America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by CWFoster. 45 replies replies.
Let The Apologies Begin
DrMaddVibe Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
UK experts to help Iraq destroy chemical residues

Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of what's left of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons, still stored in two bunkers in north of Baghdad, the British embassy in Baghdad announced Monday.

The British Defense Ministry will start training Iraqi technical and medical workers this year, an embassy statement said. The teams will work to safely destroy remnants of munitions and chemical warfare agents left over from Saddam's regime. He was overthrown in 2003 following an American-led invasion.

Saddam stored the chemical weapons near population centers so that he could access them quickly, despite the danger to his civilian population.

Most of Iraq's chemical weapons were destroyed by military forces in 1991 during the first Gulf War or by U.N. inspectors after the fighting. The inspections halted just before the invasion.

Iraq is a party to the U.N. Chemical Weapons Convention and must get rid of the remaining material, according to terms of the pact.

The head of the Iraqi National Authority, Mohammed Al Sharaa, said the remnants "represent a great challenge to the Iraqi experts to safely dispose." He called the agreement with British authorities "a good opportunity for Iraqi experts to benefit from the well-known expertise of U.K. experts."

British Ambassador to Iraq Simon Collis said Britain is glad to assist in what he called "this difficult and dangerous task."



http://news.yahoo.com/uk-experts-help-iraq-destroy-chemical-residues-144204378.html




The media told us they never had any and W lied!

Best start applying the ChapStik!
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,577
DrMaddVibe wrote:
[size=9][u][b]

The media told us they never had any and W lied!




that's what I heard... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddOk6kUXioA
dpnewell Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
Too bad Fuzz isn't here. I'm sure he'd post links to 20 articles that would "prove" that this story was manufactured by the Tea Party.
DrafterX Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,577
ya.... poor Fuzz.... Sad



Victor's around here somewhere tho.... Mellow
DrMaddVibe Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
dpnewell wrote:
Too bad Fuzz isn't here. I'm sure he'd post links to 20 articles that would "prove" that this story was manufactured by the Tea Party.



I know...and it would be great fun shredding it all to pieces....but let's just enjoy this lil' quiet moment without Cindy Brady.


Ah....



Just let all soak in....






It's like a sunset on a perfect Summer day where everything went right...you just don't want it to end...






















































I








STILL







CAN'T






BELIEVE






IT!!!!

Herfing
DrMaddVibe Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
DrafterX wrote:
ya.... poor Fuzz.... Sad



Victor's around here somewhere tho.... Mellow



He's like masturbating. Sure you can get to the finish line but isn't better with someone else?
daveincincy Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
Duuude...it's just residue.
HockeyDad Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
daveincincy wrote:
Duuude...it's just residue.



The Brits are prolly just teaching a couple of Hajis to push some brooms.
ZRX1200 Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,656
Dave....I beg to differ.

I posted regaurding this years ago. A close family member of mine personally saw barrels of chems.

Not what imagery was sold to warrant the global police.......but a fact none the less.
fiddler898 Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
So if most were destroyed in1991, and the war began in 2002, then...?
ZRX1200 Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,656
Who said most?

Probably the same jackalopes who didnt talk about what's still there.......doesn't really matter now though does it.
fiddler898 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
^OP's citation. Just going with the man's premise.
drywalldog Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
So they are destroying wmd's or chemical agents? Pictures? I thought we were looking for lg. rockets or bombs? Any of those found?
dpnewell Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 03-16-2009
Posts: 7,491
ZRX1200 wrote:
Dave....I beg to differ.

I posted regaurding this years ago. A close family member of mine personally saw barrels of chems.

Not what imagery was sold to warrant the global police.......but a fact none the less.


My ex son in law told me the same thing after his tour. But what the heck, they're only soldiers who saw it first hand. Have to be lying, right?
CelticBomber Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
not sure what everyone is celebrating? We always knew he had chemical weapons. He used them often on the kurds in the North. The claims of WMD's ie NUKES is what the big lie was. Centrifuges on the backs on mobile trucks etc was the claim. Had nothing to do with chemical weapons. Keep on dancing though if it makes you happy.
cwilhelmi Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 07-24-2001
Posts: 2,739
CelticBomber wrote:
not sure what everyone is celebrating? We always knew he had chemical weapons. He used them often on the kurds in the North. The claims of WMD's ie NUKES is what the big lie was. Centrifuges on the backs on mobile trucks etc was the claim. Had nothing to do with chemical weapons. Keep on dancing though if it makes you happy.


+1
drywalldog Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
Celtic, you are ruining a perfectly good thread, and the good Dr. is waiting for his and Bush's well deserved apologies.
drywalldog Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
Where in the hell is Fox News on all this, seems like they would have a hot blond in Bagdad for something this good.
HockeyDad Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
drywalldog wrote:
Where in the hell is Fox News on all this, seems like they would have a hot blond in Bagdad for something this good.



They're busy getting their reporters imbedded for the next war.
drywalldog Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
I think they are sending the hot blonds to Tampa for the Ron Paul nomination.
drywalldog Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
Probably get a few conventioners embedded with those reporters.
ZRX1200 Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,656
Bush deraingment syndrome has no cure and it seems to be chronic. At least he skirted around getting war powers act.........Barry just says "we dont need congress".

Same shīt different azzhole.

DWD surprised your always so angry your wife is a looker.......how do you feel about Paul and Gary Johnson?
ZRX1200 Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,656
Also they WERE lacing artillery rounds.......
DrMaddVibe Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
drywalldog wrote:
Where in the hell is Fox News on all this, seems like they would have a hot blond in Bagdad for something this good.



After watching CNN getting trounced in the ratings FoxNews has decided to go in another direction.

More people log on here on the CBid forums than watch CNN.


Sorry for those keeping score at home but WMD are WMD regardless of their delivery method.

Thanks for playing!
HockeyDad Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
Well at least we got all that oil. Wait.....what....oh crap.
drywalldog Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
What delivery method Dr.? Thats what they were looking for.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
drywalldog wrote:
What delivery method Dr.? Thats what they were looking for.



Chemical, Biological and Radiological
drywalldog Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
Method of delivery to cross its borders?
fiddler898 Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 06-15-2009
Posts: 3,782
CelticBomber wrote:
not sure what everyone is celebrating? We always knew he had chemical weapons. He used them often on the kurds in the North. The claims of WMD's ie NUKES is what the big lie was. Centrifuges on the backs on mobile trucks etc was the claim. Had nothing to do with chemical weapons. Keep on dancing though if it makes you happy.


CB, as a relative noob you clearly haven't grasped that there is no place for measured discourse or objectivity on this part of the boards. Get back to trades where you belong!

Boo hoo!
CelticBomber Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
Quote:
drywalldog wrote:
What delivery method Dr.? Thats what they were looking for.


DrMaddVibe wrote:
Chemical, Biological and Radiological


But those aren't delivery methods... those are types of weapons. You can have a drum full of a Chemical or Biological or Radiological agent, you still have to get it to your target.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
CelticBomber wrote:

But those aren't delivery methods... those are types of weapons. You can have a drum full of a Chemical or Biological or Radiological agent, you still have to get it to your target.



True...I made a mistake in verbage.

So now they are disposing of what exactly?


We were told they didn't exist!


WMD...not rockets...not missles...those deliver the payload so you might as well be describing a bottle rocket!

We were told by the media that they didn't exist.

Clearly if they're destroying them...the do.
CelticBomber Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 05-03-2012
Posts: 6,786
You were never told Iraq didn't have chemical weapons. I don't know why you keep bringing that up. As I said he was known to use them a lot on his own people and our own media reported on it constantly. But what Powell and the rest of the Bush administration said he had to the UN and to the American public, they didn't. Powell even claims now that the most trusted source they used to say these things was a known liar code named curveball because his info was so often wrong. Claims of hidden nuke programs and weaponized biological agents being made in mobile labs just weren't true and they pretty much knew it when they used that as an excuse to go into Iraq. They didn't just say "Saddam has WMD's" they gave details on what exactly he had. Details they apparently just made up. Powell himself calls his "WMD Speech" to the UN a blot on his military record to this day.
DrafterX Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,577
Sadam wanted everyone to think he had them to look tough... he could have prevented the war by letting inspectors back in... he tried to call our bluff and he lost.... Mellow
jetblasted Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 08-30-2004
Posts: 42,595
Looks like a job for ServPro
ZRX1200 Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,656
Fiddler thats some funny chit!
teedubbya Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
It's déjàvu all over again. We went through this when we destroyed the yellow cake.

No apology here on the ginned up war and Powells embarrassing UN speach.

We'll go through this again and again as the bush apologists keep trying to justify the unjustifiable.

by the way my cousins and friends who were over there saw icbms everywhere and trained flying monkeys with vials of anthrax in their bung holes. All saddam had to do is feed them the exlax and send them to the air. God bless gwb.
DrafterX Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,577
Are those the same monkeys invading Puerto Rico now..?? Huh
DrMaddVibe Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
teedubbya wrote:
It's déjàvu all over again. We went through this when we destroyed the yellow cake.

No apology here on the ginned up war and Powells embarrassing UN speach.

We'll go through this again and again as the bush apologists keep trying to justify the unjustifiable.

by the way my cousins and friends who were over there saw icbms everywhere and trained flying monkeys with vials of anthrax in their bung holes. All saddam had to do is feed them the exlax and send them to the air. God bless gwb.




Cindy Brady could bake yellow cake.
ZRX1200 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,656
TW......I actually saw photos. And I'm not apologizing, love means never having to have to say it.

XXOOXXOO
teedubbya Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
I saw the photos too. Those monkeys were menacing. Send the photos to fox, they are looking for them.

I can't wait for the next round if this nonsense. It will come.
drywalldog Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
No chapstick? No apology? At least a hurrah for Doc.
Stinkdyr Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
But how does Lolo Jones feel about this?


Think
CWFoster Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
daveincincy wrote:
Duuude...it's just residue.



Residue of something the mainstream media and the liberals in Washington insisted that Saddam didn't have..... Hmmmm.......

Move along, nothing to see here!
CWFoster Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
teedubbya wrote:
It's déjàvu all over again. We went through this when we destroyed the yellow cake.

No apology here on the ginned up war and Powells embarrassing UN speach.

We'll go through this again and again as the bush apologists keep trying to justify the unjustifiable.

by the way my cousins and friends who were over there saw icbms everywhere and trained flying monkeys with vials of anthrax in their bung holes. All saddam had to do is feed them the exlax and send them to the air. God bless gwb.



No, they're living in Washington D.C., and Obama is threatening to sent them over Syria. I wasn't around for Obama's illegal war on Libya (At least GWB consulted Congress, and got authorization), but thanks to the Democrats penchant for the instant replay (those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it- George Santayana), I can say the same thing about Syria that i was saying elsewhere about Libya, to wit:

when you see one enemy attacking another enemy, you do not have to feel obligated to take sides. I espouse the Budweiser Doctrine! When the enemy has engaged himself, sit back, crack open a cold one and cheer both sides on, and hope they weaken each other so neither is an immediate threat to you! If they wipe each other from the face of the earth, problem solved!
Users browsing this topic
Guest