America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by frankj1. 29 replies replies.
Where all 'da wimmen at??
Jump to Bottom | Previous Topic | Next Topic
tailgater Offline
#1 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 12:13 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/10/joe-scarborough-slams-mika-brzezinski-for-defending-presidents-all-male-cabinet-picks/


New term.
New hires.

But no new women.


The liberals SLAMMED Mitt Romney for being somehow "anti-woman".
Yet here we are a few weeks into Obamas 2nd term and his cabinet has fewer females then it did last term.


I don't suggest that Barrack is anti woman.

But I DO detect the foul stench of hypocrisy from the suddenly silent feminists.
At least I hope that stench is merely hypocrisy...
DrMaddVibe Offline
#2 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 12:16 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
tailgater wrote:
But I DO detect the foul stench of hypocrisy from the suddenly silent feminists.
At least I hope that stench is merely hypocrisy...



That smell is ****. We tried to flush it but it just won't.
bloody spaniard Offline
#3 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 12:22 PM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
What's the difference? The guys there all act like women anyway. Might as well be all women. Probably have more testosterone.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#4 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 12:25 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
Hillary has a helmet now.
daveincincy Offline
#5 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 12:35 PM EST
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
BINDERS FULL O' WIMMINZ!!!

VOTE R-MONEY IN DA HIZZOUS!!
dubleuhb Offline
#6 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 2:17 PM EST
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
bloody spaniard wrote:
What's the difference? The guys there all act like women anyway. Might as well be all women. Probably have more testosterone.

This

Applause
Brewha Offline
#7 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 3:20 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,207
Wait, doesn’t Boehner being his b1tch count?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#8 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 3:35 PM EST
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,633
Brewha wrote:
Wait, doesn’t Boehner being his b1tch count?



Uh oh...somebody wants to play with Georgetown rules!
Brewha Offline
#9 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 4:42 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,207
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Uh oh...somebody wants to play with Georgetown rules!

Where’s your sense of humor DMV? Everybody knows Boehner is a Nancy boy . . . .
ZRX1200 Offline
#10 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 4:59 PM EST
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,682
He pays men in the cabinet more too......

His black half always get to pass. I say we impeach his white half!
Brewha Offline
#11 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 9:18 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,207
Guess Romney wouldn't share his binder with him . . .
frankj1 Offline
#12 Posted: Thu, Jan 10 2013, 9:48 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
I see the discussion of supporting equal pay/opportunity for women less simply than in terms of how many did or would the two major candidates hire. Certainly, supporters of the "cause" should be disappointed in Obama's current appointments, but I'm pretty sure he and Romney have different views about the issue in general.
pdxstogieman Offline
#13 Posted: Fri, Jan 11 2013, 4:06 AM EST
Joined: 10-04-2007
Posts: 5,219
frankj1 wrote:
I see the discussion of supporting equal pay/opportunity for women less simply than in terms of how many did or would the two major candidates hire. Certainly, supporters of the "cause" should be disappointed in Obama's current appointments, but I'm pretty sure he and Romney have different views about the issue in general.


You're making entirely too much sense for this forum.

Shills! Stat! Clean up on aisle 5
frankj1 Offline
#14 Posted: Fri, Jan 11 2013, 8:14 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
pdxstogieman wrote:
You're making entirely too much sense for this forum.

Shills! Stat! Clean up on aisle 5

sorry. it's this darned brain. can't control it.
bloody spaniard Offline
#15 Posted: Sat, Jan 12 2013, 12:47 PM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
frankj1 wrote:
I see the discussion of supporting equal pay/opportunity for women less simply than in terms of how many did or would the two major candidates hire. Certainly, supporters of the "cause" should be disappointed in Obama's current appointments, but I'm pretty sure he and Romney have different views about the issue in general.




Professor Irwin Corey, is that you???Blink
frankj1 Offline
#16 Posted: Sat, Jan 12 2013, 2:36 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
bloody spaniard wrote:
Professor Irwin Corey, is that you???Blink

my idol! the self proclaimed "World's Leading Authority". I can only dream of approaching his penchant for obfuscating the most mundane creatonin with the verbosity of one trained in the art of salinization.
knokmdwn Offline
#17 Posted: Sat, Jan 12 2013, 3:23 PM EST
Joined: 04-13-2008
Posts: 8,849
His cabinet of women, or lack there of, matters not. It's not like he's worried about not being re-elected again.
bloody spaniard Offline
#18 Posted: Sat, Jan 12 2013, 4:13 PM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
frankj1 wrote:
my idol! the self proclaimed "World's Leading Authority". I can only dream of approaching his penchant for obfuscating the most mundane creatonin with the verbosity of one trained in the art of salinization.


Your logical elocution leading to a less than succinct closure sends me into a soporific spiral of excitement followed by synaptic paralysis, ergo your observations nurture the id of all those who conga to the beat. ...and I'm not just saying that to hear myself bleat.
frankj1 Offline
#19 Posted: Sat, Jan 12 2013, 5:24 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
bloody spaniard wrote:
Your logical elocution leading to a less than succinct closure sends me into a soporific spiral of excitement followed by synaptic paralysis, ergo your observations nurture the id of all those who conga to the beat. ...and I'm not just saying that to hear myself bleat.

but, but, yours actually means something! well played, sir.
bloody spaniard Offline
#20 Posted: Wed, Jan 16 2013, 2:01 PM EST
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Frank, what's your (generic) line of work or are you retired?Herfing
frankj1 Offline
#21 Posted: Wed, Jan 16 2013, 7:16 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
bloody spaniard wrote:
Frank, what's your (generic) line of work or are you retired?Herfing

my autopilot response to many (not all) questions is...why do you ask?
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#22 Posted: Thu, Jan 17 2013, 8:03 AM EST
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
frankj1

ROMNEY HAS NO VIEWS ABOUT ANYTHING.
frankj1 Offline
#23 Posted: Thu, Jan 17 2013, 5:42 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
frankj1

ROMNEY HAS NO VIEWS ABOUT ANYTHING.

close. he actually has had every view about all things...at various times during various elections.

however, he has no lasting convictions (and I don't mean the charges were dropped either).
RICKAMAVEN Offline
#24 Posted: Fri, Jan 18 2013, 7:02 AM EST
Joined: 10-01-2000
Posts: 33,248
frankj1

i am corect, but you are more correct then i am.
frankj1 Offline
#25 Posted: Fri, Jan 18 2013, 1:34 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
frankj1

i am corect, but you are more correct then i am.

Could be cuz I am from Massachusetts, witnessed the act up close.
tailgater Offline
#26 Posted: Fri, Jan 18 2013, 3:51 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
RICKAMAVEN wrote:
frankj1

ROMNEY HAS NO VIEWS ABOUT ANYTHING.


Wow.

Rick, even YOU of extreme bias should recognize that our sitting president was a complete JOKE as a Senator.

Take your shots at Romney because of your hatred of mormonism. But be careful when you criticize viewpoints and convictions.

Perhaps if Governor and Candidate Romney has simply stated "Present" to all the tough questions then you'd be smitten.
tailgater Offline
#27 Posted: Fri, Jan 18 2013, 3:55 PM EST
Joined: 06-01-2000
Posts: 26,185
frankj1 wrote:
Could be cuz I am from Massachusetts, witnessed the act up close.


That's a joke.

As a mass-hole, you must then realize that since 85+% of our state legislature is Democrat, that a sitting Republican has to "go along to get along".
It's called compromise.

But with the liberal media feeding you sound bites, you fail to recognize that Romeny gets criticized for flip flopping when he DOES compromise, and then the GOP gets criticized for blocking progress when they don't.

I'd say that the liberals "can't have it both ways".
But, of course, I'd be mistaken on several different fronts....
Brewha Offline
#28 Posted: Fri, Jan 18 2013, 6:39 PM EST
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,207
tailgater wrote:
That's a joke.

As a mass-hole, you must then realize that since 85+% of our state legislature is Democrat, that a sitting Republican has to "go along to get along".
It's called compromise.

But with the liberal media feeding you sound bites, you fail to recognize that Romeny gets criticized for flip flopping when he DOES compromise, and then the GOP gets criticized for blocking progress when they don't.

I'd say that the liberals "can't have it both ways".
But, of course, I'd be mistaken on several different fronts....



More jealousy of liberals . . . .
You know they are much better dancers too.
frankj1 Offline
#29 Posted: Fri, Jan 18 2013, 6:49 PM EST
Joined: 02-08-2007
Posts: 44,290
tailgater wrote:
That's a joke.

As a mass-hole, you must then realize that since 85+% of our state legislature is Democrat, that a sitting Republican has to "go along to get along".
It's called compromise.

But with the liberal media feeding you sound bites, you fail to recognize that Romeny gets criticized for flip flopping when he DOES compromise, and then the GOP gets criticized for blocking progress when they don't.

I'd say that the liberals "can't have it both ways".
But, of course, I'd be mistaken on several different fronts....



you'd certainly be mistaken by assuming you know my opinions are determined by the "liberal media" any more than me assuming righty extremists have their opinions shaped by limited yet manipulative sources. Somehow you are able to resist what I am unable to sift through while living in the same state, exposed to the same media?

That said, I have known of and had interest (unexplainable yet true) in Mitt Romney since before he claimed he really really was a Mass-holer. Going along to get along happened after he won (finally) an election. Of course, because he has no real convictions the way you do, or I do, he had no real lasting interest in Massachusetts' future, he simply looked for legislation he could get approved (MUCH was unpoular among libs btw, the dems were more than equally kind to him as they always are to the many GOP Guvs we have had) just to build any kind of resume so he could immediately run for his next ego stroking office. Oh yeah, he lowered taxes while surrounded by tax and spend libs...yeah right. He also tripled, quadrupled and more fees and fines to raise revenue at the same time, hence his magical ability to work with the 85% Dem gov't. The late Jerry Williams on radio would have been screaming about "fees fines and taxes are all taxes".

But what he said before that campaign, hell even when he previously ran for Senator, to what he said early in the primaries, to what he said during the stretch run of this recent campaign...I simply can't find a divisive issue upon which he has not camped firmly on both sides.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Back to Top