America's #1 Online Cigar Auction
first, best, biggest!

Last post 11 years ago by bloody spaniard. 10 replies replies.
Vast Industrial Military Complex...C'mon Down!!!
DrMaddVibe Offline
#1 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
You're the next contestant on The Price Is Right!


Obama’s nuclear U-turn: Billions set aside for B61 nukes

According to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, the US is believed to have deployed approximately 1,950 strategic nuclear warheads, including about 200 B61 gravity bombs deployed in five NATO states (Belgium, Italy, Turkey, Germany, and the Netherlands)."

US President Barack Obama is accused of making a U-turn on his nuclear disarmament pledges as his administration plans to allocate billions of dollars for upgrading its atomic arsenal in Europe.


According to newly published figures, the United States will set aside more than USD 10 billion dollars for a life extension program for the B61 bombs and another USD one billion for adding controllable tail fins.

The plan to give new tail fins to nearly 200 B61 gravity bombs stored in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy and Turkey would give them new mission and new capabilities. The bombs could be delivered by stealth F35 fighter-bombers.

"What will be going back to Europe will be a guided nuclear bomb… Especially when you combine it with F35 with stealth characteristics, that expands the targets you can hold at risk from Europe, because by placing the explosion closer to the target you can choose a lower explosive yield,” Hans Kristensen, a nuclear weapons expert at the Federation of Nuclear Scientists, told The Guardian.


“That is very important as there is less radioactive fallout. For many people this is a great concern because it means making nuclear weapons more 'usable'," Kristensen added.

In its Nuclear Posture Review in 2010, the US administration pledged to reduce its nuclear arsenal by not developing new nuclear warheads and vowing that it would not "support new military missions or provide for new military capabilities."

According to the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, the US is believed to have deployed approximately 1,950 strategic nuclear warheads, including about 200 B61 gravity bombs deployed in five NATO states (Belgium, Italy, Turkey, Germany, and the Netherlands).

It also keeps 2,650 non-deployed warheads in reserve, and 3,000 warheads which are reportedly awaiting disarmament.

"It flies directly in the face of the pledges Obama made in 2010 that he would not deploy new weapons,” Kristensen added.

The US is the only country to have used an atomic bomb in war. Hiroshima was devastated on August 6, 1945 after the US B-29 bomber Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the city, killing an estimated 140,000 people instantly or gradually from radiation sickness and cancers. Three days later, another atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing more than 70,000.

The nuclear radiation emitted following the blasts continued to claim thousands of more lives over the past decades.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/04/22/299609/obama-nuke-uturn-10bn-set-for-b61s/



A military base in every nation and nuclear bombs in every pot!
HockeyDad Offline
#2 Posted:
Joined: 09-20-2000
Posts: 46,199
We need a guided nuclear bomb that can be launched from a unmanned aerial vehicle.

Note to self: Submit a proposal to DOD.
DrMaddVibe Offline
#3 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
Need to get a grant and study the feasibility of such a thing.

Mo money..mo money..mo money!
DadZilla3 Offline
#4 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
HockeyDad wrote:
We need a guided nuclear bomb that can be launched from a unmanned aerial vehicle.

Note to self: Submit a proposal to DOD.

Just design it to be an environmentally friendly green nuke...solar panel power, recyclable casing materials, the whole nine yards and the proposal will be a slam dunk.
ZRX1200 Offline
#5 Posted:
Joined: 07-08-2007
Posts: 60,673
Wind turbine on the tail?
sd72 Offline
#6 Posted:
Joined: 03-09-2011
Posts: 9,600
Doesn't turkey hate us too? Maybe not good to store nukes there? Muslim extremest based population? Could we just store em in North Korea? That's where they're gonna be used, right?
DrMaddVibe Offline
#7 Posted:
Joined: 10-21-2000
Posts: 55,590
sd72 wrote:
Doesn't turkey hate us too? Maybe not good to store nukes there? Muslim extremest based population? Could we just store em in North Korea? That's where they're gonna be used, right?



Oh darn...the support line broke when we were delivering to Lil Kim...from 15,000 feet...damn the luck.whip
DadZilla3 Offline
#8 Posted:
Joined: 01-17-2009
Posts: 4,633
ZRX1200 wrote:
Wind turbine on the tail?

Perfect. And maybe a 'COEXIST' sticker on the vertical stabilizer...
bobsnook Offline
#9 Posted:
Joined: 10-02-2006
Posts: 279
drop the big one and see what happens
bloody spaniard Offline
#10 Posted:
Joined: 03-14-2003
Posts: 43,802
F the military industrial complex
F the bomb merchants who peddle their wares to the highest bidder
...and F the expression "thank you for your service"- it's a voluntary JOB performed for some OTHER country's benefit.

This old ex-Reaganite adds, F the system and its professional parasites, period.

Thank you for this thread, DMV. In my heart, I knew Eisenhower & Goldwater were right.
Cursing
Users browsing this topic
Guest