America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by HockeyDad. 85 replies replies.
2 Pages12>
More Middle East Fun
Buckwheat Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Happy, Happy, Joy, Joy!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-19274866 Brick wall
bloody spaniard Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
When do you think- Fall? October surprise?
I thought it would have happened by now.
jackconrad Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
SEPTEMBER 11th
Papachristou Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-20-2010
Posts: 845
let them do their thing. israel could destroy iran without the US.
frankj1 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
just trying to keep Iran at bay, no one would ever know their real plans.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
Islamic militants warn Egypt army on Sinai raids

CAIRO (AP) — Islamic militants in the Sinai Peninsula warned the Egyptian military on Wednesday against cracking down on jihadis and claimed they were not behind a sneak attack earlier this month that killed 16 Egyptian soldiers.

In a statement posted on a website which usually carries al-Qaida and similar groups' statements, the militants said their main focus is Israel and that they do not target Egyptians soldiers. There was no way to independently verify it.

"Prevent bloodshed, blood which has been spilled and which will be spilled if this aggression continues. You are dragging us to a battle that is not ours," the statement read.

"Our weapon is not directed at you," it continued, adding: "We don't want to turn our rage against you ... have mercy on the soldiers you are using as fuel in the battle."

Islamic militants are believed to be behind the August 5 assault that killed the 16 soldiers in what was the worst attack on troops from inside Egypt in living memory. Gunmen stormed a security checkpoint near the border between Gaza and Israel and killed the soldiers while they were breaking their fast for the holy month of Ramadan.

The attackers then commandeered an armored vehicle and stormed across the border into Israel, where an Israeli airstrike knocked out the vehicle and killed at least six militants.

The attacks prompted the military to launch an offensive in the increasingly volatile peninsula. Most operations there however remain limited and objectives are unclear. However, for the first time since Egypt signed a peace deal with Israel, military helicopters, tanks and troops have been deployed there — a move which before had not been allowed under the deal.

The attack is also believed to have triggered a drastic political and military shakeup.

Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi ordered longtime defense minister Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi, his aid Lt. Gen. Sami Anan and other members of the military council — which took power after the ouster of longtime ruler Hosni Mubarak in last year's uprising — into retirement. Morsi also sacked the intelligence chief and the governor of Northern Sinai.

It is not clear who issued Wednesday's statement. It is signed by "the Jihadist Salafis of Sinai" which could refer to several small Jihadist groups that are active in the area.

Large swaths of northern Sinai have plunged into lawlessness following Mubarak's ouster, and weapons smuggled from Libya have found their way into militants' hands. The weapons and the security vacuum fueled the rise of al-Qaida-inspired militant groups which have staged several low-level cross-border attacks on Israel.


http://news.yahoo.com/islamic-militants-warn-egypt-army-sinai-raids-165759444.html
HockeyDad Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
Papachristou wrote:
let them do their thing. israel could destroy iran without the US.



The only way this is true is if Israel goes nuclear.

When this was comes it will be the USA fighting it as Israel's proxy and we'll be funneling billions in cash and military equipment to Israel that will gleefully be replenished by the US taxpayer and the US military-industrial complex.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
HockeyDad wrote:
The only way this is true is if Israel goes nuclear.

When this was comes it will be the USA fighting it as Israel's proxy and we'll be funneling billions in cash and military equipment to Israel that will gleefully be replenished by the US taxpayer and the US military-industrial complex.



I say we're done being their bitch. They need to fend for themselves. USA...Peace out!
frankj1 Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
The only way this is true is if Israel goes nuclear.

When this was comes it will be the USA fighting it as Israel's proxy and we'll be funneling billions in cash and military equipment to Israel that will gleefully be replenished by the US taxpayer and the US military-industrial complex.


warning, **** stirring coming:
are we now allowed to use the money for Israel that used to go to Egypt? Or does Egypt still get the second most amount of cash even though you never read that outrage here? After all, they are now being attacked by their peace loving brothers.
Stinkdyr Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 06-16-2009
Posts: 9,948
Papachristou wrote:
let them do their thing. israel could destroy iran without the US.



But not without US taxpayer $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


fog
HockeyDad Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
warning, **** stirring coming:
are we now allowed to use the money for Israel that used to go to Egypt?



Trying to suck down even more US taxpayer money now!?
HockeyDad Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:

are we now allowed to use the money for Israel that used to go to Egypt?


Cut all funding to both. Use the money to build a wall.
frankj1 Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
Cut all funding to both. Use the money to build a wall.

let 'em use their own money to build a wall.
frankj1 Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
Trying to suck down even more US taxpayer money now!?

nope, no extra money. already goes to Egypt, just trying to divert it to friends, long as it's going somewhere it should do some good for us at least.

wasn't sure if people know how much has been going to Egypt, it's not news fit to print here.

And I thought it was funny.
HockeyDad Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
Egypt gets almost as much as Israel does each year. Mostly it goes for things like M1 Abrams tanks and Apache helicopters.

If we cut Egypt's money and Israel's money we have enough to build a wall around the entire Middle East.

Call it Thunderdome....sell admission to the show.
jojoc Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 03-05-2007
Posts: 6,272
HockeyDad wrote:
Egypt gets almost as much as Israel does each year. Mostly it goes for things like M1 Abrams tanks and Apache helicopters.

If we cut Egypt's money and Israel's money we have enough to build a wall around the entire Middle East.

Call it Thunderdome....sell admission to the show.


how about just build a wall around the US and refund the star Wars air defense system. Leave the middle east to self-distruct on its own.
frankj1 Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
Egypt gets almost as much as Israel does each year. Mostly it goes for things like M1 Abrams tanks and Apache helicopters.

If we cut Egypt's money and Israel's money we have enough to build a wall around the entire Middle East.

Call it Thunderdome....sell admission to the show.

Now it has been fit to print here. Thanks.

There was talk about the security wall Israel was building, around pseudo-Palestine. Nothing but bad press here.

frankj1 Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
but what of the OP? A wall long enough to include Iran will certainly take up most of our aid to Egypt.
HockeyDad Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
but what of the OP? A wall long enough to include Iran will certainly take up most of our aid to Egypt.



Borrow money from China. We'll need to do that to buy the water pumps as well.
jojoc Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 03-05-2007
Posts: 6,272
HockeyDad wrote:
Borrow money from China. We'll need to do that to buy the water pumps as well.



why act as middle man. Why not just tell Egypt and Israel to get the money they need directly from China? its not like it is really our money that we are giving them anyway.
frankj1 Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
Borrow money from China. We'll need to do that to buy the water pumps as well.

we still have unused credit limit with China? Must be over the 80% LTV my C.U. set.

Hey,let 'em buy their own water pumps! What do we need water pumps for anyway?
rfenst Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,410

Iran: Israel's existence 'insult to all humanity'
Published - Aug 17 2012 04:37AM EST

Associated Press

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran's president says Israel's existence is an "insult to all humanity."

It's one of his sharpest attacks yet against the Jewish state. It comes as Israel openly debates whether to attack Iran over its nuclear program.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said confronting Israel is an effort to "protect the dignity of all human beings."

He was addressing worshippers at Tehran University after nationwide pro-Palestinian rallies, an annual event marking Quds (Jerusalem) Day on the last Friday of the holy month of Ramadan.

Iran and Israel have been bitter enemies for decades. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has called Israel a "cancerous tumor" that must be wiped out.

Israel considers Iran an existential threat because of its nuclear and missile programs and repeated references by Iranian leaders to Israel's destruction.
HockeyDad Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:

Hey,let 'em buy their own water pumps! What do we need water pumps for anyway?



Once we've built the wall around the Middle East, we need the pumps to fill it with water.
HockeyDad Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
rfenst wrote:
Iran: Israel's existence 'insult to all humanity'
Published - Aug 17 2012 04:37AM EST

Associated Press

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran's president says Israel's existence is an "insult to all humanity."

It's one of his sharpest attacks yet against the Jewish state. It comes as Israel openly debates whether to attack Iran over its nuclear program.



Who would have thought that Iran would say something bad about Israel while Israel openly debates attacking Iran if the Americans won't do it. Outrageous! Poor Israel.

Now for a musical interlude....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBj5neka5Zw
frankj1 Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
Once we've built the wall around the Middle East, we need the pumps to fill it with water.

Thank G-d Israel irrigated the desert and turned it into productive land. We can use that water against them.
frankj1 Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
Who would have thought that Iran would say something bad about Israel while Israel openly debates attacking Iran if the Americans won't do it. Outrageous! Poor Israel.

Now for a musical interlude....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBj5neka5Zw

wow. I would have thought you'd pretend not to notice Robert's article instead of pretending that Iran's position is a recent knee jerk reaction to current Israeli threats. When it comes to the chicken/egg question re Arabs/Iran vs Israel's right to exist, need go no more into it than Israel's first day of existence (look it up). Iran joined the party once the Shah was tossed. You make it sound like they were cool with Jews until like a week ago, but Israel ruined it! That drum you've been hearing for years now has been beaten by Imadinnerjacket!

How convenient of you to ignore decades of attempts to wipe them off the map and spin it to look like Iran is just trying to protect themselves from the bad guys. Very disappointing manipulation. This is not brand new Iranian crap. Sadly, it's possible mainstream non-religious zealot Iranian citizens long for a more Western lifestyle...which accepts Israel btw.

Hey! If the terrorists end up taking over Egypt, can we just call that Palestine and consider problem solved?
HockeyDad Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
Thank G-d Israel irrigated the desert and turned it into productive land. We can use that water against them.



I was thinking maybe a coffer dam at Gibraltar and then drain the Mediterranean. We could get some cool archeology done as well before refilling it.
HockeyDad Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
How convenient of you to ignore decades of attempts to wipe them off the map and spin it to look like Iran is just trying to protect themselves from the bad guys.



How convenient of you to ignore 30 centuries of near constant warfare in the region. We should have never backed off on the Crusades. I blame Saladin.

Buy the water pumps!
frankj1 Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
How convenient of you to ignore 30 centuries of near constant warfare in the region. We should have never backed off on the Crusades. I blame Saladin.

Buy the water pumps!

wrong subject, surprising deflection...but funny.

Relax everyone. I'm about done here. Just wanted to make sure everyone knows that Egypt has been getting virtually the same "aid" as Israel all these years, but only Israel sucks on our teat and only Israel is our bitch and only Israel beats the war drums...yet no Egyptian outrage?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,550
frankj1 wrote:
wrong subject, surprising deflection...but funny.

Relax everyone. I'm about done here. Just wanted to make sure everyone knows that Egypt has been getting virtually the same "aid" as Israel all these years, but only Israel sucks on our teat and only Israel is our bitch and only Israel beats the war drums...yet no Egyptian outrage?



Um Frank...I believe Israel has been using US like a bitch. Taking OUR money and what have we received in return? Not a damned thing!

Now we're being bled like ticks on a dog by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt too?

PULL THE PLUG on the insanity!

They don't need our money.

THEY HAVE PLENTY!



Plus they already have the most current military toys!
rfenst Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,410
jojoc wrote:
how about just build a wall around the US and refund the star Wars air defense system. Leave the middle east to self-distruct on its own.



Self destruct?
Instability of all sorts has been the norm since the beginning of recorded history...
HockeyDad Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
wrong subject, surprising deflection...but funny.

Relax everyone. I'm about done here. Just wanted to make sure everyone knows that Egypt has been getting virtually the same "aid" as Israel all these years, but only Israel sucks on our teat and only Israel is our bitch and only Israel beats the war drums...yet no Egyptian outrage?




Deflection? Are you not getting the framed conversation that you wanted? Well sanction me!

Egypt get a ton of money every year for two reasons. 1. They signed a peace treaty with Israel. 2. They dumped the Soviet Union as their military supplier and took up arms with the US military-industrial complex.

Egypt and Israel couldn't make peace until the USA bought them off with long term multi-billion dollar payments. Your taxpayer dollars....still at work for you!

There is one striking difference between Israel and Egypt's teat sucking......Egypt hasn't dragged us into any proxy wars. In fact, Egypt hasn't had any wars in a very long time. Although they've managed to avoid war since the 1970s, they did send a couple of divisions of troops to the coalition in the first Gulf War to help liberate Kuwait.
drywalldog Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 06-19-2007
Posts: 5,536
HD is back!
teedubbya Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Your apology is accepted.
frankj1 Offline
#35 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
Deflection? Are you not getting the framed conversation that you wanted? Well sanction me!

Egypt get a ton of money every year for two reasons. 1. They signed a peace treaty with Israel. 2. They dumped the Soviet Union as their military supplier and took up arms with the US military-industrial complex.

Egypt and Israel couldn't make peace until the USA bought them off with long term multi-billion dollar payments. Your taxpayer dollars....still at work for you!

There is one striking difference between Israel and Egypt's teat sucking......Egypt hasn't dragged us into any proxy wars. In fact, Egypt hasn't had any wars in a very long time. Although they've managed to avoid war since the 1970s, they did send a couple of divisions of troops to the coalition in the first Gulf War to help liberate Kuwait.

Egypt signed the peace treaty because of the shock of seeing Israeli tanks 90 miles outside of Cairo and their air force decimated in less than 6 days after Egypt lined up on the border as part of a planned attack from several fronts against Israel. Sadat got smart and signed on with the best alternative. We sent aid to keep the hateful crazies out of power.

I have stated before (and hope I no longer have to endure you mistating my position and then asking me to defend it) that you and DMV and all of America can be politically and philosophically against aid to any and all countries...not the issue to me. Much of America shares that opinion. That's why we have voting booths. I have not campaigned for spending the dough. I too question the wisdom of spending money we don't have, but we do spend it and you and I disagree on where it should go and why...and the results.

Assuming the money gets sent overseas despite your or my opinion on the wisdom of draining taxpayers, I am of the belief that supporting a real democracy vs supporting dictatorships is a no brainer. Just about every dictatorship we have propped up has fallen and the people now despise us. And then there is Israel.

In this particular thread, I am pointing out that we read ad naseum on these boards about aligning ourselves with and sending aid to Israel. But until this thread, no mention, no whining about virtually the same amount quietly going to Egypt.

Israel did as requested by the Bushes, even holding back while scuds landed in their neighborhoods. Your wording cleverly makes it sound like Egypt was the better friend in the Gulf. Well, Egypt was also a minority partner in 9/11. I do not recall any Israelis on the comandeered planes. Should the inference be that Egypt is/was a terrorist sponoring nation? Just as flimsy as using a couple of divisions to the Gulf as proof of loyalty to US.

So after billions of dollars sent to these two countries, after decades of "investing" in major players of the Middle East, today we (still) have an ally in Israel, an actual democracy with a standard of living we could envy, and despite DMV saying he has received nothing in return, Israel is at the forefront of much that improves the world due to research, technology etc etc etc.

Egypt, in the aftermath of Arab Spring, is quite possibly heading in the other direction. The real more moderate brave leaders of the revolution are out of the power mix after they did the dirty work. And what we have is looking like just another extremist religious country on its way to considering the US the western devil that needs eradication, along with Israel. I say possibly because it is not really an entrenched government yet.

There goes your good money after bad. Outrageous, no? My mind won't be changed, nor will yours. Write to your congressman, we are wasting our respective talents on a cigar forum.
HockeyDad Offline
#36 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
Assuming the money gets sent overseas despite your or my opinion on the wisdom of draining taxpayers, I am of the belief that supporting a real democracy vs supporting dictatorships is a no brainer. Just about every dictatorship we have propped up has fallen and the people now despise us. And then there is Israel.


We supported Sadat who was a dictator and got the Egypt-Israel peace treaty signed. Now Egypt is a true democracy you should want to support them even more!
HockeyDad Offline
#37 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
Egypt signed the peace treaty because of the shock of seeing Israeli tanks 90 miles outside of Cairo and their air force decimated in less than 6 days after Egypt lined up on the border as part of a planned attack from several fronts against Israel. Sadat got smart and signed on with the best alternative. We sent aid to keep the hateful crazies out of power.



You have your timeline wrong and are confusing the 1967 war with the 1973 war and the Camp David Accords years later.

The 1973 war stopped because it was dangerously close to going nuclear.
HockeyDad Offline
#38 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:

Israel did as requested by the Bushes, even holding back while scuds landed in their neighborhoods. Your wording cleverly makes it sound like Egypt was the better friend in the Gulf. Well, Egypt was also a minority partner in 9/11. I do not recall any Israelis on the comandeered planes. Should the inference be that Egypt is/was a terrorist sponoring nation? Just as flimsy as using a couple of divisions to the Gulf as proof of loyalty to US.



I don't recall any connection with the government of Egypt and 9/11. Are you overreaching just a bit to try to downplay Egypt's role in the Persian Gulf war to liberate Kuwait and Egypt's role in rendition operations after 9/11?

Egypt had 35,000 troops involved in the Gulf War. 3rd behind the USA and the UK. Flimsy?

You brought up financial aid to Egypt and now say I am misstating your position.....you do that just fine on your own.
frankj1 Offline
#39 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
I don't recall any connection with the government of Egypt and 9/11. Are you overreaching just a bit to try to downplay Egypt's role in the Persian Gulf war to liberate Kuwait and Egypt's role in rendition operations after 9/11?

Egypt had 35,000 troops involved in the Gulf War. 3rd behind the USA and the UK. Flimsy?

You brought up financial aid to Egypt and now say I am misstating your position.....you do that just fine on your own.

among the Saudis et al, there was an Egytian citizen or two involved in 9/11...I am saying that is not enough to indict the Egytian government but left out there floating as a statement it could be construed as such...much like you tossing statements and allowing them to be inferred as love for us by Egyt.
frankj1 Offline
#40 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
You have your timeline wrong and are confusing the 1967 war with the 1973 war and the Camp David Accords years later.

The 1973 war stopped because it was dangerously close to going nuclear.

Egypt was never the same threat again after Israel came rolling up their gut. Without that...who knows?
frankj1 Offline
#41 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
We supported Sadat who was a dictator and got the Egypt-Israel peace treaty signed. Now Egypt is a true democracy you should want to support them even more!

I am agreeing (I think you agree) that money to Egytian dictators was not so wise, I say less wise than to Israel...you can argue that neither makes sense, but you seem to feel support for Israel makes even less sense. Sadat needed a little fear to play nicely, and he ended up proving he was brave enough to do the right thing, regardless of why. But I'm not sure where the feeling that Egypt is some reliable ally is coming from...certainly compared to Israel, certainly today.

I do support democracy elsewhere, Egypt included. It remains to be seen if their brand of democracy is anywhere close to the true style adhered to by Israel among many other free nations.

Early returns show that the freedom fighters have in fact been tossed aside in this government as Muslim Brotherhood and military jockey for position. You liking that? You a little concerned about the peace treaty?
frankj1 Offline
#42 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
You have your timeline wrong and are confusing the 1967 war with the 1973 war and the Camp David Accords years later.

The 1973 war stopped because it was dangerously close to going nuclear.

I stand corrected.

I did confuse the two wars. Damn memory, shoulda googled. It took longer than the six days in '67 the second time because Egypt had become fairly well entrenched as Syria tried to keep Israel tied up and retake the Golan Heights. The ol' hit 'em high/hit 'em low trick. But Israel regrouped, and it took about another extra week to be knocking on the front door of Damascus and Cairo.

The Arab world had been disillusioned and humiliated by Israel twice in 6 years, but Israel did learn this could not go on forever. Treaties ensued, but never would have happened if the Arab world had not been humbled..and scared.

In hindsight, one must ask would Russia and the US have really gone nuke if Israel had finished the job? But finishing the job defines the heart of the aggressor, the ones who want to drive the other out of existence. And there is absolutely no doubt that Egypt and Syria had no intention of stopping if Israel had not regrouped.

Peace brother.

Frank
HockeyDad Offline
#43 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
among the Saudis et al, there was an Egytian citizen or two involved in 9/11...I am saying that is not enough to indict the Egytian government but left out there floating as a statement it could be construed as such...much like you tossing statements and allowing them to be inferred as love for us by Egyt.




The Egyptian government and military loved the USA. I know this doesn't play into the spin that Israel is our only ally in the region and deserves free money because they do all kinds of wonderful things for the world. Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, UAE....they all love the USA as well. I know, it doesn't fit the story you want to sell.
HockeyDad Offline
#44 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
[quote=frankjI do support democracy elsewhere, Egypt included. It remains to be seen if their brand of democracy is anywhere close to the true style adhered to by Israel among many other free nations.

Early returns show that the freedom fighters have in fact been tossed aside in this government as Muslim Brotherhood and military jockey for position. You liking that? You a little concerned about the peace treaty?[/quote]


If you support democracy then you will have to stand an applaud if the Muslim Brotherhood becomes the ruling party. Democracy is a bit overrated sometimes!

I think it is perfectly possible that Egypt could establish a brand of democracy just like the style in Israel.

In a related note:

In the latest of several similar incidents, police detained four women from the Women of the Wall activist organization at the Western Wall plaza Sunday morning for wearing prayer shawls.

The women were questioned for more than two hours and then brought to the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court, where they were served with a restraining order forbidding them from entering the Western Wall plaza for 50 days.

Israeli law, upheld by the Supreme Court, stipulates that it is forbidden to conduct a religious ceremony “contrary to accepted practice” at a holy site, or one that may “hurt the feelings of other worshipers.”

This law is interpreted to include women performing religious practices at the Western Wall traditionally done by men in Orthodox Jewish practice, such as reading from a Torah scroll, wearing tefillin or a tallit, or blowing a shofar.

Approximately 50 women from the organization assembled in the women’s section of the plaza Sunday morning for the prayer service for the new month, many of whom wore prayer shawls, or tallitot, traditionally worn by men.

The four women who were detained were wearing black and white or plain white tallitot, whereas the rest of the group were wearing more colorful prayer shawls.

The police generally tolerate the wearing of the decorative tallitot by women, and only take exception to women wearing the black and white, blue and white or completely white shawls, which they view as being the preserve of male worshipers.


Israel's wonderful brand of democracy smells a lot like theocracy.
HockeyDad Offline
#45 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,187
frankj1 wrote:
The Arab world had been disillusioned and humiliated by Israel twice in 6 years, but Israel did learn this could not go on forever. Treaties ensued, but never would have happened if the Arab world had not been humbled..and scared.

In hindsight, one must ask would Russia and the US have really gone nuke if Israel had finished the job? But finishing the job defines the heart of the aggressor, the ones who want to drive the other out of existence. And there is absolutely no doubt that Egypt and Syria had no intention of stopping if Israel had not regrouped.



You may not realize it but in the Arab world the 1973 war was considered a moral victory because they fought Israel to a stalemate. They weren't humbled or scared. Two wars in Lebanon that were clusterf&%ks for Israel have emboldened them even more.

How could the war have ended....there a number of theories out there that the Soviets moved nuclear weapons to Egypt and had Cairo fallen, Israel would have been taken out by Egyptian SCUDs armed with Russian nukes.
Russia and the US would not have gone to war.
rfenst Offline
#46 Posted:
Joined: 06-23-2007
Posts: 39,410
HockeyDad wrote:
In a related note:

In the latest of several similar incidents, police detained four women from the Women of the Wall activist organization at the Western Wall plaza Sunday morning for wearing prayer shawls.

The women were questioned for more than two hours and then brought to the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court, where they were served with a restraining order forbidding them from entering the Western Wall plaza for 50 days.

Israeli law, upheld by the Supreme Court, stipulates that it is forbidden to conduct a religious ceremony “contrary to accepted practice” at a holy site, or one that may “hurt the feelings of other worshipers.”

This law is interpreted to include women performing religious practices at the Western Wall traditionally done by men in Orthodox Jewish practice, such as reading from a Torah scroll, wearing tefillin or a tallit, or blowing a shofar.

Approximately 50 women from the organization assembled in the women’s section of the plaza Sunday morning for the prayer service for the new month, many of whom wore prayer shawls, or tallitot, traditionally worn by men.

The four women who were detained were wearing black and white or plain white tallitot, whereas the rest of the group were wearing more colorful prayer shawls.

The police generally tolerate the wearing of the decorative tallitot by women, and only take exception to women wearing the black and white, blue and white or completely white shawls, which they view as being the preserve of male worshipers.


Israel's wonderful brand of democracy smells a lot like theocracy.



What you write about is unacceptable to most American Jews. In fact, we find it abhorrent. But, we are not Israeli and do not make or agree with those laws. Thankfully, IMO, centuries of such unfair religious law are changing, albeit slowly. Compared to our form of egalitarian, non-denominational democracy, Israeli law as stated above is antiquated and unlawful. But, I wonder how Israeli's feel about it. No sense complaining if they support such a law. But, Americans have an entirely different different history and the culture and the central theme of our nation is not the same as Israel's. The difference in women's' rights in Islam and perhaps Christianity haven't been brought up. I think you are just throwing this unpleasant fact out to heap criticism and keep the arguments going. It took this nation almost 200 years before blacks were allowed to vote and more than a century before women were allowed to vote. But, in time, we changed. So too will Israel.
frankj1 Offline
#47 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
rfenst wrote:
If you support democracy then you will have to stand an applaud if the Muslim Brotherhood becomes the ruling party. Democracy is a bit overrated sometimes!

I think it is perfectly possible that Egypt could establish a brand of democracy just like the style in Israel.

In a related note:

In the latest of several similar incidents, police detained four women from the Women of the Wall activist organization at the Western Wall plaza Sunday morning for wearing prayer shawls.

The women were questioned for more than two hours and then brought to the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court, where they were served with a restraining order forbidding them from entering the Western Wall plaza for 50 days.

Israeli law, upheld by the Supreme Court, stipulates that it is forbidden to conduct a religious ceremony “contrary to accepted practice” at a holy site, or one that may “hurt the feelings of other worshipers.”

This law is interpreted to include women performing religious practices at the Western Wall traditionally done by men in Orthodox Jewish practice, such as reading from a Torah scroll, wearing tefillin or a tallit, or blowing a shofar.

Approximately 50 women from the organization assembled in the women’s section of the plaza Sunday morning for the prayer service for the new month, many of whom wore prayer shawls, or tallitot, traditionally worn by men.

The four women who were detained were wearing black and white or plain white tallitot, whereas the rest of the group were wearing more colorful prayer shawls.

The police generally tolerate the wearing of the decorative tallitot by women, and only take exception to women wearing the black and white, blue and white or completely white shawls, which they view as being the preserve of male worshipers.


Israel's wonderful brand of democracy smells a lot like theocracy.



What you write about is unacceptable to most American Jews. In fact, we find it abhorrent. But, we are not Israeli and do not make or agree with those laws. Thankfully, IMO, centuries of such unfair religious law are changing, albeit slowly. Compared to our form of egalitarian, non-denominational democracy, Israeli law as stated above is antiquated and unlawful. But, I wonder how Israeli's feel about it. No sense complaining if they support such a law. But, Americans have an entirely different different history and the culture and the central theme of our nation is not the same as Israel's. The difference in women's' rights in Islam and perhaps Christianity haven't been brought up. I think you are just throwing this unpleasant fact out to heap criticism and keep the arguments going. It took this nation almost 200 years before blacks were allowed to vote and more than a century before women were allowed to vote. But, in time, we changed. So too will Israel.[/quote]

better said than I would have answered. Of course it is unacceptable, the whole idea of laws dedicated to an ultra branch of Judaism is something that does not fly with true lovers of a democratic and free state. Still literally centuries ahead of the countries that HD listed as loving us though. The world would be a better place if the Saudis et al could get to where Israel is now.
France does not allow Muslim women to wear head coverings btw.
frankj1 Offline
#48 Posted:
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,245
HockeyDad wrote:
You may not realize it but in the Arab world the 1973 war was considered a moral victory because they fought Israel to a stalemate. They weren't humbled or scared. Two wars in Lebanon that were clusterf&%ks for Israel have emboldened them even more.

the moral victory was just about the first several days, and even then not for Syria. They were handled swiftly, allowing Israel to focus on Egypt, who started very well by distributing misinformation and attacking on Yom Kippur. But their inability to keep from being pushed back to Cairo resulted in Sadat losing support. His extremely brave and proper tacit recognition of Israel's right to exist (he accepted an invitation to come to Israel as part of the negotiations, unthinkable in the Arab world) resulted in a peace treaty and also sealed his sad fate.

How could the war have ended....there a number of theories out there that the Soviets moved nuclear weapons to Egypt and had Cairo fallen, Israel would have been taken out by Egyptian SCUDs armed with Russian nukes.
Russia and the US would not have gone to war.


Theories are theories, may be there is some validity, we do not know. But we do know that Russia backed down when it becane obvious the US took them seriously. Not a theory, but a fact that their policy became that they did not feel that Syria and Egypt were worth a showdown. They reluctantly ceded much of their sway in the Middle East.
CWFoster Offline
#49 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
frankj1 wrote:
Theories are theories, may be there is some validity, we do not know. But we do know that Russia backed down when it becane obvious the US took them seriously. Not a theory, but a fact that their policy became that they did not feel that Syria and Egypt were worth a showdown. They reluctantly ceded much of their sway in the Middle East.


Good observation, but remember, nothing happens in a vacuum.
WHO was President in 1973? -Richard M. Nixon
WHAT else was going on? -Nixon was bringing the Vietnam War to an end by forcing the N. Vietnamese back to the bargaining table by bombing Hanoi and mining Haiphong Harbor.
Yes, Ford the bumbler was next and then the joke that was Carter, but the Russians had no idea of that in 1973, of course they wouldn't have "bet the farm" on trying to escalate in the Middle East.
CWFoster Offline
#50 Posted:
Joined: 12-12-2003
Posts: 5,414
rfenst wrote:
If you support democracy then you will have to stand an applaud if the Muslim Brotherhood becomes the ruling party. Democracy is a bit overrated sometimes!

I think it is perfectly possible that Egypt could establish a brand of democracy just like the style in Israel.

In a related note:

In the latest of several similar incidents, police detained four women from the Women of the Wall activist organization at the Western Wall plaza Sunday morning for wearing prayer shawls.

The women were questioned for more than two hours and then brought to the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court, where they were served with a restraining order forbidding them from entering the Western Wall plaza for 50 days.

Israeli law, upheld by the Supreme Court, stipulates that it is forbidden to conduct a religious ceremony “contrary to accepted practice” at a holy site, or one that may “hurt the feelings of other worshipers.”

This law is interpreted to include women performing religious practices at the Western Wall traditionally done by men in Orthodox Jewish practice, such as reading from a Torah scroll, wearing tefillin or a tallit, or blowing a shofar.

Approximately 50 women from the organization assembled in the women’s section of the plaza Sunday morning for the prayer service for the new month, many of whom wore prayer shawls, or tallitot, traditionally worn by men.

The four women who were detained were wearing black and white or plain white tallitot, whereas the rest of the group were wearing more colorful prayer shawls.

The police generally tolerate the wearing of the decorative tallitot by women, and only take exception to women wearing the black and white, blue and white or completely white shawls, which they view as being the preserve of male worshipers.


Israel's wonderful brand of democracy smells a lot like theocracy.



What you write about is unacceptable to most American Jews. In fact, we find it abhorrent. But, we are not Israeli and do not make or agree with those laws. Thankfully, IMO, centuries of such unfair religious law are changing, albeit slowly. Compared to our form of egalitarian, non-denominational democracy, Israeli law as stated above is antiquated and unlawful. But, I wonder how Israeli's feel about it. No sense complaining if they support such a law. But, Americans have an entirely different different history and the culture and the central theme of our nation is not the same as Israel's. The difference in women's' rights in Islam and perhaps Christianity haven't been brought up. I think you are just throwing this unpleasant fact out to heap criticism and keep the arguments going. It took this nation almost 200 years before blacks were allowed to vote and more than a century before women were allowed to vote. But, in time, we changed. So too will Israel.[/quote]


Not a big fan of Democracy myself, nor were the Founders. Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch. What our Founders gave us was a Democraticly Elected Representative Republic. Read "The 5000 Year Leap" It's educational without being too dry. It cover point by point by point how the Founders arrived at the form of government we were given. note how I keep saying "they left to us" and "We were given". What we've made of it is a total mess, and bears only a superficial resemblance to what was intended. One of my favorite quotes was from Thomas jefferson in regards if someone should have been allowed to do some thing or other, and he said "If it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg, why should I care?" (paraphrased) There are TWO types of tyranny, the tyranny of the minority over the majority (think a small ruling party of nobles or Party Aperachiks (sp?) that make the decicions for the commoners or proliteriat, depending on which political lexicon you choose to use. A Democracy is evil, a Democracy says "there are fewer of you than us, and we vote you give us your stuff and you work as our slaves". You can bash Israel all you want, but there ARE a few Palestinian Arabs in the Knesset. How many jews are there on the ruling Council in Egypt? in Syria?, Saudi Arabia? Lebanon? Iraq?, Iran?, Libya? Morroco, Yemen, Oman? Baharain, UAE, Dubai? Go ahead, i'm sure it will take awhile for you to count them all!




















(crickets chirping)


































You think that maybe.... just MAYBE that MIGHT be indicative of the Israelis trying to have a government that is relevant to THEIR faith, and at the same time, tries to respect the sensibilities of others, as long as they aren't shooting rockets into their cities?

Take that one step further... you think that MAYBE that might be indicative that ALL those Arab countries have no concern whatsoever for anyones sensibilities OTHER than their own, and they have little if any tolerance for others?

OKAY ONE MORE STEP, now this is a BIG one, so get ready! you think Maybe.... POSSIBLY, THAT difference could make any comparison of moral equivalence between the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood backed government and Israels parlimentary system to be propagandistic and intellectually bankrupt? I'll let you go have a cigar now, you probably have a headache.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>