tailgater wrote:We obviously have different perspectives on this, but I think you're missing the big picture here.
Obama blamed Bush.
Repeatedly.
Loudly.
And is still doing it, even as his term nears an end.
If you get on a soapbox and call out your predecessor by name, that is placing blame. It's an Excuse.
If you respond to criticism of your record by detailing contextually accurate facts, then that is an explanation.
identical?
I think not.
Find a few of these repeated statements where Obama blamed Bush by name as an excuse. He hasn't done that.
What he has said is he inherited a mess, the country was losing 800,000+ jobs a month, the banks were going bust ruining the economy, the housing bubble burst, etc etc when he took office and that his policies did not take effect until the next fiscal year, so the first year's numbers don't reflect his policies.
This is exactly what Romney's spokesperson was floating this weekend. He inherited a mess and contested the numbers the Obama administration is quoting because it includes the numbers when he took office and that his policies did not take effect until the next fiscal year, so the first year's numbers don't reflect his policies.
It is identical.
Now, as to your assertion that Obama has blamed bush by name repeatedly, please provide the evidence of that. I'll save you the trouble right now by informing you that it never happened and you only think it did from the way the media you consume frames the issue.