America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by DrafterX. 98 replies replies.
2 Pages<12
what's da problem..??
DrafterX Offline
#51 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
Laugh




even if you don't know how to drive or your license was taken away the DMV will still issue you a picture ID... some high schools and most colleges issue them... some places of employment.. Think
seems like if you could find your way to da polls once (or six times) every 4 years you could get to the DMV at some time or another.... Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#52 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
The conservatives are all about “small government” ...




That is a damn lie perpetuated by the conservatives.
HockeyDad Offline
#53 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
You can't really function in the USA (or most other countries) without a valid ID....but ask people to show it to vote and the liberal panty-wastes get all freaked out.
bloody spaniard Offline
#54 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Truth be told, the only segments of society that probably don't have some form of valid photo ID are those who live in pockets of dire poverty, the very old, feeble, (may not have renewed driver's licenses, etc.), possibly the mentally ill, those incarcerated who legally can't vote anyway, and the HUGE number of undocumented folks who have crossed over the border and may not have had the chance to forge documents. Well even if they haven't forged papers, they can get registered to vote at any DMV when they get their driver's license. These are more likely to vote Democrat IMHO. Thus, the Republican opposition.


Having said that, it is a travesty how the Democrats have prevented many of the military votes from counting as well.

HockeyDad Offline
#55 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
bloody spaniard wrote:
Having said that, it is a travesty how the Democrats have prevented many of the military votes from counting as well.




Democrats don't like the military because they have guns and are the only real opposition to the government class/entitled/dependent party.
Brewha Offline
#56 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:
You can't really function in the USA (or most other countries) without a valid ID....but ask people to show it to vote and the liberal panty-wastes get all freaked out.

bloody spaniard wrote:
Having said that, it is a travesty how the Democrats have prevented many of the military votes from counting as well.

HockeyDad wrote:
Democrats don't like the military because they have guns and are the only real opposition to the government class/entitled/dependent party.


I’m starting to think this is really about when you were kids, and the Democrats kept taking your milk money . . . .
HockeyDad Offline
#57 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
I’m starting to think this is really about when you were kids, and the Democrats kept taking your milk money . . . .



No you don't. That would be an utterly stupid thing to think.
DrafterX Offline
#58 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
udderly... Not talking
Buckwheat Offline
#59 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
goodwrench wrote:
voter fraud is a real concern to many people, should be to all. calling anyone a racist for pointing it out is insane.


In-person voter fraud or impersonation on Election Day is virtually non-existent.

ID's would be a waste of time and money, IMO.

Fraud will occur but not at any substantial level to cause the election to go one way or the other. JMO
bloody spaniard Offline
#60 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
^ It is generally acknowledged that the illegal vote probably threw out Dornan & replaced him with Sanchez in Orange County.


Brew, you don't believe that the Democrats DON'T want the military vote (from abroad), which tends to go Republican, to count for less, in other words made more difficult? Not sure what big kids taking my milk/snack money as a child have to do with that.
DrafterX Offline
#61 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
bloody spaniard wrote:
Not sure what big kids taking my milk/snack money as a child have to do with that.



OhMyGod

was is that bassard Ram..?? Mad
Brewha Offline
#62 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
udderly... Not talking

ThumpUp
bloody spaniard Offline
#63 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
DrafterX wrote:
OhMyGod
what is that bassard Ram..?? Mad



Rather not talk about it.Sad
DrafterX Offline
#64 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
poor Bloody.... Sad

did he have a bat back then..?? Huh
HockeyDad Offline
#65 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Back in those days Ram just carried a slapjack.
DrafterX Offline
#66 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
Think
we're gonna need a 'young Ram slapjack' smiley.... Mellow
Brewha Offline
#67 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
bloody spaniard wrote:
^ It is generally acknowledged that the illegal vote probably threw out Dornan & replaced him with Sanchez in Orange County.


Brew, you don't believe that the Democrats want the military vote (from abroad), which tends to go Republican, to count for less, in other words made more difficult? Not sure what big kids taking my milk/snack money as a child have to do with that.

I’m not familiar with the allegation of “democrats” wanting the military vote to count for less. I do remember there being a news article about a foul up on their voting. Were there egregious wrong doings by a person in particular?

I was just joking about the milk money – The joke being that the you guys are just angry that Obama won the election.
HockeyDad Offline
#68 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
I’m not familiar with the allegation of “democrats” wanting the military vote to count for less. I do remember there being a news article about a foul up on their voting. Were there egregious wrong doings by a person in particular?

I was just joking about the milk money – The joke being that the you guys are just angry that Obama won the election.




Obama's re-election was foretold in the prophesies of Le HockeyDad many years ago. The joke is people did not head the warnings and get under the Obama Cone Of Protection....and the rank and file Democrats didn't even realize there was a Cone Of Protection. Their shock and outrage about not having their needs/expectations met is priceless.
Buckwheat Offline
#69 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
bloody spaniard wrote:
^ It is generally acknowledged that the illegal vote probably threw out Dornan & replaced him with Sanchez in Orange County.


Brew, you don't believe that the Democrats DON'T want the military vote (from abroad), which tends to go Republican, to count for less, in other words made more difficult? Not sure what big kids taking my milk/snack money as a child have to do with that.



Could be the case but I was really just saying that in person voter fraud is not a problem. I do agree with you on the military vote and I also believe that absentee voting is a larger source of voter fraud then any other source. No system is fool proof. We can only hope to keep the system as clean as it can be. I think that our electoral system would probably collapse if everyone who is eligible to vote actually voted.
Brewha Offline
#70 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:
Obama's re-election was foretold in the prophesies of Le HockeyDad many years ago. The joke is people did not head the warnings and get under the Obama Cone Of Protection....and the rank and file Democrats didn't even realize there was a Cone Of Protection. Their shock and outrage about not having their needs/expectations met is priceless.

Can it be that the wisdom and foresight of the venerable LHD is not paid the homage and deference it is due here on the Cbid Forum?

Nah . . .
I think you are dazed from the echo of your cone.
DrafterX Offline
#71 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598

Mayday, this is Echo Hotel

Mayday, this is Echo Hotel

Mayday, this is Echo Hotel

Hotel Echo, this is Mike November

I can hear your call

Mayday, this is Echo Hotel

Mayday, this is Echo Hotel

Hotel Echo, this is Charlie Delta

I can feel the fear

Mayday, this is Echo Hotel


Mellow
HockeyDad Offline
#72 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
Can it be that the wisdom and foresight of the venerable LHD is not paid the homage and deference it is due here on the Cbid Forum?

Nah . . .
I think you are dazed from the echo of your cone.



And the prophet Le HockeyDad said unto the Philistine Brewha, "There shalt be a Cone Of Protection and a Cone Of Protection shall be. To enter the Cone, shalt thou count to three. No more. No less. Three shalt be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, nor either count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then you shall be denied entry to the Cone. You are a peasant and a peasant you shall always be. The Cone Of Protection is not for peasants even if they can count to three."
DrafterX Offline
#73 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
what was that about five..?? Huh
Brewha Offline
#74 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
From the Book of Brewha:

And low, there came to be among them the veil contempt of the false prophet: He that would claim himself to be the father of all pucking sports for his name sake. He that would bespeak the dreaded Cone of Shame as the false Cone of Protection. He that would beguile his fellow brethren with the master trickery known only to those with outrageous accents.

And the Forum saw it not.
DrafterX Offline
#75 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
and there was much rejoicing.... Beer
DrMaddVibe Offline
#76 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,618
Brewha wrote:
From the Book of Brewha:[/i]



Nobody will read that book!
DadZilla3 Offline
#77 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
SMGBobbyScott wrote:
Here is an idea...let's let every red blooded American age 18 and over with a government issued ID vote in the next election as long as they haven't committed a felony. No need to "register" as long as they have the ID card...how about that???


But...but...how are all the illegal aliens going to vote then?
Brewha Offline
#78 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrMaddVibe wrote:
Nobody will read that book!

Blasphemer!
The great profits deny your prayers for the end to your incontinence!
HockeyDad Offline
#79 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
Blasphemer!
The great profits.....



Let's not bring Goldman Sachs and Warren Buffett into this.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#80 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,618
HockeyDad wrote:
Let's not bring Goldman Sachs and Warren Buffett into this.



Trust me...it'll end up in some proof-reader's litterbox!
Brewha Offline
#81 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:
Let's not bring Goldman Sachs and Warren Buffett into this.

Yes.
For it is written; it is easier for a rich man to pass through a camel, then to put a needle in your eye.
DadZilla3 Offline
#82 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
Brewha wrote:
Yes.
For it is written; it is easier for a rich man to pass through a camel, then to put a needle in your eye.


Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three.
Brewha Offline
#83 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Don't stand there gawping, like you've never seen the hand of God before!
DrafterX Offline
#84 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598
Nobody has seen God's hands... he communicates through the singing bush... Mellow
engletl Offline
#85 Posted:
Joined: 12-26-2000
Posts: 26,493
Brewha wrote:
Because it is not needed. You have to be on the voter roll and know you are there in order to vote.

What is a “valid” reason to not ban assault weapons?

What is a “valid” reason to not have license to own a dog?


Assault weapons are already banned. But then again maybe we really need to ban EVERYTHING...since EVERYTHING can be used to kill another person...do it now, for the children

BTW

The National Firearms Act of 1968 (NFA) defines a number of categories of regulated firearms. These weapons are collectively known as NFA firearms and include the following:
Machine guns—this includes any firearm which can fire more than 1 cartridge per trigger pull. Both continuous fully automatic fire and "burst fire" (i.e., firearms with a 3-round burst feature) are considered machine gun features. The weapon's receiver is by itself considered to be a regulated firearm.
Short-barreled rifles (SBRs)—this category includes any firearm with a buttstock and either a rifled barrel under 16" long or an overall length under 26". The overall length is measured with any folding or collapsing stocks in the extended position. The category also includes firearms which came from the factory with a buttstock that was later removed by a third party.
Short barreled shotguns (SBSs)—this category is defined similarly to SBRs, but the barrel must be at least 18" instead of 16", and the barrel must be a smoothbore. The minimum overall length limit remains 26".
Silencers —this includes any portable device designed to muffle or disguise the report of a portable firearm. This category does not include non-portable devices, such as sound traps used by gunsmiths in their shops which are large and usually bolted to the floor.
Destructive Devices (DDs)—there are two broad classes of destructive devices:
Devices such as grenades, bombs, explosive missiles, poison gas weapons, etc.
Any firearm with a bore over 0.50 inch except for shotguns or shotgun shells which have been found to be generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes. (Many firearms with bores over 0.50" inch, such as 12-gauge shotguns, are exempted from the law because they have been determined to have a "legitimate sporting use".)
Any Other Weapons (AOWs)—this is a broad "catch-all" category used to regulate any number of firearms which the BATFE under the NFA enforces registration and taxation. Examples include, among others:
1) Smooth-bore pistols 2) Pen guns and cane guns 3) A firearm with combinations smooth bore and rifle barrels 12 inches or more but less than 18 inches in length from which only a single shot can be made from either barrel. 4) Disguised firearms 5) Firearms that can be fired from within a wallet holster or a briefcase 6) A short-barreled shotgun which came from the factory with a pistol grip and no buttstock is categorized as an AOW (smooth-bore pistol) rather than a Short Barrel Shotgun (SBS), because the Gun Control Act describes a shotgun as, "…designed or redesigned to be fired from the shoulder…" 7) Handguns with a forward vertical grip.
HockeyDad Offline
#86 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
Don't stand there gawping, like you've never seen the hand of God before!



To love another person is to see the face of God.
HockeyDad Offline
#87 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
As long as we don't ban whistles, our women are safe.
Brewha Offline
#88 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
DrafterX wrote:
Nobody has seen God's hands... he communicates through the singing bush... Mellow

I knew a girl like that once . . . .
Brewha Offline
#89 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
engletl wrote:
Assault weapons are already banned. But then again maybe we really need to ban EVERYTHING...since EVERYTHING can be used to kill another person...do it now, for the children

BTW

The National Firearms Act of 1968 (NFA) defines a number of categories of regulated firearms. These weapons are collectively known as NFA firearms and include the following:
Machine guns—this includes any firearm which can fire more than 1 cartridge per trigger pull. Both continuous fully automatic fire and "burst fire" (i.e., firearms with a 3-round burst feature) are considered machine gun features. The weapon's receiver is by itself considered to be a regulated firearm.
Short-barreled rifles (SBRs)—this category includes any firearm with a buttstock and either a rifled barrel under 16" long or an overall length under 26". The overall length is measured with any folding or collapsing stocks in the extended position. The category also includes firearms which came from the factory with a buttstock that was later removed by a third party.
Short barreled shotguns (SBSs)—this category is defined similarly to SBRs, but the barrel must be at least 18" instead of 16", and the barrel must be a smoothbore. The minimum overall length limit remains 26".
Silencers —this includes any portable device designed to muffle or disguise the report of a portable firearm. This category does not include non-portable devices, such as sound traps used by gunsmiths in their shops which are large and usually bolted to the floor.
Destructive Devices (DDs)—there are two broad classes of destructive devices:
Devices such as grenades, bombs, explosive missiles, poison gas weapons, etc.
Any firearm with a bore over 0.50 inch except for shotguns or shotgun shells which have been found to be generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes. (Many firearms with bores over 0.50" inch, such as 12-gauge shotguns, are exempted from the law because they have been determined to have a "legitimate sporting use".)
Any Other Weapons (AOWs)—this is a broad "catch-all" category used to regulate any number of firearms which the BATFE under the NFA enforces registration and taxation. Examples include, among others:
1) Smooth-bore pistols 2) Pen guns and cane guns 3) A firearm with combinations smooth bore and rifle barrels 12 inches or more but less than 18 inches in length from which only a single shot can be made from either barrel. 4) Disguised firearms 5) Firearms that can be fired from within a wallet holster or a briefcase 6) A short-barreled shotgun which came from the factory with a pistol grip and no buttstock is categorized as an AOW (smooth-bore pistol) rather than a Short Barrel Shotgun (SBS), because the Gun Control Act describes a shotgun as, "…designed or redesigned to be fired from the shoulder…" 7) Handguns with a forward vertical grip.

Good points.
Nothing to do with what I was writing about, but good points.

Know anything about preventing earthquakes with sheeps bladders?
Brewha Offline
#90 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:
To love another person is to see the face of God.

Each man sees and comes to know God is his own way.

There was this girl I knew with a singing . . . .




Oh, never mind.
HockeyDad Offline
#91 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
Each man sees and comes to know God is his own way.

There was this girl I knew with a singing . . . .




Oh, never mind.



I thought you were an atheist?!
Brewha Offline
#92 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:
I thought you were an atheist?!

Atheist is such a pejorative term . . . It would be accurate to say I am an agnostic.

However, if you look closely at my statement;
“Each man sees and comes to know God is his own way.”
You will find it easily qualifies as heresy in many a religion.
I do believe it though. Truly.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#93 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,618
Brewha wrote:
Atheist is such a pejorative term . . . It would be accurate to say I am an agnostic.

However, if you look closely at my statement;
“Each man sees and comes to know God is his own way.”
You will find it easily qualifies as heresy in many a religion.
I do believe it though. Truly.



Agnostic is the new half-ass.
DrafterX Offline
#94 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598

86-year-old woman with dementia faces felony voting fraud charge for voting twice
Published March 08, 2013

Minnesota county attorney claims Margaret Schneider voted twice. (myfoxtwincities.com)

An 86-year-old Minnesota woman who suffers from dementia is facing a felony voting fraud charge after she says she accidentally voted twice.

Margaret Schneider tells MyFoxTwinCities.com she forgot she had already sent in her absentee ballot when she went to her polling place in November.

"It's very hard to remember everything," Schneider said.

Schneider says the matter is particularly upsetting to her because she considers herself a proud American and has voted in every election.

"I've always voted, ever since I've been old enough to," she said.

The criminal complaint against Schneider says records show she submitted her absentee ballot in July. It claims the roster book at her polling place had the letters "AB" next to her name, signifying that Schneider had already cast an absentee ballot.

This aspect of the case is frustrating for Schneider.

"Why didn't they tell me to go home? That's what I'm trying to figure out," she told MyFoxTwinCities.com.

The county attorney tells the station she had no choice but to file charges against Schneider, saying she could even lose her job if she refused to.

"If I have probable cause to believe the crime occurred, I do not have discretion to charge," Michelle Zehnder Fischer said. "I have to charge it."

Fischer says she has no interest in putting Schneider in jail, and she hopes the case is resolved quickly.

Schneider says she never would have intentionally voted twice.

"It's against the law to do that," she said



Film at 11..... Not talking
HockeyDad Offline
#95 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
A woman with dementia votes twice.We can all take a wild guess who she selected!
SweetHavok Offline
#96 Posted:
Joined: 11-28-2012
Posts: 557
DrafterX wrote:
Weren't the troops overseas denieded the opportunity last year..?? That's what I heard anyway... Mellow





For various reasons politicians try to dismiss our votes when it suits them. Remember hearing Al Gore, trying to throw out military absantee ballots for Florida. If you remeber, it came down to Florida in deciding the presidency between Gore & Bush.
RWhisenand Offline
#97 Posted:
Joined: 01-06-2012
Posts: 49
HockeyDad wrote:
A woman with dementia votes twice.We can all take a wild guess who she selected!



Probably FDR.
DrafterX Offline
#98 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,598

Cincinnati poll worker charged with voting half dozen times in November
By Eric Shawn

Published March 11, 2013


She admitted voting twice in the presidential election last November, and now, Obama supporter Melowese Richardson has been indicted for allegedly voting at least six times. She also is charged with illegal voting in 2008 and 2011.

The 58-year-old veteran Cincinnati poll worker, indicted Monday, faces eight counts of voter fraud. Two others, one of whom is a nun, have been charged separately.

Richardson had admitted on camera to a local TV station, "Yes, I voted twice," claiming she was concerned that her vote would not count. She also said there "was no intent on my part to commit any voter fraud."

"I'll fight it for Mr. Obama and Mr. Obama's right to sit as president of the United States," she proclaimed in the interview.

Officials charged that she voted in her own name by absentee ballot and also in person at the polls, but Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney Joseph Deters said she also is charged with voting in the name of five other people in various elections.

"This is not North Korea," Deters said in a statement announcing the indictments. "Elections are a serious business and the foundation of our democracy. In the scheme of things, individual votes may not seem important, but this could not be further from the truth. Every vote is important and every voter and candidate needs to have faith in our system. The charges today should let people know that we take this seriously."

Richardson made national headlines when the Hamilton County Board of Elections announced that it was investigating whether she voted up to half a dozen times, including on behalf of her granddaughter, India Richardson.

India told Fox News that her grandmother did indeed vote in her name, telling us that "it wasn't a big deal."

But voting twice or in another person's name is illegal.

Prosecutors say the five other people for whom Richardson cast ballots are all relatives.

Sister Marguerite Kloos also faces one count of illegal voting, for allegedly submitting an absentee ballot in the name of a fellow nun, Sister Rose Marie Hewitt, who had died before absentee ballots were sent out. She is accused of opening Sister Hewitt’s ballot, forging her signature and mailing it to the Board of Elections as a vote.

The 54-year-old Kloos has resigned as the dean of the Division of Arts and Humanities at the College of Mount St. Joseph in Cincinnati, where she still serves as an associate professor of religious and pastoral studies.

Kloos was not indicted but faces what is known as an information, because her lawyer contacted prosecutors and she agreed to cooperate and plead guilty.

"As a valued member of the Mount community, our thoughts are with her during this difficult time," the college said in a written statement. "We respect her privacy and will not comment further on this matter at this time."

Russell Glassop, 75, also is charged with illegal voting. He is accused of voting on behalf of his wife, who died before election day.

But it was Richardson's case, and the possibility of repeated votes, that shocked many. She faces up to 12 years in prison if convicted. Efforts to contact her and her lawyer have been unsuccessful.

The Hamilton County Board of Elections recently held hearings on cases of possible double voting and voter fraud, part of a statewide review ordered by Secretary of State John Husted. He called on all 88 counties to review complaints of fraud, as well as voter disenfranchisement.

“Every voter must play by the rules, and if they don’t they will be held accountable,” Husted, a Republican, said in a written statement. “For voters to have confidence in our elections, we must prosecute every case of voter fraud in Ohio.”

Last month, Husted told Fox News that Richardson's case was especially troubling, because "it appears she not only attempted to vote more than once, but was actually successful at it and having those additional votes counted."

"Most attempts are caught by the system. But there are cases that do slip through, as this one does, and we need to make sure that we really send a strong message, that if you do this, you are going to be held accountable,” Husted said. “It might mean fines, it might mean jail time."

Hamilton County prosecutors are investigating three additional cases of possible voter fraud.



Film at 11...... Not talking
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages<12