (those against us) were not the American taxpayers, nor the democratic members of congress. This is not a minor difference.

You're tenacious. I'll give you that.
But it grows tiresome when you ignore the specifics.

And maybe you can find one or two examples. It proves nothing when compared to the CONSTANT barrage spewed forth by Obama. He is well into his third year, and virtually every one of his speeches point fingers and divide the country. And maybe you agree with him. Fine. But it doesn't change the truth in my first post.

Double back implied insult.

From Illinois?