America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DrMaddVibe. 72 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
Romney camp blames previous governor for bad job numbers. Wait, what?
FuzzNJ Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Appearing together on ABC’s “This Week,’’ Romney adviser Eric Fehrnstrom and Obama deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter offered competing takes on the presumptive Republican nominee’s jobs record.

“Actually, when Mitt Romney arrived, Massachusetts was an economic basket house,’’ Fehrnstrom said. “If you throw D.C. into the mix, we were 51 out of 51. By the time Mitt Romney left four years later, we were in the middle of the pack.


DrMaddVibe Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
Making W appear stronger every day.

Applause


WTG Snickerdoodles!
tailgater Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
First of all, I don't know by what standards they are ranking the states, but that information is almost certainly inaccurate.

But more to the point, you can't possibly suggest that a single attempt by the "Romney Camp" to put perspective on the Governors results is somehow equal to the 3+ years that the Obama regime has invested into their blame-a-thon.




ZRX1200 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
51st is better than 57th!
dubleuhb Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
ZRX1200 wrote:
51st is better than 57th!

Oh sheeeit!
FuzzNJ Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
tailgater wrote:
First of all, I don't know by what standards they are ranking the states, but that information is almost certainly inaccurate.

But more to the point, you can't possibly suggest that a single attempt by the "Romney Camp" to put perspective on the Governors results is somehow equal to the 3+ years that the Obama regime has invested into their blame-a-thon.



lol, yeah, as always the two situations are totally different with neither one wanting to take the blame for bad numbers before their policies went into effect. I mean wow, trying to compare the two candidates on this issue is like night and day. Not sure what I was thinking really.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
FuzzNJ wrote:
lol, yeah, as always the two situations are totally different with neither one wanting to take the blame for bad numbers before their policies went into effect. I mean wow, trying to compare the two candidates on this issue is like night and day. Not sure what I was thinking really.



Wouldn't the real measure of success be what the numbers looked like AFTER their policies were in effect?

By that we can see a much better picture.

Mittens, who ran a left leaning bastion away from the rocks and gave the state a chance to survive. Owedumba, who racked up debt and piled it all on the backs of kids so he could bail out Wall Street, unions, automotive companies and doomed a nation's credit rating to make us a 2nd class citizen.
FuzzNJ Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Like playing scrabble with a toddler.
HockeyDad Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,156
FuzzNJ wrote:
Like playing scrabble with a toddler.



Did you win?!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
HockeyDad wrote:
Did you win?!



He thinks he is!

All that's left now is for him to round up his family while he reads them his wacky exploits on a cigar forum. They'll laugh.


AT HIM!
rfenst Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,345
DrMaddVibe wrote:
He thinks he is!

All that's left now is for him to round up his family while he reads them his wacky exploits on a cigar forum. They'll laugh.


AT HIM!



Or you.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
rfenst wrote:
Or you.



You really think I care what some Jersey trash does with their spare time?

Really?
tailgater Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
lol, yeah, as always the two situations are totally different with neither one wanting to take the blame for bad numbers before their policies went into effect. I mean wow, trying to compare the two candidates on this issue is like night and day. Not sure what I was thinking really.


Romney's camp is basically saying that he improved the standing of the state.
To do so, they have to explain where it was prior to his arrival.

How is this "blaming" anyone?

You should switch to doing laundry today. The dusting has obviously caused your allergies to impair your reasoning skills.

FuzzNJ Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
oh no, reprimanded on logic by a dittohead

and there was much sorrow
DrafterX Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
Sad
tailgater Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
oh no, reprimanded on logic by a dittohead

and there was much sorrow


Is a ditto head a follower of Limbaugh?
Because I gotta tell ya, I work during the day and don't listen to his show.

I do admit, I envy your free time.

Whistlebritches Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 04-23-2006
Posts: 22,128
Why is Fuzz such a flaming idiot????? Please someone???


Ron
DrMaddVibe Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
tailgater wrote:
Is a ditto head a follower of Limbaugh?
Because I gotta tell ya, I work during the day and don't listen to his show.

I do admit, I envy your free time.




He's admitted already to listening to Rush Limbaugh!Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan
DrafterX Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,559
I heard he's going on tour.... Mellow
DrMaddVibe Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
DrafterX wrote:
I heard he's going on tour.... Mellow


Opening act is Swifter?
FuzzNJ Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ROMNEY: [Obama] was very critical of his predecessor for the debts his predecessor put in place. And sure it’s true you can’t blame one party or the other for all the debts this country has, because both parties in my opinion have spent too much and borrowed too much when they were in power. But he was very critical of his predecessor because the predecessor put together $4 trillion of debt over eight years. This president however — oh, by the way, he said that doing that was unpatriotic, irresponsible and unpatriotic. And he said he would cut the debt in half if he became president.Instead he doubled it, alright, he doubled it.”

ERIK FERHNSTROM: Actually, when Mitt Romney arrived, Massachusetts was an economic basket house. If you throw D.C. into the mix, we were 51 out of 51. By the time Mitt Romney left four years later, we were in the middle of the pack. We were 30th in the nation in terms of job growth. That’s the trend line that you want to see.

The three governors of Massachusets prior to Romney were all Republicans

Romney, you see, inherited “an economic basket house” from his predecessor, Gov. Jane Swift. So he can’t really be blamed for that. But by the end of Romney’s term, as Ferhnstrom points out, job growth had increased and “that’s the trend line that you want to see. That’s called a turnaround.”

It’s an interesting theory; it also seems strangely familiar.

And how much did job growth increase? What was the extent of this “Massachusetts miracle?” In 2006, the year that Ferhnstrom wants the public to focus upon as Romney’s final year as governor, the number of jobs in the Bay State economy grew 1.3 percent. Here are two ways to put that into context:

1.) Nationwide in 2006, job growth was 1.5 percent. So even under the best spin offered by his campaign, using the year hand-selected by his staff, job growth under Romney slightly lagged the national average.

2.) In his last year as governor, Romney “produced” job growth of 1.3 percent, which Fehrnstrom lauds as “the trend line that you want to see. That’s called a turnaround.” Over the last year, the American economy under President Obama has produced identical job growth numbers of 1.3 percent, which according to Fehrnstrom means “this president is not adding jobs fast enough.”
DrMaddVibe Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
Snickerdoodles with opening act Swifter on the Hope & Change tour!
tailgater Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
^21

Fuzz,
Now we're talking talking something very different from what the thread title claims.
You want to talk performance in job growth, fine. That isn't placing blame, however, and that was your focus until you realized that it was a losing battle.

But let's talk Romney and his job in MA.
Tell me his hands weren't tied.
Not like the President since 2010. No, MA doesn't merely have a "majority" of democrats on beacon hill. It's the most democratic state in the nation and our house and senate continually fought Romney every step of the way.
Even on trivial things, such as trying to oust a sitting university chancellor without having to pay several hundred $K plus benefits for his pension. The house speaker called out Romney and virtually taunted him, letting him know who was "really" in charge of the state.
It was embarrassing, and Romney had no authority to do anything about it.

Romney made some mistakes, that's for sure. The biggest of which is the health care initiative. But look back and realize that this was going to happen with or without him. It was better to have input and accept concessions then to have a potentially worse bill rammed through the true-blue roll call.

I like Romney when he's allowed to let his hair down and be himself. He has done some local radio spots in the past filling in for the conservative talk jock. He did a great job. I wish we had THAT Romney on the stage.
The closest we got was his speech in New Hampshire after one of the primaries. The guy understands financial matters and the economy better than most, and that's what we need right now because of the bad economy.

I don't like the direction Obama is leading.
I'd vote for a chimp if he ran against Barack.
But my vote this fall isn't anti-Obama. It's PRO-Romney. Because he may not be everything this country needs long term, but he has the knowledge to be everything we desperately need right now.
FuzzNJ Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
Tail. Both campaigns are attempting to use the same argument. Neither want to take credit/blame for the economic/job/budget/etc numbers in their first fiscal year because they measure the previous years economic policies, something over which neither of them were the "executives".

it is an identical argument

the right is framing it as 'blaming bush'. people like me saw this argument made by the Romney campaign and pointed out the parallel.

and kinda like demonizing Keynesian economics and calling for extreme budget cuts to 'save' the economy, while still arguing against cuts because it would slow down and hurt the economy.
ZRX1200 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
You realize we're not in year one of the usurpers term right?
FuzzNJ Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
it matters not
romney isn't governor either
discussion about records
try to keep up
ZRX1200 Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
This IS Soetoro's record azzwipe......



What other experience does he have besides voting present as a senator?




Three years of record. I like Mittens as much as you do but you're really obtuse for such a smart fellow sometimes, you know that?
DadZilla3 Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Whistlebritches wrote:
Why is Fuzz such a flaming idiot????? Please someone???


Ron


'Arguing online with liberals is like playing chess with a pigeon...no matter how good you are at chess, the pigeon is just going to knock over the pieces, crap all over the board, and strut around like it's victorious'. - Anonymous
FuzzNJ Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
There are times I think some of these posts arguing with me have got to be jokes because they are so whacked it's funny.
tailgater Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
Tail. Both campaigns are attempting to use the same argument. Neither want to take credit/blame for the economic/job/budget/etc numbers in their first fiscal year because they measure the previous years economic policies, something over which neither of them were the "executives".

it is an identical argument

the right is framing it as 'blaming bush'. people like me saw this argument made by the Romney campaign and pointed out the parallel.

and kinda like demonizing Keynesian economics and calling for extreme budget cuts to 'save' the economy, while still arguing against cuts because it would slow down and hurt the economy.



We obviously have different perspectives on this, but I think you're missing the big picture here.

Obama blamed Bush.
Repeatedly.
Loudly.
And is still doing it, even as his term nears an end.

If you get on a soapbox and call out your predecessor by name, that is placing blame. It's an Excuse.
If you respond to criticism of your record by detailing contextually accurate facts, then that is an explanation.

identical?
I think not.
ZRX1200 Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Tailgater.


If you don't buy Fuzzys narrative wholecloth then a conversation you won't have.
FuzzNJ Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
tailgater wrote:
We obviously have different perspectives on this, but I think you're missing the big picture here.

Obama blamed Bush.
Repeatedly.
Loudly.
And is still doing it, even as his term nears an end.

If you get on a soapbox and call out your predecessor by name, that is placing blame. It's an Excuse.
If you respond to criticism of your record by detailing contextually accurate facts, then that is an explanation.

identical?
I think not.


Find a few of these repeated statements where Obama blamed Bush by name as an excuse. He hasn't done that.

What he has said is he inherited a mess, the country was losing 800,000+ jobs a month, the banks were going bust ruining the economy, the housing bubble burst, etc etc when he took office and that his policies did not take effect until the next fiscal year, so the first year's numbers don't reflect his policies.

This is exactly what Romney's spokesperson was floating this weekend. He inherited a mess and contested the numbers the Obama administration is quoting because it includes the numbers when he took office and that his policies did not take effect until the next fiscal year, so the first year's numbers don't reflect his policies.

It is identical.

Now, as to your assertion that Obama has blamed bush by name repeatedly, please provide the evidence of that. I'll save you the trouble right now by informing you that it never happened and you only think it did from the way the media you consume frames the issue.
ZRX1200 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
"The previous administration" has never been uttered from his lips eh?

The way you parse words to ignore reality is aggravating to some who attempt to converse with you. Maybe. I'm just projecting now......
FuzzNJ Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
"The previous administration" has never been uttered from his lips eh?

The way you parse words to ignore reality is aggravating to some who attempt to converse with you. Maybe. I'm just projecting now......


lmao.

Dude. TG wrote that Obama has repeatedly done it, it's not me, it's him saying that because Obama has "repeatedly" blamed Bush "by name" "loudly" as an "excuse". And because of that the two situations are different. I'm not parsing a thing. Even removing his 'by name' description, he still won't find anything different from what the Romney camp floated this weekend when they put forward: "when Mitt Romney arrived, Massachusetts was an economic basket house." and that they want him to be judged on the upward trend during his term and not what he inherited.

Identical.

This is scary funny you guys are arguing this point.

ZRX1200 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
He HAS REPEATEDLY tried to deflect blame to Bush.


Mittens is trying to take credit for allegedly improving things. He's not laying blame, he trying to "spike the ball" like Barry did with his cousin Osamas death.
FuzzNJ Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
He HAS REPEATEDLY tried to deflect blame to Bush.


Mittens is trying to take credit for allegedly improving things. He's not laying blame, he trying to "spike the ball" like Barry did with his cousin Osamas death.


lol

UMADBRO?

ZRX1200 Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
No not with you.......


FuzzNJ Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
No not with you.......




It's funny watching you of all people trying to defend Romney. I'm enjoying it a lot, especially with such forced 'logic'.
ZRX1200 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
Im not defending Romney!


FuzzNJ Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
Im not defending Romney!




You just have to disagree with me on everything huh?
ZRX1200 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
The guy before me sucked! (Same arguments)


All this good stuff is because of me!
All this bad stuff is the sucky guy before me's fault!
(Not the same arguments!)


Thats all.......and yes I have argue with you 98.2% of the time.
FuzzNJ Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
ZRX1200 wrote:
The guy before me sucked! (Same arguments)


All this good stuff is because of me!
All this bad stuff is the sucky guy before me's fault!
(Not the same arguments!)


Thats all.......and yes I have argue with you 98.2% of the time.


The only difference is your perspective. One blaming because he sucks, the other being logical because he sucks less. nothing more, nothing less.

When the election is long over, maybe you can see it.
tailgater Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
Find a few of these repeated statements where Obama blamed Bush by name as an excuse. He hasn't done that.



Google.
30 seconds.
better than a quote. A video.

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/01/13/obama-called-smaller-bush-debt-rise-unpatriotic/

And the sun will rise tomorrow.
But please don't ask for proof.
This is tiresome.

tailgater Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
FuzzNJ wrote:
The only difference is your perspective. One blaming because he sucks, the other being logical because he sucks less. nothing more, nothing less.

When the election is long over, maybe you can see it.


No Fuzz.
The difference is the magnitude.


As for an earlier remark about "inheriting" the crisis??
That's not entirely accurate since he should have known what he was getting into prior to campaigning for the position. You don't fight tooth and nail to achieve something, only to complain that you've inherited all sorts of problems.
Well, maybe you do.
But a person with character and a sense of personal responsibility doesn't.


Buckwheat Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
FuzzNJ wrote:
Like playing scrabble with a toddler.


He was leading until the little **** pulled "quixotry" out of his ass to take the win. Frying pan
FuzzNJ Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
tailgater wrote:
Google.
30 seconds.
better than a quote. A video.

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2012/01/13/obama-called-smaller-bush-debt-rise-unpatriotic/

And the sun will rise tomorrow.
But please don't ask for proof.
This is tiresome.



That is not a quote where Obama was President blaming Bush by name for problems the country is dealing with now. Kind of obvious, but if you want to prove something that you claim to be true, at least try.
FuzzNJ Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 06-28-2006
Posts: 13,000
tailgater wrote:
No Fuzz.
The difference is the magnitude.


As for an earlier remark about "inheriting" the crisis??
That's not entirely accurate since he should have known what he was getting into prior to campaigning for the position. You don't fight tooth and nail to achieve something, only to complain that you've inherited all sorts of problems.
Well, maybe you do.
But a person with character and a sense of personal responsibility doesn't.




So Romney did not know the economy in MA was not very good when he fought tooth and nail to be governor?

your excuses are laughable
ZRX1200 Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,626
^ you know I just realized you remind me of Bobby "The Brain" Heenan.
tailgater Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
Fuzz,
At the risk of your lips getting tired, reread my post.
Magnitude may have been too ambiguous.
Frequency?
Incessant?
Perpetual?


Further to the point, Romney never slammed Jane Swift while he was governor. To be fair, they're both supposedly republicans. But this is not an insignificant tidbit.
Obama is our sitting president. And he points fingers at the "mess he inherited" nearly every time he speaks.
Even after 3.5 years.

You and I won't agree on much, but if you don't recognize facts when they're presented then the discussion has run its course.
Saying Obama has never blamed Bush is like saying Bush never said anything that sounded dumb or that Clinton was a faithful husband or Nixon loved the press.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,489
tailgater wrote:
You and I won't agree on much, but if you don't recognize facts when they're presented then the discussion has run its course.
Saying Obama has never blamed Bush is like saying Bush never said anything that sounded dumb or that Clinton was a faithful husband or Nixon loved the press.


Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan Frying pan


Ever play tic-tac-toe with a rooster?

You have better odds beating that **** then getting any real semblance of reality from Snickerdoodles!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>