America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by bloody spaniard. 26 replies replies.
Early Release OUTRAGE..!!
DrafterX Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
DHS to release thousands of illegal immigrants, blaming budget cuts

Published February 26, 2013


The Department of Homeland Security has started releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails in anticipation of automatic budget cuts, in a move one Arizona sheriff called politically motivated -- and dangerous.

Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu said Tuesday that Immigration and Customs Enforcement released more than 500 detainees in his county alone over the weekend. A spokesman for Babeu told FoxNews.com that ICE officials have said they plan to release a total of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants -- though an ICE official told FoxNews.com it's unclear how many ultimately might be released.

Babeu described the move as a "mass budget pardon" and suggested the administration was going to unnecessary lengths to demonstrate the impact of the so-called sequester.

"President Obama would never release 500 criminal illegals to the streets of his hometown, yet he has no problem with releasing them in Arizona. The safety of the public is threatened and the rule of law discarded as a political tactic in this sequester battle," he said.

An ICE spokeswoman confirmed the plans without specifying how many illegal immigrants might be released.

Spokeswoman Gillian Christensen said ICE had directed field offices to make sure the "detained population" is "in line with available funding." She stressed that ICE would continue to prosecute the cases while keeping them under supervision.

"Over the last week, ICE has reviewed several hundred cases and placed these individuals on methods of supervision less costly than detention," she said. "All of these individuals remain in removal proceedings. Priority for detention remains on serious criminal offenders and other individuals who pose a significant threat to public safety."

The announcement comes after DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano on Monday warned about the potential impact of the cuts. She said the department "would not be able to maintain the 34,000 detention beds as required by Congress."

"We're doing our very best to minimize the impacts of sequester. But there's only so much I can do," she said. "I'm supposed to have 34,000 detention beds for immigration. How do I pay for those?"

Republicans in Congress, though, have challenged the numerous Obama Cabinet secretaries warning about the devastating impact to their departments. With cuts set to take effect Friday and no deal in sight to avert them, Republicans claim the administration is trying to make the cuts seem worse than they are -- some want to give the administration more leeway so that high-priority agencies don't get hit as hard.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., called the move to release illegal immigrants "abhorrent." "By releasing criminal immigrants onto the streets, the administration is needlessly endangering American lives," he said in a statement.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., also said "these savings could be much more safely and rationally achieved."

In Arizona, Babeu slammed the move, painting his community as a victim of gridlock in Washington.

"Clearly, serious criminals are being released to the streets of our local communities by this mass budget pardon. These are illegals that even President Obama wants to deport. This is insane that public safety is sacrificed when it should be the budget priority that's safeguarded," he said.



Film at 11.... Mad
DrMaddVibe Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,516
Wait...this is why they were buying all that ammo...TARGET PRACTICE!
HockeyDad Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,164
Sound like we can just go ahead and eliminate ICE if they are this useless.
DrafterX Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
true.... true..... Mellow
bloody spaniard Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Before the Spanish conquistadors arrived this was THEIR land!
The indigenous are just repatriating with their American cousins and taking it back state by state. BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
DrafterX Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
bloody spaniard wrote:
Before the Spanish conquistadors arrived this was THEIR land!



no it wasn't... Not talking
bloody spaniard Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
DrafterX wrote:
no it wasn't... Not talking



Of course it was. All of the Southwest, Texas, & California belonged to Mexico. Who do you think lived in old Mexico?
bloody spaniard Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
You should be happy, Drafter. This country will be indian majority again except they'll all speak spanglish. BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
dubleuhb Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
So in anticipation they do this ? Sounds like the criminals are on both sides of the bars.
DrafterX Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
Obama told them too..... Mellow
dubleuhb Offline
#11 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
DrafterX wrote:
Obama told them too..... Mellow

I'm sure someone in his regime made it happen, just for affect or is it effect, doesn't matter anyhoo.
cacman Offline
#12 Posted:
Joined: 07-03-2010
Posts: 12,216
They will all be filing for disability, welfare and unemployment now. Much cheaper I'm sure!

Probably file civil lawsuits too.
TimFusco Offline
#13 Posted:
Joined: 08-10-2012
Posts: 928
Part of our Man-Child In-Chief's tantrum. "You won't raise taxes again? Fine, take this...and know its your fault." So, Obama (via his surrogates) is ordering the release of criminals into the community. How is this protecting and defending the American people? Does anyone really think that we will make any effort to "round 'em up" after the sequester?
TimFusco Offline
#14 Posted:
Joined: 08-10-2012
Posts: 928
cacman wrote:
They will all be filing for disability, welfare and unemployment now. Much cheaper I'm sure!

Probably file civil lawsuits too.



That explains it...swelling the Democrat voting rolls.
dubleuhb Offline
#15 Posted:
Joined: 03-20-2011
Posts: 11,350
Odd how none of Barry's disciples have commented on this.

bloody spaniard Offline
#16 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
Anyone else see any similarity between this handling of illegals & the release by Castro of the Marielitos back in the '80's? Think



Dancing
DrafterX Offline
#17 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
still no baseball comments..?? you guys are slipping... Mellow
CapeFear Offline
#18 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2012
Posts: 130
Wouldn't be cheaper to just give them a one-way bus ticket back to Mexico rather than spend tax dollars to keep them in prison? I hate that we're basically negating the work that has been done to catch them, but why are we spending our money to clothe and feed them?

Even if they aren't from Mexico and realizing that they would just try to come back here, I would think a bus ticket would be a great way to fund Greyhound (don't we subsidize them anyway?) and threaten them with the realization that coming here illegally will mean immediate deportation? Just keep putting them on buses - do not pass go, do not collect meals in prison, just drive em back.

I'm not really on either side on this one but I think it's a bit sad that you put supposedly the best representation of America in one city and no one can agree on anything, even after multiple threats of making good on automatic spending cuts.

I wish there was a law in place that allowed for the clearing out of all three branches of government after a set number of days where we could re-elect a new set of officials.
bloody spaniard Offline
#19 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
In their opinion, we've just spruced up the country for them but overstayed our welcome as guests.
They've had squatters' rights for over a thousand years.
DrafterX Offline
#20 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
bloody spaniard wrote:
They've had squatters' rights for over a thousand years.



they used to be shot at the border and have their wimmins taken away frrom them.... you'd think they would have learned... Mellow
CapeFear Offline
#21 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2012
Posts: 130
I'm white/hispanic - does that mean I have dual squatting rights (here and in Europe)? Herfing

My family has been in Southern Texas for at least 200+ years. If their family had been smarter they would have settled up here before they drew the borders. If they want to join the club, they can fill out the application and pay the dues.
bloody spaniard Offline
#22 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
CapeFear wrote:
I'm white/hispanic - does that mean I have dual squatting rights (here and in Europe)? Herfing

My family has been in Southern Texas for at least 200+ years. If their family had been smarter they would have settled up here before they drew the borders. If they want to join the club, they can fill out the application and pay the dues.



Same here, Cape, but land squatting only applies to the original inhabitants many of whom were never driven from their lands after being conquered. What you fail to understand is that property rights are won/lost over time. Some due to war, some due to politics. In this case, NAFTA and our lack of political will have made it inevitable that the indigenous people who used to own the American lands will eventually take over again due to their ever increasing numbers. The new majority will eventually rule again as soon as most of Mexico (and Latin America) enters.

Not sure why this rankles Drafter because he's indigenous as well. Think
DrafterX Offline
#23 Posted:
Joined: 10-18-2005
Posts: 98,566
bloody spaniard wrote:

Not sure why this rankles Drafter because he's indigenous as well. Think



Confused
I can eat most anything with no side effects... Mellow
bloody spaniard Offline
#24 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
I envy you.Herfing
CapeFear Offline
#25 Posted:
Joined: 03-06-2012
Posts: 130
Yeah I see what your saying, but the term "American lands" could be defined as northern alaska/canada down through panama, unless you consider south america to also be under this term. I guess I'm looking at it from a migration perspective, where "natives" originally crossed over from asia millions of years ago and continually moved south to settle what is now north/south america (not even sure if this was proven).

So if someone is "indigenous" to America, how far back do you go to prove that they are? Or have I gone way off topic and thread-jacked the hell out of this?

My take in all of this is that you just need to deport the criminals (greyhound), and green-light the non-criminals to where they can start paying taxes. I don't really care if they become the majority. I love taco trucks and chorizo.

How much more work is it to realize them on the other side of the fence instead of the US? But I do realize were talking about our gubmint here and that this is ultimately a lost cause.
bloody spaniard Offline
#26 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
CapeFear wrote:
Yeah I see what your saying, but the term "American lands" could be defined as northern alaska/canada down through panama, unless you consider south america to also be under this term. I guess I'm looking at it from a migration perspective, where "natives" originally crossed over from asia millions of years ago and continually moved south to settle what is now north/south america (not even sure if this was proven).

So if someone is "indigenous" to America, how far back do you go to prove that they are? Or have I gone way off topic and thread-jacked the hell out of this?

My take in all of this is that you just need to deport the criminals (greyhound), and green-light the non-criminals to where they can start paying taxes. I don't really care if they become the majority. I love taco trucks and chorizo.

How much more work is it to realize them on the other side of the fence instead of the US? But I do realize were talking about our gubmint here and that this is ultimately a lost cause.




I like they way you process things, Cape, but IMHO you're waaaaay overthinking this. You'll know the indigenous when you see them. lol Yes, although expensive, they COULD ship illegals and their anchor babies back over the border if they wanted but they don't want to. They would have to hire American replacements at fair wages and jack up the cost of produce by a few quarters. That's a no no.

The wheels were set in motion to change the demographics of this country back in the 60's with Ted & his cronies. That's what the powers that be (Carter, Reagan, Bushes, Clintons, & now the Indonesian wunderkid) have set in motion & want to happen. I suppose some do it to for power (votes) & others for social egalitarian altruism. Either way, the asian emigres have little bearing on the new New Mazatlan being established here under the watch of our betters.

Like you, I will sit back and order my tacos & chorizos in spanish. Those who don't like it can email outrage to their elected officials. LOL

Oh, and don't forget that there are good numbers of asians, europeans (mostly eastern or slavic), Nigerian businessmen along with "Pepe" Muhammads entering and/or staying illegally after Visas expire.
Users browsing this topic
Guest