America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by Brewha. 34 replies replies.
Confessions of a Republican Reaganite & supporter of deer in headlights Dan Quayle
bloody spaniard Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Some of our leftist brothers may be on to something.

Trickle down economics didn't work as intended. Even Stockman discredited his own concept. Only the rich got richer.

And perhaps there IS a need for a Government safety net for those in need. The idea, that we as conservatives proposed, that there was no need for Government programs due to family and church is generally a pipe dream these days. Family or church help nonwithstanding, if it weren't for unemployment comp, welfare, school lunches, public housing, and Social Security many would be in dire straits & out on the street or worse.Many of these could have been subsidized many times over if we had not had costly military interventions such as the the 3 TRILLION dollar war in Iraq & current incursion in Afghanistan. What? so that the war doesn't come here??? All the while we keep our borders unguarded. Phfffft.

What is your take? Do you really think that adopting Libertarian ideas with minimal Government is the way to go? Everyone doing their own thing with little or no Government (sans Government pensions to ANYONE as well)?

Ok, we know that TARP was mostly an unmitigated failure & that the two idiots in charge are void of any substantive ideas but should the social services system that's been in place be trimmed at the expense of a military presence abroad? Btw, I used to believe in a big military as well until I discovered how much the industrial complex was skimming from the top even before they were assigned lucrative potato peeling and underpant cleaning contracts. Not to mention institutional bribes to bloody Third World chieftains with Swiss accounts.
DrafterX Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,595
bomb bomb bomb,
bomb bomb Iran... Whistle
DrMaddVibe Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,610
bloody spaniard wrote:
Some of our leftist brothers may be on to something.


Actually after the Occupooper Movement...It's safe to say they're just ON something...pot...LSD...Heroin...Molly...Who knows...who cares...just take a bath and go back to the basement!


bloody spaniard wrote:
Trickle down economics didn't work as intended. Even Stockman discredited his own concept. Only the rich got richer.


What REALLY happened...the squeeze on the middle class...squash them like a bug...annihilate them...can't get over the fence? There's a steamroller coming!

bloody spaniard wrote:
And perhaps there IS a need for a Government safety net for those in need. The idea, that we as conservatives proposed, that there was no need for Government programs due to family and church is generally a pipe dream these days. Family or church help nonwithstanding, if it weren't for unemployment comp, welfare, school lunches, public housing, and Social Security many would be in dire straits & out on the street or worse.Many of these could have been subsidized many times over if we had not had costly military interventions such as the the 3 TRILLION dollar war in Iraq & current incursion in Afghanistan. What? so that the war doesn't come here??? All the while we keep our borders unguarded. Phfffft.


I believe on 9/12/01 I uttered the famous stance..."Landmines, Gun Turrets & Predator Drones"...maybe it was later...all I know is if we were using them now...we'd be better off. As for Govt. assistance? Just thank FDR for *****uing up the America that was created for all of us. That America...wasn't good enough. What America needs is a big Santa Claus...giving free toys to everybody...even after a couple of wars...oh, you lost? Hmmmm...we'll just pay to rebuild you back better than before and you don't have to pay a damn thing...President Reagan had it correct ...The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'

bloody spaniard wrote:
What is your take? Do you really think that adopting Libertarian ideas with minimal Government is the way to go? Everyone doing their own thing with little or no Government (sans Government pensions to ANYONE as well)?


At this point, what do you say to trying it? Really. We've tried their way and look where that got us.

bloody spaniard wrote:
Ok, we know that TARP was mostly an unmitigated failure & that the two idiots in charge are void of any substantive ideas but should the social services system that's been in place be trimmed at the expense of a military presence abroad? Btw, I used to believe in a big military as well until I discovered how much the industrial complex was skimming from the top even before they were assigned lucrative potato peeling and underpant cleaning contracts. Not to mention institutional bribes to bloody Third World chieftains with Swiss accounts.



Mostly? MOSTLY? MOSTLY? No. It WAS an utter and sheer failure of epic proportions. Gut it all like a fish. Start holding trials and break out the guillotines (PLURAL!) for the Wall Street criminals and washington DC insiders...audit the Federal Reserve first and run them through it too! Hold new elections and run them through it as well and then have another round of elections...FFS...every year or so...have some guys go running through the Capital Builiding shooting off those evil assault weapons...just to keep 'em on their toes! No, it needs to implode. I told people to read "The Empire of Debt"...did they? The happy ending is there for all to see.
bloody spaniard Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Bomb Iran with viri only, Drafter.

Once the genie is out the bag, our gas prices will skyrocket or worse. The time to act militarily on Iran and South Korea has passed. If we (the "western Allies") had only had half the gumption & foresight to act as the Israelis did when they bombed the Iraqui reactor...
bloody spaniard Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
I think we agree more than we disagree Doc. Problem with pulling out the net from under our citizenry in order to finance corporations and maintain big hat dictators is that it's morally wrong AND fiscally crazy because it's waaaaay more expensive to do the latter.

Many of the left have starry idealism as they don dirty Che shirts & wave Mao's little red book of nonsense but so do many on the right who talk about self determination and responsibility as they collect checks from the Government or work for fatcat corporations that suck the lifeblood out of the taxpayer.
daveincincy Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 08-11-2006
Posts: 20,033
The world would be a better place if it weren't for all these people....
bloody spaniard Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
daveincincy wrote:
The world would be a better place if it weren't for all these people....



Nah, plenty of room in the barrel. Just some rotten apples that need to be tossed is all.Herfing
z6joker9 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2011
Posts: 5,902
My idea of a perfect government is one guy who sits in a small room at a desk, and the only thing he’s allowed to decide is who to nuke. The man is chosen based on some kind of IQ test, and maybe also a physical tournament, like a decathlon. And women are brought to him, maybe ... when he desires them.
HockeyDad Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Trickle down economics......trickle up economics.....trickle down government......

Each have the same result: The rich get richer.

The rich are still rich. The bourgeoisie are still bourgeoisie. The peasants are still peasants but now owned by the democratic government instead of the King.
HockeyDad Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
bloody spaniard wrote:
What is your take? Do you really think that adopting Libertarian ideas with minimal Government is the way to go? Everyone doing their own thing with little or no Government (sans Government pensions to ANYONE as well)?



Austerity and the ultimate bankruptcy of the USA will force this along with the break-up of the Union. ...or totalitarianism.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,610
bloody spaniard wrote:
I think we agree more than we disagree Doc. Problem with pulling out the net from under our citizenry in order to finance corporations and maintain big hat dictators is that it's morally wrong AND fiscally crazy because it's waaaaay more expensive to do the latter.

Many of the left have starry idealism as they don dirty Che shirts & wave Mao's little red book of nonsense but so do many on the right who talk about self determination and responsibility as they collect checks from the Government or work for fatcat corporations that suck the lifeblood out of the taxpayer.



I wouldn't prop up either one! Safety nets, corporations...gut it.

Money to big hatted lunatics...end it.

As far as the Ché shirt...I have one...I wear it to herfs sometimes...its the iconic picture of him but it has Mickey Mouse ears on it...Capitalism over Gang warfare is what it symbolizes to me...Capitalism wins!
stogiefan Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 10-23-2012
Posts: 80
The rich are getting richer because the government has passed laws and modified the tax code to keep the uber wealthy filthy rich and never in threat of losing their money. The answer isn't to raise their taxes but to get rid of these safeguard laws and expose them to the same risks as the small entrepreneur taking a chance at a start up business. Our problem isn't a failure of capitalism its the deformation of capitalism into corporatism or crony capitalism. There would be a lot more opportunity for those less off if we had a truly free market approach. What we have now is the ruling class (government) picking the winners and losers rather than the free market.

Saying that we need a stronger middle class to get the economy booming again is putting the cart before the horse. A strong middle class is the byproduct of a healthy, vibrant economy so long as government does not interfere. I'm not opposed to all safety nets, however, today there are people making a permanent living on safety nets and it is not sustainable to have a growing portion of the population producing nothing while living at the expense of the producers.
Buckwheat Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
"Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony."
HockeyDad Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Cone Of Protection Capitalism is great as long as you're under the cone....and not the last one in on the giant Ponzi scheme.
Brewha Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:
Cone Of Protection Capitalism is great as long as you're under the cone....and not the last one in on the giant Ponzi scheme.

Oh, Lord please . . . not “the Cone” again . . . .
HockeyDad Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
Oh, Lord please . . . not “the Cone” again . . . .




What....are you gonna cry? Occupy something? Get back to work.
Brewha Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
It makes me wonder if things ever really change.

For millennia mankind has a ruling class that was beyond reproach, we enslaved each other, and had widely held belief in ideas that served to organize and control even though they were not true.

Sure, believing that the ruling king is divine has fallen out of fashion. But most of the worlds’ people know better than to speak out against the injustice of the ruler.

People are born into royalty today (royalty of wealth) and into peasantry (poverty). A few move from one class to the next, but it is the exception not the rule.




Sure, things look different - and we have new buzz words for old ideas to rub in the ground (“cone “ reference), but are things really the same as they have always been?
Brewha Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:
What....are you gonna cry? Occupy something? Get back to work.

No – I’m not French . . . .
Buckwheat Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 04-15-2004
Posts: 12,251
Brewha wrote:
Oh, Lord please . . . not “the Cone” again . . . .


"Albatross!! Albatross!! Albatross!!"
"What flavour is it?"
jackconrad Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 06-09-2003
Posts: 67,461
I love Me
HockeyDad Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,208
Brewha wrote:
No – I’m not French . . . .



You can still eat cake.

Je vous en prie
DrMaddVibe Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,610
Brewha wrote:
Sure, things look different - and we have new buzz words for old ideas to rub in the ground (“cone “ reference), but are things really the same as they have always been?




LET MY PEOPLE GO!
teedubbya Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
someone has your peeps? can I help?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,610
teedubbya wrote:
someone has your peeps? can I help?



Too sugary!
teedubbya Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
Like suge knight?
bloody spaniard Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
^ Speaking of Suge Knight, John "Heinz's Suge" Kerry was the ONLY major Democrat that I ever voted for as a protest against Dimwit II.


Brewha wrote:
It makes me wonder if things ever really change.

For millennia mankind has a ruling class that was beyond reproach, we enslaved each other, and had widely held belief in ideas that served to organize and control even though they were not true.

Sure, believing that the ruling king is divine has fallen out of fashion. But most of the worlds’ people know better than to speak out against the injustice of the ruler.

People are born into royalty today (royalty of wealth) and into peasantry (poverty). A few move from one class to the next, but it is the exception not the rule.

Sure, things look different - and we have new buzz words for old ideas to rub in the ground (“cone “ reference), but are things really the same as they have always been?



Michael Moore made a documentary about this & I mocked him for being stupid, fat, and a hypocrite. Alas, now he's just a fat hypocrite.Gonz
teedubbya Offline
#27 Posted:
Joined: 08-14-2003
Posts: 95,637
nah he's still stupid. that's like me pointing out the stop sign is red. doesn't make me smart.
Brewha Offline
#28 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
HockeyDad wrote:

Je vous en prie


And a happy Klaatu Barada necktie to you . . . .


(When WILL thw French learn to speed?)
DrMaddVibe Offline
#29 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,610
bloody spaniard wrote:
^ Speaking of Suge Knight, John "Heinz's Suge" Kerry was the ONLY major Democrat that I ever voted for as a protest against Dimwit II.





Michael Moore made a documentary about this & I mocked him for being stupid, fat, and a hypocrite. Alas, now he's just a fat hypocrite.Gonz




No...he's still pretty stupid too!
bobsnook Offline
#30 Posted:
Joined: 10-02-2006
Posts: 279
what's so bad about the dan dan.lol
bloody spaniard Offline
#31 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Yeah, I miss him too. Poor misunderstood bastid.Sad
CapeFear Offline
#32 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2012
Posts: 130
People aren't getting richer, the corporations that control them are getting richer! And now corporations are people too...
ZRX1200 Offline
#33 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,682
Flat tax.
Brewha Offline
#34 Posted:
Joined: 01-25-2010
Posts: 12,202
Free love.
Users browsing this topic
Guest